BACKGROUND:A three-antigen DNA-prime/chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) boost vaccine containing pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) circumsporozoite protein (CSP), Pf apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA1) and malaria multiple epitopes (ME) fused to Pf thrombospondin-related adhesion protein (ME-TRAP) elicited higher vaccine efficacy (VE) in an open label, randomized Phase 1 trial against controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) than the two-antigen vaccine DNA/Human Adenovirus 5 (HuAd5) containing CSP and AMA1. The objective of this follow-up study was to determine whether responses to CSP, AMA1 or TRAP MHC Class I-restricted epitopes were associated with VE. METHODOLOGY:Protected (n = 6) and non-protected participants (n = 26) were screened in FluoroSpot interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and Granzyme B (GzB) assays using antigen-specific 15mer peptide subpools spanning CSP (n = 9 subpools), AMA1 (n = 12 subpools), and TRAP (n = 11 subpools). Individual antigen-specific 15mers in the subpools with strong responses were then deconvoluted, evaluated for activities, and MHC Class I-restricted epitopes within the active 15mers were predicted using NetMHCpan algorithms. The predicted epitopes were synthesized and evaluated in the FluoroSpot IFN-γ and GzB assays. RESULTS:Protected and some non-protected participants had similar responses to individual antigen-specific peptide subpools, which did not distinguish only protected participants. However, deconvoluted antigen-specific positive subpools with high magnitudes of responses revealed individual 15mer peptides containing specific and/or predicted MHC Class I (HLA) epitopes. Responses to epitopes were either IFN-γ-only, IFN-γ and GzB, or GzB-only. Due to limitation of cells, most of the analysis concentrated on the identification of protection associated AMA1 epitopes, since most of the predominant pool specific responses were generated against AMA1 15mer subpools. Furthermore, we previously identified protection associated HLA class I-restricted epitopes in a previous gene-based vaccine trial. Seven predicted minimal epitopes in AMA1 were synthesized and upon testing, five recalled responses from protected participants confirming their possible contribution and association with protection, and two recalled responses from non-protected participants. Two protection-associated epitopes were promiscuous and may have also contributed to protection by recognition of different HLA alleles. In addition, strongly positive antigen-specific 15mers identified within active antigen-specific subpools contained 39 predicted but not tested epitopes were identified in CSP, AMA1 and TRAP. Finally, some non-protected individuals recognized HLA-matched protection-associated minimal epitopes and we discuss possible reasons. Other factors such as HLA allele fine specificity or interaction between other HLA alleles in same individual may also influence protective efficacy. CONCLUSIONS:This integrated approach using immunoassays and bioinformatics identified and confirmed AMA1-MHC Class I-restricted epitopes and a list of predicted additional epitopes which could be evaluated in future studies to assess possible association with protection against CHMI in the Phase 1 trial participants. The results suggest that identification of protection-associated epitopes within malaria antigens is feasible and can help design potent next generation multi-antigen, multi-epitope malaria vaccines for a genetically diverse population and to develop robust assays to measure protective cellular immunity against pre-erythrocytic stages of malaria. This approach can be used to develop vaccines for other novel emerging infectious disease pathogens.

ABSTRACT Introduction Malaria, a devastating febrile illness caused by protozoan parasites, sickened 247,000,000 people in 2021 and killed 619,000, mostly children and pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. A highly effective vaccine is urgently needed, especially for Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), the deadliest human malaria parasite. Areas covered Sporozoites (SPZ), the parasite stage transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes to humans, are the only vaccine immunogen achieving >90% efficacy against Pf infection. This review describes >30 clinical trials of PfSPZ vaccines in the U.S.A., Europe, Africa, and Asia, based on first-hand knowledge of the trials and PubMed searches of ‘sporozoites,’ ‘malaria,’ and ‘vaccines.’ Expert opinion First generation (radiation-attenuated) PfSPZ vaccines are safe, well tolerated, 80–100% efficacious against homologous controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) and provide 18–19 months protection without boosting in Africa. Second generation chemo-attenuated PfSPZ are more potent, 100% efficacious against stringent heterologous (variant strain) CHMI, but require a co-administered drug, raising safety concerns. Third generation, late liver stage-arresting, replication competent (LARC), genetically-attenuated PfSPZ are expected to be both safe and highly efficacious. Overall, PfSPZ vaccines meet safety, tolerability, and efficacy requirements for protecting pregnant women and travelers exposed to Pf in Africa, with licensure for these populations possible within 5 years. Protecting children and mass vaccination programs to block transmission and eliminate malaria are long-term objectives.

