BACKGROUND:With evolving therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the benefits of adding a defibrillator in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain unclear, particularly for nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). This study evaluates long-term survival among patients with NICM treated with CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) versus CRT pacemaker (CRT-P). METHODS:DECIDE-CRT (Cardiac Resynchronization With or Without Defibrillator in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy) is a multicenter cohort study across 170 US Veterans Affairs hospitals. We identified patients with NICM receiving primary-prevention CRT-P or CRT-D between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2020. Using a propensity score approach, we applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline characteristics between the CRT-P and CRT-D groups. An inverse probability of treatment weighting-weighted Cox model estimated hazards for all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included generator replacement, device-related infections, hospitalization for heart failure, and ventricular arrhythmias. RESULTS:Of 16 609 CRT recipients, 3965 met NICM primary-prevention criteria (CRT-D=3158; CRT-P=807). At baseline, patients with NICM receiving CRT-P were much older, with more cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbidities compared with the CRT-D group. During the median follow-up of 5.2 years, the mortality rate for CRT-P versus CRT-D was 9.46 versus 9.21 per 100 person-years (RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.71-1.13]; P=0.66). The adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality using the inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox model was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.71-1.13; P=0.34). There was no difference in adjusted hazard for heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.86-1.87]), while the CRT-D group had higher rates of generator replacement and device-related infections. CONCLUSIONS:This nationwide observational study from the Veterans Affairs Health system did not demonstrate a clear survival advantage with the addition of a defibrillator among patients with NICM receiving CRT although residual confounding cannot be excluded. Given the uncertainty surrounding the incremental benefit of the defibrillator in this setting, a randomized trial is needed to test the incremental value of CRT-D over CRT-P in NICM.

Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in reducing the risk of hospital admission for heart failure and mortality in a contemporary nationwide cohort of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).Design Nationwide cohort study (REFINE-HFpEF).Setting 170 veteran health medical centres across the US, 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2021.Participants 2177 patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF; 1129 patients were newly prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors and 1048 were newly prescribed dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors or sulfonylureas.Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite of all cause mortality and hospital admission for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included all cause mortality only and serial changes in body weight. Hazard ratios were derived from Cox proportional hazards models, incorporating inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores to account for confounding.Results From a validated cohort of 179 288 patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF, the study included 1129 new users of SGLT2 inhibitors (active treatment) and 1048 new users of DPP4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas (comparators). After a median follow-up of 2.63 years, 46.4% of the study population had at least one hospital admission for heart failure (n=1011) and the overall mortality rate was 45.9% (n=1000). Use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a relative risk reduction in the primary composite outcome of 18% compared with the use of DPP4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.96; P=0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio for all cause mortality only was 0.73 (0.60 to 0.89; P=0.002). Weight loss was similar in the two groups.Conclusions In this large, contemporary, nationwide cohort of patients with HFpEF, type 2 diabetes, and high event rates, starting SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a significantly lower risk of hospital admission for heart failure and all cause mortality compared with starting treatment with DPP4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas.

Phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients create a complex nexus between cardiac treatment and psychological distress. These sensations, mimicking therapeutic shocks without device activation, deeply affect patients' functionality and well-being. Heightened anxiety, depression, and hopelessness predispose individuals to these occurrences, posing significant challenges. This article delves into the intricate nature of phantom shocks, highlighting subtle clinical cues to differentiate them from genuine therapy shocks. Through a case study of a 75-year-old male with recurrent ICD shocks, diagnosed eventually with phantom shocks, the interplay between psychological distress and physical sensations is underscored. Urgent intervention to address the patient's anxiety and depression using psychotherapy and antidepressants became imperative. The case underscores the immense psychological toll of phantom shocks, exacerbating fear, hopelessness, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite treatment attempts, their impact persisted, leading to a shift to comfort-focused care. While research identifies factors such as education levels and prior therapy, predicting and managing phantom shocks remains challenging. This article stresses the need for clinician vigilance, urging proactive identification and tailored interventions to mitigate the profound effects of phantom shocks. The current research landscape lacks comprehensive strategies, necessitating further exploration and targeted therapies to restore patient well-being. In conclusion, comprehensive understanding and specialized care for phantom shocks in ICD recipients, addressing both cardiac and psychological aspects, are imperative. Early recognition and tailored interventions offer promise in alleviating their adverse effects, reinstating patient control, and improving their quality of life.

