BACKGROUND:Developing clinical reasoning is a critical component of physiotherapy education. Active strategies such as simulation- and digital-based learning have been proposed to enhance these skills. However, their effectiveness, but also the best modalities remain largely unknown. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various educational strategies on clinical reasoning among physiotherapy students and clinicians. METHODS:A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Central was conducted for studies published between January 1, 2015 and February 28, 2026. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials, controlled before - after studies, pre - post studies, and quasi-experimental designs. Methodological quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) for quantitative studies and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for qualitative or mixed-methods studies. Data were narratively synthesized by grouping studies into three pedagogical categories: (i) simulation- and digital-based learning, (ii) active and case-based learning methods, and (iii) structured educational programs and training. RESULTS:Thirty four studies (n = 3,048 participants) of moderate-to-high methodological quality were included in this study. Participants ranged from entry-level physiotherapy students to licensed clinicians. Simulation- and digital-based approaches, such as standardized patients, virtual reality, mobile applications, and computer-assisted learning, showed consistent improvements in clinical decision-making and performance, as well as gains in self-efficacy and motivation. Active and case-based learning strategies, including problem-based learning and concept mapping, were associated with increased satisfaction, reflective practice, and usability. Structured programs, such as residencies, workshops, and mentorship models, produced notable benefits in decision-making, self-efficacy, and professional attitudes. Overall, simulation-, digital-based and structured programs demonstrated the most consistent evidence of effectiveness across studies. CONCLUSION:Simulation, digital technologies, active learning, and structured programs effectively foster clinical reasoning in physiotherapy education. Simulation-based and active approaches appear particularly impactful. Future research should emphasize high-quality randomized trials and long-term outcomes, including patient-related measures.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal disorder and a major cause of disability, posing growing challenges for healthcare systems worldwide. Conventional supervised clinical assessments provide valuable insights but are largely limited to cross-sectional snapshots and often fail to reflect the variability of real-world functioning, physical activity patterns, and symptom fluctuations experienced by individuals with OA, especially those with knee OA. This perspective introduces a multisensor digital phenotyping framework for smart knee OA assessment, integrating supervised laboratory evaluations with unsupervised continuous monitoring in daily living environments using wearable sensors, smart insoles, activity trackers, and mobile devices. Feasibility was tested in 40 participants (20 knee OA patients, 20 controls). Raw data from questionnaires, electronic goniometry, dynamometry, force plate, connected insoles, and seven-day home monitoring were harmonized via a standardized pipeline aligned with the ICF framework. The pipeline employed anomaly detection, missing data imputation, z-score normalization, and cloud-based storage. This framework is envisioned to facilitate advanced data integration and machine-learning-ready analytics, enabling longitudinal monitoring, pattern recognition, and individualized health profiling. By conceptually bridging cross-sectional and continuous sensing modalities, this approach has the potential to enhance ecological validity, support earlier identification of functional decline, and inform data-driven clinical decision-making. Key methodological, technological, and ethical challenges—including data quality, interpretability, privacy, digital literacy, and clinical adoption—are also highlighted. Overall, this paper underscores the promise of AI-enabled multisensor digital phenotyping to advance smart, personalized, and precision healthcare for individuals with knee OA.

Background/Objective: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and debilitating condition affecting older adults, often progressing to advanced stages and requiring total joint replacement. Exercise therapy is widely recognized as the first-line approach for the prevention and initial management of OA. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of home-based exercises (HBEs) compared to supervised exercises in alleviating pain and reducing disability among patients with knee OA. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2001 and October 2024. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, and a meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the efficacy of these interventions. Results: Ten RCTs involving 917 patients were included, ranging in moderate to high methodological quality (PEDro score: 6.3 ± 1.2). Intervention durations ranged from 4 to 12 weeks. Both supervised and HBEs were found to be effective, but supervised exercises demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pain (SMD = −0.45 [95% CI −0.79; −0.11], p = 0.015) and disability (SMD = −0.28 [95% CI −0.42; −0.14], p < 0.001) compared to HBEs. Conclusions: Despite the superiority of supervised exercises over HBEs, considering the cost-effectiveness and ease of implementation of HBEs, we developed recommendations to create a hybrid rehabilitation program that combines both approaches to maximize clinical outcomes.

