The 'CPPopt-Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness' (COGiTATE) randomised controlled trial demonstrated the feasibility and safety of targeting an automated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) tailored to optimize cerebrovascular autoregulation (CPPopt) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring intracranial pressure management. The average values of the autoregulation index known as the pressure reactivity index (PRx) were not different between the intervention (CPP target = CPPopt) and control (CPP target = 60–70 mmHg) groups of the trial. This secondary analysis was performed to investigate whether: (1) in the intervention group, PRx was closer to PRxopt (PRx at CPPopt) values, indicating a more preserved reactivity, as opposed to in the control group; (2) in the intervention group, patients experienced lower hourly PRx when CPP was close to the CPPopt-based target. We analyzed data from the 28 and 32 patients randomized to the control and intervention groups of the COGiTATE study, respectively. We compared hourly averaged ΔPRx (PRx minus PRxopt, where PRxopt is PRx at CPPopt) between the two groups, focusing on periods of globally preserved/homogeneous autoregulation (negative PRxopt). For each patient in the intervention group, PRx values in periods when ΔCPP (CPP minus CPPopt target) was between −5 and + 5 mm Hg were compared to values in periods when ΔCPP was outside this range. The median ΔPRx was significantly lower in the intervention group for negative PRxopt (Mann–Whitney U-test, p < 0.001). For each patient in this group, the median PRx was lower in periods when CPP was close to the CPPopt-based target (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001). Despite no statistically significant difference in the grand mean PRx, our results suggest that targeting CPPopt does provide a way of improving cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with TBI, offering a rational intervention for trials that address this issue. We also bring insight into aspects of the PRx/CPP relationship that should be considered for autoregulation-guided management for future clinical protocols and trials design.

Poor postoperative outcomes may be associated with cerebral ischaemia or hyperaemia, caused by episodes of arterial blood pressure (ABP) being outside the range of cerebral autoregulation (CA). Monitoring CA using COx (correlation between slow changes in mean ABP and regional cerebral O 2 saturation—rSO 2 ) could allow to individualise the management of ABP to preserve CA. We aimed to explore a continuous automated assessment of ABP OPT (ABP where CA is best preserved) and ABP at the lower limit of autoregulation (LLA) in elective neurosurgery patients. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 85 patients [median age 60 (IQR 51–68)] undergoing elective neurosurgery. ABP BASELINE was the mean of 3 pre-operative non-invasive measurements. ABP and rSO 2 waveforms were processed to estimate COx-derived ABP OPT and LLA trend-lines. We assessed: availability (number of patients where ABP OPT /LLA were available); time required to achieve first values; differences between ABP OPT /LLA and ABP. ABP OPT and LLA availability was 86 and 89%. Median (IQR) time to achieve the first value was 97 (80–155) and 93 (78–122) min for ABP OPT and LLA respectively. Median ABP OPT [75 (69–84)] was lower than ABP BASELINE [90 (84–95)] ( p < 0.001, Mann-U test). Patients spent 72 (56–86) % of recorded time with ABP above or below ABP OPT ± 5 mmHg. ABP OPT and ABP time trends and variability were not related to each other within patients. 37.6% of patients had at least 1 hypotensive insult (ABP < LLA) during the monitoring time. It seems possible to assess individualised automated ABP targets during elective neurosurgery.

