Background To identify patients most likely to respond to everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, a prospective biomarker study was conducted in hormone receptor-positive endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer patients treated with exemestane-everolimus therapy. Methods Metastatic tumor biopsies were processed for immunohistochemical staining (p4EBP1, PTEN, pAKT, LKB1, and pS6K). ESR1, PIK3CA and AKT1 gene mutations were detected by NGS. The primary endpoint was the association between the p4EBP1 expression and clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months of everolimus plus exemestane treatment. Results Of 150 patients included, 107 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. p4EBP1 staining above the median (Allred score ≥6) was associated with a higher CBR at 6 months (62% versus 40% in high-p4EBP1 versus low-p4EBP1, χ2 test, p = 0.026) and a longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS of 9.2 versus 5.8 months in high-p4EBP1 versus low-p4EBP1; p = 0.02). When tested with other biomarkers, only p4EBP1 remained a significant predictive marker of PFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.591; p = 0.01). Conclusions This study identified a subset of patients with hormone receptor-positive endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer and poor outcome who would derive less benefit from everolimus and exemestane. p4EBP1 may be a useful predictive biomarker in routine clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02444390.

The objective of the CHEOPS trial was to assess the benefit of adding aromatase inhibitor (AI) to metronomic chemotherapy, oral vinorelbine, 50 mg, three times a week for pre-treated, HR + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients. In this multicentric phase II study, patients had to have progressed on AI and one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomized between oral vinorelbine (Arm A) and oral vinorelbine with non-steroidal AI (Arm B). 121 patients were included, 61 patients in Arm A and 60 patients in Arm B. The median age was 68 years. 109 patients had visceral metastases. They all had previously received an AI. The study had been prematurely stopped following the third death due to febrile neutropenia. Median PFS trend was found to be different with 2.3 months and 3.7 months in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.50–1.06, p value = 0.0929). No statistical difference was shown in OS and better tumor response. 56 serious adverse events corresponding to 25 patients (21%) were reported (respectively, 12 (20%) versus 13 (22%) for arms A and B) (NS). The addition of AI to oral vinorelbine over oral vinorelbine alone in aromatase inhibitor-resistant metastatic breast cancer was associated with a non-significant improvement of PFS. Several unexpected serious adverse events were reported. Metronomic oral vinorelbine schedule, at 50 mg three times a week, requires close biological monitoring. The question of hormonal treatment and chemotherapy combination remains open.

Abstract Background: Advances in screening and treatment have led to increase in breast cancer (BC) survival in recent years but prognoses for metastatic BC remain poor with poorer outcomes as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Treatment as bevacizumab and paclitaxel for metastatic BC, although that can increase time to progression of disease, often carry toxicity and is not curative but rather palliative in intent with the goal to improve or maintain HRQOL. The aim of this work was to assess impact of clinical factors such as disease progression, toxicity on HRQOL. Methods: COMET study is a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort study in France whose main objective was to identify biological factor that could predict the clinical benefit of bevacizumab-paclitaxel combination therapy as first treatment in HER2 negative metastatic BC. HRQOL was assessed at baseline, at every cycle (every for 4 weeks) until progression and then every 3 months up to death using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and its BC specific module, the EORTC QLQ-BR23. In this ancillary study, we targeted 5 dimensions HRQOL for the primary analyses: Global health status (GHS), physical functioning (PF), Emotional functioning (EF), fatigue (FA) and pain (PA). The primary endpoint was time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in HRQOL scales that defined as time between inclusion