Appendicitis is a common surgical problem that is associated with a systemic inflammatory response. Previous studies have shown that cytokines are activated early in acute inflammation and sepsis and may serve as indicators of clinical severity. In this study we examined the role of cytokines as serum markers to distinguish nonperforated versus perforated appendicitis. Patients with the presumptive diagnosis of appendicitis had serum drawn preoperatively. Only patients (n = 59) with an intraoperative diagnosis of nonperforated (n = 34) and perforated (n = 25) appendicitis had serum drawn 12 hours postoperatively. Diagnosis was later confirmed by pathologic examination. The serum specimens were batch analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays specific for interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10. Serum from normal healthy subjects served as control specimens (n = 9). Patients in the nonperforated and perforated groups were similar with regard to age, gender, race, white blood cell count, and fever. All cytokine levels including preoperative, postoperative, nonperforated, and perforated were higher in patients with appendicitis as compared with controls. IL-1beta, IL-2, and IL-10 levels were not different between groups with appendicitis. Preoperative serum levels of IL-6 (P = 0.036) and IL-8 (P = 0.047) were higher in patients with perforated versus nonperforated appendicitis. In addition postoperative serum levels of IL-6 (P = 0.0001) remained higher in the perforated group versus the nonperforated group. Serum levels of IL-6 and IL-8 may have a role in discerning the extent of disease in this condition. This initial step in systemically studying the role of cytokines in this disease may ultimately lead to the development of molecular indicators to aid in diagnosis and differentiate appendicitis from other conditions.

Acute diverticulitis requiring surgical intervention has conventionally been treated by resection with colostomy or delayed resection with primary anastomosis at a second admission. Our objective was to determine the outcome for treatment of diverticulitis with resection and primary anastomosis during the same hospitalization. We conducted a retrospective review of patients (n = 74) undergoing surgery for diverticulitis. Groups included: 1) resection with primary anastomosis (n = 33), 2) resection with colostomy followed by a takedown colostomy (n = 32), and 3) delayed resection with primary anastomosis at a second admission (n = 9). Despite local perforation primary anastomosis was often performed unless patients were clinically unstable or had fecal contamination. The operation was urgent in five (15%) patients in Group 1 as compared with 26 patients (88%) in Group 2. Serious intra-abdominal complications occurred in two patients (6%) in Group 1 as compared with nine patients (28%) in Group 2 and one patient (11%) in Group 3. Postoperative abscesses occurred in two patients in Group 1, five patients in Group 2, and one patient in Group 3. We have shown that resection with primary anastomosis for acute diverticulitis—even in selected patients requiring urgent operation—can be safely performed during the same hospital admission with a low complication rate.

Although appendectomy is the most commonly performed emergency operation septic complications of appendectomy remain a major source of morbidity. Historically, advanced appendicitis has been treated by appendectomy with cecostomy and/or drainage tubes. Our objective was to evaluate the use of ileocecal resection for the immediate treatment of advanced appendicitis. We examined the cases of all patients undergoing ileocecal resection for appendicitis from August 1989 through April 2000. There were 92 patients (60 male and 32 female) with a median age of 34 (range 6-71). Abdominal pain was present in 98 per cent of patients with duration of 5.1 +/- 0.6 days. Right lower quadrant tenderness was present in 91 per cent with accompanying right lower quadrant mass in 30 per cent. Temperature on admission was 38.0 +/- 0.1 degrees C with a white blood cell count of 15,300 +/- 500. Preoperative radiological studies included abdominal X-rays (33), contrast enemas (two), CT scans (41), and abdominal ultrasound (17); these studies yielded a correct preoperative diagnosis in 89 percent. Previous appendectomy had been performed in six patients with failed percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses in five. There were 94 cecal resections performed in 92 patients. The extent of surgical resection varied between patients and ranged from partial cecectomy (34) to ileocecectomy (55) to ileocecectomy with diverting ileostomy (five). Intra-abdominal abscesses were present at operation in 46 cases (50%), and drains were placed in 38 (41%). Skin incisions were packed open in most cases (65); there was skin closure in 27. There was no mortality encountered in this period. There were 25 complications in 23 patients (25%). Complications included postoperative abscess (10; 11%), wound infection (10; 11%), partial small bowel obstruction (two) and pulmonary embolus (one). Reoperation was required in seven patients and CT-guided percutaneous drainage in five patients. Anastomic leaks occurred in two cases of partial cecectomy and required conversion to ileocecectomy. Mean hospital stay was 10.5 +/- 1.0 days with adjusted hospital costs of $31,689 +/- 3018. We conclude that definitive treatment of advanced appendicitis can be performed by resection of the involved areas of the ileocecum. This can be accomplished with a primary anastomosis obviating the need for ileostomy and secondary operation. This aggressive surgical approach may reduce infectious complications and reduce hospital costs.