In low and middle-income countries (LMICs), the burden of disability and the need for rehabilitation services are substantial (1). Rehabilitation encompasses a wide array of interventions and is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "a set of interventions designed to optimize functioning and reduce disability in individuals with health conditions in interaction with their environment" (2). According to the WHO, an estimated 2.4 billion people globally are in need of rehabilitation, with a significant portion residing in LMICs (3). These countries indeed face a variety of challenges due to pervasive poverty, limited healthcare infrastructure, and constrained resources, which contribute to the high prevalence of disability and limited access to necessary rehabilitation services (4). Disabilities not only arise from congenital conditions and non-communicable diseases but are also exacerbated by external factors such as armed conflicts and inadequate medical facilities (5). Therefore, the need for rehabilitation is expected to rise due to population aging and the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions, making access to quality rehabilitation services more critical than ever (3), as the WHO projects that non-communicable diseases will account for 80% of the disease burden in LMICs by 2030 (6). Additionally, demographic shifts show rapid population aging in these regions, with estimates suggesting a 200% increase in older populations by 2050 (7). These trends, combined with high rates of trauma and injury, create an urgent need for accessible rehabilitation services.The integration of rehabilitation into health systems can improve quality of life, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance workforce productivity (8). Studies have indeed demonstrated that every dollar invested in rehabilitation service yields a 9-11 return through reduced healthcare costs and improved workforce participation (9). Research shows that integrated rehabilitation programs reduce hospital readmission rates by up to 30% and improve patients' functional outcomes by 40-60% (10). Nevertheless, LMICs often face significant challenges in providing equitable access to quality rehabilitation care (2). These countries indeed often face a multitude of obstacles, including limited resources, infrastructure constraints, and geographical barriers, all of which impede their ability to provide equitable access to high-quality rehabilitation care (11). The most critical points are the shortage of rehabilitation professionals (with ratios as low as 0.5 therapists per 10,000 population in some regions), limited infrastructure (particularly in rural areas) (12), and financial barriers where out-of-pocket expenses can exceed 40% of household income (13). These factors further exacerbate the already substantial burden of rehabilitation needs in these regions (14).In recent years, digital technology has demonstrated significant potential for delivering public health, health systems and health interventions remotely in LMICs (15). Particularly, serious mobile games and open-source technologies have promising evidence in supporting improved efficacy of public health solutions in LMIC settings (16). Serious games are a form of interactive digital media designed for a specific purpose beyond mere entertainment (17). They are specifically "games that do not have entertainment, enjoyment, or fun as their primary purpose." Serious games aim to achieve objectives such as education, training, human resource management, and health improvement (18). These games encompass interactive computer applications that may include extensive hardware components, offering users valuable skills, knowledge, or attitudes while remaining challenging, entertaining, and engaging. Serious games integrate therapeutic exercises with engaging game mechanics, such as challenges, rewards, and progress tracking, to motivate patients to participate actively in their rehabilitation programs. have demonstrated considerable potential in improving rehabilitation outcomes in high-income countries (19). By integrating therapeutic exercises and engaging gameplay mechanics, serious games offer an innovative approach to rehabilitation that can potentially address the challenges faced by LMICs and help to overcome the shortage of rehabilitation specialists. This paper seeks to explore the potential of serious games to bridge the gap in rehabilitation access in LMICs, particularly by offering cost-effective, accessible solutions to regions where conventional rehabilitation services may be unavailable or prohibitively expensive. Serious games have the potential to reduce the burden on healthcare systems by allowing patients to participate in homebased rehabilitation (20,21), thereby alleviating the strain on limited healthcare facilities. Additionally, serious games can address barriers to rehabilitation adherence, as they offer engaging, user-friendly formats that increase motivation and engagement among patients. We will examine the potential of serious games for rehabilitation in LMICs, evaluating both their opportunities and limitations. By highlighting the current barriers and proposing strategies to overcome these challenges, we aim to demonstrate how serious games can be transformative tools for rehabilitation in LMICs. Furthermore, we will discuss how technological advancements, policy support, and stakeholder collaborations can contribute to making