Objective: Observational studies on the use of commercially available wearable devices for infection detection lack the rigor of controlled clinical studies, where time of exposure and onset of infection are exactly known. Towards that end, we carried out a feasibility study using a commercial smartwatch for monitoring heart rate, skin temperature, and body acceleration on subjects as they underwent a controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) challenge. Methods: Ten subjects underwent CHMI and were asked to wear the smartwatch for at least 12 hours/day from 2 weeks pre-challenge to 4 weeks post-challenge. Using these data, we developed 2B-Healthy , a Bayesian-based infection-prediction algorithm that estimates a probability of infection. We also collected data from eight control subjects for 4 weeks to assess the false-positive rate of 2B-Healthy. Results: Nine of 10 CHMI subjects developed parasitemia, with an average time to parasitemia of 12 days. 2B-Healthy detected infection in seven of nine subjects (78% sensitivity), where in six subjects it detected infection 6 days before parasitemia (on average). In the eight control subjects, we obtained a false-positive rate of 6%/week. Conclusion: The 2B-Healthy algorithm was able to reliably detect infection prior to the onset of symptoms using data collected from a commercial smartwatch in a controlled human infection study. Significance: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of wearables as a screening tool to provide early warning of infection and support further research on the use of the 2B-Healthy algorithm as the basis for a wearable infection-detection platform.

Controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) has supported Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) malaria vaccine development by providing preliminary estimates of vaccine efficacy (VE). Because CHMIs generally use Pf strains similar to vaccine strains, VE against antigenically heterogeneous Pf in the field has been required to establish VE. We increased the stringency of CHMI by selecting a Brazilian isolate, Pf7G8, which is genetically distant from the West African parasite (PfNF54) in our PfSPZ vaccines. Using two regimens to identically immunize US and Malian adults, VE over 24 weeks in the field was as good as or better than VE against CHMI at 24 weeks in the US. To explain this finding, here we quantify differences in the genome, proteome, and predicted CD8 T cell epitopes of PfNF54 relative to 704 Pf isolates from Africa and Pf7G8. We show that Pf7G8 is more distant from PfNF54 than any African isolates tested. We propose VE against Pf7G8 CHMI for providing pivotal data for malaria vaccine licensure for travelers to Africa, and potentially for endemic populations, because the genetic distance of Pf7G8 from the Pf vaccine strain makes it a stringent surrogate for Pf parasites in Africa.

