Persistent pathological structures, such as tumors, fibrotic nodules, granulomas, microbial biofilms, or protein aggregates, are traditionally viewed as age-related conditions that emerge after reproduction, when natural selection is less effective at eliminating traits expressed late in life. However, some pathologies with robust and organized architectures can arise surprisingly early, challenging this classical perspective. We recently proposed that intra-organismal selection for function, a selective process operating within organisms and acting on non-reproducing entities by favoring structural configurations that enhance stability, robustness, and novelty generation, may play a role in aging. Here, we suggest that this same process can also operate well before the so-called selection shadow (i.e., life stages where natural selection is too weak to purge deleterious mutations). We identify three non-mutually exclusive mechanisms that may promote this early-life action: (i) initial local adaptive benefits, such as improved tissue repair or containment of infection; (ii) limited or context-specific fitness costs, allowing structurally stable but abnormal configurations to persist undetected; and (iii) rapid environmental changes that reshape tissue-level selective landscapes, driven by pollutants, endocrine disruptors, or novel diets. Recognizing early-onset organized pathologies as by-products of eco-evolutionary tissue dynamics, rather than as mere developmental errors, reframes their biological significance and opens new therapeutic avenues. Instead of targeting cells exclusively, future strategies could focus on disrupting the functional architecture of pathological tissues and structures, offering novel means to prevent or control early-life diseases shaped by internal selection forces.
Pathological processes are often conceptualized as localized phenomena anchored in a primary tumor, a focal lesion, or a single organ. However, growing evidence indicates that many diseases persist and progress as complex distributed systems, maintained by interactions among multiple sites. Building on the emerging framework of selection for function, which can be applied to understand the evolutionary persistence of both replicating and non-replicating entities, we propose that metastases, amyloidoses, fibroses, autoimmune syndromes, granulomatous diseases, and multifocal reproductive disorders can all be understood as complex evolving pathological systems within individuals. In these contexts, local units such as metastatic nodules, amyloid plaques, or fibrotic foci act as semi-autonomous entities, yet achieve collective persistence through systemic flows, feedback loops, and network-level interactions, where local structuration gives rise to systemic effects. At certain points, lesions that produce mediators can trigger systemic alterations that, in turn, favor the emergence and persistence of additional lesions. This creates a vicious cycle in which local and systemic dynamics reinforce one another, helping these specific pathological networks to overcome host defense mechanisms and persist (i.e., be 'selected' via differential persistence). This perspective unifies seemingly disparate conditions under the principle of system persistence, reframing pathology as an emergent organizational property of a pathological system rather than as isolated local breakdowns of organismal components. It also carries important implications for evolutionary medicine, suggesting a taxonomy of diseases that distinguishes localized from distributed functional pathologies. Clinically, it underscores the need to go beyond focal interventions, advocating instead for therapies that disrupt pathological connectivity, destabilize network coherence, and monitor systemic biomarkers of disease persistence. Recognizing the role of selection for function in the emergence and persistence of complex pathological systems opens new avenues for both theoretical integration and therapeutic innovation in evolutionary medicine.
Many cancer therapies achieve durable control without complete tumor eradication, suggesting that disrupting tumor organization may be more critical than killing cells. We propose that effective treatments converge by destabilizing the tumor's Group Phenotypic Composition (GPC), the functional and spatial organization of interacting cell populations. When this organization collapses, tumors lose coherence. This perspective provides a unifying framework for designing therapies targeting tumor-level dynamics rather than cell number alone.
