Advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) carries a poor prognosis. Targeted therapy in GAC has traditionally been limited to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Recent years have brought immune checkpoint therapy to the GAC treatment landscape. However, continued discovery of targeted therapy in GAC is needed. Claudins, transmembrane proteins located in tight junctions of epithelial and endothelial cells, help regulate cellular polarity. Claudin dysregulation has been linked to cancers and other diseases. Claudin 18.2 specifically has become a new novel and exciting biomarker for GAC. Many agents are in the investigative pipeline, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric T-cell therapy. Recently, zolbetuximab, an anti-claudin 18.2 monoclonal antibody, was the first of these agents to get FDA approval. Here, we review zolbetuximab’s place in therapy along with other agents being explored.

INTRODUCTION:Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) represents a heterogeneous disease making treatment advancements difficult. Recently, claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as an exciting new target in GAC. Zolbetuximab, an anti-CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody, has now been FDA approved. AREAS COVERED:Phase 1, 2, and 3 zolbetuximab trials have been completed in GAC. Phase 3 trials evaluating zolbetuximab in combination with front-line fluoropyrimidine plus platinum therapy improved survival endpoints compared to placebo plus chemotherapy in those with high CLDN18.2 positivity (>75% of tumor cells). This led to zolbetuximab's FDA approval in this population. Here, we review aspects of zolbetuximab's pharmacology known at this time. EXPERT OPINION:Zolbetuximab is one of many agents targeting CLDN18.2 under development. Zolbetuximab in combination with chemotherapy has a slight impact on high CLDN18.2 expressed GAC to chemotherapy alone. Examining how to improve upon outcomes will be of benefit. Additionally, there are GAC subsets who may have benefit from zolbetuximab but need more close examination such as those with moderate CLDN18.2 expressed tumors, low CLDN18.2 expressed tumors, and CLD18-ARHGAP fusion patients.

Background/Objectives: Anal cancer is a rare malignancy with limited treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown benefits in some patients with metastatic disease, but predictive factors for immunotherapy response remain undefined. This study retrospectively evaluated clinical and pathological features associated with survival outcomes in metastatic anal cancer treated with immunotherapy. Methods: Data from 105 patients with metastatic anal cancer were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with subgroup comparisons utilizing the Mantel–Cox test. Associations between survival and clinicopathologic features were assessed with Fisher’s exact test. Results: Of the patients, 69 (65.7%) received immunotherapy during the first three treatment lines. With a median follow-up of 23.2 months, the median PFS for first-, second-, and third-line systemic therapies was 7.2, 3.7, and 4.7 months, respectively (χ2 = 14.2; p < 0.001). In the treatment-refractory setting, median PFS was similar for immunotherapy and chemotherapy: 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.3–4.9) vs. 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.8–5.0), respectively (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.60–1.3; p = 0.52). Among patients treated with immunotherapy, patients with lymph node-only metastases had significantly prolonged PFS compared to patients with visceral organ involvement (11.3 vs. 3.1 months; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.21–0.74; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients with lymph node-only metastatic anal cancer experienced significantly prolonged PFS with immunotherapy relative to those with involvement of other distant organs, highlighting a distinct subgroup of patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. We also contextualize PFS outcomes across treatment lines for metastatic anal cancer, which can be applied towards the design of future immunotherapy clinical trials.

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, including esophageal, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and gastric adenocarcinomas, remain a major global health concern, with poor overall survival and high recurrence rate despite aggressive treatment. Patients with very early tumors (cT1a) can benefit from endoscopic therapy. However, patients with locally advanced disease require multimodal therapies that may combine surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in the treatment of locally advanced upper GI adenocarcinomas. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative treatment, with perioperative chemotherapy emerging as the standard of care. While preoperative chemoradiation has demonstrated some benefits in esophageal and GEJ cancers, recent data suggest a more limited role for radiation going forward. Immunotherapy has shown some promise in both the adjuvant and perioperative settings but has yet to establish definitive survival benefit. The integration of HER2-targeted therapies into treatment regimens for HER2-positive locally advanced gastroesophageal cancers has not yielded significant improvements, underscoring the need for more effective strategies. Ongoing research focuses on better predictive biomarkers, personalized treatment approaches, and potential organ preservation strategies for patients achieving a clinical complete response. Continued advancements in treatment modalities and precision medicine are critical to improving survival for patients with locally advanced upper GI adenocarcinomas.

