Importance Childbearing has been a particular barrier to successful recruitment and retention of women in surgery. Pregnant surgeons are more likely to have major pregnancy complications, such as preterm delivery, intrauterine growth restriction, infertility, and miscarriage, compared with nonsurgeons. The average obstetric complication rate for surgeons ranges between 25% and 82% in the literature and is considerably higher than that in the general US population at 5% to 15%. Observations The risks that pregnant surgeons experience were individually analyzed. These risks included missed prenatal care; musculoskeletal hazards, such as prolonged standing, lifting, and bending; long work hours; overnight calls; exposure to teratogenic agents, such as ionizing radiation, anesthetic gases, chemotherapy agents, and methyl methacrylate; and psychological stress and discrimination from the long-standing stigma associated with balancing motherhood and professional life. Conclusions and Relevance A clear, translatable, and enforceable policy addressing perinatal care of surgeons was proposed, citing evidence of the risks reviewed from the literature. A framework of protection for pregnant individuals is essential for attracting talented students into surgery, retaining talented surgical trainees and faculty, and protecting pregnant surgeons and their fetuses.

Increasing diversity among vascular surgeons and trainees has introduced a growing number of female trainees in vascular surgery, which necessitates the creation of guidelines that both support and protect those wishing to pursue family planning during training. The expectations of long work hours, clinical responsibilities, and radiation exposure associated with surgical training place pregnant trainees at increased risk for complications. These include intrauterine growth restriction, premature delivery, and postpartum depression. It is therefore important to establish guidelines that address the specific risks of training in vascular surgery to prioritize the health and well-being of pregnant trainees. Existing literature and recommendations surrounding support and protections for the pregnant individual and guidelines created for trainees desiring to start a family within other medical societies were reviewed and used to form the foundation for relevant recommendations to guide program directors in vascular surgery. While considering vascular surgery trainees' unique risks and demands, guidance surrounding radiation exposure, clinical responsibilities, parental leave, and culture paradigms is described to establish minimum recommendations for training programs. Strategies to incorporate a culture of support to protect trainees are necessary to both recruit and retain talent within the field. Integration of this guidance into training programs is a crucial first step toward more successful recruitment of female talent and prevention of burnout and subsequently leading toward successful retention and satisfaction within the specialty. (JVS-Vascular Insights 2024;2:100126.)

Objective: To determine the safety and effectiveness of vena cava filters (VCFs). Methods: A total of 1429 participants (62.7 +/- 14.7 years old; 762 [53.3% male]) consented to enroll in this prospective, nonrandomized study at 54 sites in the United States between October 10, 2015, and March 31, 2019. They were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months following VCF implantation. Participants whose VCFs were removed were followed for 1 month after retrieval. Follow-up was performed at 3, 12, and 24 months. Predetermined composite primary safety (freedom from perioperative serious adverse events [AEs] and from clinically significant perforation, VCF embolization, caval thrombotic occlusion, and/or new deep vein thrombosis [DVT] within 12-months) and effectiveness (composite comprising procedural and technical success and freedom from new symptomatic pulmonary embolism [PE] confirmed by imaging at 12-months in situ or 1 month postretrieval) end points were assessed. Results: VCFs were implanted in 1421 patients. Of these, 1019 (71.7%) had current DVT and/or PE. Anticoagulation therapy was contraindicated or had failed in 1159 (81.6%). One hundred twenty-six (8.9%) VCFs were prophylactic. Mean and median follow-up for the entire population and for those whose VCFs were not removed was 243.5 +/- 243.3 days and 138 days and 332.6 +/- 290 days and 235 days, respectively. VCFs were removed from 632 (44.5%) patients at a mean of 101.5 +/- 72.2 days and median 86.3 days following implantation. The primary safety end point and primary effectiveness end point were both achieved. Procedural AEs were uncommon and usually minor, but one patient died during attempted VCF removal. Excluding strut perforation greater than 5 mm, which was demonstrated on 31 of 201 (15.4%) patients' computed tomography scans available to the core laboratory, and of which only 3 (0.2%) were deemed clinically significant by the site investigators, VCF-related AEs were rare (7 of 1421, 0.5%). Postfilter, venous thromboembolic events (none fatal) occurred in 93 patients (6.5%), including DVT (80 events in 74 patients [5.2%]), PE (23 events in 23 patients [1.6%]), and/or caval thrombotic occlusions (15 events in 15 patients [1.1%]). No PE occurred in patients following prophylactic placement. Conclusions: Implantation of VCFs in patients with venous thromboembolism was associated with few AEs and with a low incidence of clinically significant PEs.