and the first decrease HRQOL score ≥ 5 points compared to baseline score, with no further improvement of at least 5 points. Multivariable Cox model with time dependent covariate was performed to assess clinical factors associated with TUDD for each of the 5 target dimensions HRQOL. We performed 3 models for each dimension: model 1 including all covariate with p< 0.10 in univariable; model 2 including model 1 and adjusted on cancer subtype and model 3 included model 1 stratified by cancer subtype. P value < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 510 patients included in COMET study, 432 patients with available HRQOL data were analyzed in this study. Median age at inclusion was 58 years (range: 29-83), and 24.4% of patients had triple negative tumor subtype. About 79 % of cancers were invasive ductal carcinoma and 43 % patients had least 3 metastasis sites at baseline. At baseline, patients reported a mean score for GHS of 57.6 (SD=22.7), for PF of 75.8 (23.2), for EF of 62.2 (25.8), for FA of 42.2 (29.60) and for PA of 38.1 (31.5). The Median TUDDs for the 5 targeted dimensions was 10.1 months [7.5-16.9] for GHS, 6.1 months [4.1-8.9] for PF, 21.6 [18.7-31.2] for EF, 10.8 [6.2-16.6] for FA and 13.6[10.1-22.5] months for PA. In multivariable analyses, Disease Progression was associated with TUDD of GHS (HR [99%CI] =2.4 [1.2-4.9] and TUDD of PF (2.1 [1.1-3.7]). After adjusted on cancer subtype, association persisted with TUDD of GHS (p=0.009). Performance Status was associated with TUDD of PF (1.6 [1.2-2.3]), and TUDD of Pain (1.6 [1.1-2.3]). Performance Status association with TUDD of PF continued after adjustment on cancer subtype (p=0.0003). Prior endocrine therapy was associated with TUDD of pain in patients with tumor with positive hormone receptor (HR+) (2.4 [1.2-4.7]). There was no factor associated with TUDD of EF and TUDD of FA. Conclusion: Results of this study have shown that among the 5 targeted dimensions HRQOL, Physical Functioning was deteriorated in the shortest time. Disease progression, base line performance status and prior endocrine therapy for HR+ subtype, are clinical factors that could influence HRQOL in HER2 negative metastatic BC treated with first line chemotherapy. Citation Format: Oumar Billa, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Marion Chevrier, Franck Bonnetain, Isabelle Desmoulins, William Jacot, Olivier Trédan, Marc Debled, Christelle Levy, Anthony Gonçalves, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Florence Dalenc, Christelle Jouannaud, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Mireille Mousseau, Julien Grenier, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Fatima-Zohra Toumi, Frédérique Berger, Jérôme Lemonnier, Jean-Yves Pierga. Health related quality of life of patients treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: impact of clinical factors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-54.

Abstract Background: The HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated efficacy in heavily pretreated HER2-over- and HER2-low expressing ABC (1, 2). We aimed to assess the activity of T-DXd in HER2-over-, HER2-low and HER2-nul expressing ABC, to describe the drug mechanisms of action in the 3 cohorts and to identify biomarkers associated to drug response or resistance. Study Description: DAISY is a multicenter, open-label phase II trial designed to assess the efficacy of single agent T-DXd at 5.4 mg/kg dose in ABC with extensive biomarkers analysis. Three cohorts of patients were included: Cohort 1 (HER2 over-expressing: HER2 3+ on immunohistochemistry (IHC) or HER2 IHC2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]+), Cohort 2 (HER2 low-expressing: IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) and cohort 3 (HER2-nul: IHC0+). Biopsy of metastatic sites was performed: at baseline, on treatment (mandatory for cohort 1, optional for cohort 2/3) and at tumor progression; blood samples for ctDNA were collected at baseline. The primary endpoint was the Best Overall Response (BOR) in each cohort, according to the investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints were BOR by central assessment, clinical benefit rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results:185 women and 1 man were enrolled between November 2019 and March 2021. Among the patients enrolled in the safety population (see Table 1), median (range) age was 55 (24-82) years, all received at least one prior line of therapy and 12 patients were