INTRODUCTION:Gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEACs) continue to carry a poor prognosis in most patients. New and exciting therapies have entered the treatment landscape in recent years. Prior to these recent approvals, treatment advances had been limited. AREAS COVERED:Important treatment decision biomarkers for metastatic GEAC are microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, programmed-death ligand 1, and claudin 18.2 expression among others (such as Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) and agnostic biomarkers). Results of these biomarkers drive therapy decisions. Second-line treatment in most cases is less biomarker driven and needs further progress. EXPERT OPINION:Studies of molecular subsets in GEAC has led to the understanding that these are heterogenous diseases that need to be treated differently. Other biomarkers with targeted therapies are being studied including fibroblast growth factor receptor, trophoblast cell surface antigen-2, and epidermal growth factor receptor. Additionally, epidemiological distinctions are starting to drive therapy such as in EBV in GAC.

Background: The clinical impact of SMARCA4 mutations (SMARCA4ms) in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) remains underexplored. This study aimed to examine the association of SMARCA4ms with clinical outcomes and co-occurrence with other gene mutations identified through a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in GEA patients. Methods: A total of 256 patients with metastatic or recurrent GEA who underwent NGS panel profiling at the MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2016 and 2022 were included. Comparative analyses were performed to assess clinical outcomes related to SMARCA4ms. The frequency and types of SMARCA4ms and their co-occurrence with other gene mutations were also examined. Results: SMARCA4ms were identified in 19 patients (7.4%). These SMARCA4ms were significantly associated with non-signet ring cell subtype (p = 0.044) and PD-L1 positive expression (p = 0.046). No difference in survival between the SMARCA4m and SMARCA4-normal group was observed (p = 0.84). There were significant associations between SMARCA4ms and FANCA, IGF1R, KRAS, FANCL, and PTEN alterations. Notably, 15 of the 19 SMARCA4m cases involved SNV missense mutations, with frequent co-occurrences noted with TP53, KRAS, ARID1A, and ERBB2 mutations. Conclusions: These results serve as the first comprehensive examination of the relationship between SMARCA4ms and clinical outcomes in GEA.

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) continues to be a prevalent worldwide malignancy and a leading cause of cancer death, and it is frequently cited as incurable. Targeted therapy in GAC has lagged behind other solid tumors. The human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) represented the single target in GACs for many years, seen in approximately 20% of patients with advanced GAC. Recent advances in management now include the addition of immunotherapy checkpoint inhibition to select front-line advanced GACs. Unfortunately, outcomes remain poor for most patients. We anticipate finding a key to future discoveries in GACs in next-generation sequencing and more targeted approaches. Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a therapeutic target in GACs. CLDN18.2 is reportedly expressed in 14–87% of GACs, and CLDN18.2 is available for monoclonal antibody (mAb) binding as it is expressed on the outer cell membrane. Here, we review the exploration of CLDN18.2 as a target in GACs via the use of zolbetuximab (IMAB362). Zolbetuximab is now under priority FDA review for GACs, and we eagerly await the review outcome.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and microsatellite (MS) status are well-established biomarkers in gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEAs). However, it is unclear how the combination of these biomarkers is associated with clinicopathological factors and prognosis. This retrospective study included baseline metastatic GEA patients who were tested for all three biomarkers (HER2, PD-L1, and MS status) at the MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2012 and 2022. Stratification was performed according to the combination of biomarker profiles: triple negative (TN), single positive (SP), and multiple positive (MP). Comparative analyses of clinicopathological factors and survival using combinations of biomarkers were performed. Among the 698 GEA patients analyzed, 251 (36.0%) were classified as TN, 334 (47.9%) as SP, and 113 (16.1%) as MP. The MP group showed a significant association with tumors located in the esophagus (p < .001), well to moderate differentiation (p < .001), and the absence of signet ring cells (p < .001). In the survival analysis, MP group had a significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to the other groups (MP vs. TN, p < .001 and MP vs. SP, p < .001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that MP serves as an independent positive prognostic indicator for OS (hazard ratio = 0.63, p < .01). Our findings indicate that MP biomarkers are associated with a favorable prognosis in metastatic GEA. These results are reflective of clinical practice and offer valuable insights into how therapeutics and future biomarkers could influence therapy/prognosis.

PURPOSE GI medical oncology care presents unique medication challenges. Here, we captured our clinical pharmacy specialists' (CPSs) involvement in patients with GI cancers starting cycle 1 of a new treatment. METHODS Our quality initiative was performed in three stages (preintervention, intervention, and postintervention). Preintervention: retrospective baseline data collection from May to December 2019. Intervention: one-time telephone encounters were conducted by a CPS between March 15 and June 11, 2021. The primary objective of the quality improvement initiative was to increase patient interaction with a CPS to 80%. Postintervention: data collection to review the impact of CPS telephone encounters. RESULTS Preintervention: we reviewed the electronic health records of 262 patients. Sixty nine percent of patients reported at least one adverse event (AE; range 1-6 AEs) at the first physician follow-up after treatment start. Most reported AEs (78%) were considered modifiable within the scope of CPS practice. Postintervention: during the intervention, 92% of patients (n = 389) received a telehealth encounter with the CPS. At the encounter, 315 patients (81%) reported at least one AE. CPS provided recommendations and/or additional education for 88% of reported AEs. Medication lists required correction 75% of the time. The median time for CPS encounters (including documentation) was 40 minutes. CONCLUSION During a 3-month period, this quality improvement initiative successfully provided an early CPS-based telehealth intervention to identify and make initial recommendations for management of AEs for patients on cycle 1 of systemic therapy for GI cancer.