Aging, and by extension age-related diseases, has traditionally been understood through classical evolutionary genetic models, such as the mutation accumulation and antagonistic pleiotropy theories. However, these frameworks primarily focus on the declining efficacy of organismal-level selection against mutations with deleterious effects in late life. Here, we propose a novel hypothesis: many chronic diseases associated with aging may emerge, at least in part, as a result of selection acting at lower organizational levels, including non-replicative biological entities, enabled by the relaxation of selective pressures that constrained within-organism evolutionary processes in early life. This hypothesis is built on the recently proposed concept of selection for function that extends the evolutionary process to non-replicative entities. While Darwinian selection acting at the organismal level strongly constrains within-organism evolution during an organism's reproductive lifespan, these constraints weaken with age. As a consequence, lower-level non-replicative entities, such as benign and malignant tumors, atherosclerotic plaques, and neurodegenerative aggregates, may experience a form of selection that favors those with increased stability, organization, and long-term persistence, sometimes at the cost to host fitness. These entities do not evolve via long-term differential reproduction, but rather certain configurations of their structure persist preferentially over others due to environmental constraints, microenvironmental selection, and internal stabilization mechanisms. Understanding aging through the lens of selection for function at the level of internal non-replicative entities provides new insights into the evolution of chronic diseases and opens novel therapeutic avenues aimed at disrupting internal functional organization, rather than merely targeting cellular proliferation/abnormalities or disease symptoms.
Non-genetic intratumoral heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity as consequences of microenvironment-driven epigenomic dysregulation examine evidence for reshaping of the epigenome in cancer and propose that epigenomic dysregulation originates from microenvironmental disruption. In the past years, convincing evidence suggested that genetic alterations are unlikely to be driving tumour formation alone and that oncogenesis strongly depends on interactions between pre-malignant cells and the surrounding environment. The tissue context normally exerts a regulatory role in maintaining the stable phenotype of differentiated cells, through mechanisms involving mechanical and signalling cues, and chromatin organization. Loss of tissue homeostasis, combined with the reacquisition of epigenomic configurations associated with pluripotency, could lead cancer cells towards increased phenotypic plasticity characteristic of unicellular organisms, in which heterogeneity and bet-hedging strategies are advantageous and fuel their adaptation. We finally propose that acting on the tumour microenvironment could help re-establish more stable phenotypes, potentially sensitizing cancer to existing therapies and preventing resistance.
Current cancer therapies often fail due to tumor heterogeneity and rapid resistance evolution. A new evolutionary framework, 'selection for function,' proposes that tumor progression is driven by group phenotypic composition (GPC) and its interaction with the microenvironment, not by individual cell traits. This perspective opens new therapeutic avenues: targeting the tumor's functional networks rather than individual cells. Real-time tracking of GPC changes could inform adaptive treatments, delaying progression and resistance. By integrating evolutionary and ecological principles with conventional therapies, this strategy aims to transform cancer from a fatal to a manageable chronic disease. Crucially, it does not necessarily require new drugs but offers a way to repurpose existing therapies to impair a tumor's evolutionary potential. By steering tumor evolution toward less aggressive states, this approach could improve prognosis and long-term patient survival compared to current methods. We argue that leveraging GPC dynamics represents a critical, yet underexplored, opportunity in oncology.
A common feature of bacterial, fungal and cancer cell populations upon treatment is the presence of tolerant and persistent cells able to survive, and sometimes grow, even in the presence of usually inhibitory or lethal drug concentrations, driven by non-genetic differences among individual cells in a population. Here we review and compare data obtained on drug survival in bacteria, fungi and cancer cells to unravel common characteristics and cellular pathways, and to point their singularities. This comparative work also allows to cross-fertilize ideas across fields. We particularly focus on the role of gene expression variability in the emergence of cell-cell non-genetic heterogeneity because it represents a possible common basic molecular process at the origin of most persistence phenomena and could be monitored and tuned to help improve therapeutic interventions.
Tumorigenesis is commonly attributed to Darwinian processes involving natural selection among cells and groups of cells. However, progressing tumors are those that also achieve an appropriate group phenotypic composition (GPC). Yet, the selective processes acting on tumor GPCs are distinct from that associated with classical Darwinian evolution (i.e. natural selection based on differential reproductive success) as tumors are not genuine evolutionary individuals and do not exhibit heritable variation in fitness. This complex evolutionary scenario is analogous to the recently proposed concept of 'selection for function' invoked for the evolution of both living and non-living systems. Therefore, we argue that it is inaccurate to assert that Darwinian processes alone account for all the aspects characterizing tumorigenesis and cancer progression; rather, by producing the genetic and phenotypic diversity required for creating novel GPCs, these processes fuel the evolutionary success of tumors that is dependent on selection for function at the tumor level.