TN. Table 2 shows investigator-reported T-Dxd activity in the 3 cohorts at a median follow-up of 10.1 months [95%CI: 9.2-11.1]. A total of 170 patients (95%) had at least one treatment-related toxicity. Key grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (10.6% of patients), fatigue (5.6%), leucopenia (4.5%), vomiting (4.5%) and anemia (3.4%). A total of 4 patients had drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (grade 1 in 3 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient), 11 patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. No drug-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: T-DXd showed clinically meaningful activity in patients with HER2-overexpressing ABC and interestingly also in those with HER2low and HER2-nul ABC. Safety profile was consistent with previous reports. 1.Modi S et al N Engl J Med 2020 2.Mosi S et al J Clin Oncol 2020 Table 1.Analysis populationsTotalCohort 1 (HER2 over-expressing)Cohort 2 (HER2 low-expressing)Cohort 3 (HER2 non-detected)Enrolled population186727440Safety population*179687338 (including 12 TN)Full analysis Set**176687236TN: Triple Negative. *: safety population = enrolled population except 7 patients who did not receive at least one dose of study drug. **: Full Analysis Set = safety population except 3 patients (2 who did not have a valid first post-baseline assessment of disease status or who did not have progressive disease and 1 who did not have at least one radiologically measurable lesion according to RECIST v1.1) Table 2.T-DXd activity in the three cohorts according to investigator assessmentTotalCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3BOR confirmedn/N82/176 (46.6%)47/68 (69.1%)24/72 (33.3%)11/36 (30.6%)[95%CI][39.1; 54.2][56.7; 79.8][22.7; 45.4]16.3; 48.1]Median DORmonths7.69.97.66.8[95%CI][6.2; 9.7][5.4; NR][4.4; 8.7][2.8; 8.3]Median PFSmonths6.911.16.74.2[95%CI][6.7; 8.7][8.4; NR][4.6; 8.5][2.1; 6.9]NR: Not Reached Citation Format: Véronique Diéras, Elise Deluche, Amélie Lusque, Barbara Pistilli, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Yves Pierga, Frédéric Viret, Christelle Levy, Laura Salabert, Fanny Le Du, Florence Dalenc, Christelle Jouannaud, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Xavier Durando, Thierry Petit, Céline Mahier - Aït Oukhatar, Thomas Filleron, Maria Fernanda Mosele, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Agnès Ducoulombier, Fabrice André. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for advanced breast cancer patients (ABC), regardless HER2 status: A phase II study with biomarkers analysis (DAISY) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-02.

PURPOSE Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, improves progression-free survival in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in postmenopausal women with aromatase inhibitor–resistant metastatic breast cancer. However, the benefit of adding everolimus to ET in the adjuvant setting in early breast cancer is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized double-blind phase III study, women with high-risk, hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to everolimus or placebo for 2 years combined with standard ET. Stratification factors included ET agent, receipt of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, progesterone receptor status, duration of ET before random assignment, and lymph node involvement. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01805271 ). RESULTS Between June 2013 and March 2020, 1,278 patients were randomly allocated to receive everolimus or placebo. At the first interim analysis, the trial was stopped for futility and a full analysis undertaken once data snapshot complete. One hundred forty-seven patients have had a DFS event reported and at 3 years, DFS did not differ between patients who received ET plus everolimus (88% [95% CI, 85 to 91]) or ET plus placebo (89% [95% CI, 86 to 91; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.32; P = .77]). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 22.9% of patients (29.9% with everolimus v 15.9% with placebo, P < .001). 53.4% everolimus-treated patients permanently discontinued experimental treatment early compared with placebo-treated 22.3%. CONCLUSION Among high-risk patients, everolimus added to adjuvant ET did not improve DFS. Tolerability was a concern, with more than half of patients stopping everolimus before study completion. Everolimus cannot be recommended in the adjuvant setting.