BACKGROUND:A DNA-prime/human adenovirus serotype 5 (HuAd5) boost vaccine encoding Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP) and Pf apical membrane antigen-1 (PfAMA1), elicited protection in 4/15 (27%) of subjects against controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) that was statistically associated with CD8+ T cell responses. Subjects with high level pre-existing immunity to HuAd5 were not protected, suggesting an adverse effect on vaccine efficacy (VE). We replaced HuAd5 with chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63), and repeated the study, assessing both the two-antigen (CSP, AMA1 = CA) vaccine, and a novel three-antigen (CSP, AMA1, ME-TRAP = CAT) vaccine that included a third pre-erythrocytic stage antigen [malaria multiple epitopes (ME) fused to the Pf thrombospondin-related adhesive protein (TRAP)] to potentially enhance protection.METHODOLOGY:This was an open label, randomized Phase 1 trial, assessing safety, tolerability, and VE against CHMI in healthy, malaria naïve adults. Forty subjects (20 each group) were to receive three monthly CA or CAT DNA priming immunizations, followed by corresponding ChAd63 boost four months later. Four weeks after the boost, immunized subjects and 12 infectivity controls underwent CHMI by mosquito bite using the Pf3D7 strain. VE was assessed by determining the differences in time to parasitemia as detected by thick blood smears up to 28-days post CHMI and utilizing the log rank test, and by calculating the risk ratio of each treatment group and subtracting from 1, with significance calculated by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method.RESULTS:In both groups, systemic adverse events (AEs) were significantly higher after the ChAd63 boost than DNA immunizations. Eleven of 12 infectivity controls developed parasitemia (mean 11.7 days). In the CA group, 15 of 16 (93.8%) immunized subjects developed parasitemia (mean 12.0 days). In the CAT group, 11 of 16 (63.8%) immunized subjects developed parasitemia (mean 13.0 days), indicating significant protection by log rank test compared to infectivity controls (p = 0.0406) and the CA group (p = 0.0229). VE (1 minus the risk ratio) in the CAT group was 25% compared to -2% in the CA group. The CA and CAT vaccines induced robust humoral (ELISA antibodies against CSP, AMA1 and TRAP, and IFA responses against sporozoites and Pf3D7 blood stages), and cellular responses (IFN-γ FluoroSpot responses to CSP, AMA1 and TRAP) that were not associated with protection.CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrated that the ChAd63 CAT vaccine exhibited significant protective efficacy, and confirmed protection was afforded by adding a third antigen (T) to a two-antigen (CA) formulation to achieve increased VE. Although the ChAd63-CAT vaccine was associated with increased frequencies of systemic AEs compared to the CA vaccine and, historically, compared to the HuAd5 vectored malaria vaccine encoding CSP and AMA1, they were transient and associated with increased vector dosing.

Background. A live-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite (SPZ) vaccine (PfSPZ Vaccine) has shown up to 100% protection against controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) using homologous parasites (same P. falciparum strain as in the vaccine). Using a more stringent CHMI, with heterologous parasites (different P. falciparum strain), we assessed the impact of higher PfSPZ doses, a novel multi-dose prime regimen, and a delayed vaccine boost upon vaccine efficacy (VE). Methods. We immunized 4 groups that each contained 15 healthy, malaria-naive adults. Group 1 received 5 doses of 4.5 x 10(5) PfSPZ (Days 1, 3, 5, and 7; Week 16). Groups 2, 3, and 4 received 3 doses (Weeks 0, 8, and 16), with Group 2 receiving 9.0 x 10(5)/doses; Group 3 receiving 18.0 x 10(5)/doses; and Group 4 receiving 27.0 x 10(5) for dose 1 and 9.0 x 10(5) for doses 2 and 3. VE was assessed by heterologous CHMI after 12 or 24 weeks. Volunteers not protected at 12 weeks were boosted prior to repeat CHMI at 24 weeks. Results. At 12-week CHMI, 6/15 (40%) participants in Group 1 (P =.04) and 3/15 (20%) participants in Group 2 remained aparasitemic, as compared to 0/8 controls. At 24-week CHMI, 3/13 (23%) participants in Group 3 and 3/14 (21%) participants in Group 4 remained aparasitemic, versus 0/8 controls (Groups 2-4, VE not significant). Postboost, 9/14 (64%) participants versus 0/8 controls remained aparasitemic (3/6 in Group 1, P =.025; 6/8 in Group 2, P =.002). Conclusions. Administering 4 stacked priming injections (multi-dose priming) resulted in 40% VE against heterologous CHMI, while dose escalation of PfSPZ using single-dose priming was not significantly protective. Boosting unprotected subjects improved VE at 24 weeks, to 64%.