To characterize the current practice of vena cava filter use in the United States, including indications, safety and effectiveness. PRESERVE was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-randomized longitudinal evaluation of subjects in whom commercially available vena cava filters from seven manufacturers were implanted at 54 sites in the United States between October 10, 2015, and March 31, 2019. Subjects were evaluated at procedure, discharge, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-procedure. Follow-up imaging was performed at 3 and 12 months. Subjects from whom vena cava filters were removed were followed for 1 month post-retrieval. The composite primary safety endpoint was freedom from perioperative significant adverse events and freedom from clinically significant perforation, filter embolization, caval thrombotic occlusion, and/or new deep vein thrombosis within the first twelve months following placement, assessed in subjects with filters at twelve months; Composite primary effectiveness endpoint: procedural success and freedom from new clinically significant pulmonary embolus at twelve months or one-month post-retrieval. Filters were implanted in 1421 subjects. Of these, 1019 (71.7%) had current deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolus. Anticoagulation was contraindicated or had failed in 1159 (81.6%). One hundred twenty six vena cava filters were placed as prophylaxis. Filters were removed from 632 (44.5%) subjects. The primary safety endpoint (89.4%) and primary effectiveness endpoint (96.4%) were both achieved. Procedural complications were uncommon and usually mild, but one subject died during attempted filter removal. Clinically significant vena cava filter-related adverse events were rare. Post-filter deep vein thrombosis (80 events in 74 subjects [5.2%]), pulmonary embolus (23 events in 23 subjects [1.6%]), and/or caval thrombotic occlusions (15 events in 15 subjects [1.1%]), none fatal, occurred in 93 subjects (6.5%). No pulmonary embolus occurred in subjects following prophylactic placement. Implantation of vena cava filters in patients with venous thromboembolism and contraindication to or complication or failure of anticoagulation is associated with few adverse events and is effective in preventing clinically significant pulmonary embolus. Prophylactic use is associated with very few adverse events and is effective in preventing clinically significant pulmonary embolus.

Objective: Elderly patients with critical limb ischemia are an especially frail and vulnerable group of patients. There is little literature investigating outcomes and resource utilization in nonagenarians undergoing major lower extremity amputation (MLEA). This study aims to elucidate the outcomes of this unique set of patients for whom amputation may often be considered a "palliative"intervention. Methods: Analyzing over 16,000 records from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database, we collected demographic, operative, and postoperative data on all patients who underwent an MLEA. We performed univariate analysis comparing nonagenarians to younger patients examining both short-term and long-term outcomes. Multimodel inference was used to analyze the effect of age on clinically meaningful outcomes: mortality and long-term living disposition.Results: With 392 nonagenarians and 16,349 patients under the age of 90, we found nonagenarians were less comorbid and less likely to have a prior bypass or amputation. Despite experiencing lower rates of reoperation and individual postoperative complications, nonagenarians suffered higher long-term mortality (46% vs. 22%, P < 0.0005) and were more likely to be living in a facility at follow-up (34% vs. 15%, P < 0.0005). Incorporating important demographic and clinical factors, multimodel inference demonstrated that, the nonagenarian age group was a critical predictor of nonhome living status (Akaike Importance weight 0.99).Conclusions: Although nonagenarians were less comorbid than their younger counterparts and suffered fewer perioperative complications, MLEA leads to a poorer outcome with significant mortality and a higher likelihood of residing in a facility at long-term follow-up. These findings underscore the importance of frank goals of care discussions in nonagenarians considering major amputation.

