Significant aortic invasion by metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors can present difficult problems intraoperatively in attempted curative retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Aortic replacement with Dacron graft has been a successful method of dealing with this predicament. We describe a new approach of intraoperative floppy aortic graft reconstruction in a young patient with testicular germ cell cancer in whom a 14 cm pseudoaneurysm involving the infrarenal aorta developed after four courses of preoperative chemotherapy. This technique prevents significant lower extremity and pelvic ischemia during resection of the aorta and retroperitoneal tumor while providing the urologic surgeon with excellent exposure and minimal interference from the aortic graft.
As promoters of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with preservation of caval flow, we reviewed our 8-year experience to assess the feasibility and limits of this technique. Preservation of caval flow during OLT, which improves intraoperative hemodynamic stability, was not considered feasible in a significant proportion of transplant recipients. When transient clamping of caval flow is required, causes and consequences of this clamping during all phases of the procedure were not reported. Between 1991 and 1998, a total of 275 OLTs using a whole graft were performed in 259 patients with a policy consisting of a systematic attempt to preserve inferior vena cava (IVC) and caval flow. Preservation of IVC flow was possible in all cases, and no procedure was converted to the conventional technique. Caval flow was maintained throughout the procedure in 246 procedures (90%). Temporary IVC cross-clamping was required in 24 cases during hepatectomy because of difficult dissection and in 5 cases after graft reperfusion because of outflow obstruction; none required the use of a venovenous shunt. IVC cross-clamping during hepatectomy was required more frequently in cases of a large liver, with a mean duration of 11 +/- 4 minutes, but without significant influence on early postoperative risk, including one graft failure (4%) and one postoperative death (4%). Conversely, IVC cross-clamping after reperfusion, with a mean duration of 23 +/- 5 minutes, was associated with four graft failures (80%) and four deaths (80%). We conclude that IVC preservation is feasible in almost all candidates, allowing the use of split livers from cadaveric or living donors independently from their underlying disease. Although preservation of caval flow was possible in the large majority of cases, transient IVC cross-clamping during hepatectomy was well tolerated in contrast to caval clamping after graft reperfusion. Therefore, if necessary, we recommend transient IVC cross-clamping to perform a large cavocaval anastomosis.
Purpose: Marginal cadaveric renal transplant donors represent a potential source for expansion of the donor pool but these kidneys have generally demonstrated significantly poorer survival compared to those from conventional donors. A strategy to provide sufficient renal mass for adequate nephron dosing and subsequent improved survival is the use of both kidneys for a single recipient. We present our 2-year experience with double renal transplants from marginal donors.Materials and Methods: During an 8-year period 28 patients received double renal transplants (group 1) and 31 received a single transplant (group 2) from marginal donors. Donors were older than 55 years, or had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, greater than 15% glomerulosclerosis on biopsy, increasing creatinine or intrinsic renal parenchymal disease.Results: Both groups were of similar age and the number of rejection episodes per year was similar but followup time differed (22.4 +/- 14.6 months for group 1 versus 43.7 +/- 20.5 for group 2). Male-to-female ratio, cold ischemia time, terminal creatinine and pre-transplant biopsy rates were similar for donors in both groups. Average donor age was younger in group 1 (48.9 +/- 15.8 versus 57.5 +/- 8.2 years, p = 0.01), and incidence of intrinsic renal disease and increasing donor creatinine was greater (12 versus 2, p = 0.002 and 4 versus 0, p = 0.04, respectively). Incidence of primary nonfunction (1 group 1 versus 5 group 2 patients) and delayed graft function (6 versus 7) was similar. The 1 and 2-year graft survival rates of 96% and 96%, respectively, for group 1 were significantly higher than those for group 2 (77% and 73%, p = 0.02).Conclusions: Our experience to date with double kidney transplants from marginal donors demonstrates acceptable 1 and 2-year survival rates significantly superior to the outcome using only 1 marginal kidney. This finding has important implications in the decision to use marginal donors in regard to cost-effectiveness and patient survival compared to the alternative of continued hemodialysis until an ideal donor organ becomes available.
