BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of various malignancies, but their use is frequently accompanied by immune-related adverse events, among which immune-mediated colitis (IMC) represents one of the most common and clinically significant gastrointestinal toxicities. IMC may lead to treatment interruption, increased morbidity, and compromised quality of life. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management, and emerging therapeutic strategies with particular emphasis on the role of the gut microbiota and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). METHODS:This review integrates current international guidelines, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and recent translational studies addressing IMC. The available evidence on immunological mechanisms, predictive biomarkers, clinical presentation, diagnostic algorithms, and treatment options was critically synthesized to outline a structured and multidisciplinary management approach. RESULTS:IMC is driven by dysregulated immune activation, cytokine release, and alterations in gut microbiota. Incidence and severity vary according to ICI class, combination regimens, tumor type, and patient-related factors. Diagnosis requires exclusion of infectious causes, laboratory assessment, and endoscopic and histologic evaluation with CTCAE-based severity grading. Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of first-line therapy, while infliximab and vedolizumab are effective in steroid-refractory cases. Emerging therapies, including JAK inhibitors and FMT, have shown promising results in refractory disease. CONCLUSIONS:IMC is a complex and potentially severe complication of ICI therapy that necessitates early recognition, accurate grading, and individualized, multidisciplinary management. Severity-guided treatment, timely escalation to biologics, and careful balancing of immunosuppression with antitumor efficacy are essential for optimal outcomes. Future research should focus on biomarker validation, microbiome-targeted therapies, and prospective trials to refine therapeutic algorithms and define the optimal role and timing of FMT in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND:Pembrolizumab is among the costliest anticancer therapies; fixed dosing may cause drug wastage, particularly in lower-weight patients, adding to health-system budgetary pressure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:This retrospective, single-center pharmacoeconomic analysis compared standard flat-dose pembrolizumab (200 mg every three weeks [Q3W] or 400 mg every six weeks [Q6W]) with a simulated weight-banded strategy (<65 kg, 65-90 kg, ≥90 kg) in adults with advanced non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer treated at the Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Croatia, during 2024. Institutional and national public-payer budget impact was modeled using list drug-acquisition prices, with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS:Ninety-six patients received pembrolizumab during the study period. Weight-banded dosing reduced institutional drug consumption by 25%, yielding annual savings exceeding €1.1 million. National extrapolation, assuming Rijeka accounts for 10-30% of national pembrolizumab use, projected savings of €3.7-11.2 million annually. CONCLUSIONS:Weight-banded pembrolizumab dosing may reduce drug expenditure without evidence of compromised outcomes in this economic model; prospective clinical validation and consideration of pharmacodynamic, safety, and regulatory implications are warranted before implementation.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective and increasingly utilized treatment modality for abdominal tumors, offering high rates of local control with generally acceptable toxicity profiles. Nevertheless, rare but severe late gastrointestinal complications, including radiation-induced ulceration, may occur and significantly impair patients’ quality of life, as well as continuation of oncologic treatment. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has shown potential benefit in the management of chronic radiation-induced tissue injury, although evidence regarding its role following SBRT remains limited. We report the case of a 75-year-old woman with cholangiocellular carcinoma who developed severe radiation-induced duodenal ulceration following liver SBRT, presenting with persistent postprandial pain, nausea, vomiting, and substantial weight loss despite standard supportive treatment. Helicobacter pylori testing was negative, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was excluded, and histopathology showed chronic inflammatory and fibrotic mucosal injury with reactive epithelial changes. Despite high-dose proton pump inhibition, bismuth subcitrate, and nutritional support, symptoms and endoscopic ulceration persisted. HBOT was administered at 2.4 atmospheres absolute for 60 min over 30 sessions. Clinical improvement was noted after three sessions, and treatment was completed without adverse effects. Follow-up endoscopy demonstrated almost complete ulcer regression, with complete symptom resolution, improved oral intake, and a 10 kg weight gain. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first reported case describing the successful use of HBOT as a potentially effective adjunctive treatment for severe radiation-induced duodenal ulceration following liver SBRT in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma. Although encouraging, this observation should be interpreted cautiously, and prospective clinical studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy, safety, and optimal timing of HBOT in this setting.