serious games an accessible and effective component of rehabilitation in LMICs, ultimately reducing healthcare disparities and improving outcomes for patients.Digital games can enhance rehabilitation by improving both quality and efficiency. They offer a welcome alternative to traditional methods, mitigating the potential for monotony and providing scalable therapeutic interventions. Serious games have several characteristics that make them particularly suitable for rehabilitation in LMICs. First, they can provide accessible and cost-effective rehabilitation solutions (22). In regions with limited healthcare resources, serious games can be deployed on low-cost devices such as smartphones or tablets, enabling remote access to rehabilitation programs (23). This not only expands the reach of rehabilitation services but also reduces the financial burden on individuals and healthcare systems, through the provision of home-based therapy and reduced therapist time per patient. Furthermore, their digital nature facilitates widespread distribution via the internet, enabling personalized experiences and accessibility in home and remote settings (24).Second, serious games have the potential to enhance patient motivation and engagement, which is crucial for successful rehabilitation (17). By incorporating game elements such as rewards, challenges, and social interaction, serious games can make therapy sessions more enjoyable and encourage patients to adhere to their rehabilitation programs (25). This can be especially beneficial in LMICs where access to traditional rehabilitation centres might be limited, and patients may struggle with adherence due to various barriers (26).Third, serious games can address cultural and contextual factors by offering localized content and incorporating culturally relevant narratives and characters (27). Cultural sensitivity is crucial in healthcare, and serious games can be designed to resonate with the values, beliefs, and practices of the target communities. This customization can enhance the acceptability and engagement of rehabilitation interventions in LMICs, making them more effective in addressing the specific needs of the population.( 28) Locally developed serious games offer sustainability and customization to cater to cultural preferences and specific patient needs. They can be adapted for various conditions and task-oriented training, helping patients transfer acquired skills to real-life daily tasks.To assess the current use of serious games in LMICs, we conducted a bibliometric analysis. This method quantitatively evaluates research trends and the impact of studies within a specific field (29). We systematically searched two major databases, Web of Science and Scopus, for publications related to serious games, rehabilitation, and LMICs. A total of 1,564 articles were included in the analysis, with data processed using VOSviewer to visualize and map collaboration networks (30).Our analysis identified 88 countries with at least one author contributing to these studies. To ensure meaningful statistical analysis while maintaining representativeness, we established a threshold of 10 publications per country, resulting in 42 countries for further analysis. This threshold was chosen based on several considerations: (i) it provides a balanced trade-off between including a sufficient number of countries for robust comparative analysis while excluding those with limited research activity, (ii) it aligns with statistical requirements for minimum sample sizes in comparative studies (31,32), and (ii) it captures approximately 90% of the total publication output while reducing noise from countries with sporadic research contributions. As shown in Figure 1, the retained countries formed significant research clusters in Europe, the Middle East, North America, and Australia. Unfortunately, the African continent shows minimal representation, with only Algeria contributing 12 publications.However, different mHealth solutions have already been developed and implemented in Africa, mostly to provide relevant information to patients and increase health literacy (33): Hello Doctor (South Africa): advice and medical assistance; Mobile Widewife (Nigeria): voice messages sent to pregnant women for follow-up pregnancy; M-Pedigree (Kenya): drug identification; My Healthline (Cameroon): answers to questions on sexuality, family planning and HIV/AIDS; mHero (Liberia): information on the virus outbreak Ebola; Djobi (Mali, Senegal): mobile application contributing to reducing infant mortality and kindergarten in Senegal and Mali through mutual health insurance. These first experiences have shown the interest that SSA has regarding the use of mobile telephony for health actions. In rehabilitation Captain Log's has been used in Uganda to improve knowledge and cognition (34), MyDailyRoutine, is a serious game designed to assist patients with cerebral dysfunction, incorporating activities like virtual coffee preparation (35). RehabCity simulates a city environment, requiring users to engage in everyday tasks within its virtual streets, buildings, and parks (36). But commercial solutions (e.g., Nintendo Wii Fit) have also been successfully implemented to provide rehabilitation in low-income community in South-Africa (37). Other studies have also demonstrated the feasibility and a good adherence to rehabilitation program provided with the Microsoft Xbox Kinect in LMICs (38).Despite their potential, serious games