The generation of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) by tumours is an important pathway for neoplastic cell invasion and metastasis. Indeed in several tumour types, elevated levels of uPA, its receptor (uPAR) or its inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is associated with a poorer prognosis. Since endothelial cells also use this proteolytic system to remodel the extracellular matrix during angiogenesis and since angiogenesis, as assessed by microvessel density, is also a predictor of patient survival, this study was designed to investigate the relationship between angiogenesis and the urokinase system in breast tumours. The aims were to assess whether the uPA, uPAR and/or PAI-1 correlates with angiogenic activity and could therefore be a useful objective clinical measure of tumour neovascularization; and to clarify whether the poor outcome associated with high levels of the urokinase system is due to its association with angiogenesis. The study also sought to examine the relationship between the uPA system and vessel remodelling using loss of a basement membrane epitope (LH39) normally associated with established capillaries. The cytosolic levels of uPA, PAI-1 and uPAR were therefore measured by enzyme linked immunoabsorbent assay, together with tumour vascularity, in 136 well-characterized invasive breast carcinomas. There were significant relationships between uPA and uPAR (Spearman r=0.37, p<0.0001), uPA and PAI-1 (Spearman r=0.19, p=0.03) and between uPAR and PAI-1 (Spearman r=0.23 p=0.01). A significant correlation was also observed between PAI-1 and vessel remodelling (Spearman r=0.34, p=0.04), patient age (p=0.01), nodal status (p=0.047) and tumour grade (p=0.04), but no association between tumour vascularity and PAI (p=0.96), uPA (p=0.69) or uPAR (p=0.81) was present. No significant association was seen between any of the urokinase variables and expression of the angiogenic factor thymidine phosphorylase. Furthermore, no significant associations were found between any of the studied parameters and overall survival in a univariate analysis of the cancer patients. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model of overall survival showed that uPA (p=0.15), but not uPAR (p=0.52) or PAI-1 (p=0.61), gave no additional prognostic information. These findings show that uPA may work via an independent pathway to angiogenesis and therefore combined blockade of uPA and angiogenesis may have additional therapeutic benefits. It also shows, as recently demonstrated in animal models, that PAI-1 may be a key regulator of vascular remodelling in human cancer.

Editorial by Verspaget Invasion by cancer cells requires proteases such as the serine protease plasmin to degrade the cellular matrix. Plasmin is formed from its zymogen, plasminogen, a reaction catalysed by urokinase type plasminogen activator—which is implicated in invasion1—and partly regulated by plasminogen activator inhibitors. The active form of the inhibitor complexes with free and receptor bound active urokinase plasminogen activator and is bound by vitronectin in plasma and extracellular matrix.2A high concentration of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in biopsy specimens from tumours is associated with a poor prognosis,3 and some patients with ovarian cancer have raised plasma concentrations of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.4 We studied the prognostic importance of plasma concentrations of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in patients with colorectal …

The components of the plasminogen activation system have been reported to have prognostic impact in several cancer types, e.g. breast-, colon-, gastric- and lung cancer. Most of these studies have used quantification by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on tumour tissue extracts. However, results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) studies obtained by quantitative ELISA and semiquantitative immunohistochemistry differ. If the prognostic value of the components of the plasminogen activation system is to be exploited clinically in the future, it is important to choose an easy and valid methodology. In the present study we investigated levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), as quantitated by ELISA in tumour extracts from 64 NSCLC patients (38 squamous cell carcinomas, 26 adenocarcinomas), and compared them to staining intensity as semiquantitated by immunohistochemistry for PAI-1 and uPAR on corresponding cryostat sections. A significant association (r = 0.49, P < 0.0001) was found between the PAI-1 levels measured by ELISA and semiquantitated by immunohistochemistry. No association was found for uPAR. When correlating levels of PAI-1 and uPAR determined by ELISA and immunohistochemistry, respectively, to survival status, no significant correlation was found for any of the subgroups. At present neither of the methods examined in the present study can be recommended as superior for quantitating PAI-1 and uPAR with the aim of predicting prognosis. In conclusion, a larger comparative study is needed to clarify the relationship between ELISA and immunohistochemical results, before a methodology for clinical use can be chosen in non-small cell lung cancer.

The urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is involved in extracellular matrix degradation during cancer invasion. Binding of uPA to a specific cell surface receptor (uPAR) is a key step in this process. We have previously reported that high levels of uPAR in squamous cell lung cancer tissue extracts are associated with poor prognosis (Pedersen et al., Cancer Res 1994, 54, 4671–4675). Recently we found that uPAR is present in blood plasma from healthy donors as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemical cross-linking. We now report that uPAR in plasma from 17 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was significantly higher than in 30 healthy controls (P = 0.0004), while no significant increase was found in plasma from 14 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The increased levels of uPAR in the plasma from NSCLC patients is likely to be due to release of uPAR from the tumour tissue, and may, therefore, be related to prognosis.