Parallel to the increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is also increasing. Almost all organs can be affected by the immune-mediated response, including the liver, pancreas and biliary tract. Immune-Mediated Hepatitis is a common complication of ICI therapy, while cholangitis, cholecystitis and pancreatic involvement are less frequent. Emerging evidence from clinical trials and real-world data series helps us better understand the risk factors, diagnostic challenges and management strategies for these irAEs. With wider use of ICIs, more data are also available on the management of special populations with comorbidities and patients with difficult-to-treat or treatment-resistant adverse events, but larger prospective studies and more robust evidence are required for further recommendations on their management and ICI reintroduction. In clinical practice, a multidisciplinary approach to the management of ICI-mediated complications is advised, with close collaboration among specialties such as oncologists, gastroenterologists or hepatologists, pathologists, radiologists and others. While Immune-Mediated Hepatitis is a common irAE of ICI therapy, pancreato-biliary involvement is often overlooked and underdiagnosed. These irAEs require multimodal management, development of new biomarkers and prediction models to facilitate decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Circadian rhythms regulate key biological processes central to cancer biology, including cell cycle control, DNA repair, metabolism, immune function, and drug pharmacokinetics. Experimental models consistently demonstrate marked time-of-day differences in the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapies. Clinical studies of chronomodulated chemotherapy—particularly with fluoropyrimidines, platinum compounds, and anthracyclines—show reproducible reductions in treatment-related toxicity, while effects on survival outcomes remain variable and often sex dependent. Emerging clinical evidence also suggests that timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor administration may influence progression-free and overall survival across several tumor types. However, translation into routine oncology practice has been limited by interindividual variability in circadian phase, tumor-specific disruption of clock function, lack of validated biomarkers, and logistical constraints of time-specific drug delivery. Advances in circadian phenotyping, wearable monitoring, and adaptive dosing technologies now offer feasible pathways toward individualized, biology-driven treatment timing. This narrative review critically evaluates mechanistic, preclinical, and clinical evidence for chronotherapy across oncological treatment modalities and examines challenges and opportunities for its integration into precision cancer care.

Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with limited survival gains despite advances in systemic therapy. However, rapid expansion of biomarker-directed therapies, immunotherapy, and novel treatment modalities has created an increasingly complex clinical trial landscape. We aimed to characterize contemporary PDAC clinical development and identify emerging therapeutic trends. Methods: We performed a narrative review with a scoping approach of active PDAC clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Eligible studies were initiated between January 1, 2021, and February 16, 2026, and included recruiting, active, or not-yet-recruiting phase I–III trials. Data extracted included trial phase, disease setting, therapeutic strategy, endpoints, enrollment, sponsorship, and late-phase development. Results: A total of 355 interventional trials were included. Most trials were phase I, phase I/II, or phase II trials, with fewer than 10% being evaluated in phase II/III or phase III development. Advanced or metastatic disease was the predominant setting. Chemotherapy remained the most frequently incorporated treatment modality, while molecularly targeted therapies were evaluated in 167 trials. KRAS/RAS-directed approaches represented the largest targeted subgroup, although only daraxonrasib and setidegrasib reached phase III evaluation. Immunotherapy was evaluated in 139 trials, although only a limited number progressed to late-phase development, reflecting the immune-resistant biology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Additional areas of active investigation included Claudin 18.2-targeted therapies, MTAP-associated approaches, homologous recombination deficiency-directed strategies, CD73 inhibition, radiotherapy, local interventions, surgery-focused optimization, imaging-guided approaches, and supportive-care interventions. Industry organizations were listed as the lead sponsor for approximately half of all studies, while non-commercial organizations supported most remaining trials. Conclusions: The contemporary PDAC clinical trial landscape is characterized by broad therapeutic diversification but limited late-phase maturity. Chemotherapy remains the dominant treatment backbone, whereas KRAS/RAS-directed therapies have emerged as the most advanced precision oncology strategy. Future progress will likely depend on successful integration of biomarker-selected therapies with established multidisciplinary treatment approaches, including optimized systemic therapy, local-control strategies, and supportive care.