Abstract Background Vaccination with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites is known to induce protective immunity. However, the mechanisms underlying this protection remain unclear. In this work, two recent radiation-attenuated sporozoite vaccination studies were used to identify potential transcriptional correlates of vaccination-induced protection. Methods Longitudinal whole blood RNAseq transcriptome responses to immunization with radiation-attenuated P. falciparum sporozoites were analysed and compared across malaria-naïve adult participants (IMRAS) and malaria-experienced adult participants (BSPZV1). Parasite dose and method of delivery differed between trials, and immunization regimens were designed to achieve incomplete protective efficacy. Observed protective efficacy was 55% in IMRAS and 20% in BSPZV1. Study vaccine dosings were chosen to elicit both protected and non-protected subjects, so that protection-associated responses could be identified. Results Analysis of comparable time points up to 1 week after the first vaccination revealed a shared cross-study transcriptional response programme, despite large differences in number and magnitude of differentially expressed genes between trials. A time-dependent regulatory programme of coherent blood transcriptional modular responses was observed, involving induction of inflammatory responses 1–3 days post-vaccination, with cell cycle responses apparent by day 7 in protected individuals from both trials. Additionally, strongly increased induction of inflammation and interferon-associated responses was seen in non-protected IMRAS participants. All individuals, except for non-protected BSPZV1 participants, showed robust upregulation of cell-cycle associated transcriptional responses post vaccination. Conclusions In summary, despite stark differences between the two studies, including route of vaccination and status of malaria exposure, responses were identified that were associated with protection after PfRAS vaccination. These comprised a moderate early interferon response peaking 2 days post vaccination, followed by a later proliferative cell cycle response steadily increasing over the first 7 days post vaccination. Non-protection is associated with deviations from this model, observed in this study with over-induction of early interferon responses in IMRAS and failure to mount a cell cycle response in BSPZV1.

ABSTRACTControlled human malaria infection (CHMI) has supported Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) malaria vaccine development by providing preliminary estimates of vaccine efficacy (VE). Because CHMIs generally use Pf strains similar to vaccine strains, VE against antigenically heterogeneous Pf in the field has been required to establish VE. We increased the stringency of CHMI by selecting a Brazilian isolate, Pf7G8, which is genetically distant from the West African parasite (PfNF54) in our PfSPZ vaccines. Using two regimens to identically immunize US and Malian adults, VE over 24 weeks in the field was as good as or better than against CHMI at 24 weeks in the US. To explain this finding, we quantified differences in the genome, proteome and predicted CD8 T cell epitopes of PfNF54 relative to 709 Pf isolates from Africa and Pf7G8. Pf7G8 is more distant from PfNF54 than any African isolates tested. We propose VE against Pf7G8 CHMI for providing pivotal data for malaria vaccine licensure for travelers to Africa, and potentially for endemic populations, because the genetic distance of Pf7G8 from the Pf vaccine strain makes it a stringent surrogate for Pf parasites in Africa.

Background Immunization with radiation-attenuated sporozoites (RAS) by mosquito bites provides >90% sterile protection against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in humans. We conducted a clinical trial based on data from previous RAS clinical trials that suggested that 800–1200 infected bites should induce ~50% protective vaccine efficacy (VE) against controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) administered three weeks after the final immunization. Two cohorts were immunized separately. VE was 55% in Cohort 1 but 90% in Cohort 2, the cohort that received a higher first dose and a reduced (fractional) fifth dose. Immune responses were better boosted by the fractional fifth dose in Cohort 2 and suggested the importance of the fractional fifth dose for increased protection in Cohort 2 responses. Three protected subjects were later boosted and were protected suggesting that protection could be extended to at least 67 weeks. Methods The ex vivo FluoroSpot assay was used to measure peripheral IFN-γ, IL2, and IFN-γ+IL2 responses to PfNF54 sporozoites and malaria antigens CSP, AMA1, TRAP, and CelTOS using pools of synthetic overlapping 15mer peptides spanning each antigen. Results There was no correlation between IFN-γ, IL2, and IFN-γ+IL2 responses to sporozoites and protection, but fold-increases between post-4th and post-5th responses greater than 1.0 occurred mostly in protected subjects. IFN-γ and IL2 responses to TRAP, CelTOS and CSP occurred only in protected subjects. Peripheral IFN-γ, IL2, and IFN-γ+IL2 responses were short-lived and low by 27 weeks post-CHMI but were restored by boosting. Conclusions These studies highlight the importance of vaccine dose and schedule for vaccine efficacy, and suggest that CSP, TRAP, AMA1 and CelTOS may be targets of protective immunity. The correlation between fold-increases in responses and protection should be explored in other vaccine trials. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01994525.