Bladder drainage by the duodenal segment (DS) technique is currently the preferred method of pancreas transplantation (PTX) but is associated with unique complications. Over a 7-year period, 191 diabetic patients underwent 201 whole-organ PTXs with bladder drainage using a 6 to 8 cm length of DS as an exocrine conduit. A retrospective chart review was performed to document all DS morbidity. DS complications occurred in 38 cases (19%). Twelve patients developed DS leaks and required operative repair. DS bleeding was documented in 26 cases, necessitating cystoscopy in 22 patients and open repair in eight patients for significant hematuria. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) duodenitis was diagnosed in seven cases, with four presenting as DS leaks and three with hematuria. Five patients experienced ampullary obstruction early after PTX. Rejection of the DS was confirmed by biopsy in 13 patients, including eight cases of acute and five cases of chronic rejection. Two patients had stone formation from the DS staple line. Enteric conversion was performed in five patients for DS abnormalities (leaks in 2 cases, bleeding in 2, and CMV duodenitis in 1). Among patients with DS complications, patient survival is 84% and pancreas graft survival is 68% after a mean follow-up of 44 ± 12 months. Complications related to the DS remain an important source of morbidity but rarely cause death after PTX. In spite of unique side effects, transplantation of the DS remains an acceptable alternative for exocrine drainage after PTX.
Whole organ pancreaticoduodenal transplantation with bladder drainage by the duodenal segment technique is currently the preferred method of vascularized pancreas transplantation but is associated with a finite risk of surgical complications. Meticulous bench reconstruction of the pancreaticoduodenal allograft may minimize complications following transplantation. Over a 6.5-yr period, 192 pancreas transplants were performed in 181 diabetic patients by the same transplant team. A retrospective review was performed in order to describe a stepwise approach to bench preparation of the pancreaticoduodenal allograft that has developed from this experience. In this series of 192 consecutive pancreaticoduodenal reconstructions, no procured pancreas was deemed non-usable solely from an anatomic standpoint. The mean backtable pancreas preparation time was 2 h. The operative complication rate was 19%, the incidence of technical graft loss was 6.8%, and there was no mortality related to technical problems. Conclusions: Using a standardized approach, meticulous bench reconstruction of the pancreaticoduodenal allograft: 1) can be performed in virtually any anatomic setting; 2) decreases complications following transplantation; 3) improves initial allograft function; and 4) minimizes organ wastage.
OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and efficacy of solitary pancreas transplantation in the treatment of IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A single-center retrospective case series of 62 consecutive solitary pancreas transplants (20 sequential pancreas after kidney, 42 pancreas transplants alone) performed in 57 adult IDDM patients was studied. Indications for solitary pancreas transplantation were 1) the presence of two or more overt diabetic complications and/or 2) glucose hyperlability with hypoglycemic unawareness and impaired quality of life. The recipient group consisted of 31 men and 26 women with a mean age of 38 years (range 25–62) and a mean duration of diabetes of 26 years (range 14–52). Mean pretransplant glycohemoglobin level was 9.9 ± 2.6%. Organ acceptance was restricted to ideal donors and man-dated a minimum of a two-antigen match (mean human leukocyte antigen ABDR match 2.7). The mean cold ischemia time was 16.6 h. Whole-organ pancreas transplantation was performed with bladder drainage by the duodenal segment technique. All patients were managed with either triple or quadruple immunosuppression. Monitoring included prospective urine cytology as well as cystoscopic transduodenal needle biopsies. RESULTS The mean length of initial hospital stay was 18 days, and mean hospital charges were $106,341. The incidences of rejection, infection, and surgical complications were 70, 55, and 47%, respectively. Overall patient and graft survival rates were 86 and 52%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 28 months. All patients with functioning grafts had excellent metabolic control (mean glycohemoglobin level 5.1%) and achieved good rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS Despite morbidity, solitary pancreas transplantation can be performed with improving success, can enhance quality of life, and can offer an opportunity to arrest secondary diabetic complications.