Abstract Background: The double blind randomized UNIRAD trial (NCT01805271) showed no evidence that adding Everolimus (EVE) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (EHT) for high-risk early breast cancer (BC) improved 3-year disease-free survival (iDFS) compared with EHT alone. In this trial, high risk was defined by any T and either ≥4N+, or ≥1N+ after neoadjuvant treatment, or ≥1N+ and EPclin high risk (EPCH) score ≥3.3. This sub analysis is aimed to verify prognostic added value of EndoPredict test results on outcomes in patients screened for the UNIRAD study.. Material and methods: From May 2015 to March 2020, 777 patients were screened with the EndoPredict test. Complete results were obtained for 767 of them. 662 pts were classified as EPCH and 429 were randomized in UNIRAD. 233 pts with EPCH and 105 pts with EPclin low risk (EPCL) were not randomized but followed up for iDFS. Statistical analysis: Kaplan-Meier estimates the association of the integrated molecular-clinico-pathologic EPclin score, and the 12-gene molecular EP score, with iDFS (primary endpoint) and dMFS (secondary endpoint). Independent prognostic added value of EPclin score was tested in a multivariate Cox model after adjusting on tumor characteristics (Grade and T, N). A two-sided p-value less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant, 95% confidence intervals reported with HR. Results: Median follow-up of the cohort was 36.6 mo (0-69) since EndoPredict test. As for the whole population, there was no significant difference in iDFS between treatment arms in the randomized EPCH group. On the other hand, EPclin was an independent prognostic factor for iDFS. 36 mo relapse rate from testing for patients in the EPCL group and the EPCH group was 0% and 7%, respectively (HR supposing continuous EPclin score: 2.36, 95%CI: 1.7-3.3, p < .0001). This difference remained significant when assessed in a cox model with tumor size, number of positive nodes and tumor grade (HR: 1.96, 95%CI: 1.32-2.9, p=0.0008). Furthermore, EPclin results was independently correlated to distant metastatic free survival: 36 mo dMFS for patient in the EPCL and EPCH group was 100% and 94%, respectively (adjusted HR: 2.13, 95%CI:11.3-3.4, p = .0014). Of interest when assessing prognostic of patients within quartiles of EPclin Score (<3.6; 3.6-4.1; ≥4.1-4.8; ≥ 4.8), 36 mo iDFS was 99%; 95%; 94% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion: These prospective results confirm the significance of EPclin score as an independent prognostic parameter in node positive ER+/HER2- eBC patients receiving standard adjuvant treatment. This information can be of importance for selection of specific adjuvant intervention, particularly chemotherapy and new targeted therapy. Further analysis on the EP score will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Frederique Penault-Llorca, Florence Dalenc, Sylvie Chabaud, Paul Cottu, Djelila Allouache, David Cameron, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Julien Grenier, Laurence Venat Bouvet, Apurna Jegannathen, Mario Campone, Francesco Del Piano, Marc Debled, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Sylvie Giacchetti, Philippe Barthelemy, Laure Kaluzinski, Audrey Mailliez, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Eric Legouffe, Anne Cayre, Mathilde Martinez, Catherine Delbaldo, Delphine Mollon-Grange, E. Jane Macaskill, Matthew Sephton, Laëtitia Stefani, Blaha Belgadi, Matthew Winter, Hubert Orfeuvre, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Herve Bonnefoi, Judith Bliss, Jean-Luc Canon, Jerome Lemonnier, Fabrice Andre, Thomas Bachelot. Prognostic value of EndoPredict test in patients screened for UNIRAD, a UCBG randomized, double blind, phase III international trial evaluating the addition of everolimus (EVE) to adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) in women with high risk HR+, HER2- early breast cancer (eBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-08.

