Since magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique is constantly evolving with higher field strength scanners, the question arises whether images from different field strength scanners can be used interchangeably for scientific and clinical purposes. We address this issue in a study group of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Two different quantification methods for analysing structural (MRI) were used. Conventional volumetry was performed by manually tracing amygdala and hippocampus volumes on both 1.5 and 3 T scans of 10 TLE patients. Additionally a voxel-based morphometry (VBM)-based extraction of those structures was conducted. As an answer to the main question, it was determined that the volumetrically derived volumes of amygdala and hippocampus from 1.5 and 3.0 T images did not differ. Our findings concerning the volumetry are consistent with findings in healthy controls, thus offering the possibility to use volumetry of the different scanners interchangeably. The results of the VBM-analyses show satisfying inter-scanner volume quantification but not consistent enough to be deemed interchangeable. Further investigations analysing the outcomes of conventional VBM of different field strength scanners are necessary.

Summary Background. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetry has evolved to a highly sensitive method for presurgical detection of hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Seizure resolution and neuropsychological sequelae are believed to correlate with extent of resection. Therefore an easy volumetric method to determine extent of resection is desirable. The purpose of this work is to evaluate and compare two different measurement techniques for hippocampal resection length. Methods. Sixty-one patients with a mean seizure history of 25.1 years and medically intractable TLE were included. They underwent MRI with sagittal acquired 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient recalled echo sequence in 1 mm 3 isotropic voxel. Hippocampal resection length was calculated with two different methods. In the slice counting method (SCM) the number of consecutive 1-mm-thick slices containing resected hippocampus formation was counted. In the vector method (VM) the sum of the oblique and thus longer distances between the centre points of segmented hippocampal areas on each MRI slice were calculated. Results. Since the hippocampus is a curved body, the resection lengths measured with VM were always larger than measured with SCM. The comparison of resection length expressed in “percent of total length” showed good agreement between the two methods, because unlike the absolute values of resection length, the percentage values are unaffected by the three-dimensional shape of the hippocampus. Conclusion. The easier and quicker method of “slice counting” may be used to determine resection length expressed in “percent of total length”, giving reliable values for resection length but causing less volumetric work.