BACKGROUND:Immunization with radiation-attenuated sporozoites (RAS) by mosquito bite provides >90% sterile protection against Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) malaria in humans. RAS invade hepatocytes but do not replicate. CD8+ T cells recognizing parasite-derived peptides on the surface of infected hepatocytes are likely the primary protective mechanism. We conducted a randomized clinical trial of RAS immunization to assess safety, to achieve 50% vaccine efficacy (VE) against controlled human malaria infection (CHMI), and to generate reagents from protected and non-protected subjects for future identification of protective immune mechanisms and antigens.METHODS:Two cohorts (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2) of healthy, malaria-naïve, non-pregnant adults age 18-50 received five monthly immunizations with infected (true-immunized, n = 21) or non-infected (mock-immunized, n = 5) mosquito bites and underwent homologous CHMI at 3 weeks. Immunization parameters were selected for 50% protection based on prior clinical data. Leukapheresis was done to collect plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells.RESULTS:Adverse event rates were similar in true- and mock-immunized subjects. Two true- and two mock-immunized subjects developed large local reactions likely caused by mosquito salivary gland antigens. In Cohort 1, 11 subjects received 810-1235 infected bites; 6/11 (55%) were protected against CHMI vs. 0/3 mock-immunized and 0/6 infectivity controls (VE 55%). In Cohort 2, 10 subjects received 839-1131 infected bites with a higher first dose and a reduced fifth dose; 9/10 (90%) were protected vs. 0/2 mock-immunized and 0/6 controls (VE 90%). Three/3 (100%) protected subjects administered three booster immunizations were protected against repeat CHMI vs. 0/6 controls (VE 100%). Cohort 2 uniquely showed a significant rise in IFN-γ responses after the third and fifth immunizations and higher antibody responses to CSP.CONCLUSIONS:PfRAS were generally safe and well tolerated. Cohort 2 had a higher first dose, reduced final dose, higher antibody responses to CSP and significant rise of IFN-γ responses after the third and fifth immunizations. Whether any of these factors contributed to increased protection in Cohort 2 requires further investigation. A cryobank of sera and cells from protected and non-protected individuals was generated for future immunological studies and antigen discovery.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01994525.

Background Whole parasite vaccination is an efficacious strategy to induce sterile immunity and to prevent malaria transmission. Understanding the mechanism and response of immune cells to vaccines plays a critical role in deciphering correlates of protection against infection and disease. Immunoassays, such as ELISpot, are commonly used to assess the immunogenicity of vaccines towards T cells and B cells. To date, these assays only analyse responses to specific antigens since they are based on recombinant parasite-derived proteins or peptides. There is the need for an agnostic approach that allows the evaluation of all sporozoite-associated antigens. Methods ELISpot plates coated with a defined amount of lysed Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites were used to assess the frequency of sporozoite-specific B cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from donors immunized with either a recombinant malaria vaccine or irradiated sporozoites. Results This report describes the assay conditions for a specific and sensitive sporozoite-based B cell ELISpot assay. The assay development considers the quality of sporozoite preparation as well as the detection threshold of the frequency of antigen-specific B cells. The assay enables the detection of sporozoite-specific IgM and IgG-producing B cells. Moreover, the assay can detect sporozoite-reactive B cells from subjects that were either vaccinated with the radiation attenuated sporozoite vaccine or a recombinant pre-erythrocytic vaccine. Conclusion The newly developed sporozoite-based B cell ELISpot enables the monitoring of changes in the frequency of sporozoite-specific B cells. Applying this assay to assess the potency of vaccination regimens or seasonal changes in B cell populations from subjects residing in malaria-endemic areas will provide an opportunity to gain insight into immune mechanisms involved in protection and/or disease.