for rehabilitation in LMICs face various limitations and challenges that need to be addressed before taking full advantage of their benefits. Figure 2 outlines a consolidated framework for implementing serious games in LMICs, serving as a foundation for addressing current limitations and maximizing the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies. This framework, based on an implementation research model, incorporates multilevel strategies to overcome the infrastructural, cultural, and educational barriers prevalent in these regions and illustrates the complex interplay between these domains and how they influence the successful implementation. It highlights that success depends not only on the technology itself but also on the broader ecosystem in which it is implemented. The adoption of serious games faces multiple barriers beyond technical issues. These include ethical considerations, policy limitations, administrative challenges, disparities in healthcare access, and insufficient resources. There are also concerns about the quality and reliability of research evidence. From a technical standpoint, key obstacles include disconnected systems that lack long-term sustainability, undefined industry standards, questionable data accuracy, limited technological infrastructure, and insufficient skilled personnel. To address these challenges, several approaches have been suggested: gaining support from policymakers, fostering partnerships across different sectors, increasing financial support, developing consistent regulatory guidelines, conducting flexible research studies, enhancing healthcare workers' skills, and maintaining open dialogue with the public through clear communication channels (39).More in details, one significant challenge is the lack of technological infrastructure, digital health literacy or skills and access to appropriate devices (40). Many LMICs struggle with limited internet connectivity, inadequate power supply, and outdated hardware, which can hinder the effective deployment of serious games of other portable technologies (41). However, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has seen a surge in mobile phone, computer, and internet usage. The GSMA projects substantial growth in the SSA mobile market, forecasting a compound annual growth rate of 4.6% between 2019 and 2025, outpacing the global average of 3% (42). This rapid expansion positions SSA as one of the world's fastest-growing regions for mobile phone subscriptions.However, investments in improving technological infrastructure is crucial, including initiatives to expand internet connectivity and provide affordable and suitable devices for game-based rehabilitation. Power generation shortages, leading to electricity load shedding and power cuts is also a common occurrence in LMICs, which can be a major barrier in the implementation of serious games for healthcare and rehabilitation purposes (43).Additionally, the cultural context of LMICs may influence the design and content of serious games. Localization efforts must consider language barriers, cultural sensitivities, and the diversity of healthcare practices to ensure meaningful engagement and effective healthcare outcomes (44). One crucial note is that a significant portion of the population in LMICs may not be accustomed to technology, impacting user acceptance and adoption. Collaborating with local stakeholders, such as healthcare providers, patients, and community representatives, during the development of serious games can ensure their relevance and cultural sensitivity (45). This approach helps bridge the gap between inadequate or unavailable rehabilitative therapy and effective medical treatment Developing serious games in collaboration with local stakeholders, including healthcare providers, patients, and community representatives, can help ensure that the games are relevant and sensitive to the cultural context (45), this will ensure the medical transition between unsuitable and unavailable rehabilitative therapy as well as effective therapy.However, integrating serious games into existing healthcare systems presents challenges, as it necessitates collaborative efforts among game developers, healthcare providers, policymakers, and local communities (46). This requires interdisciplinary cooperation and resource allocation, highlighting the obstacles faced in successfully implementing and sustaining serious games in rehabilitation practices (47).As digital health initiatives progress from the experimental phase to wider implementation, there is a growing emphasis on effective expansion and integration to offer lasting advantages to healthcare systems (Figure 2). To overcome the limitations and challenges, several strategies can be implemented. Insights from real-world case studies of serious games scaling in LMICs highlight five crucial focal areas for achieving success (48).First, these programs or initiatives must possess inherent qualities that provide concrete solutions to unmet needs, incorporating input from end-users right from the beginning. Partnerships between game developers, rehabilitation specialists, and local stakeholders are essential to ensure the development of culturally appropriate and context-specific serious games (49). Collaborative efforts can also help leverage existing infrastructure, expertise, and resources to facilitate the deployment and evaluation of serious games (50). By involving all relevant stakeholders from