ABSTRACT Tumorigenesis is commonly attributed to Darwinian processes involving natural selection among cells and groups of cells. However, progressing tumors are those that also achieve an appropriate group phenotypic composition (GPC). Yet, the selective processes acting on tumor GPCs are distinct from that associated with classical Darwinian evolution (i.e. natural selection based on differential reproductive success) as tumors are not genuine evolutionary individuals and do not exhibit heritable variation in fitness. This complex evolutionary scenario is analogous to the recently proposed concept of ‘selection for function’ invoked for the evolution of both living and non-living systems. Therefore, we argue that it is inaccurate to assert that Darwinian processes alone account for all the aspects characterizing tumorigenesis and cancer progression; rather, by producing the genetic and phenotypic diversity required for creating novel GPCs, these processes fuel the evolutionary success of tumors that is dependent on selection for function at the tumor level.
The genetic stability and metabolic robustness of production strains is one of the key criteria for the production of bio-based products by microbial fermentation on an industrial scale. These criteria were here explored in an industrial ethanol-producer strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae able to co-ferment D-xylose and L-arabinose with glucose through the chromosomal integration of several copies of pivotal genes for the use of these pentose (C5) sugars. Using batch sequential cultures in a controlled bioreactor that mimics long-term fermentation in an industrial setting, this strain was found to exhibit significant fluctuations in D-xylose and L-arabinose consumption as early as the 50th generation and beyond. These fluctuations seem not related to the few low-consumption C5 sugar clones that appeared throughout the sequential batch cultures at a frequency lower than 1.5% and that were due to the reduction in the number of copies of transgenes coding for C5 sugar assimilation enzymes. Also, subpopulations enriched with low or high RAD52 expression, whose expression level was reported to be proportional to homologous recombination rate did not exhibit defect in C5-sugar assimilation, arguing that other mechanisms may be responsible for copy number variation of transgenes. Overall, this work highlighted the existence of genetic and metabolic instabilities in an industrial yeast which, although modest in our conditions, could be more deleterious in harsher industrial conditions, leading to reduced production performance.
Genetic mosaicism has long been linked to aging, and several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the potential connections between mosaicism and susceptibility to cancer. It has been proposed that mosaicism may disrupt tissue homeostasis by affecting intercellular communications and releasing microenvironmental constraints within tissues. The underlying mechanisms driving these tissue-level influences remain unidentified, however. Here, we present an evolutionary perspective on the interplay between mosaicism and cancer, suggesting that the tissue-level impacts of genetic mosaicism can be attributed to Indirect Genetic Effects (IGEs). IGEs can increase the level of cellular stochasticity and phenotypic instability among adjacent cells, thereby elevating the risk of cancer development within the tissue. Moreover, as cells experience phenotypic changes in response to challenging microenvironmental conditions, these changes can initiate a cascade of nongenetic alterations, referred to as Indirect non-Genetic Effects (InGEs), which in turn catalyze IGEs among surrounding cells. We argue that incorporating both InGEs and IGEs into our understanding of the process of oncogenic transformation could trigger a major paradigm shift in cancer research with far-reaching implications for practical applications.
ABSTRACTWhile it is recognised that most, if not all, multicellular organisms harbour neoplastic processes within their bodies, the timing of when these undesirable cell proliferations are most likely to occur and progress throughout the organism's lifetime remains only partially documented. Due to the different mechanisms implicated in tumourigenesis, it is highly unlikely that this probability remains constant at all times and stages of life. In this article, we summarise what is known about this variation, considering the roles of age, season and circadian rhythm. While most studies requiring that level of detail be done on humans, we also review available evidence in other animal species. For each of these timescales, we identify mechanisms or biological functions shaping the variation. When possible, we show that evolutionary processes likely played a role, either directly to regulate the cancer risk or indirectly through trade‐offs. We find that neoplastic risk varies with age in a more complex way than predicted by early epidemiological models: rather than resulting from mutations alone, tumour development is dictated by tissue‐ and age‐specific processes. Similarly, the seasonal cycle can be associated with risk variation in some species with life‐history events such as sexual competition or mating being timed according to the season. Lastly, we show that the circadian cycle influences tumourigenesis in physiological, pathological and therapeutic contexts. We also highlight two biological functions at the core of these variations across our three timescales: immunity and metabolism. Finally, we show that our understanding of the entanglement between tumourigenic processes and biological cycles is constrained by the limited number of species for which we have extensive data. Improving our knowledge of the periods of vulnerability to the onset and/or progression of (malignant) tumours is a key issue that deserves further investigation, as it is key to successful cancer prevention strategies.
