NMDA receptor ligands have therapeutic potential in neurological and psychiatric disorders. We designed (R)-3-(5-thienyl)carboxamido-2-aminopropanoic acid derivatives with nanomolar agonist potencies at NMDA receptor subtypes (GluN12/A-D). These compounds are superagonists at GluN1/2C compared to glycine and partial to full agonists at GluN1/2A and GluN1/2D but display functional antagonism at GluN1/2B due to low agonist efficacy. Notably, 8d display 864% agonist efficacy at GluN1/2C relative to glycine, and 8j has high potency at GluN1/2A (0.018 μM), GluN1/2C (0.0029 μM), and GluN1/2D (0.016 μM). We evaluated the binding mode in the glycine site using molecular modeling and mutagenesis. In vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) assays predict high metabolic stability but poor blood–brain barrier permeability. However, an ester prodrug for the carboxylate group of 7j display moderately high blood–brain barrier permeability. The thiophenecarboxamide agonists expand the synthetic pharmacology of NMDA receptors and provide structural insights that facilitate the design of GluN1 agonists with GluN2 subunit-specific activity.

N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-type ionotropic glutamate receptors are critically involved in excitatory neurotransmission and their dysfunction is implicated in many brain disorders. Allosteric modulators with selectivity for specific NMDA receptor subtypes are therefore attractive as therapeutic agents, and sustained drug discovery efforts have resulted in a wide range of new allosteric modulators. However, evaluation of allosteric NMDA receptor modulators is limited by the lack of operational ligand-receptor models to describe modulator binding dissociation constants (KB) and effects on agonist binding affinity (α) and efficacy (β). Here, we describe a pharmacological equilibrium model that encapsulates activation and modulation of NMDA receptors, and we apply this model to afford deeper understanding of GluN2A-selective negative allosteric modulators, TCN-201, MPX-004, and MPX-007. We exploit slow negative allosteric modulator unbinding to examine receptors at hemi-equilibrium when fully occupied by agonists and modulators to demonstrate that TCN-201 display weaker binding and negative modulation of glycine binding affinity (KB = 42 nM, α = 0.0032) compared with MPX-004 (KB = 9.3 nM, α = 0.0018) and MPX-007 (KB = 1.1 nM, α = 0.00053). MPX-004 increases agonist efficacy (β = 1.19), whereas TCN-201 (β = 0.76) and MPX-007 (β = 0.82) reduce agonist efficacy. These values describing allosteric modulation of diheteromeric GluN1/2A receptors with 2 modulator binding sites are unchanged in triheteromeric GluN1/2A/2B receptors with a single binding site. This evaluation of NMDA receptor modulation reveals differences between ligand analogs that shape their utility as pharmacological tool compounds and facilitates the design of new modulators with therapeutic potential. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Detailed understanding of allosteric N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor modulation requires pharmacological methods to quantify modulator binding affinity and the strengths of modulation of agonist binding and efficacy. We describe a generic ligand-receptor model for allosteric NMDA receptor modulation and use this model for the characterization of GluN2A-selective negative allosteric modulators. The model enables quantitative evaluation of a broad range of NMDA receptor modulators and provides opportunities to optimize these modulators by embellishing the interpretation of their structure-activity relationships.

NMDA-type ionotropic glutamate receptors are critical for normal brain function and are implicated in central nervous system disorders. Structure and function of NMDA receptors composed of GluN1 and GluN3 subunits are less understood compared to those composed of GluN1 and GluN2 subunits. GluN1/3 receptors display unusual activation properties in which binding of glycine to GluN1 elicits strong desensitization, while glycine binding to GluN3 alone is sufficient for activation. Here, we explore mechanisms by which GluN1-selective competitive antagonists, CGP-78608 and L-689,560, potentiate GluN1/3A and GluN1/3B receptors by preventing glycine binding to GluN1. We show that both CGP-78608 and L-689,560 prevent desensitization of GluN1/3 receptors, but CGP-78608-bound receptors display higher glycine potency and efficacy at GluN3 subunits compared to L-689,560-bound receptors. Furthermore, we demonstrate that L-689,560 is a potent antagonist of GluN1(FA+TL)/3A receptors, which are mutated to abolish glycine binding to GluN1, and that this inhibition is mediated by a non-competitive mechanism involving binding to the mutated GluN1 agonist binding domain (ABD) to negatively modulate glycine potency at GluN3A. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that CGP-78608 and L-689,560 binding or mutations in the GluN1 glycine binding site promote distinct conformations of the GluN1 ABD, suggesting that the GluN1 ABD conformation influences agonist potency and efficacy at GluN3 subunits. These results uncover the mechanism that enables activation of native GluN1/3A receptors by application of glycine in the presence of CGP-78608, but not L-689,560, and demonstrate strong intra-subunit allosteric interactions in GluN1/3 receptors that may be relevant to neuronal signaling in brain function and disease.