Introduction: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) who are deemed unacceptable candidates for open repair (UNFIT) pose a clinical challenge. The EVAR2 Trial randomized UNFIT patients to endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) vs no intervention from 1999 to 2003, concluding that survival was not improved by EVAR. However, outcomes after EVAR over the last 2 decades have dramatically changed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes after EVAR in UNFIT patients using more contemporary data and to determine which subsets of UNFIT patients may potentially benefit from EVAR. Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2020) was used to identify elective EVARs for AAAs. Patients were categorized as UNFIT or suitable (SUITABLE) for open repair by the operative surgeon. Predicted 1-year mortality of untreated AAAs was calculated via a modified Gagne Index adjusted for AAA size. The primary outcome for the study was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included perioperative major adverse cardiac events (a composite of clinically significant arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, and myocardial infarction), length of stay, and 1-year mortality. Results: A total of 31,471 patients met study criteria with 27,036 (85.9%) deemed SUITABLE and 4435 (14.1%) UNFIT. UNFIT patients were more likely to experience a perioperative major adverse cardiac event (5.1% vs 2.2%, P < .001) and had longer lengths of stay (1 day [interquartile range, 1-3 days] vs 1 day [interquartile range, 1-2 days], P < .001). The 30-day mortality was significantly higher for UNFIT patients (0.8% vs 0.4%, P < .001). UNFIT patients had worse 1-year survival compared with SUITABLE patients. However, UNFIT and SUITABLE patients had significantly improved actual 1-year mortality with EVAR compared with predicted 1-year mortality without EVAR: 9.5% vs 15.6% (P < .001) and 4.0% vs 11.7% (P < .001), respectively. The mortality benefit after EVAR in UNFIT patients was primarily restricted to those with smaller Gagne Indices and larger aneurysm diameters. Patients deemed unsuitable for open repair due to frailty or multiple reasons had significantly higher 30-day mortality rates after EVAR when compared with SUITABLE patients (1.3% vs 1.6% vs 0.4%, P < .001). Those deemed unsuitable for open repair due to frailty or multiple reasons had worse 1-year cumulative survival compared with all other UNFIT patients. Conclusions: Despite being high risk with higher perioperative morbidity and mortality, UNFIT patients have lower actual 1-year mortality with EVAR than predicted 1-year mortality without EVAR. However, this potential benefit is reserved to those with small Gagne Indices, larger AAA diameters, and lack of frailty.

Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) who are deemed unaccepTable candidates for open repair (UNFIT) pose a clinical challenge. The EVAR2 Trial randomized UNFIT patients to endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) vs no intervention from 1999 to 2004, concluding that survival was not improved by EVAR. We evaluated outcomes after EVAR in those deemed UNFIT using more contemporary data.

