In a retrospective review, in order to describe the palliative care and prognosis of patients with advanced cancer of the esophagus, the clinical characteristics and the treatment modalities applied were explored in relation to survival and symptom relief for 261 patients treated without curative potential. The data were obtained from a study of all patients with cancer of the esophagus treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital in the 10-year period from 1990 to 1999. Medical data of the patients were reviewed and missing clinical information was retrieved from local hospitals and general practitioners. The patients were divided into three groups based upon the overall survival from start of treatment to death. Survival ≤3 months is in this paper, defined as 'short,' while survival > 6 months is defined as 'long.' Median survival for the total group of patients was 4 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival was 8%, 3%, and 1%, respectively. Patients with short survival (n= 107) had more advanced disease, lower performance status, and more dysphagia, weight loss, and pain and used more analgesics than patients with long survival (n= 91). Tumor characteristics such as localization, tumor length, and histology were not significantly associated with survival. This result was confirmed in a logistic regression analysis (with backward stepwise elimination) including sex, age, clinical stage, tumor length, tumor localization, histology, performance status, dysphagia, weight loss, and pain, where clinical stage, performance status, weight loss, and pain were included in the final model. A large variety of first-line palliative treatments were applied within the studied time period; external radiotherapy ± brachytherapy (n= 149), brachytherapy alone (n= 44), endoluminal stent (n= 28), laser evaporization (n= 8), chemotherapy (n= 5), and best supportive care only (n= 27). There were no clear differences in the effect on dysphagia between the modalities. Fourteen percent of the patients had treatment related complications. In conclusion, symptoms, performance status, and use of analgesics seemed to better prognosticate survival than tumor characteristics other than stage of disease. Our study reveals that knowledge about prognostic factors is crucial for the choice of palliative treatment. Even though all of the different treatment modalities seemed to provide relief of dysphagia, several other factors should be considered when deciding which treatment modality to offer. The time to onset of relief, duration of response, level of complications, and time spent in hospital should be a part of the decision-making process when selecting the appropriate treatment.

Purpose: By comparing our old (DP5, in use from 1978 to 1994) and new (Plato, Nucletron) dose planning system, we found that the old system underestimated doses by 20-25%. To study the possible consequences for the patients treated between 1978 and 1994, all who were still alive were invited to undergo an examination with respect to side effects and quality of life (QOL).Methods and Materials: The degree of overdosage was calculated by comparing the isodose distribution generated on the two dose planning systems. Eighty-four patients were then invited to undergo an examination with respect to side effects and QOL. The side effects were scored according to the LENT SOMA system and QOL according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), and EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head & Neck 35 (QLQH&N35).Results: The mean overdosage of brachytherapy was 19.3%. No association was found between overdosage and side effects or QOL. For implants in the lateral border of the tongue, we found a statistically significant correlation between osteoradionecrosis and the following parameters: linear activity, total activity, dose rate, and extrapolated response dose. By multivariate analysis, only total implanted activity and the use of lead protection during brachytherapy were found to be of prognostic significance with respect to development of osteoradionecrosis.Conclusion: The incidence of side effects after brachytherapy at the Norwegian Radium Hospital seems to have been somewhat higher in the period under investigation than at other institutions. There may be several explanations, including the use of external beam radiotherapy before brachytherapy and departure from the Paris system among others. However, the side effects were not associated with the overdosage that was the basis for the study. As opposed to the general consensus of opinion, long-term QOL was found to be worse after brachytherapy than after external beam radiotherapy. This calls for increased awareness and a systematic prospective registration of the long-term side effects of brachytherapy. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.

From 1985 to 1994, 23 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule were treated by brachytherapy. The TNM stage was as follows: T1N0 (9 patients), T2N0 (11 patients) and T4N0 (3 patients), Four patients had primary surgery and postoperative brachytherapy, whereas 12 patients had brachytherapy alone and 7 had tele- and brachytherapy in combination, For brachytherapy, the plastic tube technique was used, With the exception of one patient with a partial response, complete response was obtained in all patients, Two patients relapsed: one (T4N0) locally after 5 months and one (T2N0) regionally after 12 months, Both are alive and with no evidence of disease after salvage surgery, For early stage carcinoma (T1, T2) of the nasal vestibule, brachytherapy is a safe treatment yielding a high grade of local control and with good cosmetic results.