BackgroundEftilagimod alpha (efti; IMP321) is a soluble LAG-3 protein (LAG-3Ig) that binds to a subset of MHC class II molecules and mediates activation of antigen-presenting cells followed by CD8 T-cells. Weekly paclitaxel is a standard of care chemo-regimen after failure of endocrine-based therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). AIPAC (Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel) investigated the addition of efti to weekly paclitaxel in these patients (pts).MethodsThis placebo-controlled, double-blinded, 1:1 randomized phase IIb trial enrolled pts with measurable disease, HR+ HER2- MBC after endocrine-based therapy. Pts received paclitaxel (80 mg/m² IV on D1, D8, D15) + efti (30 mg) or placebo on D2, D16 (every 2 weeks) for up to 24 weeks following efti/placebo for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint (EP) was progression-free survival (RECIST1.1) by BICR. Secondary EPs included overall survival (OS), PFS (local read), overall response rate (ORR), biomarker, quality of life. Exploratory EPs included univariate/multivariate analyses.Results227 pts were randomized (Jan2017-Jul2019). All except 1 received ≥1 treatment and were included in the full analysis set [efti (n=114); placebo (n=112)]. Data cut-off was 14May2021 (min. follow-up= 22 months). Median age was 60 yrs with ECOG 0 in 61.5%. 91.6% had visceral disease. Pts were mostly endocrine resistant (84%) and partially pre-treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (44.2%). Post-study treatment was similar. Median OS was 20.4 (95% CI: 14.3-25.1) months in the efti group vs. 17.5 (95% CI: 12.9-21.9) in the placebo group. HR was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.64-1.19; p=0.197). In predefined univariate analyses, younger pts, low baseline monocytes and luminal B showed significant/clinically meaningful improvement in OS (table 1).Efti increased PBMC/T cell (CD4/CD8) count vs. placebo, correlating with improved OS (Spearman Rho=0.6, p=0.02 for CD8 T cells). In a whole population multivariate cox regression model, increasing BMI and prior treatment with CDK4/6 were independent significant poor prognostic markers for PFS and OS.TEAEs leading to discontinuation were similar at 5.3%(efti) & 6.3%(placebo). PFS (Primary EP) and safety were reported at SABCS 2020 (Abstract#132).Abstract 948 Table 1Overall survival by subgroups at final analysisConclusionsEfti added to paclitaxel led to a non-significant 2.9 months median OS increase in HR+ HER2- MBC pts after endocrine-based therapy. Effects were significant in pts <65yrs, with low monocytes and more aggressive disease (luminal B). Efti increased circulating CD4/CD8 T cells, which significantly correlated to improved OS. Weekly paclitaxel + efti should be further investigated in MBC.Trial RegistrationThe trial identifiers are IMP321-P011 (code for sponsor), 2015-002541-63 (EudraCT) and NCT02614833 (ClinicalTrials.gov).Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by relevant ethic committees and institutional review boards.

Purpose The use of oral cancer drugs (OAD) has increased over the last two decades. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of a nurse-led telephone follow-up in the therapeutic management of patients treated with an OAD regarding toxicity, medication adherence and quality of life. Methods A randomized, multicenter, controlled trial was conducted. All consecutive over 18-year-old patients, treated in medical oncology, radiotherapy, or hematology departments, receiving OAD for any cancer were invited to participate to the study. A total of 183 patients treated for solid or hematological cancers with an OAD were randomly assigned to receive a nurse-led telephone follow-up or standard care for 24 weeks. Data were collected between 2015 and 2018. Results Nurse telephone follow-up did not improve the global score toxicity in the intervention group. However, telephone calls directed by trained nurses induced a significant decrease in number of patients with grade 3 adverse events throughout the follow-up [OR 0.45 (IC à 95%) (0.23, 0.9)]( P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in quality of life and medication adherence between groups at any follow-up time point. Conclusions In this first French real-life study, the advice provided by qualified nurses via phone calls improved the management of grade 3 toxicities but failed to demonstrate an improvement of all grades of toxicities. More prospective studies are needed to confirm the impact of telephone calls on the toxicities related to OAD. Trial registration Clinical trial registration is NCT02459483. Protection committee SUD-ESTI registration is 2015-A00527-42 on 13 April 2015. National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products registration is 150619-B on the 27 may 2015.