INTRODUCTION:Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common following open heart surgery, and is associated with significant morbidity. Medications used for ventricular rate control of POAF may not be effective in controlling rapid ventricular rates during the postoperative period because of increased sympathetic tone. The purpose of this study was to develop nonpharmacologic rate control of POAF by atrioventricular node (AVN) fat pad stimulation using clinically available temporary pacing wires in the canine sterile pericarditis model. METHODS:We studied 10 sterile pericarditis dogs in the closed-chest state on postoperative days 1-3. The AVN fat pad stimulation (amplitude 2-15 mA; frequency 20 Hz; pulse width 0.03-0.2 ms) was performed during sustained POAF (>5 min). We measured ventricular rate and inefficient ventricular contractions during sustained POAF and compared it with and without AVN fat pad stimulation. Also, the parameters of AVN fat pad stimulation to achieve a rate control of POAF were measured over the postoperative days. RESULTS:Eleven episodes of sustained POAF were induced in 5/10 sterile pericarditis dogs in the closed-chest state on postoperative days 1-2. During POAF, the AVN fat pad stimulation decreased the ventricular rate from 178 ± 52 bpm to 100 ± 8 bpm in nine episodes. Nonpharmacologic rate control therapy successfully controlled the ventricular rate and eliminated inefficient ventricular contractions during POAF for the duration of the AVN fat pad stimulation. The AVN fat pad stimulation output remained relatively stable over the postoperative days. CONCLUSION:During sustained POAF, nonpharmacologic rate control by AVN fat pad stimulation effectively and safely controlled rapid ventricular rates throughout the postoperative period.

Trans catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) represents a revolutionary treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are at high surgical risk. The rate of periprocedural complications has decreased over time. However, the incidence of conduction disease requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation has failed to decrease. The decision for PPM for conduction disease post TAVR is usually made based on ECG. It's not uncommon for patients with conduction disease without evidence for infra-nodal block to receive a PPM, and pacing has been shown to have deleterious effects.

This case report describes a patient in their 60s with shortness of breath who tested positive for COVID-19.

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves survival in patients with heart failure and severely reduced left ventricular systolic function (LVEF). Limited data exist regarding adverse cardiovascular event rates after CABG in patients with heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF; LVEF > 40% and < 55%).Methods: We analyzed data on isolated CABG patients from the Veterans Affairs national database (2010-2019). We stratified patients into control (normal LVEF and no heart failure), HFmrEF, and heart failure with reduced LVEF (HFrEF) groups. We compared all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization rates between groups with a Cox model and recurrent events analysis, respectively.Results: In 6533 veterans, HFmrEF and HFrEF was present in 1715 (26.3%) and 566 (8.6%) respectively; the control group had 4252 (65.1%) patients. HFrEF patients were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (59%), insulin therapy (36%), and pre-vious myocardial infarction (31%). Anemia was more prevalent in patients with HFrEF (49%) as was a lower serum albumin (mean, 3.6 mg/dL). Compared with the control group, a higher risk of death was observed in the HFmrEF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3 [1.2-1.5)] and HFrEF (HR, 1.5 [1.2-1.7]) groups. HFmrEF patients had the higher risk of myocardial infarction (subdistribution HR, 1.2 [1-1.6]; P 1/4 .04). Risk of heart failure hospitalization was higher in patients with HFmrEF (HR, 4.1 [3.5-4.7]) and patients with HFrEF (HR, 7.2 [6.2-8.5]).Conclusions: Heart failure with midrange ejection fraction negatively affects sur-vival after CABG. These patients also experience higher rates myocardial infarction and heart failure hospitalization. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;165:149-58)

