AIM:The aim of this study was to estimate the association between objective cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and subjective self-reported physical function, taking into account the influence of mental distress. We hypothesized an association between these parameters, since they might be thought to measure parts of the same phenomenon.METHODS:Approximately 1 month after discontinuation of all primary treatment, 90 cancer patients aged 18-50 years treated with chemotherapy were surveyed. CRF was determined by the Astrand-Ryhming indirect cycle ergometer test, which indicate peak VO2 in mL x kg(-1) x min(-1) (predicted VO2max). Self-reported physical function was assessed by The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The relation between VO2max and self-reported physical function was estimated by multiple linear regression. Mental distress (assessed by The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), age, gender, body mass index (BMI), time from treatment to physical test and diagnoses were included as potential confounders.RESULTS:There was no association between predicted VO2max and self-reported physical function. Mental distress was negatively associated with self-reported physical function (P<0.001), but is not associated with predicted VO2max.CONCLUSIONS:The results suggest that predicted VO2max does not reflect self-reported physical function and vice versa in cancer patients after chemotherapy. If information about cardiac and/or pulmonary status is required, direct or indirect measures of VO2max should be used.

PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of a supervised home-based flexible training program on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), mental distress, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) parameters in young and middle-aged cancer patients shortly after curative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred eleven patients age 18 to 50 years who had received chemotherapy for lymphomas or breast, gynecologic, or testicular cancer completed the trial. These patients were randomly allocated to either an intervention group (n = 59), which underwent a 14-week training program, or a control group (n = 52) that received standard care. Primary outcome was change in CRF, as determined by Astrand-Rhyming indirect bicycle ergometer test (maximum oxygen uptake [VO(2max)]), between baseline (T0) and follow-up (T1). Secondary outcomes were mental distress, as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and HRQOL, as assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. Two-way analysis of covariance was used to analyze changes from T0 to T1. RESULTS VO(2max) increased by 6.4 mL/kg(-1)/min(-1) in patients in the intervention group and by 3.1 mL/kg(-1)/min(-1) in patients in the control group (P < .01). The fatigue score decreased by 17.0 points in the control group compared with only 5.8 points in the intervention group (P < .01). There were no intergroup differences in mental distress or HRQOL. CONCLUSION A supervised, home-based, flexible training program has significant effect on CRF in young and middle-aged cancer patients shortly after curative chemotherapy, but it has no favorable effect on patients' experience of fatigue, mental distress, or HRQOL.