Spreading of cancer cells is dependent on the combined action of several proteolytic enzymes, such as serine proteases, comprising the urokinase pathway of plasminogen activation. Previous studies of lung cancer indicate that expression, localization and prognostic impact of the components of the plasminogen activation system differ in the different non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) types, whereas the expression of the components in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has only sparingly been investigated. In the present study we investigate the presence of the components of the plasminogen activation system, and compare the levels of uPA, PAI-1 and uPAR in extracts of NSCLC-tissue and SCLC-tissue. A statistically significant difference, P = 0.037, was found between uPA-levels in NSCLC-patients (n = 75) and SCLC-patients (n = 8), the highest levels being found in NSCLC. No such difference was found for the two other components investigated, although a trend towards increased uPAR-levels was observed in SCLC, P = 0.055. The relationship between the levels of each of the components and other known clinical parameters was also analysed. No relationship was found between any of the components and the clinical parameters. This is the first report of a study using a quantitative method to compare levels of the components of the plasminogen activation system in tissue extracts from the two major lung cancer groups. The study shows that uPA, PAI-1 and uPAR are present in SCLC-tissue, suggesting that the plasminogen activation system could play a role in this type of cancer during invasion. In addition a difference in the levels of the components of the plasminogen activation system in NSCLC and SCLC is found, which could contribute to the differences in biology.

A sandwich-type ELISA has been developed for the assessment of complexes between urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) in extracts of squamous cell lung carcinomas. The assay is based on a combination of rabbit polyclonal anti-uPA antibodies and a biotinylated mouse anti-uPAR monoclonal antibody (MAb). The detection limit of the assay is approximately 0.5 fmol/ml. A linear dose-response is obtained with up to 40 fmol/ml of uPA:uPAR complexes, while uPA and uPAR separately do not cause any response in the ELISA. A buffer which has been used previously for optimal extraction of uPAR yields the highest amounts of uPA:uPAR complexes. Absorption of tumor extracts with anti-uPA or anti-uPAR MAbs results in a complete disappearance of the ELISA signal, demonstrating the specificity of the ELISA. The recovery of chemically cross-linked uPA:uPAR complexes added to tumor extracts varies between 80% and 105%. The intra- and inter-assay variation coefficients are 5.3% and 9.8%, respectively. Furthermore, a peptide antagonist for uPAR was employed to evaluate de novo uPA:uPAR complex formation during tumor tissue extraction and the immunoassay procedure. Our results strongly indicate that de novo complex formation is a major factor to consider and that complexes analyzed in the presence of this antagonist represent original uPA:uPAR complexes present prior to tumor tissue processing. The present ELISA appears suitable for studying the potential prognostic impact of uPA:uPAR complexes in lung tumor tissue as well as other types of cancer.

We have reported previously that both urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type 1 inhibitor (PAI-1) are statistically significant prognostic variables in patients with high-risk breast cancer (Grondahl-Hansen et al., Cancer Res., 53:2513-2521, 1993), and we recently described that the uPA receptor (uPAR) is a prognostic marker in postmenopausal, node-positive breast cancer patients (Grondahl-Hansen et al., Clin. Cancer Res., 1:1079-1087, 1995). The present retrospective study describes the prognostic impact of uPA, its receptor uPAR, and PAI-1 in breast cancer cytosol from 111 low-risk premenopausal patients and 184 low-risk postmenopausal patients with a median follow-up of 6.0 years (range, 3.8-14.9) and 7.4 (range, 3.7-14.0) years, respectively. uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 levels were determined by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and data were dichotomized using the median value as the cutoff for calculation of recurrence-free survival and overall survival. A correlation was found between the levels of each of the three molecules. In univariate analysis, high PAI-1 was significantly associated with short overall survival in postmenopausal patients [relative risk (RR), 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-4.3; P = 0.005] and shorter recurrence-free survival in both premenopausal (RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-4.7; P = 0.004) and postmenopausal (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9; P = 0.02) patients. Neither uPA nor uPAR reached statistical significance in the univariate analyses. The prognostic value of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 was then compared with that of other established prognostic variables by multivariate analysis. PAI-1 was an independent prognostic variable for recurrence-free survival in premenopausal patients, with a RR of 2.6 (95% CI, 1.3-5.0). For recurrence-free survival (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5) and overall survival (RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.7) in postmenopausal patients, PAI-1 was the only independent variable left in this group of patients. Neither uPA nor uPAR reached significance in the multivariate analysis. These data, together with previously published data on the prognostic significance of components of the urokinase plasminogen activation system in breast cancer cytosols, strongly indicate that PAI-1 is a statistically significant and independent prognostic marker in both low- and high-risk breast cancer patients.