the early stages of development, the games can be tailored to meet the specific needs and preferences of the target population (51).Second, it is vital for all stakeholders to be actively engaged, well-trained, and motivated to support new implementations. Capacity building initiatives and the role of north-south training programs (52) can be implemented to enhance the skills of healthcare professionals in utilizing serious games for rehabilitation. This would empower local healthcare providers to effectively integrate serious games into their practice and maximize their potential impact. Training can include not only technical aspects of using the games but also understanding their potential benefits and limitations, as well as strategies to ensure patient compliance and engagement (53). At the WHO level, a rehabilitation competency framework has been developed to provide foundations for curricula for rehabilitation specialists (54). It is advocated to include serious games and new technologies related to rehabilitation in the competency framework.Third, the technical design should prioritize simplicity, interoperability, and adaptability. Efforts should be made to improve technological infrastructure in LMICs, including expanding internet connectivity and ensuring access to affordable and suitable devices for game-based rehabilitation. Africa currently indeed faces the challenge of having the lowest internet penetration rate among continents, with 42% of its population having access to the internet (55). The introduction of the new technology necessitates a careful adjustment to the specific context, taking into consideration local physical barriers, particularly the availability of clinical facilities (56). Furthermore, it requires a conscientious adaptation to the existing lack of internet access, which involves advocating for offline applications and carefully limiting contacts between users and healthcare professionals. This may require collaboration with governments, non-governmental organization, and private sector entities to invest in and support the necessary infrastructure improvements.The fourth focus is on the policy landscape, emphasizing the need for alignment with comprehensive healthcare policies and securing sustainable funding, including contributions from the private sector when applicable. From a public health perspective, it is imperative to engage in concerted and harmonized endeavours aimed at the successful integration of novel interventions into the healthcare system. These efforts span three distinct tiers: the macro level (57), encompassing legal, regulatory, and economic facets; the meso level (46), which pertains to local health services and community dynamics; and the micro level (50), which is intricately linked with patient-level considerations. The integration of multilevel models elucidating the interplay between immediate and distal determinants of health has markedly enriched our comprehension of the mechanisms underlying health disparities. Consequently, the inclusion of these multifaceted dimensions is of paramount significance in our analytical pursuits.Lastly, consideration must be given to the external ecosystem, ensuring the availability of the necessary infrastructure to support large-scale digital initiative deployment. The development of local scientific research capability is a crucial undertaking, supported by the need to gather evidence that supports the effectiveness of innovative solutions (58). This necessitates careful examination of local and cultural nuances, in addition to technical limitations like inadequate infrastructure. Currently, research efforts focused on exploring emerging serious games advancements and assessing their effectiveness predominantly occur in countries with high-income economies. As a result, the practical implementation of these discoveries in LMICs presents complex difficulties, underscoring the need for prompt development of local scientific evidence.It is imperative to determine the viability and acceptance of modified technology within the scope of both patients and professionals. Following this assessment, there is a need to determine the amount of evidence at the regional level, which is particularly relevant in the context of evidence-based practice. It is crucial to acknowledge that the rehabilitation goals in LMICs may differ from those in high-income nations, highlighting the need for research endeavours that are specific to the local context (59).Serious games have the potential to revolutionize rehabilitation in LMICs by overcoming barriers to access and delivering cost-effective, engaging, and culturally relevant interventions. However, to unlock this potential, it is crucial to address the current limitations and challenges. By fostering collaborations, improving infrastructure, and promoting capacity building, serious games can become transformative tools that contribute to the improvement of rehabilitation outcomes and the reduction of healthcare disparities in LMICs.Embracing this innovative approach can pave the way for a more inclusive and effective healthcare system, ensuring that all individuals have access to the rehabilitation services they need for a better quality of life