The intestinal microbiota is an important part of the human body, and its composition can affect the effectiveness of immunotherapy. In the last few years, the modulation of intestinal microbiota in order to improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy has become a current topic in the scientific community, but there is a lack of research in this area. In this review, the goal was to analyze the current relevant literature related to the modulation of intestinal microbiota and the effectiveness of immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer. The effects of antibiotics, probiotics, diet, and fecal microbial transplantation were analyzed separately. It was concluded that the use of antibiotics, especially broad-spectrum types or larger quantities, causes dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota, which can reduce the effectiveness of immunotherapy. While dysbiosis could be repaired by probiotics and thus improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy, the use of commercial probiotics without evidence of intestinal dysbiosis has not yet been sufficiently tested to confirm its safety for cancer for immunotherapy-treated cancer patients. A diet consisting of sufficient amounts of fiber, as well as a diet with higher salt content positively correlates with the success of immunotherapy. Fecal transplantation is a safe and realistic adjuvant option for the treatment of cancer patients with immunotherapy, but more clinical trials are necessary. Modulating the microbiota composition indeed changes the effectiveness of immunotherapy, but in the future, more human studies should be organized to precisely determine the types and procedures of microbiota modulation.

Introduction: Melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Liver injury can also occur due to hepatitis caused by immunotherapy used in the treatment of melanoma. Case Presentation: This case report presents a 38-year-old male diagnosed with advanced melanoma who experienced acute liver failure (ALF) initially thought to be a side effect of immunotherapy. Despite following aggressive supportive care as per the latest guidelines, the patient’s condition deteriorated rapidly. It was discovered that the patient had liver metastases. As the tumor had a positive BRAF mutation, we opted for invasive treatment with therapeutic plasma exchange to restore liver function and create the conditions for initiating treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. After the use of a liver support device, the liver function was resolved, and a BRAF/MEK inhibitor was introduced. After 2 months of targeted therapy, a favorable effect and good melanoma control are observed. Conclusion: The report underscores the complexity of managing melanoma with liver metastasis and the urgent need for advancements in treatment modalities ALF in oncology patients. We suggest that invasive treatment methods, such as liver support system devices, should be considered in well-selected oncology patients, even in advanced stages of disease.

As immunotherapy is becoming more inevitable in everyday oncology, we are witnessing a higher number of patients who are on immunosuppressive medication but are also candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment. There have been few case reports and several small retrospective studies investigating the use of ICIs in liver transplant recipients mainly with hepatocellular carcinoma and skin cancer, but there is no report regarding the use of atezolizumab for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in liver transplant recipients. We are presenting a metastatic breast cancer female patient undergoing both immunosuppressive treatment after liver transplantation due to cryptogenic liver failure and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) medication-atezolizumab whose liver enzymes and tacrolimus level we have monitored intensively through 18 months and is still ongoing. Our patient has not presented with any signs of acute graft rejection and has a regression on follow-up imaging despite the treatment combination.

Numerous factors are involved in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which are responsible for its development and progression as an independent entity, but also thanks to their simultaneous action. This is explained by the hypothesis of multiple parallel hits. These factors are insulin resistance, lipid metabolism alteration, oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, inflammatory cytokine liberation, gut microbiota dysbiosis or gut–liver axis activation. This is a systematic review which has an aim to show the connection between intestinal microbiota and the role of its disbalance in the development of NAFLD. The gut microbiota is made from a wide spectrum of microorganisms that has a systemic impact on human health, with a well-documented role in digestion, energy metabolism, the stimulation of the immune system, synthesis of essential nutrients, etc. It has been shown that dysbiosis is associated with all three stages of chronic liver disease. Thus, the modulation of the gut microbiota has attracted research interest as a novel therapeutic approach for the management of NAFLD patients. The modification of microbiota can be achieved by substantial diet modification and the application of probiotics or prebiotics, while the most radical effects are observed by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Given the results of FMT in the context of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and NAFLD in animal models and scarce pilot studies on humans, FMT seems to be a promising treatment option that could reverse intestinal dysbiosis and thereby influence the course of NAFLD.

Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the major cornerstones in managing gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, several side effects, such as intestinal inflammation, mucosal injury, and dysbiosis, often compromise this. The gut microbiota increasingly attracts much interest as an essential modulator of RT effects influencing immune responses and tissue repair. Through short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate, representatives of certain bacterial species play a crucial role under normal conditions, keeping the mucosal integrity intact and reducing oxidative stress-mediated damage. Dysbiosis, a state where diminished microbial diversity and increased pathogenic species in the microbiota are seen, amplifies RT-induced toxicity in patients. Clinical investigations highlight that microbiota-targeted interventions, including probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation, hold the means to augment RT efficacy and lessen toxicity. Increased microflora diversity and specific microbial profiles have yielded serious patient improvements. Advanced RT methods use stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with microbiota modulation as a promising technique to shield healthy tissue and maximize immune-mediated antitumor effects. Additionally, there is an implication in tumor behavior regulated by the intratumoral microbiota regarding the response to radiotherapy. Notably, the modulation of gut and tumor microbiota provides an avenue to optimize RT benefits in GI cancers, underscoring the importance of personalized therapy.

Background: The development of immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care. However, old patients are underrepresented in most clinical trials, although they represent a significant proportion of real-world patients. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICIs in patients older than the age of 70. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 145 patients aged 70 or older treated with ICIs for metastatic or unresectable cancer. Results: Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.4 months (95% CI 8.6–13.7), with no differences between octogenarians and septuagenarians (p = 0.41). Female gender (p = 0.04) and first-line treatment setting (p < 0.0001) were associated with a longer median PFS. Median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months (95% CI 13.5–35.0 months), with no difference based on performance status, cancer site, gender, or between septuagenarians and octogenarians (all p > 0.005). Patients treated with ICIs in the first-line setting reported longer OS compared to treatment in the second-line setting (p < 0.001). Discontinuation of ICIs due to adverse effects was associated with both shorter PFS (p = 0.0005) and OS (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The effectiveness of ICIs in older cancer patients primarily depends on the line of treatment and treatment discontinuation. Octogenarians experienced similar treatment responses, PFS, OS, and adverse effects compared to septuagenarians.

Background and Objectives: Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in the male population and the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide in men as of 2022. One of the potential biomarkers that can predict the progression of the disease is the transmembrane adhesion molecule CD44s. The aims of this study were to determine the expression of CD44s in prostate cancer in the central tumor mass and in the tumor periphery of the disease and to compare it with the clinicopathological parameters (PSA, Gleason score, surgical margins, and biochemical recurrence of the disease) in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: The research was randomized retrospectively during the period from 2001 to 2006. Tissue microarrays of 121 archival acinar prostate carcinoma samples were immunohistochemically evaluated for CD44s expression. The immunoexpression was determined semiquantitatively, taking into account the percentage (0 (0–5%), 1 (6–24%), 2 (26–75%), and 3 (76–100%) and intensity of the membranous staining of the tumor cells (0 absent; 1 weak at 400×; 2 intermediates at 100×; 3 strong at 40×) and calculated to obtain a final score (0–3 were regarded as negative; 4–6 were regarded as positive). Results: For statistical purposes, we divided the tumors into two categories: Gleason grade group 1 makes up 80.7% and grade group 2, which includes all the remaining Gleason grade groups (out of 2–5), accounts for 19.3% of the tumors. Grade group 1 had the highest incidence of score 4 (positive expression). There were statistically significantly more positive expressions in those tumors with negative prostatectomy margins (chi square: p = 0.001; Cramer V: 0.319). There was no correlation between CD44s expression and biochemical recurrence (p = 0.218), nor with the preoperative PSA values (p = 0.165). In the grade group 1 tumors, the CD44s immunoexpression and status of prostatectomy margin were statistically significantly related with negative margins (p = 0.028). An analysis of the expression of CD44s according to the localization in the central part of the tumor mass and on the periphery of the cancer in the group of tumors with a positive margin did not show a significant correlation because the sample was too small. Descriptively, it can be noted that the expression on the periphery was higher, and the central/peripheral expression ratio was higher in favor of the periphery. Conclusions: Our results provide insight into the possible value of CD44s expression for predicting the behavior of prostate tumors and the justification of therapy after a prostatectomy. Also hypothetically, they indicate a protective role of CD44s in a group of well-differentiated tumors at the periphery of the tumor mass. Therefore, it is useful to study the CD44s molecule further in this sense.