NMDA-type ionotropic glutamate receptors are composed of two glycine-binding GluN1 and two glutamate-binding GluN2 subunits. Simultaneous occupation of all 4 agonist binding domains allows the receptor to undergo all the conformational changes that lead to opening of the ion channel. Agonist-induced conformational changes in turn alter agonist affinity. Thus, the efficacy by which agonists induce conformational changes and channel gating influences the apparent affinity. Allosteric modulators influence the agonist-induced conformational changes and can therefore alter agonist binding affinity and efficacy.

N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors play critical roles in central nervous system function and are involved in variety of brain disorders. We previously developed a series of (R)-3-(5-furanyl)carboxamido-2-aminopropanoic acid glycine site agonists with pronounced variation in activity among NMDA receptor GluN1/2A-D subtypes. Here, a series of (R)-2-amino-3-triazolpropanoic acid analogues with a novel chemical scaffold is designed and their pharmacological properties are evaluated at NMDA receptor subtypes. We found that the triazole can function as a bioisostere for amide to produce glycine site agonists with variation in activity among NMDA receptor subtypes. Compounds 13g and 13i are full and partial agonists, respectively, at GluN1/2C and GluN1/2D with 3- to 7-fold preference in agonist potency for GluN1/2C-D over GluN1/2A-B subtypes. The agonist binding mode of these triazole analogues and the mechanisms by which the triazole ring can serve as a bioisostere for amide were further explored using molecular dynamics simulations. Thus, the novel (R)-2-amino-3-triazolpropanoic acid derivatives reveal insights to agonist binding at the GluN1 subunit of NMDA receptors and provide new opportunities for the design of glycine site agonists.

GRIN2B mutations are rare but often associated with patients having severe neurodevelopmental disorders with varying range of symptoms such as intellectual disability, developmental delay and epilepsy. Patient symptoms likely arise from mutations disturbing the role that the encoded NMDA receptor subunit, GluN2B, plays at neuronal connections in the developing nervous system. In this study, we investigated the cell-autonomous effects of putative gain- (GoF) and loss-of-function (LoF) missense GRIN2B mutations on excitatory synapses onto CA1 pyramidal neurons in organotypic hippocampal slices. In the absence of both native GluN2A and GluN2B subunits, functional incorporation into synaptic NMDA receptors was attenuated for GoF mutants, or almost eliminated for LoF GluN2B mutants. NMDA-receptor-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (NMDA-EPSCs) from synaptic GoF GluN1/2B receptors had prolonged decays consistent with their functional classification. Nonetheless, in the presence of native GluN2A, molecular replacement of native GluN2B with GoF and LoF GluN2B mutants all led to similar functional incorporation into synaptic receptors, more rapidly decaying NMDA-EPSCs and greater inhibition by TCN-201, a selective antagonist for GluN2A-containing NMDA receptors. Mechanistic insight was gained from experiments in HEK293T cells, which revealed that GluN2B GoF mutants slowed deactivation in diheteromeric GluN1/2B, but not triheteromeric GluN1/2A/2B receptors. We also show that a disease-associated missense mutation, which severely affects surface expression, causes opposing effects on NMDA-EPSC decay and charge transfer when introduced into GluN2A or GluN2B. Finally, we show that having a single null Grin2b allele has only a modest effect on NMDA-EPSC decay kinetics. Our results demonstrate that functional incorporation of GoF and LoF GluN2B mutants into synaptic receptors and the effects on EPSC decay times are highly dependent on the presence of triheteromeric GluN1/2A/2B NMDA receptors, thereby influencing the functional classification of NMDA receptor variants as GoF or LoF mutations. These findings highlight the complexity of interpreting effects of disease-causing NMDA receptor missense mutations in the context of neuronal function.

NMDA receptors mediate glutamatergic neurotransmission and are therapeutic targets due to their involvement in a variety of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Here, we describe the design and synthesis of a series of (R)-3-(5-furanyl)carboxamido-2-aminopropanoic acid analogues 8a-s as agonists at the glycine (Gly) binding site in the GluN1 subunit, but not GluN3 subunits, of NMDA receptors. These novel analogues display highly variable potencies and agonist efficacies among the NMDA receptor subtypes (GluN1/2A-D) in a manner dependent on the GluN2 subunit. Notably, compound 8p is identified as a potent partial agonist at GluN1/2C (EC50 = 0.074 μM) with an agonist efficacy of 28% relative to activation by Gly and virtually no agonist activity at GluN1/2A, GluN1/2B, and GluN1/2D. Thus, these novel agonists can modulate the activity of specific NMDA receptor subtypes by replacing the full endogenous agonists Gly or d-serine (d-Ser), thereby providing new opportunities in the development of novel therapeutic agents.