The antithrombin A384S mutation has a relatively high frequency in the British population but has not been identified in other populations. This variant has been associated with cases of thrombotic disease, but its clinical relevance in venous thrombosis remained unclear. We have conducted a secondary analysis of the prevalence of the mutation in a large case-control study, including 1018 consecutive Spanish patients with venous thromboembolism. In addition, we evaluated its functional consequences in 20 carriers (4 homozygous). This mutation, even in the homozygous state, did not affect anti-Xa activity or antigen levels, and it only slightly impaired anti-IIa activity. Thus, routine clinical methods cannot detect this anomaly, and, accordingly, this alteration could have been underestimated. We identified this mutation in 0.2% of Spanish controls. Among patients, this variant represented the first cause of antithrombin anomalies. Indeed, 1.7% patients carried the A384S mutation, but 0.6% had any other antithrombin deficiency. The mutated allele was associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis with an adjusted OR of 9.75 (95% CI, 2.2-42.5). This is the first study supporting that antithrombin A384S mutation is a prevalent genetic risk factor for venous thrombosis and is the most frequent cause of antithrombin deficiency in white populations.

The main platelet adhesive receptors integrin α2β1, integrin αIIbβ3 and glycoprotein (GP) Ibα are also expressed in breast carcinoma cells. They play a key role in tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation and in adhesive interactions necessary for tumoral invasion and metastasis. Several polymorphisms affecting these molecules, two in integrin α2 (C807T and G1648A), one in integrin β3 (T1565C) and one in GP Ibα (VNTR), influencing their levels, structure, and possibly their function, have been previously described and associated with cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we investigated the association of these polymorphisms with breast cancer risk or clinical presentation. We studied 101 patients with invasive breast cancer. The main prognostic variables were recorded, and genomic PCR analysis of these polymorphisms was performed. A group of 101 control subjects matched on age and sex was studied and compared with patients. No association was found between VNTR (GP Ibα) polymorphism and breast cancer risk or presentation. Genotype and allele frequencies of C807T and G1648A polymorphisms of integrin α2 were not statistically different in breast cancer patients and controls, although we found an association between the 1648G/G genotype and higher disease stages (III and IV) (p = 0.02). Breast cancer risk was higher in carriers of β3 integrin T/T genotype (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.04–4.16, p = 0.04). Furthermore, genotype 1565T/T was also associated with axillary nodal metastasis (p = 0.017) and with tumoral diameter greater than 2 cm (p = 0.02). Although confirmatory studies are needed, our results suggest that polymorphic genetic variation of integrins expressed in platelets and epithelial breast cells could modify the risk and the biological aggressiveness of breast carcinomas.