The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell–mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.
BACKGROUND:Bladder drainage by the duodenal segment technique is currently the preferred method of handling the exocrine secretions after vascularized pancreatic transplantation. Despite improving results, however, the management of metabolic and urologic complications associated with bladder drainage remains problematic.STUDY DESIGN:A retrospective survey was performed of a consecutive case series of 196 pancreatic transplantations in 186 patients with diabetes over an 80-month period. All patients underwent whole organ pancreatic transplantation with bladder drainage by the duodenal segment technique.RESULTS:A total of 25 conversions (13 percent) from bladder drainage to enteric drainage were performed in 24 patients (24 side-to-side duodenoenterostomies, one Roux-en-Y limb duodenoenterostomy). The mean time of enteric conversion after pancreatic transplantation was 22 +/- 18 months (range, 1 to 72 months). All but two of the enteric conversions were performed at least 6 months after pancreatic transplantation. Indications for enteric conversion included dehydration with intractable metabolic acidosis (n = 18; 9 percent), urologic complications (n = 5; 3 percent), or problems with the duodenal segment (n = 2; 1 percent). The mean length of hospitalization for enteric conversion was 12 +/- 7 days (range, 6 to 30 days). All patients experienced improvement in their symptoms after enteric conversion. Anastomotic leaks developed postoperatively in five patients; two were managed operatively and three were managed nonoperatively. Oral bicarbonate supplementation was eliminated in all but one patient after enteric conversion. Patient survival is 100 percent and pancreatic graft survival (insulin independence) is 96 percent after a mean follow-up of 22 months after enteric conversion.CONCLUSIONS:Enteric conversion after pancreatic transplantation with bladder drainage is a safe and effective therapy for refractory problems related to the duodenal segment, altered physiologic function, or urologic complications and should be considered after 6 months for patients with persistent side effects.
Combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) has become generally accepted as an effective treatment option, but controversy exists regarding the early morbidity rate of the procedure. To address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed all readmissions occurring in the first 3 months after PKT. Over a 5-year period, we performed 98 PKTs with bladder drainage. The mean recipient age was 36.6 years, with a mean pretransplant duration of diabetes of 23.5 years. All patients received quadruple immunosuppression with antilymphocyte induction therapy. The mean length of initial hospital stay was 20 days. One hundred forty-five readmissions occurred in 73 patients (74.5%), with the initial readmission occurring at a mean of 8.5 days after hospital dismissal and 28 days after PKT. Twenty-five patients (25.5%) had no readmissions, 35 (36%) had one readmission, 17 (17%) had two readmissions, and the remaining 21 patients (21.5%) had three or more readmissions in the first 3 months. The mean number of readmissions was 1.5 per patient. Forty-seven patients (48%) were readmitted within 1 week, and all but one initial readmission occurred within 1 month of hospital dismissal. Causes of readmission included rejection (51), infection (32), pancreas-specific morbidity (such as dehydration, hematuria, or pancreatitis; 50), and miscellaneous causes (12). Thirteen patients (13%) underwent reoperation during readmission. The mean length of hospital stay during readmission was 7.6 days. The mean total length of hospitalization in the first 3 months after PKT was 31 days. Over the span of 5 years, no changes have occurred either in the incidence, timing, causes, or duration of readmissions. The patient survival rate is 96%, the kidney graft survival rate is 90%, and the pancreas graft survival rate is 88% after a mean follow-up of 2.6 years. Mean rehabilitation time (return to work or normal activity) after PKT was 4.0 months. In conclusion, PKT is associated with a fixed morbidity characterized by early readmission (within 1 week) in nearly half of patients and pancreas-specific morbidity as the cause in 35% of readmissions. During evaluation, prospective candidates should be counseled regarding the unique morbidity of PKT. Successful management strategies must emphasize the intensity of early follow-up and recognize the propensity toward immunologic, metabolic, exocrine, and urologic side effects.