Abstract Background:Eftilagimod alpha (efti, IMP321),a soluble LAG-3 protein (LAG-3Ig) that binds to a subset of MHC class II molecules, mediates antigen-presenting cell (APC) activation followed by CD8 T-cell activation. AIPAC (Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel; NCT02614833) investigatedcombinations of the APC activator efti + weekly paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel + placebo in metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) patients (pts). Methods:The placebo-controlled, double-blinded, 1:1 randomized, multinational, phase IIb trial enrolled pts with measurable disease, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) MBC with indications for first line weekly paclitaxel without indication for HER2/neu targeted therapy. Pts received paclitaxel (80 mg/m² IV at D1, D8, D15 plus efti (30 mg) or placebo at D2, D16 (injected SC every 2 weeks) for 6 cycles (1 cycle = 4 weeks). Maintenance phase followed in which pts benefitting from treatment received efti or placebo for an additional 52 weeks. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) (RECIST1.1) determined by blinded independent central read (BICR). Secondary endpoints included local read PFS, RECIST 1.1 tumor response, pharmacodynamic effects, quality of life and overall survival. The study was powered (80 %) to detect 0.667 hazard ratio (HR) based on 5% one-sided alpha and planned to enroll 226 pts. Results: From Jan 2017-Jul 2019, 227 pts were randomized. All except 1 received ≥ 1 treatment and were included in the full analysis set [(efti (n = 114); placebo (n = 112)]. Data cut-off was 10th Jan 2020 with 12 month median follow-up. HR for PFS assessed by BICR was 0.93 [95 % CI 0.67-1.30], p =0.341. In the efti group 63 % (95% CI 52- 71%) were progression free at 6 months compared to 54 % (95% CI 43-63%) in the placebo group. ORR was 48.3 % in the efti group compared to 38.4 % in the placebo group as assessed by BICR (p=0.118). Efti increased numbers of PBMCs and T cells (CD4 and CD8) significantly compared to placebo. In predefined subgroups such as pts with low monocytes at baseline, luminal B subtype or age <65 years, clinically meaningful improvement in PFS was observed. TEAE rates leading to death (or discontinuation) in the two groups were similar, at 1.8 % (5.3 %) and 2.7 % (6.3 %) for the efti and placebo groups, respectively. Three pts (1.3 %) were withdrawn from treatment due to grade 3-4 immediate hypersensitivity reactions to efti, while 4 pts (1 in efti group vs. 3 in placebo group) were withdrawn from the study due to grade 2-3 hypersensitivity to paclitaxel. The most frequent (≥10%) TEAEs ≥ grade 3 were gamma-glutamyl transferase increase (19.3% vs 29.5%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (8.8% vs 10.7%) and neutropenia (15.8% vs 14.3%) reported in the efti and placebo group, respectively. Injection site reaction (34.2% vs 3.6%) and injection site erythema (30.7% vs 1.8%) were more frequent in efti versus placebo arms. Conclusion: Efti did not prolong overall median PFS in women with HR+ MBC receiving first line chemotherapy. Tested in a randomized setting against placebo in pts receiving paclitaxel, efti is well tolerated and did not add clinically significant toxicity while inducing a sustained, significant increase in CD8 T cells in blood and clinical benefits in some predefined subgroups. Relevant subgroups and overall survival will be investigated. BICRInvestigatorEfti+paclitaxel(N= 114)Placebo+paclitaxel(N= 112)Efti+paclitaxel(N= 114)Placebo+paclitaxel(N= 112)Median PFS, months (95% CI)7.29 (6.64-7.46)7.29 (5.52-7.46)7.16 (5.65-7.39)6.70 (5.52-7.33)HR (95% CI)0.93 (0.67-1.30)0.92 (0.69-1.23)P value0.3410.305Mean PFS [SE], months7.12 [0.37]6.64 [0.38]6.81 [0.33]6.30 [0.31] Citation Format: Hans Wildiers, Anne Armstrong, Eveline Cuypere, Florence Dalenc, Luc Dirix, Steve Chan, Frederik Marme, Carolina Pia Schröder, Jens Huober, Jill Wagemans, Peter Vuylsteke, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Etienne Brain, Sherko Kümmel, Zsuzsanna Pápai, Luca Perjesi, Christian Mueller, Chrystelle Brignone, Frederic Triebel. Primary efficacy results from AIPAC: A double-blinded, placebo controlled, randomized multinational phase IIb trial comparing weekly paclitaxel plus eftilagimod alpha (soluble LAG-3 protein) vs. weekly paclitaxel plus placebo in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD14-08.

