Single neuronal activity was recorded from the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), the cingulate motor area (CMA) and the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in two Macaca fascicularis trained to perform a delayed conditional sequence of coordinated pull and grasp movements. The monkey had to perform three types of trials instructed in a random manner: (i) bimanually, using the two hands in a coordinated sequence of movements; (ii) unimanually, using the left hand only; (iii) unimanually, using the right hand only. The aim of this study was first to assess the bilateral relationships of the three cortical areas for unimanual motor control. Second, to establish whether the three cortical areas contain units reflecting bimanual synergy. A total of 255 task-related neurons were recorded from the PMd, CMA and PPC, where most neurons exhibited a significant modulation of activity in both contralateral and ipsilateral unimanual trials (bilateral neurons: 85, 77 and 61%, respectively). Lower proportions of neurons in PMd (7%), CMA (16%) and PPC (6%) were active in unimanual contralateral trials, but not in unimanual ipsilateral trials. The reverse (modulation of activity in ipsilateral but not contralateral unimanual trials) represented 5% of neurons in PMd, 7% in CMA and 3% in PPC. When comparing unimanual and bimanual trials to search evidence for bimanual coordination, 57% of PMd task-related neurons were classified as bimanual, defined as units in which the activity observed in bimanual trials could not be predicted from that associated with unimanual trials when comparing the same events related to the same arm. The proportion of bimanual neurons in CMA (56%) was comparable to that found in PMd (55%), whereas PPC exhibited a higher proportion of bimanual neurons (74%). Furthermore, comparison of the present data with our previous results regarding the supplementary (SMA) and primary (M1) motor cortical areas shows that there is no statistically significant difference between PMd, CMA, SMA and M1 with respect to the proportions of bimanual neurons. Altogether, these results suggest that the five cortical areas PMd, CMA, PPC, SMA and M1 are participating to the control of sequential bimanually coordinated movements. Inter-limb coordination may thus be controlled by a widely distributed network including several cortical and sub-cortical areas.

Single neuronal activity was recorded from the supplementary motor area (SMA-proper and pre-SMA) and primary motor cortex (M1) in two Macaca fascicularis trained to perform a delayed conditional sequence of coordinated bimanual pull and grasp movements. The behavioural paradigm was designed to distinguish neuronal activity associated with bimanual coordination from that related to a comparable motor sequence but executed unimanually (left or right arm only). The bimanual and unimanual trials were instructed in a random order by a visual cue. Following the cue, there was a waiting period until presentation of a "go-signal", signalling the monkey to perform the instructed movement. A total of 143 task-related neurons were recorded from the SMA (SMA-proper, 62; pre-SMA, 81). Most SMA units (87%) were active in both unimanual contralateral and unimanual ipsilateral trials (bilateral neurons), whereas 9% of units were active only in unimanual contralateral trials and 3% were active only in unimanual ipsilateral trials. Forty-eight per cent of SMA task-related units were classified as bimanual, defined as neurons in which the activity observed in bimanual trials could not be predicted from that associated with unimanual trials when comparing the same events related to the same arm. For direct comparison, 527 neurons were recorded from M1 in the same monkeys performing the same tasks. The comparison showed that M1 contains significantly less bilateral neurons (75%) than the SMA, whereas the reverse was observed for contralateral neurons (22% in M1). The proportion of M1 bimanual cells (53%) was not statistically different from that observed in the SMA. The results suggest that both the SMA and M1 may contribute to the control of sequential bimanual coordinated movements. Interlimb coordination may then take place in a distributed network including at least the SMA and M1, but the contribution of other cortical and subcortical areas such as cingulate motor cortex and basal ganglia remains to be investigated.

In the motor, somatosensory, and auditory systems of rodents and cats, the corticothalamic connection is composed of a main projection formed by small endings and a minor projection terminating with giant endings. To establish whether the corticothalamic projection originating from motor cortical areas in primates exhibits the same duality, the anterograde tracer biotinylated dextran amine was injected in eight macaque monkeys in the primary motor (M1; n = 3), the supplementary motor (SMA; n = 3) and the dorsal premotor (PMd; n = 2) cortical areas to label corticothalamic axons. The corticothalamic projection originating from these three motor cortical areas was characterized by the presence of axon terminals constituting the same two types of endings, observed both as boutons en passant and terminaux. The population of small endings exhibited a mean cross-sectional maximum diameter of 0.95 mu m (S.D. = 0.23), a range of diameters not overlapping that of giant endings (mean diameter = 3.46 mu m, S.D. = 0.74 mu m). Topographically, the giant endings originating from M1 were located in the same thalamic nucleus (ventroposterolateral nucleus, oral part) in which the small endings were found. In contrast, the giant endings originating from SMA and PMd were located in a thalamic nucleus (mediodorsal nucleus) distinct from the main termination zone formed by small endings. Along the rostrocaudal axis, the giant endings were distributed in a restricted zone, irrespective of the origin of the projection (M1, SMA, PMd). The dual morphology of corticothalamic endings, previously found in rodents and cats, is present in the motor system of subhuman primates for both primary and nonprimary motor cortical areas. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The primate basal ganglia are known to be involved in the initiation and control of visually guided movements, However, the precise role of these structures is not clear, partly because most neurophysiological studies have not dissociated neuronal activity related to visuomotor processing from that reflecting other aspects of behaviour, such as shifts of spatial attention. Moreover, the way the basal ganglia function together with the frontal cortex during movement initiation and execution is still a matter of debate, In an effort to clarify these issues, we recorded single neurons from the striatum (caudate nucleus and putamen) in two rhesus monkeys trained to perform a conditional visuomotor task, and compared their properties with those of the frontal cortex. The experimental paradigm was designed to distinguish neuronal activity associated with shifts of attention from that reflecting motor preparation. in a given trial, an identical visual stimulus could serve as a cue for the reorientation of spatial attention or as a cue for establishing a motor set depending on when it occurred during that trial. Additional aspects of the paradigm were designed to identify neurons whose activity differed when various stimulus configurations instructed the same action (stimulus effect), as well as neurons whose activity differed when two different actions were instructed by the same stimulus (movement effect). The majority of cells (60%) were preferentially active after instructional cues, 38% discharged preferentially after attentional cues, and the remaining 2% of cells discharged equally after both types of cue, Neurons active after instructional cues were further analysed for stimulus and movement effects. During movement preparation, the activity of the vast majority of striatal cells (putamen, 81%; caudate, 76%) varied significantly when different stimuli instructed the same action. Likewise, when different movements were instructed by the same stimulus, preparatory activity of a majority of cells (putamen, 92%; caudate, 82%) changed, Consequently, a substantial proportion of cells showed combined stimulus and movement effects. Comparison of these neuronal properties with those of the dorsal premotor cortex showed significantly higher proportions of cells in the striatum whose activity reflected sensory or sensorimotor processing, These results suggest that the basal ganglia are involved in shifting attentional set and in high-order processes of movement initiation, including the linking of sensory information with behavioural responses.