BACKGROUND: A radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) sporozoite (SPZ) malaria vaccine, PfSPZ Vaccine, protected 6 of 6 subjects (100%) against homologous Pf (same strain as in the vaccine) controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) 3 weeks after 5 doses administered intravenously. The next step was to assess protective efficacy against heterologous Pf (different from Pf in the vaccine), after fewer doses, and at 24 weeks. METHODS: The trial assessed tolerability, safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of direct venous inoculation (DVI) of 3 or 5 doses of PfSPZ Vaccine in non-immune subjects. RESULTS: Three weeks after final immunization, 5 doses of 2.7 × 105 PfSPZ protected 12 of 13 recipients (92.3% [95% CI: 48.0, 99.8]) against homologous CHMI and 4 of 5 (80.0% [10.4, 99.5]) against heterologous CHMI; 3 doses of 4.5 × 105 PfSPZ protected 13 of 15 (86.7% [35.9, 98.3]) against homologous CHMI. Twenty-four weeks after final immunization, the 5-dose regimen protected 7 of 10 (70.0% [17.3, 93.3]) against homologous and 1 of 10 (10.0% [-35.8, 45.6]) against heterologous CHMI; the 3-dose regimen protected 8 of 14 (57.1% [21.5, 76.6]) against homologous CHMI. All 22 controls developed Pf parasitemia. PfSPZ Vaccine was well tolerated, safe, and easy to administer. No antibody or T cell responses correlated with protection. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated for the first time to our knowledge that PfSPZ Vaccine can protect against a 3-week heterologous CHMI in a limited group of malaria-naive adult subjects. A 3-dose regimen protected against both 3-week and 24-week homologous CHMI (87% and 57%, respectively) in this population. These results provide a foundation for developing an optimized immunization regimen for preventing malaria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02215707. FUNDING: Support was provided through the US Army Medical Research and Development Command, Military Infectious Diseases Research Program, and the Naval Medical Research Center's Advanced Medical Development Program.

Background Immunizing human volunteers by mosquito bite with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (RAS) results in high-level protection against infection. Only two volunteers have been similarly immunized with P. vivax (Pv) RAS, and both were protected. A phase 2 controlled clinical trial was conducted to assess the safety and protective efficacy of PvRAS immunization. Methodology/Principal Findings A randomized, single-blinded trial was conducted. Duffy positive (Fy+; Pv susceptible) individuals were enrolled: 14 received bites from irradiated (150 ± 10 cGy) Pv-infected Anopheles mosquitoes (RAS) and 7 from non-irradiated non-infected mosquitoes (Ctl). An additional group of seven Fy- (Pv refractory) volunteers was immunized with bites from non-irradiated Pv-infected mosquitoes. A total of seven immunizations were carried out at mean intervals of nine weeks. Eight weeks after last immunization, a controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with non-irradiated Pv-infected mosquitoes was performed. Nineteen volunteers completed seven immunizations (12 RAS, 2 Ctl, and 5 Fy-) and received a CHMI. Five of 12 (42%) RAS volunteers were protected (receiving a median of 434 infective bites) compared with 0/2 Ctl. None of the Fy- volunteers developed infection by the seventh immunization or after CHMI. All non-protected volunteers developed symptoms 8–13 days after CHMI with a mean pre-patent period of 12.8 days. No serious adverse events related to the immunizations were observed. Specific IgG1 anti-PvCS response was associated with protection. Conclusion Immunization with PvRAS was safe, immunogenic, and induced sterile immunity in 42% of the Fy+ volunteers. Moreover, Fy- volunteers were refractory to Pv malaria. Trial registration Identifier: NCT01082341.