J Nucl Med. Markus Schwaiger István Kósa, Rudolf Blasini, Jan Schneider-Eicke, Franz J. Neumann, Ichiro Matsunari, Jodi Neverve, Albert Schömig and Implantation Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy to Evaluate Patients After Coronary Stent http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/39/8/1307 This article and updated information are available at: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/subscriptions/online.xhtml Information about subscriptions to JNM can be found at: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml Information about reproducing figures, tables, or other portions of this article can be found online at:

OBJECTIVES:We evaluated regional diastolic function by pulsed Doppler myocardial mapping for the detection of left ventricular ischemia during pharmacologic stress testing. BACKGROUND:Evaluation and quantification of diastolic myocardial function remain a challenge for imaging techniques in stress tests. METHODS:A prospective study compared the detection of coronary artery stenosis: 1) by pulsed Doppler myocardial mapping, 2) by two-dimensional echocardiographic dobutamine stress test, and 3) by perfusion scintigraphy in 64 patients using coronary angiography for reference. An age matched subgroup of 10 patients with normal angiograms and two-dimensional echocardiographic stress test served as control group. Peak myocardial contraction velocity (Vc) and lengthening rate during early diastolic left ventricular (LV) filling (VE) were measured in 12 LV segments from three apical views. RESULTS:In controls, myocardial velocities increased during stress by > or =3.6 cm/s (p < 0.001). In LV segments depending on a stenosed artery (n = 70), VE decreased by > or =1 cm/s and, thus, was different from control segments (n = 112, p < 0.001) and from scar segments (n = 13, p < 0.01), whereas the change of Vc was similar to that in scar segments. A stress induced 2 cm/s reduction of VE discerned the best diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 84%, specificity 93%) in comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography (78% and 71%) and perfusion scintigraphy (61% and 86%). Using receiver operating curves at incremental levels of luminal narrowing, these relations persisted. CONCLUSIONS:Quantification of diastolic myocardial function by pulsed Doppler myocardial mapping during dobutamine stress test was shown to be a feasible, accurate, reproducible, noninvasive technique that should be considered to be a sensitive alternative to the present echocardiographic and scintigraphic imaging techniques for stress tests.

We investigated the use of visual and quantitative technetium 99m tetrofosmin ECG-gated single-photon emission tomography (SPET) for the assessment of regional myocardial wall thickening (WT) and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) in comparison with gated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a low angiographic LVEF. Gated SPET using 99mTc-labelled flow tracers offers potential for simultaneous assessment of myocardial perfusion and LV function. Few data are available on the use of visual and quantitative gated SPET in patients with low LVEF. In this study 21 patients with low angiographic LVEF (mean 37%±5%) were studied. Resting gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPET and gated MRI were performed within 48 h. WT was assessed by visual interpretation (five point score) and quantitative analysis based on count increase. There was good agreement for EF measurements by MRI and gated SPET (mean EF: 33%±12% vs 35%±11%, r = 0.86, P<0.001). Areas under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) for differentiation between MRI WT score points ranged from 0.60 to 0.66 for visual SPET WT analysis, from 0.59 to 0.71 for delta count increase values and from 0.46 to 0.60 for % WT, indicating substantial overlap between WT categories. Absolute agreement for visual WT between MRI and gated SPET ranged from 25% to 57% (kappa 0.03–0.25) depending on tracer uptake, and was limited in areas with moderate to severe perfusion defects (kappa 0.03–0.13). It is concluded that gated SPET provided reliable estimates of regional WT and global function in patients with low angiographic LVEF.