Objective This review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of mHealth-supported active exercise interventions to reduce pain intensity and disability level in persons with hip or knee OA. Data Sources Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of science) were systematically searched for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) published between 01-01-2012 and 31-07-2023. PROSPERO registration number of this review was CRD42023394119. Study Selection We included only RCTs that were identified and screened by two independent reviewers (JM and GN). In addition, the reference lists of the identified studies were manually checked for further inclusion. Included studies had to provide a mHealth-supported active exercises for persons with hip or knee OA, and evaluate pain intensity and disability using both questionnaires and performance tests. Data Extraction From the included studies, the two independent authors extracted data using a predetermined Excel form. Characteristics of the interventions were described and a meta-analysis was performed. Data Synthesis Twelve RCTs were included, representing 1,541 patients with a mean age of 58.7±5 years, and a BMI of 28.8±3.1; females being more predominant than males with a total ratio female/male of 2.2. The methodological quality of the included studies was of moderate quality in 75% of the studies. There was no statistically significant difference between mHealth-supported active exercises compared to the interventions without mHealth in terms of pain reduction (SMD= −0.42 [95%CI −0.91; 0.07], p = 0.08) and disability mitigation (SMD = −0.36 [95%CI −0.81; 0.09], p = 0.10). However, a statistically significant difference was found between patient education combined with mHealth-supported active exercises compared to patient education alone in terms of pain (SMD= −0.42 [95%CI −0.61; −0.22], p<0.01) and disability (SMD= −0.27 [95%CI −0.46; −0.08], p < 0.01) reduction. Conclusion mHealth-supported exercises were found to be effective, especially when combined with patient education, in reducing pain and mitigating disability in patients with hip or knee OA.

Osteoarthritis (OA) poses a growing challenge for the aging population, especially in the hip and knee joints, contributing significantly to disability and societal costs. Exploring the integration of wearable technology, this study addresses the limitations of traditional rehabilitation assessments in capturing real-world experiences and dynamic variations. Specifically, it focuses on continuously monitoring physical activity in hip and knee OA patients using automated unsupervised evaluations within the rehabilitation process. We analyzed data from 1144 patients who used a mobile health application after surgery; the activity data were collected using the Garmin Vivofit 4. Several parameters, such as the total number of steps per day, the peak 6-minute consecutive cadence (P6MC) and peak 1-minute cadence (P1M), were computed and analyzed on a daily basis. The results indicated that cadence-based measurements can effectively, and earlier, differ among patients with hip and knee conditions, as well as in the recovery process. Comparisons based on recovery status and type of surgery reveal distinctive trajectories, emphasizing the effectiveness of P6MC and P1M in detecting variations earlier than total steps per day. Furthermore, cadence-based measurements showed a lower inter-day variability (40%) compared to the total number of steps per day (80%). Automated assessments, including P1M and P6MC, offer nuanced insights into the patients’ dynamic activity profiles.

Introduction:Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) causes a great deal of discomfort, impacting a person's functionality and quality of life. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, activity limitations, and quality of life in patients with NSNP in Burundi. Patients and Methods:This was a cross-sectional study with descriptive and analytical aims, covering the period from September 2023 to February 2024. It focused on NSNP patients received in three health facilities of Bujumbura. In addition to sociodemographic data, clinical data including pain, disability, psychological status and quality of life were collected. Results:Most of patients (47.1%) were over 40 years old, with an average of 49.30 (13.30) years. The majority was female, married, employed, and had a university education. Most of them (64.70%) described their pain as moderate to severe, with a mean score of 6.20 (1.60) on the numerical scale. A minority had poor health-related quality of life (20.60%). The majority had mild to moderate disability in both the psychological (41.20%) and physical (55.90%) components. Pain location during the current episode had a statistically significant association with social aspects (p=0.049). Individuals with lower levels of education, a more sedentary lifestyle, and greater psychological distress are likely to experience increased activity limitations (p<0.05). Conclusion:NSNP is a significant public health concern in Burundi, impacting individuals' socio-professional lives and overall quality of life. Individuals with lower levels of education, a more sedentary lifestyle, and greater psychological distress are likely to experience increased activity limitations. The state of health was perceived as poor by 20.60% of the sample. The physical component of health status was more impaired than the mental component, and the majority of patients presented moderate to severe disabilities, highlighting the need for preventive and management measures to mitigate its impact on individuals and the healthcare system in Burundi.