Importance:The sociopolitical and cultural context of graduate surgical education has changed considerably over the past 2 decades. Although new structures of graduate surgical training programs have been developed in response and the comparative value of formats are continually debated, it remains unclear how different time-based structural paradigms are preparing trainees for independent practice after program completion.Objective:To investigate the factors associated with trainees' and program directors' perception of trainee preparedness for independent surgical practice.Design, Setting, and Participants:This qualitative study used an instrumental case study approach and obtained information through semistructured interviews, which were analyzed using open-and-focused coding. Participants were recent graduates and program directors of vascular surgery training programs in the United States. The 2 training paradigms analyzed were the integrated vascular surgery residency program (0 + 5, with 0 indicating that the general surgery training experiences are fully integrated into the 5 years of overall training and 5 indicating the total number of years of training) and the traditional vascular surgery fellowship program (5 + 2, with 5 indicating the number of years of general surgery training and 2 indicating the number of years of vascular surgery training). All graduates completed their training in 2018. All interviews were conducted between July 1, 2018, and September 30, 2018.Main Outcomes and Measures:A conceptual framework to inform current and ongoing efforts to optimize graduate surgical training programs across specialties.Results:A total of 22 semistructured interviews were completed, involving 7 graduates of 5 + 2 programs, 9 graduates of 0 + 5 programs, and 6 vascular surgery program directors. Of the 22 participants, 15 were men (68%). Participants described 4 interconnected domains that were associated with trainees' perceived preparedness for practice: structural, individual, relational, and organizational. Structural factors included the overall and vascular surgery-specific time spent in training, whereas individual factors included innate technical skills, confidence, maturity, and motivation. Faculty-trainee relationships (or relational factors) were deemed important for building trust and granting of autonomy. Organizational factors included features of the local organization, including patient population, case volume, and case mix.Conclusions and Relevance:Findings suggest that restructuring training paradigms alone is insufficient to address the issue of trainees' perceived preparedness for practice. A framework was created from the results for evaluating and improving residency and fellowship programs as well as for developing graduate surgical training paradigms that incorporate all 4 domains associated with preparedness.

OBJECTIVE: The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program is an option to trainees to help alleviate federal education debt. The prevalence of PSLF utilization and how this may impact career decisions of trainees is unknown. The purpose of this study was to understand the prevalence, impact, and understanding of PSLF participation on trainees. DESIGN: IRB-approved anonymous survey asking study subjects to report demographics, financial status, and reliance on PSLF. In addition, study subjects were asked to report their participation in PSLF, the possible impact of PSLF participation on career decisions, and to identify the qualifications needed to complete PSLF. SETTING: Online anonymous survey. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was offered to all physician trainees in all specialties at the University of Texas, Southwestern, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. RESULTS: There were 934 respondents, yielding a 37.6% response rate. A total of 416/934 (44.5%) respondents were actively or planning on participating in the PSLF program with 175/934 (18.7%) belonging to a surgical specialty. Those belonging to a surgical specialty were more likely to be PSLF participants compared to medical specialties (53.1% versus 42.6%, p = 0.01). For those participating in PSLF, 82/416 (19.7%) stated this participation impacted career decisions. A total of 275/934 (29.4%) respondents obtained and 437/934 (46.8%) wanted to receive formal training/lectures in regards to the PSLF program. Of those actively or planning on participating in the PSLF program, only 58/416 (13.9%) were able to correctly identify all of the qualifications/criteria to complete the program. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of trainees rely on the PSLF program for education loan forgiveness with approximately 20% reporting participation impacted career decisions. Additionally, the majority may not fully understand PSLF criteria. Programs should strongly consider providing a formal education regarding PSLF to their trainees. (C) 2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND:For decades, open intervention was the treatment of choice in patients requiring lower extremity revascularization. In the endovascular era, however, open and endovascular revascularization are options. The implications of prior revascularization on the outcomes for subsequent revascularization are not known. In the present study, we evaluated 30-day outcomes after open lower extremity revascularization for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in those who had previous interventions. METHODS:The 2012-2017 open lower extremity bypass Participant User Data Files from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were used to identify a cohort of patients with CLI. Patients whose operation was considered emergent were excluded from the analysis. Patients were stratified on whether they had a previous open or endovascular intervention or undergoing a primary revascularization. The primary outcome measure was 30-day major adverse limb events (MALEs). Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and wound complications. RESULTS:A total of 12,668 patients met study criteria with 59.6% (n = 7,549) undergoing a primary open revascularization, 22.4% (n = 2,839) having a prior endovascular intervention, and 18.0% (n = 2,280) having a prior open revascularization. There were notable differences in the baseline characteristics between the 3 groups. In addition, there were differences in the reason for intervention (rest pain versus tissue loss), type of revascularization, and type of conduit used between the 3 groups. After adjustment, a prior open revascularization was significantly associated with 30-day MALE when compared with a primary revascularization (adjusted odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-1.94; P < 0.001) and prior endovascular intervention (adjusted odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-2.12; P < 0.001). There were no differences in outcomes between primary revascularization and prior endovascular patients. There were no differences between MACEs or wound complications between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS:A prior endovascular intervention does not seem to accrue any additional short-term risk when compared with primary revascularization, suggesting an endovascular-first approach may be a safe strategy in patients with CLI. However, a prior open intervention is significantly associated with 30-day MALE in patients undergoing redo open revascularization, which may be related to the rapid decline in patients once they have exhausted their best open revascularization option.