The inability to control cell proliferation results in the formation of tumors in many multicellular lineages. Nonetheless, little is known about the extent of conservation of the biological traits and ecological factors that promote or inhibit tumorigenesis across the metazoan tree. Particularly, changes in food availability have been linked to increased cancer incidence in humans, as an outcome of evolutionary mismatch. Here, we apply evolutionary oncology principles to test whether food availability, regardless of the multicellular lineage considered, has an impact on tumorigenesis. We used two phylogenetically unrelated model systems, the cnidarian Hydra oligactis and the fish Danio rerio , to investigate the impact of resource availability on tumor occurrence and progression. Individuals from healthy and tumor-prone lines were placed on four diets that differed in feeding frequency and quantity. For both models, frequent overfeeding favored tumor emergence, while lean diets appeared more protective. In terms of tumor progression, high food availability promoted it, whereas low resources controlled it, but without having a curative effect. We discuss our results in light of current ideas about the possible conservation of basic processes governing cancer in metazoans (including ancestral life history trade-offs at the cell level) and in the framework of evolutionary medicine.
Multiple Myeloma (MM) and its preexisting stage, termed Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS), have long been considered mainly as genomic diseases. However, the bone changes observed in both conditions have led to a reassessment of the role of the bone microenvironment, mainly the endosteal niche in their genesis. Here, we consider the disruption of the endosteal niche in the bone marrow, that is, the shift of the endosteal niche from an osteoblastic to an osteoclastic profile produced by bone senescence and inflammaging, as the key element. Thus, this disrupted endosteal niche is proposed to represent the permissive microenvironment necessary not only for the emergence of MM from MGUS but also for the emergence and maintenance of MGUS. Moreover, the excess of osteoclasts would favor the presentation of antigens (Ag) into the endosteal niche because osteoclasts are Ag-presenting cells. As such, they could significantly stimulate the presentation of some specific Ag and the clonal expansion of the stimulated cells as well as favor the expansion of such selected clones because osteoclasts are immunosuppressive. We also discuss this scenario in the Gaucher disease, in which the high incidence of MGUS and MM makes it a good model both at the bone level and the immunological level. Finally, we envisage that this endosteal niche disruption would increase the stochasticity (epigenetic and genetic instability) in the selected clones, according to our Tissue Disruption-induced cell Stochasticity (TiDiS) theory.
The performance of a microbial fermentation for the production of a bio-based product requires long-term robustness and stability of the producer strain. Here, we explored the genetic and metabolic stability of an industrial ethanol-producer Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain that was engineered by chromosomal integration of several copies of transgenes allowing co-fermentation of D-xylose and L-arabinose with glucose. Through sequential batch cultures in controlled bioreactor, it was found that this strain exhibited significant fluctuation of xylose and arabinose consumption starting at 50th generation and onward. Also, clones that have partly or completely lost the ability to assimilate arabinose or xylose were isolated, and this alteration was due to reduced copy number of the transgenes encoding the enzymes of the C5 sugar assimilation. However, subpopulation enriched with low or high RAD52 expression, whose expression level was reported to be proportional to homologous recombination rate did not exhibit defect in C5-sugar assimilation, arguing that other mechanisms may be responsible for copy number variation of transgenes. Overall, this work underscored genetic and metabolic instabilities, which although modest under our conditions, could in the longer term and under more stringent industrial conditions lead to a reduction of production performance. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
It is traditionally assumed that during cancer development, tumor cells abort their initially cooperative behavior (i.e., cheat) in favor of evolutionary strategies designed solely to enhance their own fitness (i.e., a "selfish" life style) at the expense of that of the multicellular organism. However, the growth and progress of solid tumors can also involve cooperation among these presumed selfish cells (which, by definition, should be noncooperative) and with stromal cells. The ultimate and proximate reasons behind this paradox are not fully understood. Here, in the light of current theories on the evolution of cooperation, we discuss the possible evolutionary mechanisms that could explain the apparent cooperative behaviors among selfish malignant cells. In addition to the most classical explanations for cooperation in cancer and in general (by-product mutualism, kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, network reciprocity, group selection), we propose the idea that "greenbeard" effects are relevant to explaining some cooperative behaviors in cancer. Also, we discuss the possibility that malignant cooperative cells express or co-opt cooperative traits normally expressed by healthy cells. We provide examples where considerations of these processes could help understand tumorigenesis and metastasis and argue that this framework provides novel insights into cancer biology and potential strategies for cancer prevention and treatment.