The surgical management of porcelain gallbladder is based on studies performed in 1931 and 1962, which indicated a correlation between porcelain gallbladder and carcinoma. We sought to evaluate the characteristics of patients with porcelain gallbladder and the risk for gallbladder carcinoma. The medical records of 10,741 cholecystectomies performed between 1955 and 1998 were reviewed and recorded. The pathology slides were evaluated for evidence of calcification and gallbladder carcinoma. Fifteen (0.14%) of 10,741 specimens were porcelain gallbladders. Ten patients (67%) had symptoms suggestive of biliary colic or cholecystitis. Five (33%) were asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally. All specimens demonstrated chronic cholecystitis and partial calcification of the gallbladder wall. Nine (60%) had cholelithiasis. None had gallbladder carcinoma by recent review of pathologic material. During this same period 88 (0.82%) patients had gallbladder carcinoma, none of which showed calcification of the wall. This report represents the largest modern review of porcelain gallbladders. No carcinoma was identified among patients with porcelain gallbladder. In addition no patient with gallbladder carcinoma had calcified gallbladder. With a better understanding of the natural history of the porcelain gallbladder the current management of these patients may change.

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is known to be safe in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC), the optimal timing of laparoscopic intervention remains controversial. The objective of this study is to prospectively compare the safety and cost effectiveness of early versus delayed LC in AC. Our study population consisted of 43 patients presenting with AC (localized tenderness, white blood cell count >10.0 or temperature >38.0° C, and ultrasound confirmation) who were prospectively randomized to early versus delayed LC during their first admission. Exclusion criteria included a history of peptic ulcer disease or evidence of gallbladder perforation. All patients were treated with bowel rest and antibiotics (piperacillin 2 g intravenous piggyback every 6 hours). Early treatment patients underwent LC as soon as the operating schedule allowed. Delayed treatment patients received anti-inflammatory medication (indomethacin 50 mg per rectum every 12 hours) in addition to bowel rest and antibiotics and underwent operation after resolution of symptoms or within 5 days if symptoms failed to resolve. Early LC was performed in 21 patients, whereas 22 patients underwent delayed LC. There was no difference in age, temperature, or white blood cell count on admission between groups. Early LC slightly reduced operative time and conversion rate. There was no difference in complications. Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in those receiving early LC. There was also a significant reduction in total hospital stay and hospital charges with early LC. We conclude that delay in operation combined with anti-inflammatory medication showed no advantage with regard to operative time, conversion, or complication rate. Furthermore, early laparoscopic intervention significantly reduced operative blood loss, hospital days, and hospital charges.

Current standard of care for complicated diverticulitis includes urgent resection with colostomy versus antibiotic treatment, followed by delayed resection with primary anastomosis at a second admission. In certain circumstances, it is possible to perform resection and anastomosis on the same admission for acute diverticulitis. A retrospective review was completed for patients undergoing surgery for diverticulitis from 1991 to 1998. Groups included: 1) sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis on same admission (n 18); 2) resection with protective end colostomy (n = 16); and 3) in-patient antibiotic treatment alone, followed by a second admission for resection with primary anastomosis (n = 5). Four patients initially treated with antibiotics worsened symptomatically or developed radiographic evidence of perforation and required resection with colostomy. Five patients in Group 1 had abscesses or contained perforations based on radiographic studies. Findings on CT scans did not predict treatment. Group 1 patients had uneventful recoveries and few minor complications (wound infections and an incisional hernia). One anastomotic leak occurred in Group 2 after colostomy closure. Although there will continue to be a role for emergent operation for diverticulitis, same admission sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis after antibiotic treatment is safe, uses a shorter course of antibiotics, and has a low complication rate.