The prognostic value of p53 protein in tumor extracts as measured by ELISA was studied retrospectively in 228 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The assay measures both wild-type and mutated p53. The specimens on which this study was performed have been used earlier to analyze the prognostic impact of components of the plasminogen activation system, which enabled an analysis of relationships between these components and p53 protein. The median of the p53 protein values in the 228 patients was 0.10 (range, 0-0.70) ng/mg protein. Survival analysis comparing patients with p53 levels below versus above the median showed no significant difference (P = 0.67). When analyzing the histological types, adenocarcinoma (n = 106), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 84), and large cell carcinoma of the lung (n = 38) separately, similarly, no significant differences in survival between patients having low versus high tumor p53 levels were found. When comparing levels of p53 protein in the three histological types, a significant difference (P < 0.0001) was found, with adenocarcinomas having the lowest levels. There was a weak positive correlation (r = 0.22) between p53 protein and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1). Multivariate analysis proved no impact of p53 on survival; tumor size, PAI-1, and lymph node involvement were the only variables with significant influence on survival. These data indicate that p53 protein quantitated with a sandwich ELISA in tumor extracts from NSCLC has no prognostic value, but the observed statistically significant difference of p53 protein content between histological subgroups may be related to differences in etiology and biology in different NSCLC subtypes. In addition, the weak association found between p53 protein and the independent prognostic marker PAI-1 could suggest yet undefined interactions in lung cancer.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is considered to play a key role in the process of invasion and metastasis. In several independent studies, in a variety of cancer types (e.g. of the breast, colon, stomach, lung, ovary), high antigen levels of uPA in tumour extracts have been associated with rapid disease progression. In these studies, different sets of antibodies and standards (often as commercially available uPA ELISA kits) have been used. The standards provided with the different uPA ELISA kits are different from each other in both composition and source. In addition, the different uPA ELISA kits use antibodies which differ in specificity and affinity for the various forms of uPA including pro-uPA, HMW-uPA, LMW-uPA, the aminoterminal fragment (ATF) and complexes with inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2) and the receptor (uPAR). Further, the composition of tumour tissue extraction buffers differ significantly among the published studies. Thus, it is not surprising that the ranges of cytosolic uPA levels reported differ considerably even when measured within the same tumour type. These discrepancies led the EORTC Receptor and Biomarker Study Group, in conjunction with the BIOMED-1 consortium on 'Clinical Relevance of Proteases in Tumour Invasion and Metastasis', to organise a workshop to study the characteristics associated with six different uPA immunoassays (ELISA) used in clinical studies reported in the literature. Although the absolute uPA antigen values measured with the respective uPA ELISA kits differed, high correlations were obtained for any two of the four uPA ELISA kits finally applied to sets of breast cancer cytosol preparations. The preparations used at present as standards in the various uPA ELISA kits are not representative of actual human breast cancer cytosols. Thus absolute standardisation is only possible by using a common reference sample (breast cancer cytosol) and similarly composed ELISA uPA kits. Then it will be possible to generate comparable data on clinical tissue as well as to check for batch-to-batch variations within particular ELISA kits.

Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is a proteolytic enzyme involved in degradation of the extracellular matrix during cancer invasion. The levels of uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1 in tumor extracts have previously been demonstrated to be of prognostic value in breast cancer as well as other types of cancer. We have previously characterized a specific cell surface receptor for uPA (uPAR) which strongly enhances the catalytic activity of uPA and is expressed during mammary cancer invasion. In order to quantitate uPAR in breast cancer tissue, we have now developed a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), with polyclonal catching antibodies and three monoclonal detecting antibodies. The detection limit of the assay is approximately 0.16 fmol of uPAR in a volume of 100 µl (1.6 pM). There is a linear relationship between signal and uPAR concentration up to at least 6.6 fmol per 100 µl (66 pM). Both free uPAR and uPAR in complex with uPA is detected. The recovery of an internal uPAR standard in breast cancer tissue extracts is above 87%. The intra-assay and inter-assay variation coefficients are 7% and 13%. In order to find a suitable buffer for extraction of various components of the uPA-system from breast cancer tissue, we tested buffers which previously have been used for optimal extraction of estrogen receptor (A), uPA (B), and uPAR (C). Buffer A and B extracted approximately 30% and 50%, respectively, of the amount of uPAR extracted with buffer C. Extracts of samples of breast cancer tissue from 94 patients all contained uPAR in amounts above the detection limit of the present assay, which appears suitable for studies of the potential prognostic value of uPAR in this disease. Significant correlations were found between uPAR, uPA and PAI-1 tumor levels.

