Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma is a subset of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that can arise around the surface of textured breast implants or in patients who have previously had textured breast implants. The condition should be suspected with late-onset breast asymmetry and seroma formation around a breast implant. If the implant with surrounding connective tissue capsule is removed, the prognosis is usually very good. The purpose of this clinical review article is to provide a concise overview of the diagnosis and treatment of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma is a subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that can occur around the surface of textured breast implants or in patients who have previously had textured breast implants. The condition should be suspected in cases of late-onset breast asymmetry and seroma formation around a breast implant. If the implant and surrounding connective tissue capsule is removed, the prognosis is usually very good. The purpose of this clinical review article is to provide a brief overview of the diagnosis and treatment of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Supplementary Figure 3 shows cell cycle profiles for Melmet 1 and WM1366 cells and YH2AX expression measured by flow cytometry for WM1366 cells. Further, the figure shows immunoblots of indicated proteins for cells treated with BGB324 and/or AZD7762 or BGB324 and/or VE-822.

Supplementary Figure 1 shows AXL expression in a melanoma cell line panel, dose response of BGB324 and how BGB324 treatment affects invasion and migration.

Supplementary Figure 2 shows animal weight throughout the treatment period.

Melanoma is a relatively common diagnosis, both in the primary and specialist health service. Ongoing research and new evidence base means that the recommendations for investigation and treatment are continually changing. This can lead to uncertainty among doctors who do not treat this patient group regularly. In this clinical review we give a summary of the latest recommendations, primarily aimed at general practitioners, dermatologists and doctors in local hospitals.

INTRODUCTION:The complication rate after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients is high. The aim of this randomized non-inferiority study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative wound drainage on early complications after ALND and ILND. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Between 2018 and 2020, 104 stage III melanoma patients operated on with ALND or ILND were randomized to a study group with complete wound drain removal 3 wk after surgery or a control group with progressive drain removal. The primary end point was overall early complications graded according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay and prognostic factors for early complications. RESULTS:Of the 99 patients analyzed, ALND was performed in 58 patients and ILND in 41 patients. Overall, 62 patients (62.6%) developed early complications: 30 in the study group and 32 in the control group (P = 0.53). The confidence interval for the difference in proportions of patients without early complications in the two groups was -0.27 to 0.11 (P = 0.42), hence non-inferiority could be claimed. Length of hospital stay was 5 d in the study group compared to 6 in the control group (P < 0.01). ILND was associated with increased risk of early complications compared to ALND (75.6% versus 53.4%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS:Complete drain removal 3 wk after ALN and ILND in stage III melanoma patients did not increase the risk of early complications compared to progressive drain removal.

Abstract Receptor tyrosine kinase AXL is found upregulated in various types of cancer, including melanoma, and correlates with an aggressive cancer phenotype, inducing cell proliferation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. In addition, AXL has recently been linked to chemotherapy resistance, and inhibition of AXL is found to increase DNA damage and reduce expression of DNA repair proteins. In light of this, we aimed to investigate whether targeting AXL together with DNA damage response proteins would be therapeutically beneficial. Using melanoma cell lines, we observed that combined reduction of AXL and CHK1/CHK2 signaling decreased proliferation, deregulated cell-cycle progression, increased apoptosis, and reduced expression of DNA damage response proteins. Enhanced therapeutic effect of combined treatment, as compared with mono-treatment, was further observed in a patient-derived xenograft model and, of particular interest, when applying a three-dimensional ex vivo spheroid drug sensitivity assay on tumor cells harvested directly from 27 patients with melanoma lymph node metastases. Together, these results indicate that targeting AXL together with the DNA damage response pathway could be a promising treatment strategy in melanoma, and that further investigations in patient groups lacking treatment alternatives should be pursued.

Although clinical management of melanoma has changed considerably in recent years, intrinsic treatment resistance remains a severe problem and strategies to design personal treatment regimens are highly warranted. We have applied a three-dimensional (3D) ex vivo drug efficacy assay, exposing disaggregated cells from 38 freshly harvested melanoma lymph node metastases and 21 patient derived xenografts (PDXs) to clinical relevant drugs for 7 days, and examined its potential to evaluate therapy response. A strong association between Vemurafenib response and BRAF mutation status was achieved (P < .0001), while enhanced viability was seen in some NRAS mutated tumors. BRAF and NRAS mutated tumors responded comparably to the MEK inhibitor Cobimetinib. Based on the ex vivo results, two tumors diagnosed as BRAF wild-type by routine pathology examinations had to be re-evaluated; one was subsequently found to have a complex V600E mutation, the other a double BRAF mutation (V600E/K601 N). No BRAF inhibitor resistance mechanisms were identified, but PIK3CA and NF1 mutations were identified in two highly responsive tumors. Concordance between ex vivo drug responses using tissue from PDXs and corresponding patient tumors demonstrate that PDX models represent an indefinite source of tumor material that may allow ex vivo evaluation of numerous drugs and combinations, as well as studies of underlying molecular mechanisms. In conclusion, we have established a rapid and low cost ex vivo drug efficacy assay applicable on tumor tissue from patient biopsies. The 3D/spheroid format, limiting the influence from normal adjacent cells and allowing assessment of drug sensitivity to numerous drugs in one week, confirms its potential as a supplement to guide clinical decision, in particular in identifying non-responding patients.

Garment-like giant congenital melanocytic nevi are very rare, and those being treated are most often offered excision and split-thickness skin transplantation. Due to the risk of restricted mobility secondary to shrinkage and hypertrophic scarring of the transplant, we treated to date the largest reported giant congenital melanocytic nevus (16% total body surface area) with Integra dermal regeneration template (Integra Life Sciences, Plainsboro, N.J.), giving a more functional skin reconstruction. In addition, the dermal regeneration template had to be covered with split-thickness skin transplant including multiple smaller nevi due to lack of larger area with normal skin.