Benefits of physical activity are widely demonstrated for early stage cancers but few studies have focused on metastatic disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of physical activity on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. We conducted a secondary analysis of the national, multicentric, non-randomized, prospective cohort SNPs to Risk of Metastasis (StoRM) study. The level of physical activity was self-reported at inclusion and divided into three categories of physical activity: light level, moderate level, and vigorous level. Overall, 833 patients (56.2%) completed the physical activity questionnaire at baseline on average physical activity during the previous year: 11.6% had a light level of physical activity, 69.0% achieved moderate levels of physical activity and 19.3% reported vigorous levels of physical activity. After adjustment for confounding, physical activity was not statistically significantly associated with overall survival in the whole population. Subgroup analysis identified that both vigorous and moderate physical activity were associated with statistically significantly improved overall survival compared to light physical activity level only in the HER2 positive subgroup (HR 0.23; 95% CI 0.07–0.70, p = 0.01 and HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15–0.96, p = 0.04). Physical activity done during the previous year was associated with survival in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients. These results suggest that overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients could be improved through physical activity which should be considered as a complementary intervention for these individuals. The study showed that moderate/vigorous levels of physical activity were associated with better overall survival, and that these associations remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis in the HER2 positive subgroup. These results have clinical relevance and justify the recommendations for physical activity interventions in metastatic breast cancer.

A 75-year-old female patient, nonsmoker was addressed to our institution for a fracture of C5 vertebra with spinal cord compression by a tumor mass invading surrounding soft tissue. She had a previous history of breast ductal carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma. Biopsy of the tumor mass showed a TTF-1-positive carcinoma. Molecular study showed a E545K mutation of PIK3CA. Lung imaging showed multiple nodules evocative of metastasis rather than a primitive tumor. Reviewing of slides of endometrioid carcinoma showed areas positive for TTF1, and the same E545K mutation was found in endometrial tumor. The final diagnosis was endometrioid metastatic carcinoma with aberrant TTF-1 expression. A subset of endometrial neoplasm expresses TTF-1, this situation might be confusing especially in case of metastatic disease.

à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

1529 Background: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with poor outcome. In this study, the association between germline genetic variants and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was analyzed in TNBC patients. Methods: A genome wide-association study (GWAS) aimed to identify variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms – SNPs) associated with prognosis in 1121 patients with TNBC in the SIGNAL prospective cohort. Associations between gene variants and iDFS were assessed in univariate Cox regression models. Variants were combined in a score to identify risk categories. A prognostic model based on breast cancer stage and genetic variants was estimated using a multivariate Cox regression. Interaction between stage and genetic score was tested. Discrimination of the model was assessed by the Harrell’s C statistic and internal validity by bootstrap method. Results: The characteristics of the 1121 patients were representative of a population with early TNBC. Four SNPs on chromosomes 9 and 2 were found significantly associated to iDFS in univariate Cox models. Homozygous status for the most frequent allele was associated with poorer iDFS for two SNPs and this status was present in 50% and 57% of the population. For the two other SNPs, the most frequent allele was associated with more favorable iDFS. Three prognostic categories were derived from the genetic score. The following table presents the results from the multivariate Cox model including genetic score and disease stage. Clinical trial information: RECF1098. Conclusions: In a prospective cohort of 1121 patients with early TNBC, 4 genetic variants (SNPs) were associated with iDFS. A score involving SNPs provided similar prognostic indications as breast cancer stages. A search assessing the function and the role of the involved genes is ongoing.[Table: see text]

Purpose: Genomic tests can identify ER-positive HER2-negative localized breast cancer patients who may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Such tests seem especially interesting in “intermediate” clinico-pathological risk categories. The psychological impact of the decision uncertainty in these women remains largely unexplored. We assessed the clinical and psychological impact of EndoPredict® (EpClin), a clinico-genomic test, in these patients. Methods: This multicenter, single arm prospective study (NCT02773004) enrolled patients for which adjuvant chemotherapy was uncertain, based on predefined criteria. The primary endpoint was the proportion of change between initial adjuvant decision and final administration of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included post-test (Day 17) and 1-year patient reported outcomes. Results: One third of 200 evaluable patients had a high EpClin score (≥3.32867; 10 years cumulative risk of distance failure ≥10%). The overall change rate of chemotherapy decision was 72/200 (35.8%, 95% CI 29.2–42.4). Chemotherapy was withdrawn in 57 cases (28.4% [22.2–34.8]) and added in 15 (7.5% [3.8–11.2]. 6 changes (8%) were based on patients’ decisions. Anxiety and distress levels increased at Day 17 when adding chemotherapy after the test result (p < 10−7 and 0.00022 respectively), while stable in other situations. At 1-year, all patients had returned to the baseline anxiety and distress levels (mean anxiety 51.5, +/− SD = 2.5 [max. 80], mean distress 3±1 [max. 10]). Conclusions: EndoPredict ® (EpClin) is clinically useful in deciding whether or not to administer adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with intermediate risk. A single-step decision is preferable since adding chemotherapy at a later stage increases anxiety and distress.