Degradation of the extracellular matrix plays a crucial role in cancer invasion. This degradation is accomplished by the concerted action of several enzyme systems, including generation of the serine protease plasmin by the urokinase pathway of plasminogen activation, different types of collagenases and other metalloproteinases, and other extracellular enzymes. The degradative enzymes are involved also in tissue remodelling under non-malignant conditions, and the main difference appears to be that mechanisms which regulates these processes under normal conditions are defective in cancer. Specific inhibitors have been identified for most of the proteolytic enzymes, e.g. plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI's) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP's). It has been contemplated that these inhibitors counteracted the proteolytic activity of the enzymes, thereby inhibiting extracellular tissue degradation which in turn should prevent tumor cell invasion. This review focuses on plasminogen inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1). It is described that PAI-1 is not produced by the epithelial cancer cell but by the stromal cells in the tumors, suggesting a concerted action between stroma and tumor cells in the processes controlling proteolysis in cancer. The specific localization of PAI-1 to the tumor stroma and in many cases to areas surrounding the tumor vessels has lead us to suggest that PAI-1 serves to protect the tumor stroma from the ongoing uPA-mediated proteolysis. This hypothesis is supported by recent clinical data showing increased levels of PAI-1 in metastases as compared to the primary tumor as well as data demonstrating that high levels of PAI-1 in tumor extracts from breast, lung, gastric and ovarian cancer is associated with a shorter overall survival.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is a proteolytic enzyme which converts the proenzyme plasminogen to the active serine protease plasmin. A cell surface receptor for uPA (uPAR) is attached to the cell membrane by a glycosyl‐phosphatidylinositol anchor. Binding of uPA to uPAR leads to an enhanced plasmin formation and thereby an amplification of pericellular proteolysis. We have shown previously that uPAR is expressed on normal blood monocytes and granulocytes, but is deficient on affected blood monocytes and granulocytes in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH), and that uPAR is present in plasma from these patients. In this study a newly established sensitive enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been applied for quantttation of uPAR in plasma. Unexpectedly, we found that uPAR is not only present in PNH plasma but also in plasma from healthy individuals. In 39 healthy individuals the mean plasma‐uPAR value ±SD was 31 ± 15 pm, median 28 (range 11‐108), and the corresponding value for six PNH patients was 116±67 pm, median 90 (range 61‐228). The elevated uPAR‐level in PNH patients was highly significant (Mann‐Whitney test; P < 0.0001), and may possibly contribute to the propensity for thrombosis in PNH by inhibition of the fibrinolytic system. Binding of pro‐uPA by uPAR in plasma may interfere with the appropriate binding of pro‐uPA to cell‐bound uPAR and therefore inhibit cell‐associated plasmin generation and fibrinolysis. It is likely that the uPAR in normal plasma reflects the overall level of activity of the uPAR‐mediated cell surface proteolysis. The present ELISA may be used for studies of uPAR levels in plasma from patients with conditions in which this activity might be increased, such as cancer and inflammatory disorders. Future studies will determine if uPAR in plasma is a parameter of clinical importance in these diseases.