Abstract Cancer is a disease that affects the control of cell proliferation in many multicellular lineages. Nonetheless, little is known about the extent of conservation of the biological traits and ecological factors that promote or inhibit tumorigenesis across the metazoan tree. Particularly, changes in food quantity and quality have been linked to increased cancer incidence in humans, an outcome of evolutionary mismatch. Here, we apply evolutionary ecology principles to test the hypothesis whether food availability, regardless of the multicellular lineage considered, should govern tumorigenesis. We used two phylogenetically unrelated model systems, namely the cnidarian Hydra oligactis and the fish Danio rerio to investigate the impact of resource availability on tumor emergence and progression. Individuals from healthy and tumor-prone lines were placed on four diets that differed in feeding frequency and quantity. For both models, frequent overfeeding favored tumor emergence, while lean diets appear more protective. When investigating tumor progression, high food availability promoted it, whereas low resources controlled it, but without curing the animals. We discuss our results in light of current ideas about the possible conservation of basic processes governing cancer in metazoans (including ancestral life history trade-offs at the cell level) and in the framework of evolutionary medicine.
Non-conventional yeast species, or non-Saccharomyces yeasts, are increasingly recognized for their involvement in fermented foods. Many of them exhibit probiotic characteristics that are mainly due to direct contacts with other cell types through various molecular components of their cell wall. The biochemical composition and/or the molecular structure of the cell wall components are currently considered the primary determinant of their probiotic properties. Here we first present the techniques that are used to extract and analyze the cell wall components of food industry-related non-Saccharomyces yeasts. We then review the current understanding of the cell wall composition and structure of each polysaccharide from these yeasts. Finally, the data exploring the potential beneficial role of their cell wall components, which could be a source of innovative functional ingredients, are discussed. Such research would allow the development of high value-added products and provide the food industry with novel inputs beyond the well-established S. cerevisiae.
These results provide a detailed characterization of the functioning of a bacterial toxin-antitoxin system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and open applicative perspectives of yeast growth control by bacterial toxin-antitoxin systems. The bacterial toxin-antitoxin systems are each composed of a toxin, which severely inhibits bacterial cells growth, and a specific neutralizing antitoxin. Some toxin-antitoxin systems are functional when expressed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. For instance, the expression of the relE toxin gene leads to a strong growth defect in yeast, whereas the expression of the relB antitoxin gene restores growth. Nevertheless, there is no available data regarding the required expression levels of each component of the relBE system leading to these growth phenotypes, neither their effects on cell viability. Here we used a double inducible plasmid-based system to independently modulate the relative amounts of relB and relE, and performed growth and gene expression analyses. These results allow us to correlate growth phenotypes to the expression levels of the toxin and the antitoxin, and to determine the levels necessary to observe either a strong growth inhibition or a normal growth. We also showed that the relE expression produces cell cycle progression defect without affecting cell viability. These results provide a detailed characterization of the functioning of the relBE system in S. cerevisiae, and open applicative perspectives of yeast growth control by bacterial toxin-antitoxin systems.
Joel Brown合作论文数UIC Biological Sciences2