Liver diseases are currently the eleventh leading cause of global mortality, and cirrhosis holds the ninth position among the causes of death in Europe. The progression of cirrhosis gives rise to complications such as portal hypertension (PH), liver failure, and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. PH plays a pivotal role in the advancement of chronic liver disease and stands as an independent predictor of mortality in individuals with cirrhosis. Given the numerous updates in the classifi cation, diagnosis, and treatment strategies for PH, the adoption of national guidelines has become imperative to enhance the care of this patient population. In the wake of Baveno VII consensus, as well as the recently published data, the working group of the Croatian Society of Gastroenterology drafted the guidelines that were discussed and agreed during 2023. Herein, we present a condensed version highlighting the key recommendations.

Background: There are limited real-world data (RWD) regarding the use of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors in western Balkan. The aim of our study was thus to analyze factors influencing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), along with the differences in adverse effects of CDK 4/6 therapy in a tertiary healthcare center in Croatia. Methods: We evaluated medical and demographic data for 163 consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors for at least one month, from October 2018, after the drug became available in Croatia. Eligible patients in our study were those patients who were treated with palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib. Results: The median PFS of CDK4/6 inhibitors treatment was 2.2 years (95% CI 1.8–3.3), with the longest ongoing treatment for 5.4 years. Treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first line was associated with a longer PFS compared to the second line or beyond (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.3–0.9), and patients without liver metastasis exhibited longer survival compared to patients with liver metastasis (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.2–0.8) (both p < 0.05). Regarding the choice of CDK4/6 inhibitors, ribociclib exhibited longer PFS compared to palbociclib (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29–0.82) (p = 0.0032), although the effect was not statistically significant when separating patients who were treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first-line (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.29–1.2), or second- or later-line therapy (0.49, 95% CI 0.15–1.55); the trend was present in both lines, however. The presence of liver metastasis (p = 0.04), initial luminal A grade (p = 0.039), and time to metastasis up to 5 years from the initial cancer (p = 0.002) were the only factors that remained statistically significant for PFS in multivariate analysis. Median OS since the diagnosis of metastatic disease was 4.5 years (95% CI 3.9–6.3), median OS since the start of CDK4/6 inhibitors treatment was 3.7 years (95% CI 3.4–4.4), while median OS from initial cancer diagnosis was 15.8 years (95% CI 13.8–18.3). There was no difference in OS based on the choice of CDK4/6 inhibitor (p = 0.44) or the adjuvant hormonal therapy (p = 0.12), although a nonsignificant trend for better OS with ribociclib was present for both regardless of whether it was in first- or second/later-line therapies (p > 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, only the presence of liver metastasis (p = 0.0003) and time to metastasis under 5 years from primary breast cancer (p = 0.03) were associated with a worse OS. Conclusion: Our study provides the RWD with the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer. To our best knowledge, there are limited RWD regarding CDK 4/6 inhibitors use in western Balkan; thus, our study provides valuable data from everyday clinical practice for this region of Europe, bridging the gap between randomized clinical trials and clinical reality in western Balkan.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a body composition assessment method. We aimed to determine its accuracy in the detection of sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC), using skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the level of third lumbar vertebra (L3-SMI) obtained using multislice computed tomography as the reference method. Patients with LC were enrolled in the period October 2019–March 2022 and follow-ups were conducted until January 2023. Their BIA parameters were compared against L3-SMI, and BIA cut-off values were proposed using AUROC analysis. Patients underwent outcome analysis based on obtained clinical characteristics. A total of 106 patients were included. We found a fair correlation between BIA parameters with the L3-SMI. We determined cut-off values of ≤11.1 kg/m2 for BIA-SMI (Se 73%, Sp 66%, AUROC 0.737, p < 0.001) and ≤5.05° for phase angle (PA) (Se 79%, Sp 60%, AUROC 0.762, p < 0.001) in the detection of sarcopenia. The relative risk of death was 2.2 times higher in patients with skeletal muscle mass (SMM) ≤ 36.5 kg. SMM was significantly associated with outcome in Kaplan–Meier analysis. This non-invasive and simple method that showed fair performances and a very good outcome prediction could provide for the unmet need for fast and affordable detection of sarcopenia in patients with LC and should be further evaluated.