We have recently described the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type 1 inhibitor (PAI-1) as strong prognostic variables in breast cancer (J. A. Foekens et al., Cancer Res., 52: 6101-6105, 1992; J. Grondahl-Hansen et al., Cancer Res., 53: 2513-2521, 1993; J. A. Foekens et al., J. Clin. Oncol., 11: 899-908, 1994). A specific cell surface receptor (uPAR) binds uPA and strongly enhances plasmin generation, and the amount of uPAR in the tumor tissue might therefore be a rate-limiting factor in the extracellular proteolysis involved in tumor invasion. Here, we report on the prognostic value of uPAR in cytosolic (uPARc) and Triton (uPARt) extracts prepared from 505 primary breast tumors. The median observation time was 54 (range: 12-125) months. uPAR levels were determined by a sandwich ELISA. Univariate analysis showed that high uPAR levels (above the median value) were significantly associated with a shorter overall survival, showing a stronger discriminatory effect for uPARc [relative hazard rate (RHR): 1.47; P = 0.012)] as compared with uPARt (RHR, 1.33; P = 0.059), while no statistically significant differences were found for relapse-free survival. Multivariate analysis including all patients showed that when including other biochemical variables (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, PS2, cathepsin D, uPA, and PAI-1), the only retained independent variable via backward elimination was PAI-1 for both relapse-free survival and overall survival. When analyzed separately in clinically relevant subgroups, the prognostic value of uPAR was particularly strong in a subgroup of 201 node-positive postmenopausal women, showing considerably shorter overall (RHR: 2.39; P < 0.0001) and relapse free (RHR: 1.91; P = 0.0006) survival for patients with high uPARc content. High uPARt levels were also significantly associated with shorter overall survival in this subgroup of patients (RHR: 1.5; P = 0.047), but not with relapse-free survival (P = 0.64). Multivariate analysis, including the basic model, estrogen and progesterone receptors, PS2, cathepsin D, uPA, PAI-1, uPARc, and uPARt in the subgroup of postmenopausal node-positive patients, showed that only uPARc and PAI-1 were significant independent prognostic parameters, with respect to overall survival, RHRs being 2.72 (P < 0.0001) and 1.81 (P = 0.005), respectively. In multivariate analysis of relapse-free survival, uPARc, PAI-1, and uPA were independent parameters with respective relative relapse rates of 1.91 (P = 0.002) for uPARc, 1.68 (P = 0.02) for PAI-1, and 1.6 (P = 0.03) for uPA. These data lend support to the hypothesis that uPAR is an important molecule in plasmin-mediated extracellular matrix degradation leading to cancer cell dissemination and death of the patient.

In order to invade and spread, cancer cells must degrade extracellular matrix proteins. This degradation is catalyzed by the concerted action of several enzymes, including metalloproteases such as interstitial collagenases, type IV collagenases and stromelysins [1], and serine proteases such as plasmin [2]. Plasmin is formed from its precursor, plasminogen, by two activators: tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), which is involved in thrombolysis [3], and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), which plays a central role in tissue remodeling, including cancer invasion [2]. The activation of plasminogen is regulated by two specific plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2) [4]. Both uPA and PAI-1 are present in breast cancer tissue, and it was recently found that high levels of uPA [5–8] and PAI-1 [8,9] in breast cancer tissue are each associated with poor prognosis.

We have studied the prognostic value of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), uPA receptor (uPAR), and type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) in tumor extracts from 84 patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma and 38 patients with large cell lung carcinoma, measuring each molecule with sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. High uPAR levels were significantly associated with short overall survival in patients with squamous cell lung carcinomas when the median value was used as a cutoff point (P = 0.038), while no statistically significant prognostic impact of uPA and PAI-1 levels was found in this group of patients. The combination of high uPAR and high PAI-1 levels did, however, have a particular significant association with short overall survival (P = 0.008). None of the 3 components was found to have a statistically significant prognostic impact in the group of 38 large cell lung cancer patients. There was a positive correlation between uPAR and PAI-1 levels in both groups and between uPA and uPAR levels in the large cell carcinoma patients. In a multivariate analysis, high uPAR was found to be an independent prognostic variable in squamous cell carcinoma patients, with a relative risk of 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.0) and tumor size the only other significant prognostic parameter. These data suggest that uPAR is an important prognostic factor in squamous cell lung carcinoma. In addition to the potential direct clinical usefulness, this information could be helpful in understanding the biology of this disease and developing new therapeutic approaches.

The urokinase pathway of plasminogen activation is involved in proteolytic degradation of various tissues, including dissolution of the extracellular matrix and basement membranes during the process of cancer cell invasion. We have studied the prognostic value of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) in tumor extracts from 106 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. uPA and PAI-1 levels were determined by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. No correlation was found between uPA and PAI-1 (r = 0.23). High PAI-1 levels were significantly associated with short-duration overall survival (P = 0.017), while uPA levels showed no significant association with overall survival. Relating the levels of PAI-1 to other prognostic factors such as stage and age, no significant correlations were found. The prognostic impact of uPA and PAI-1 were investigated together with other prognostic factors in Cox multivariate analysis. PAI-1 was found to be an independent prognostic variable for survival, the relative risks being 1.5 (low versus medium PAI-1 values (95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and 2.2 (low versus high (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6)). In patients with stage I disease (69 patients) high levels of PAI-1 were significantly associated with poor prognosis compared to low levels (P = 0.037). These data indicate that PAI-1 is a potentially important prognostic factor in pulmonary adenocarcinoma and may as such be used to select patients with low stage and poor prognosis for adjuvant therapy subsequent to complete surgical resection.