201 Background: Clinical benefit and survival data utilizing later lines of therapy with TAS in metastatic CRC is limited, highlighting the need for better patient selection (Mayer, NEJM 2015). Recently, codon-specific KRAS mutations have been implicated as biomarkers for TAS treatment. KRAS G12 was associated with a lack of benefit and G13 displayed improved benefit (Van de Haar, Nat Med 2023) However, it is unknown whether this differential prognostic impact occurs on TAS + Bev which has now supplanted TAS as the standard of care (Prager, NEJM 2023). Methods: We retrospectively investigated outcomes in a cohort of 100 mCRC patients treated with TAS + Bev for ≥1 month between September 2019 and April 2023 at MD Anderson (cohort A) using institutional databases. For validation, a cohort of 205 mCRC patients from the Tempus database was used (cohort B). Mutation status was determined from tissue biopsy using clinical NGS (Beaubier, Nat Biotechnol 2019). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), determined by Kaplan Meier estimators and risk set adjustment methods and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two cohorts; in cohort A, 52% (N = 52) patients were male and median age at diagnosis was 56 years (IQR:47-61y). Correspondingly, 56% (N = 93) of cohort B were male and the median age at diagnosis was 56 (IQR: 47-66y). The table shows the distribution of codon-specific RAS mutations and their OS across the two cohorts. Comparative analysis of median OS (mOS) between KRAS G12, KRAS G13 and RAS/RAF-WT subgroups showed no significant differences (p=0.06 and 0.94 for cohort A and B, respectively). Conclusions: In this cohort of mCRC treated with TAS-Bev, codon-specific KRAS mutations did not appear to predict survival benefit, unlike previously reported for TAS treated patients. Overall, KRAS G13 mutated patients appeared to have a worse outcome. Further investigations into codon-specific impact are required prior to incorporating this for patient selection for treatment. *G. Maddalena and Y. van der Pol as co-first authors. [Table: see text]

Efforts to improve the prognosis for patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma have focused on neoadjuvant approaches to increase the pathological complete response (pathCR) rate, improve surgical resection, and prolong event-free and overall survival (OS). Building on the recent evidence that PD-1 inhibition plus chemotherapy improves the OS of patients with metastatic GEJ adenocarcinoma, we evaluated whether the application of this strategy in the neoadjuvant setting would improve the pathological response. This single-center phase I/II trial evaluated the safety, toxicity, and efficacy of neoadjuvant atezolizumab with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX) followed by esophagectomy followed by atezolizumab. The primary objective goal was to achieve 20% pathCR. From the twenty enrolled patients, eighteen underwent resection and two (10%, 95% CI: 1.24–31.7%) achieved pathCR. After a median follow-up duration of 40.7 months, 11 patients had disease recurrence and 10 had died. The median disease-free and OS were 28.8 (95% CI: 14.7, NA) and 38.6 months (95% CI: 30.5, NA), respectively. No treatment-related adverse events led to death. Although modified FOLFOX plus atezolizumab did not achieve the expected pathCR, an acceptable safety profile was observed. Our results support the continued development of a more refined strategy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus perioperative immunotherapy/targeted agents) with molecular/immune profiling in parallel.

INTRODUCTION:Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) remains a prevalent cancer worldwide and its incidence is increasing in South America. The heterogenous nature of GAC makes advances in management challenging. AREAS COVERED:Despite challenges, recent therapeutic targets are individualizing treatment. For localized disease with microsatellite-instability-high/deficient mismatch repair, immunotherapy is now an adopted practice. In the advanced unresectable setting, those harboring human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) expression continue to be a separate entity. EXPERT OPINION:Future targets are developing. Among these include claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b), and trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (TROP-2). FDA approval of zolbetuximab's, an anti-CLDN 18.2 monoclonal antibody, is expected soon. Additionally, bemarituzumab, ananti-FGFR2b monoclonal antibody, has shown improvements in combination with chemotherapy in those with HER2 negative GAC with FGFR2 overexpression. This combination is now being investigated in a phase 3 trial. Lastly, TROP-2 has emerged as an exciting solid tumor target and study is expected in GAC. All three of these therapeutic targets have seen an abundance of drug development in recent years, and we anticipate newer targeted agents driving therapeutic decisions in GAC in the coming years.