Objective: The outcomes for common vascular operations, such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA), are associated with surgeon volume. However, the number of operations associated with an improved stroke or death rate for CEA is not known. The objective of the current study was to define the annual surgeon volume of CEAs that is associated with a lower risk of stroke or death rate. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was analyzed to identify patients undergoing CEA between 2003 and 2009. Annual surgeon volume was correlated with a composite end point of in-hospital stroke or death. Mixed linear regression analyses were conducted to determine if annual surgeon volume of CEAs is independent predictor of the composite outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed from the regression models and used to calculate the Youden Index, which defined the optimal cutoff point of annual surgeon volume of CEAs in predicting in-hospital stroke and death. This cutoff point was further assessed using Chi square analyses to determine whether incremental increases in the annual volume of CEAs were associated with a lower in-hospital stroke or death rate. Results: A total of 104,918 CEA cases with surgeon identifiers were included in the analysis. The crude in-hospital stroke or death rate for CEA was 1.26 %. As expected, the stroke ordeath rate after CEA was higher for symptomatic patients, compared to asymptomatic patients (6.46% vs 0.72%; P <.0001). For symptomatic patients, the relationship between surgeon volume and the composite end point was not significant (P = .435). In contrast, there was a strong relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes for asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA with a stroke/death rate of 1.66%, 0.91%, and 0.65% for low-, moderate-, and high-volume surgeons (P <.0001). Multivariate analysis identified age, African-American race, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and surgeon volume as independent predictors of stroke/death after CEAfor asymptomatic carotid stenosis. For asymptomatic patients, the optimal cutoff number of CEAs to predict stroke/death rate was 19.4 CEAs per year (sensitivity = 74.9%, specificity = 72.6%, Youden index = 0.475). Analyses of outcomes at different cutoff points of surgeon volume revealed that the rate of crude complications and the adjusted probability of stroke or death was higher with case numbers less than 20 CEAs per year and lower with case numbers of 20 CEA or higher per year. Cutoff points above 20 cases were year did not yield a stroke/death rate that was significantly lower than the stroke/death rate at 20 CEAs per year, which confirmed the cutoff point of 20 CEAs per year. Only 16% of surgeons in the database achieved the threshold of 20 CEAs per year. Conclusions: Higher surgeon volume is associated with improved outcomes for CEAs performed in patients with asymptomatic carotid disease, but not for symptomatic carotid disease. For asymptomatic carotid disease, the probability of stroke or death was no longer reduced significantly at cutoff points of 20 or more CEAs per year. There are a number of other variables that may impact the clinical outcomes for CEA, so it is premature at this time to restrict privileges based on surgeon volume criteria.