Mobile health (mHealth) development has advanced rapidly, indicating promise as an effective patient intervention. mHealth has many potential benefits that could help the treatment of patients, and the development of rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). mHealth is a low-cost option that does not need rapid access to healthcare clinics or employees. It increases the feasibility and rationality of clinical treatment expectations in comparison to the conventional clinical model of management by promoting patient adherence to the treatment plan. mHealth can also serve as a basis for formulating treatment plans and partially compensate for the shortcomings of the traditional model. In addition, mHealth can help achieve universal rehabilitation service coverage by overcoming geographical barriers, thereby increasing the number of ways patients can benefit from the rehabilitation service, and by providing rehabilitation to individuals in remote areas and communities with insufficient healthcare services. However, despite these positive potential aspects, there is currently only a very limited number of studies performed in LMICs using mHealth. In this study, we first reviewed the current evidence supporting the use of mHealth in rehabilitation to identify the countries where studies have been carried out. Then, we identify the current limitations of the implementation of such mHealth solutions and propose a 10-point action plan, focusing on the macro (e.g., policymakers), meso (e.g., technology and healthcare institutions), and micro (e.g., patients and relatives) levels to ease the use, validation, and implementation in LMICs and thus participate in the development and recognition of public health and rehabilitation in these countries.

PURPOSE:The aim of this systematic review was primarily to identify the types of mHealth technologies for the rehabilitation of non-specific spinal disorders, second to evaluate their efficacy, and finally to determine their applicability in LMICs.METHODS:Three databases (Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science) were searched for randomized controlled trials and clinical trials from January 2012 until December 2022. Studies were found eligible when using mHealth technologies for the rehabilitation of non-specific spinal disorders. To evaluate efficacy, the primary outcome was pain intensity, and the secondary outcomes were disability and quality of life. To evaluate the applicability in LMICs, information about financial and geographical accessibility, offline usability, and languages was extracted.RESULTS:Fifteen studies were included comprising 1828 participants who suffer from non-specific low back pain (86.05%) and non-specific neck pain (13.95%). Fourteen distinct smartphone-based interventions and two sensor system interventions were found, with a duration ranging from four weeks to six months. All mHealth interventions demonstrated efficacy for the improvement of pain, disability and quality of life in non-specific spinal disorders, particularly low back pain. Five of the evaluated smartphone applications were free of charge accessible and had language features that could be adapted for use in LMICs.CONCLUSION:mHealth interventions can be used and integrated into the conventional treatment of non-specific spinal disorders in rehabilitation. They have demonstrated efficacy and could be implemented in LMICs with minor adaptations to overcome language barriers and the absolute necessity of the internet.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic girdle pain represents a group of musculoskeletal pain disorders associated with the sacroiliac joint and/or the surrounding musculoskeletal and ligamentous structures. Its physical management is still a serious challenge as it has been considered the primary cause of low back pain. OBJECTIVE: This review sought to determine the effectiveness of motor control exercises for two clinically relevant measures; i.e., pain and disability, on patients with pelvic girdle pain of sacroiliac joint origin. METHODS: This review covered only randomized controlled studies. Online databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were searched from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2019. PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies, while Review Manager was employed to synthesize data in view of meta-analysis. The PRISMA guidelines were applied for this review. RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled trials of moderate-to-high quality were included in this review. The studies involved 1407 patients with a mean age ranging from 25.5 to 42.1 years as well as intervention and follow-up durations from 1 week to 2 years. Motor control exercises alone for pelvic girdle pain of sacroiliac joint origin were not effective in terms of pain reduction (SMD = 0.29 [ 0.64,1.22]) compared to control interventions whereas they were slightly effective in terms of disability reduction (SMD = 0.07 [ 0.67, 0.53]) at short-term. The combination of motor control exercises with other musculoskeletal therapies, however, revealed to be more effective than control interventions in terms of pain reduction (SMD = 1.78 [ 2.49, 1.07]; 95%CI) and lessened disability (SMD = 1.80 [ 3.03, 0.56]; 95%CI) at short-term. CONCLUSION: Motor control exercises alone were not found to be effective in reducing pain at short-term. However, their combination with other musculoskeletal therapies revealed a significant and clinically-relevant decrease in pain and disability at short-term, especially in peripartum period.