Background: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is rare. Most cases are diagnosed in a localized setting. Metastatic SCCA is rare, and investigation has been limited in the past for these patients. We believe that hepatic-only metastatic disease could have a unique treatment landscape compared to diseases with diffuse metastatic involvement. Here, we describe cases at our institution. Methods: We reviewed eight SCCA cases with hepatic-only metastatic disease (diagnosed February 2018–January 2022). The objectives were to determine the overall survival and disease-free survival with this approach. Results: The median age was 62 years old (yo). Patients had an ECOG of 0–1. All patients received definitive chemoradiation to their primary anal tumor. A median of three months of neoadjuvant systemic therapy was provided. All patients had a response on their first scan after systemic therapy. Sixty-two percent received carboplatin + paclitaxel. A complete pathologic response was seen in 62% of patients. At their last follow-up, all patients were alive. Three patients had recurrent disease. The estimated 1-year disease-free survival probability was 56.2%. Conclusion: Our report shows the feasibility of a curative-intent approach for patients with hepatic-only metastatic SCCA following the neoadjuvant application of carboplatin + paclitaxel. This approach appears promising in these select patients and warrants further investigation.

Gastric adenocarcinomas are a significant cause of cancer and cancer death, globally. The curative approach for those with diagnosed localized disease is with surgical resection and an adjunctive approach of perioperative chemotherapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, or postoperative chemoradiation. Unfortunately, a universal standard approach is lacking for adjunctive therapy which in part has limited the progress achieved in this area. Metastatic disease is common in the Western world at diagnosis. Metastatic disease is treated palliatively with systemic therapy. Targeted therapy has stalled in approvals in gastric adenocarcinomas. Recently, we have seen the exploration of promising targets along with the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors in select patients. Here, we review recent advances seen in gastric adenocarcinomas.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is a well-known cancer target. Many HER2-targeted agents are marketed and being investigated. Unfortunately, these therapies lack consistent responses and outcomes amongst different tumors. Questions remain as to why HER2 biology is different in different tumor types. Gastric adenocarcinomas (GACs) demonstrate both intra- and inter-tumor HER2 expression heterogeneity and show discordance amongst primary and metastatic disease sites. This creates barriers in determining HER2 agents’ effectiveness and contributes to the failure of some HER2-targeted agents in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced GACs. Trastuzumab deruxtecan, an antibody drug conjugate of trastuzumab with a topoisomerase inhibitor, was recently approved for the treatment of refractory HER2-positive advanced GAC patients. There are exciting and newer therapies under investigation. Examining resistance patterns (both adaptive and acquired) along with establishing a better understanding of the intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity is necessary to ensure successful progress. Here we review the current status of HER2-targeted therapy in GACs. We additionally review newer therapies under investigation and their potential role in HER2 GACs.

The CROSS trial group deserves enormous credit for completing a well-powered randomized trial that has established the CROSS strategy as a standard of care for patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. However, the 10-year results are rather disappointing with only 38% of all patients treated with the CROSS strategy cured compared with approximately 25% who had surgery alone. Another standard, perioperative chemotherapy has produced similar disappointing results as the CROSS strategy. Although many of us are consumed by the question as to which option is better for our patients, we conclude that both strategies produce only marginal benefits. We should have better treatment options. The timing may be opportune to reflect on how to develop novel and rational strategies rather than propagate the historical empiric approaches.

Mr. B is a 56-year-old man diagnosed with metastatic HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. He received front-line leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and trastuzumab for 10 months before restaging imaging revealed progressive disease. He then received second-line trastuzumab deruxtecan. His treatment was complicated by several admissions felt to be unrelated to his cancer therapy. He was discharged after an episode of pneumonia on a steroid taper with prophylactic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Once he recovered, he was given a fourth dose of chemotherapy. About a week later, wheezes were noticed on physical exam, and he was given a 5-day course of levofloxacin. Around the same time, he also finished his steroid taper. Twelve days after his dose of chemotherapy, he presented to the emergency room with 3 to 4 days of progressive shortness of breath and dry cough following the completion of levofloxacin without symptom improvement. A CT scan showed increasing airspace opacities and multifocal areas of consolidation. Blood, nasal, and sputum cultures were negative. A bronchoscopy was performed that did not reveal findings concerning for capillaritis. He was ultimately diagnosed with drug-induced pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease (ILD). Mr. B continued to experience worsening hypoxic respiratory failure despite continuous IV steroids. He was discharged to an inpatient hospice facility where he passed away 2 weeks later. Drug-induced pneumonitis/ILD should be considered in all patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan who develop progressive shortness of breath or other respiratory complaints.