Background: Attrition in surgical programs remains a significant problem resulting in trainee dissatisfaction and wasted time and educational dollars. Attrition rates in general surgery training programs approximate 5% per year (30% cumulative). Attrition rates in cardiovascular surgery training for the traditional vascular surgery fellowship (VSF), the vascular surgery residency (VSR), and the corresponding programs in cardiothoracic surgery have yet to be described, although they are assumed to be similar to those associated with general surgery training. Methods: A retrospective review of the Association of American Medical Colleges Annual Physician Specialty Data Book was performed. Data from consecutive academic years 2007-2008 to 2013-2014 were analyzed. The number of total residents, the number who did not complete their training, and those who successfully completed the program were recorded. Attrition rates were then calculated for VSF, VSR, general surgery residency (GSR), cardiothoracic surgery fellowship (CTF), and cardiothoracic surgery integrated residency (CTR). Results: Annually, between 2007-2008 and 2013-2014, there were zero to two vascular surgery residents who failed to complete the program (0%-5.9%). In the last 4 years of the study, whereas the absolute number of residents who failed to complete the program remained constant at 1 or 2 per year, the attrition rate decreased to 1 of 171 trainees (0.6%) in 2013-2014 as the total number of programs (and numbers of vascular surgery residents) significantly increased. During the same 7-year period, the number of vascular surgery fellows who did not complete their training ranged from one to six annually (0.4%-2.5%). Compared with the VSF, the VSR data show a relatively low and constant rate of attrition. In contrast, the number of general surgery residents who did not complete their program during the study period varied from 255 to 388 residents annually (3.3%-5.2%). During its first 3 years of inception, the CTR program had an attrition rate of 0%, and it was not until 2012-2013 that trainees failed to complete the program, resulting in an annual attrition rate of 1.2% to 3.2% from that point on. The annual attrition rate of CTF training programs ranged from 7 to 15 fellows (2.9%-6.8%) during the study period. Conclusions: The inception of VSR and CTR programs dramatically changed the paradigms for training in these highly specialized surgical fields. Comparisons of attrition rates between these two programs and the traditional VSF and CTR as well as GSR suggests lesser rates of attrition in the integrated programs. These data may prove reassuring to VSR and CTR program directors, whose significantly smaller programs are more vulnerable to the loss of even a single trainee than general surgery training programs are. In addition, the VSF program has stable and lower attrition rates compared with the CTF and GSR programs.

Background: Death from venous thromboembolism remains a significant cause of death worldwide. Although anticoagulation is the cornerstone of treatment in patients at risk for venous thromboembolism, inferior vena cava (IVC) filter use has increased exponentially over the last decade driven predominantly by the prophylactic use in patients at risk for venous thromboembolism despite limited evidence supporting this practice. The Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE) Study is being implemented by the Society for Vascular Surgery, Society of Interventional Radiology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and several IVC filter manufactures to better understand the safety, effectiveness, and current patterns of real-world use of IVC filters. Methods: The PRESERVE Study includes IVC filters from seven manufacturers: ALN (ALN 6 hook), Argon (Option Elite), B. Braun (LP, Vena Tech Convertible), CR Bard (Denali), Cook (Gunther Tulip), Cordis (OptEase, TrapEase), and Philips Volcano (Crux). The indications for filter placement, filter brand, complications, stability, frequency and success of retrieval, and clinical effectiveness of each filter will be recorded. Approximately 2100 patients (300 for each filter brand included in the study) are intended to be enrolled at 60 U.S. centers. Results: Men and women age 18 years or older requiring IVC filters for prevention of venous thromboembolism will be included in the study if no contrast allergy is present and they are willing to commit to the prescribed study follow-up. Participants will be evaluated at discharge, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after filter placement and/or 1 month after retrieval, which ever occurs first. Intravascular ultrasound examination or venography will be done before and after IVC filter placement, with abdominal plain film at 3 months, and contrast enhanced computed tomography scans at 12 and 24 months to evaluate filter stability. The primary safety end point is a composite of clinical end points, including freedom from perforation, embolization, thrombosis, recurrent DVT, and defined serious adverse events. Secondary end points include mechanical stability and procedure related complications at 3 months, major adverse events at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and filter tilt of more than 15 degrees at any point. Conclusions: The PRESERVE Study represents the largest prospective study ever undertaken to investigate real-world outcomes with contemporary use of IVC filters. The investigators await results with the hope that it can improve patient care.