The supplementary motor area (SMA) was reversibly inactivated by muscimol microinfusion in two monkeys while they were performing two motor tasks: (1) a delayed conditional bimanual drawer pulling and grasping sequence which was initiated on a self-paced basis; (2) a unimanual reach and grasp task (modified Kluver board task). Unilateral or bilateral inactivation of the SMA induced a prominent deficit in trial initiation of bimanual sequential movements, affecting the hand contralateral to the inactivated side or both hands, respectively. The deficit was a long lasting (10-15 min or more) inability of the monkey to place its hand (s) in the ready position on start touch-sensitive pads, a condition required to initiate the drawer task. However, if after such a deficit period, the experimenter put his hand on the start touch-sensitive pad to initiate the trial, then the monkey executed the drawer task without obvious motor deficit. SMA inactivation did not affect unimanual reaching and grasping movements in the board task. In contrast to the SMA, inactivation of other motor areas (primary, premotor dorsal, anterior intraparietal area) did not affect the initiation of movement sequences in the drawer task. These data thus indicate that the SMA plays a crucial and specific role in initiation of self-paced movement sequences. However, SMA inactivation did not prevent the monkeys to perform coordinated movements of the two forelimbs and hands, indicating that SMA is not necessary for bimanual coordination.

The present study was aimed at distinguishing neuronal activity associated with shifts of attention from that reflecting motor set. Our behavioural paradigm allowed a given visual stimulus to serve as a cue for the reorientation of spatial attention or as a cue for establishing a motor set, depending on when it occurred during a trial. Other aspects of the paradigm were designed to identify neurones whose activity differed when various stimulus configurations instructed the same action, as well as neurones whose activity differed when two different limb movements were instructed by the same stimulus. We found that many striatal cells discharge preferentially in relation to cues which reorient spatial attention, although they may also discharge after cues which instruct a motor act. In contrast to the dorsal premotor area (PMd, dorsolateral area 6), in both the caudate nucleus and putamen a larger proportion of the neuronal sample reflected both movement direction and stimulus attributes. These results support a role for striatal neurones in both attentional set shifting and the preparation for context-specific actions.

1. There are indications that the execution of behavioral sequences involves the basal ganglia. In this study we examined the role of the caudate nucleus in the construction, storage, and execution of spatial plans. 2. Two monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were trained to perform sequences of saccades and arm movements. The animals had to remember the order of illumination, variable from one sequence to another, of three fixed spatial targets. After a delay, they had to visually orient toward, and press each target in the same order. Six different sequences were executed on the basis of the order of illumination of the targets. Single cell activity was recorded from the four caudate nuclei of the two monkeys. 3. Neural activity was analyzed in each sequence during 10 different periods: the instruction period in which the targets were illuminated, the three orientation periods toward the different targets, the three postsaccadic periods, and the three periods of target pressing. Statistical comparisons were made to detect differences between the different sequences with respect to activity in each period (sequence specificity). 4. A total of 2,100 neurons were studied, of which 387 were task related. The task-related cells were found in both the head and the body of the caudate nucleus. 5. During central fixation, anticipatory activity (n = 81) preceded onset of specific events. Four groups were considered: 1) neurons (n = 46) anticipating offset of the central fixation point, 2) neurons (n = 7) anticipating the illumination of any target, regardless of its spatial position or order of presentation (rank), 3) neurons (n = 17) anticipating the illumination of the first target, regardless of its spatial position, and 4) neurons (n = 11) anticipating the illumination of a given target, regardless of its rank. 6. Phasic visual responses to target onset were observed in 48 cells. The cells responded primarily to the contralateral and upper targets. In a majority (n = 35), visual responses were modulated by the rank of the target(s). Many cells (n = 20) responded only if the corresponding target was first; other cells responded only if the target was second or if it had complex time relationships with the other targets. 7. The responses of the cells to the same instruction stimuli repeated twice in a row, and under the condition that the animal did not behaviorally use the first instruction in between, were tested. More than one-third of the tested cells (n = 14) did not respond, or responded very weakly, to the second instruction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)