The objective of this study was to compare ticarcillin/clavulanate given at 3.1 g every 6 hours with imipenem/cilistatin given at 500 mg every 6 hours for the treatment of infections associated with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis. One hundred thirty-seven patients were found to have gangrenous or perforated appendicitis and received the study medication for 3 to 5 days in a double-blinded, randomized manner. Clinical success was similar for the two treatment groups, 96.9 and 95.9 per cent in the ticarcillin/clavulanate and imipenem/cilistatin groups, respectively (P = 0.99; 95% confidence interval for the difference was -5.6% to 7.6%). Bacteriologic success at the end of therapy was similar in the two groups, 100 and 98.4 per cent in the ticarcillin/clavulanate and imipenem/cilistatin groups, respectively (P = 0.99; 95% confidence interval for the difference was -1.8% to 4.7%). The occurrence of adverse events related to treatment was similar for the two groups (P = 0.31) and led to study withdrawal for four patients (one with ticarcillin/clavulanate and three with imipenem/cilistatin). Ticarcillin/clavulanate given at 3.1 g every 6 hours is as effective and as safe as imipenem/cilistatin given at 500 mg every 6 hours for treatment of gangrenous or perforated appendicitis.

Background: Cecal diverticulitis is a rare condition in the Western world, with a higher incidence in people of Asian descent. The treatment for cecal diverticulitis has ranged from expectant medical management, which is similar to uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis, to right hemicolectomy.Study Design: A retrospective chart review was conducted of the 49 patients treated for cecal diverticulitis at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center from 1976 to 1998. This was the largest-ever single-institution review of cecal diverticulitis reported in the mainland US.Results: The clinical presentation was similar to that of acute appendicitis, with abdominal pain, low-grade fever, nausea/vomiting, abdominal tenderness, and leukocytosis. Operations performed included right hemicolectomy in 39 patients (80%), diverticulectomy in 7 patients (14%), and appendectomy with drainage of intraabdominal abscess in 3 patients (6%). Of the 7 patients who had diverticulectomy, 1 required right hemicolectomy at 6 months followup for continued symptoms. Of the three patients who underwent appendectomy with drainage, all required subsequent hemicolectomy for continued inflammation. Of the 39 patients who received immediate hemicolectomies, there were complications in 7 (18%), with no mortality.Conclusions: We endorse an aggressive operative approach to the management of cecal diverticulitis, with the resection of all clinically apparent disease at the time of the initial operation. In cases of a solitary diverticulum, we recommend the use of diverticulectomy when it is technically feasible. When confronted with multiple diverticuli and cecal, phlegmon, or when neoplastic disease cannot be excluded, we advocate immediate right hemicolectomy. This procedure can be safely performed in the unprepared colon with few complications. Excisional treatment for cecal diverticulitis prevents the recurrence of symptoms, which may be more common in the Western population. (J Am Cell Surg 1999;188: 629-634. (C) 1999 by the American College of Surgeons).

Two instances of vena cava injury occurring during insertion of a new trocar for laparoscopic surgery are presented. The mechanism of injury in each case was identical. These injuries are extremely rare, and fortunately both patients survived. Any new instrument that is purported to be an improvement over existing ones should be critically evaluated so that needless and unnecessary injuries such as these can be avoided.

The optimal antibacterial regimen for the treatment of patients with mixed intra-abdominal infections remains to be established. Since advanced (gangrenous and perforated) appendicitis with peritonitis probably represents the most reproducible clinical model of this disease process, we performed a randomised double-blind study comparing 2 single-agent regimens (ceftizoxime 2g every 12 hours and cefoxitin 2g every 6 hours) in the treatment of advanced appendicitis with peritonitis. 109 evaluable patients (84 male, 25 female) aged 12 to 70 (mean 28) years were randomised, 53 to ceftizoxime and 56 to cefoxitin. 75 patients (69%) had perforation and 34 (31%) exhibited gangrene, with the mean duration of abdominal pain and mean white blood cell (WBC) count on admission being significantly greater in the group with perforation [71 vs 46 hours and 16.9 vs 14.8 ×109/L, respectively (p < 0.05)]. Bacteria were recovered from the peritoneal cultures of all patients, with a mean of 3.3 aerobes and 8.8 anaerobes per specimen, representing a 600% increase in bacterial recovery compared with previous reports. The clinical cure rate was 51 of 53 (96%) for ceftizoxime vs 47 of 56 (84%) for cefoxitin (p = 0.06), or 90% overall. We conclude that single-agent antibacterial therapy with either of these 2 drugs is safe and very effective in patients with advanced appendicitis with peritonitis, and that the number of bacteria associated with this condition is much greater than previously believed.