Background: Hand ischemia following trauma in children is rare, and the natural history after upper extremity arterial bypass in children is unknown. We hypothesize children with brachial artery repair are at long-term risk of developing aneurysmal degeneration or thrombosis, thus necessitating annual duplex ultrasonography and physical examination. Methods: A retrospective review of children who had brachial artery repair (bypass or vein patch) for hand ischemia secondary to trauma at a level I trauma pediatric hospital was performed. Telephone interviews were conducted to assess the presence of arm/hand symptoms (pain, weakness, fatigue, sensory function, limb length discrepancy). Results: Between 2003 and 2016, 16 children (12 males), mean age 8 years (3-13 years) underwent brachial artery repair (12 bypass with vein, 4 vein patch). Mechanism of injury included 11 supracondylar fractures and 5 lacerations. All patients were seen at 2 weeks with a duplex ultrasound. Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up. The 3 patients with follow-up had patent bypasses, but one patient 6 years out from the repair had aneurysmal degeneration of the vein graft. Seven patients were never seen again. Phone interviews were conducted for the remaining 6 patients and 2 complained of arm fatigue and intermittent hand pain. Only one patient reported that the pediatrician checked pulses in the affected extremity. Conclusions: Eighty percentage of children had no further follow-up after the postoperative visit. Asymptomatic aneurysmal degeneration of the vein graft was noted 6 years following repair in one patient, and 2 patients had unevaluated hand complaints. These patients are at risk for late complications and are unlikely to return for routine follow-up. The importance of graft surveillance must be more clearly emphasized at time of initial surgery.

The vena cava filter (VCF) is intended to prevent the progression of deep venous thrombosis to pulmonary embolism. Recently, the indications for VCF placement have expanded, likely due in part to newer retrievable inferior vena caval filters and minimally invasive techniques. This article reviews the available VCFs, the indications for use, the techniques for placement, and possible outcomes and complications.

Background: Safe resection of intraabdominal and retroperitoneal malignancies with a goal of negative margins may require vascular surgical assistance with grafting of the aorta and/or vena cava. The current report reviews malignancies associated with major vascular reconstructions at a single tertiary referral center. Methods: Adults with abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors involving the aorta, vena cava, or iliac arteries that underwent reconstruction with vascular grafts at the University of Michigan from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The initial presentation, surgical management, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Twelve patients with tumors involving the abdominal aorta, vena cava, or iliac arteries underwent major vascular reconstruction in this seven-year study period. Tumor pathology included solid tumors (leiomyosarcoma [n = 7], germ cell tumor [n = 3], and intravascular lymphoma [n = 2]). Surgical treatment included grafting of the vena cava (n = 6), aorta (n = 3), iliac artery (n = 4), or both the aorta and vena cava (n = 1). Patients with intravascular lymphoma were identified incidentally during treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm or on pathological analysis of thromboembolism from an aortic source. Other patients had planned resection. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 86 months (median: 28.9). There were no graft occlusions. Tumor metastasized or recurred in patients with sarcoma (n = 2; 28.6%), germ cell tumor (n = 1; 33.3%), and intravascular lymphoma (n = 2; 100%). Both patients with lymphoma had multiple anastomotic or tumor-embolic pseudoaneurysms for <14 months after vascular reconstruction. Both lymphoma patients died during follow-up. Conclusions: This single-center review suggests that sarcoma and germ cell tumors may be safely resected in conjunction with major vascular reconstruction in carefully selected patients. In comparison, intravascular lymphoma identified incidentally at the time of aortic reconstruction resulted in a more malignant course with pseudoaneurysm formation of anastomoses or native vessels, cancer recurrence, and 100% mortality. Aneurysm contents and emboli should be carefully reviewed perioperatively by pathologists.