Background In 2013, the interim analysis of the Protocol for Herceptin as Adjuvant therapy with Reduced Exposure (PHARE) trial could not show that 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-inferior to 12 months. Here, we report the planned final analysis based on the prespecified number of occurring events. Methods PHARE is an open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority randomised trial of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer comparing 6 months versus 12 months of trastuzumab treatment concomitant with or following standard neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The study was undertaken in 156 centres in France. Eligible patients were women aged 18 years or older with non-metastatic, operable, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast and either positive axillary nodes or negative axillary nodes but a tumour of at least 10 mm. Participants must have received at least four cycles of a chemotherapy for this breast cancer and have started receiving adjuvant trastuzumab-treatment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to either 6 months or 12 months of trastuzumab therapy duration between the third and sixth months of adjuvant trastuzumab. The randomisation was stratified by concomitant or sequential treatment with chemotherapy, oestrogen receptor status, and centre. The primary objective was non-inferiority in the intention-to-treat population in the 6-month group in terms of disease-free survival with a prespecified hazard margin of 1.15. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00381901. Findings 3384 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either 12 months (n=1691) or 6 months (n=1693) of adjuvant trastuzumab. One patient in the 12-month group and three patients in the 6-month group were excluded, so 1690 patients in each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At a median follow-up of 7.5 years (IQR 5.3-8.8), 704 events relevant to disease-free survival were observed (345 [20.4%] in the 12-month group and 359 [21.2%] in the 6-month group). The adjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival in the 12-month group versus the 6-month group was 1.08 (95% CI 0.93-1.25; p=0.39). The non-inferiority margin was included in the 95% CI. No differences in effects pertaining to trastuzumab duration were found in any of the subgroups. After the completion of trastuzumab treatment, rare adverse events occurred over time and the safety analysis remained similar to the previously published report. In particular, we found no change in the cardiac safety comparison, and only three additional cases in which the left ventricular ejection fraction decreased to less than 50% have been reported in the 12-month group. Interpretation The PHARE study did not show the non-inferiority of 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab. Hence, adjuvant trastuzumab standard duration should remain 12 months. Copyright (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Endocrine treatment represents the cornerstone of endocrine-sensitive pre-menopausal early breast cancer. The estrogen blockade plays a leading role in the therapeutic management with surgery, radiotherapy and selective antiestrogen treatment. For several years, selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as tamoxifen, have revolutionized medical care of hormone receptors-positive breast cancer and have conquered the therapeutic arsenal while becoming the gold standard of treatment. Other combinations associating the ovarian function suppression using LHRH agonists with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors have been recently investigated, leading to mitigated opinions regarding the clinical benefit of these associations. We propose here a comprehensive overview on existing data and their actualization concerning LHRH analogues, whilst emphasizing benefit-risk balance for this targeted population.