Background: Phase analysis has been used to identify and localize atrial fibrillation (AF) sources for targeted ablation. We previously demonstrated that repetitive wannabe reentry (incomplete reentry) often generated an apparent stable rotor using phase analysis. The misinterpretation caused by phase analysis using atrial electrograms (AEGs) may result from detecting inaccurate time points at phase inversion (π to −π) in the instantaneous phase waveform converted from AEG. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of phase analysis to detect atrial activations recorded from the high-density mapping of AF in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent (LSP) AF. Methods and Results: During open heart surgery, we recorded activation from both atria simultaneously using 512 electrodes in 7 patients with persistent and LSP AF. The phase analysis was compared to manual measurements during 4 s of data. For the accuracy of activation sequence maps, a successful recording site was defined as having ≤4 mismatched activation times during the 4 s. In all AF episodes, the accuracy of the phase analysis was only 82% of the total number of activation times due to either activation time differences (14.7%), under-sensing (2.7%), or over-sensing (0.6%). Only 67.9% of the total recording sites met the requirement of a successful recording site by phase analysis. In unsuccessful recording sites, AEG characteristics were relatively irregular cycle length (CL), complex AEG, and double potential AEG. Conclusion: The phase analysis was less accurate in recording sites with a relatively irregular CL, complex AEG, or double potential AEG. As a result, phase analysis may lead to the misinterpretation of atrial activation patterns during AF. A visual review of the original AEG is needed to confirm the detected AF sources of phase analysis before performing targeted ablation.

Background: Registries show international variations in the characteristics and outcome of patients with heart failure (HF), but national samples are rarely large, and case selection may be biased owing to enrolment in academic centers. National administrative datasets provide large samples with a low risk of bias. In this study, we compared the characteristics, health care resource use (HRU) and outcomes of patients with primary HF hospitalizations (HFH) using electronic health records (EHR) from 4 high-income countries (United States, UK, Taiwan, Japan) on 3 continents. Methods and Results: We used electronic health record to identify unplanned HFH between 2012 and 2014. We identified 231,512, 10,991, 36,900, and 133,982 patients with a primary HFH from the United States, the UK, Taiwan, and Japan, respectively. HFH per 100,000 population was highest in the United States and lowest in Taiwan. Fewer patients in Taiwan and Japan were obese or had chronic kidney disease. The length of hospital stay was shortest in the United States (median 4 days) and longer in the UK, Taiwan, and Japan (medians of 7, 9, and 17 days, respectively). HRU during hospitalization was highest in Japan and lowest in UK. Crude and direct standardized in-hospital mortality was lowest in the United States (direct standardized rates 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.7%-1.9%) and progressively higher in Taiwan (direct standardized rates 3.9, 95% CI 3.8%-4.1%), the UK (direct standardized rates 6.4, 95% CI 6.1%-6.7%), and Japan (direct standardized rates 6.7, 95% CI 6.6%-6.8%). The 30-day all-cause (25.8%) and HF (7.2%) readmissions were highest in the United States and lowest in Japan (11.9% and 5.1%, respectively). Conclusions: Marked international variations in patient characteristics, HRU, and clinical outcomes exist; understanding them might inform health care policy and international trial design.Y

Background:New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with increased long-term stroke and mortality. Anticoagulation has been suggested as a potential therapy, but data on safety and efficacy are scant. Objectives:To determine the association between anticoagulation for POAF and long-term outcomes. Methods:Adult patients with POAF after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) were identified through the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database and linked to the Medicare Database. Propensity-matched analyses were performed for all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and major bleeding for patients discharged with or without anticoagulation. Interaction between anticoagulation and CHA2DS2-VASc score was also assessed. Results:Of 38,936 patients, 9861 (25%) were discharged on oral anticoagulation. After propensity score matching, discharge anticoagulation was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.26). There was no difference in ischemic stroke between groups (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15), but there was significantly higher bleeding (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.38-1.85) among those discharged on anticoagulation. Myocardial infarction was lower in the first 30 days for those discharged on anticoagulation, but this effect decreased over time. The incidence of all complications was higher for patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥5 compared to patients with scores of 2-4. Anticoagulation did not appear to benefit either subgroup. Conclusion:Anticoagulation is associated with increased mortality after new-onset POAF following CABG. There was no reduction in ischemic stroke among those discharged on anticoagulation regardless of CHA2DS2-VASc score.

Aims Despite the common occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), there is limited evidence to guide revascularization. Methods and Results We investigated the long‐term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with HF and significant CAD across the spectrum of ejection fraction, using a large national cohort of patients from the Veteran Affairs (VA) Medical Centers in the US. Patients with HF were stratified into groups, HFpEF, HF with mid‐range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and compared to patients with no preoperative HF. We analysed 10 396 patients. Despite an increased hazard in the first year following revascularization, the long‐term survival (median follow‐up 6.6 years; interquartile range 3.7–10.1) of HFpEF post‐CABG was similar to controls (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.68‐1.06), but survival progressively declined with HFmrEF and HFrEF. Similar trends were seen with recurrent HF hospitalization with lower risk with baseline HFpEF (43.9 ± 6.9/100 patient‐years) compared to HFmrEF (65.9 ± 3.8/100 patient‐years) and HFrEF (93.4 ± 4.8/100 patient‐years). Although HFpEF patients had lower mortality and HF hospitalization post‐CABG compared to patients with a lower ejection fraction, they experienced the highest rates of future myocardial infarction. Conclusion Although HFpEF patients with CAD have greater short‐term risk post‐CABG, their long‐term survival is comparable to controls. However, they are at increased risk for HF hospitalizations and myocardial infarction. These data support the safety of CABG in HFpEF patients and suggest continuum of mortality risk for ischaemic HF when stratified by baseline ejection fraction before revascularization.

OBJECTIVES This study was to test the hypotheses that: 1) when using phase analysis, repetitive Wannabe re-entry produces a phase singularity point (i.e., a rotor); and 2) the location of the stable rotor is dose to the focal source. BACKGROUND Recent contact mapping studies in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) demonstrated that phase analysis produced a different mechanistic result than classical activation sequence analysis. Our studies in patients with persistent AF showed that focal sources sometimes produced repetitive Wannabe re-entry, that is, incomplete reentry. METHODS During open heart surgery, we recorded activation from both atria simultaneously using 510 to 512 electrodes in 12 patients with persistent AF. We performed activation sequence mapping and phase analyses on 4 s of mapped data. For each detected stable rotor (>2 full rotations [720 degrees] recurring at the same site), the corresponding activation patterns were examined from the activation sequence maps. RESULTS During AF, phase singularity points (rotors) were identified in both atria in all patients. However, stable phase singularity points were only present in 6 of 12 patients. The range of stable phase singularity points per patient was 0 to 6 (total 14). Stable phase singularity points were produced due to repetitive Wannabe re-entry generated from a focal source or by passive activation. A conduction block sometimes created a stable phase singularity point (n = 2). The average distance between a focal source and a stable rotor was 0.9 + 0.3 cm. CONCLUSIONS Repetitive Wannabe re-entry generated stable rotors adjacent to a focal source. No true re-entry occurred. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Achieving Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with Biventricular pacing(BiVP) pacing for patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure (HF), left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and ventricular dyssynchrony is well established and is currently the standard of care. Multiple studies have demonstrated significant improvement in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV heart failure who underwent resynchronization therapy1,2. In addition, resynchronization therapy is associated with survival benefit3. However, one third of patients do not respond to BIVP. New modalities for resynchronization have emerged namely His bundle pacing (HBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP). In this paper, we will review the benefits and limitations of BiVP and also the role of new pacing modalities such as HBP and LVSP in patients with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and electrical dysynchrony.