INTRODUCTION: Dysfunctional cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR)/autoregulation contributes to secondary injury following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Currently, monitoring of CVR relies on intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and has known thresholds at which outcomes worsen. Interest has shifted to less invasive near infrared spectroscopic (NIRS) regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) based measures of CVR. However, threshold levels at which outcomes worsen have not yet been determined for these indices. METHODS: A retrospective multi-institutional cohort study utilizing the CAnadian High Resolution TBI (CAHR-TBI) Research Collaborative database was performed. The cohort included TBI patients with ICP, arterial blood pressure (ABP), and rSO2 monitoring treated in adult intensive care units (ICU). COx (using rSO2 and cerebral perfusion pressure) as well as COx_a (using rSO2 and ABP) were calculated for each subject as the rSO2 based indices of CVR. 2 x 2 tables were created grouping patients by alive/dead and favorable/unfavorable outcomes at various thresholds of COx and COx_a as well as rSO2 itself. Chi-square values were calculated and the threshold producing the highest value was identified as providing the best discriminative value. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients were included. For both COx and COx_a an optimal threshold value of 0.2 was identified for both survival (χ 2 = 9.57, p = 0.0020; χ 2 = 13.04, p = 0.0003 respectively) and favorable outcomes (χ 2 = 5.98, p = 0.0145; χ 2 = 8.94, p = 0.0028 respectively) with values above this associated with worse outcomes. Notably, there was no identifiable threshold for raw rSO2 values at which outcomes were identified to worsen. CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-institutional cohort study, COx and COx_a were found to have a uniform threshold of 0.2, above which clinical outcomes worsened. This study lays the groundwork to transition to less invasive means of continuously measuring CVR.

Background: Near-infrared spectroscopy regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO 2 ) has gained interest as a raw parameter and as a basis for measuring cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). This study aimed to identify threshold values of rSO 2 and rSO 2 based CVR at which outcomes worsened following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: A retrospective multi-institutional cohort study was performed. The cerebral oxygen indices, COx (using rSO 2 and cerebral perfusion pressure) as well as COx_a (using rSO 2 and arterial blood pressure) were calculated for each patient. 2x2 tables were created grouping patients by alive/dead and favorable/unfavorable outcomes at various thresholds of COx and COx_a as well as rSO 2 itself. Chi-square values were calculated to identify the most discriminative significant threshold. Results: In the cohort of 129 patients rSO 2 did not have any statistically significant threshold value. For COx and COx_a, an optimal threshold value of 0.2 was identified for both survival and favorable outcomes with values above this associated with worse outcomes. Conclusions: In this study, raw rSO 2 was found to contain no significant prognostic information. However, rSO 2 based indices of CVR, were found to have a uniform threshold of 0.2, above which clinical outcomes worsened. This study lays the groundwork to transition to less invasive means of continuously measuring CVR.

BACKGROUND:Near-infrared spectroscopy regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) has gained interest as a raw parameter and as a basis for measuring cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) due to its noninvasive nature and high spatial resolution. However, the prognostic utility of these parameters has not yet been determined. This study aimed to identify threshold values of rSO2 and rSO2-based CVR at which outcomes worsened following traumatic brain injury (TBI).METHODS:A retrospective multi-institutional cohort study was performed. The cohort included TBI patients treated in four adult intensive care units (ICU). The cerebral oxygen indices, COx (using rSO2 and cerebral perfusion pressure) as well as COx_a (using rSO2 and arterial blood pressure) were calculated for each patient. Grand mean thresholds along with exposure-based thresholds were determined utilizing sequential chi-squared analysis and univariate logistic regression, respectively.RESULTS:In the cohort of 129 patients, there was no identifiable threshold for raw rSO2 at which outcomes were found to worsen. For both COx and COx_a, an optimal grand mean threshold value of 0.2 was identified for both survival and favorable outcomes, while percent time above - 0.05 was uniformly found to have the best discriminative value.CONCLUSIONS:In this multi-institutional cohort study, raw rSO2was found to contain no significant prognostic information. However, rSO2-based indices of CVR, COx and COx_a, were found to have a uniform grand mean threshold of 0.2 and exposure-based threshold of - 0.05, above which clinical outcomes markedly worsened. This study lays the groundwork to transition to less invasive means of continuously measuring CVR.

Purpose: To describe the effect of dexamethasone and tocilizumab on regional lung mechanics over admission in all mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. Materials and methods: Dynamic compliance, alveolar overdistension and collapse were serially determined using electric impedance tomography (EIT). Patients were categorized into three groups; no anti-inflammatory therapy, dexamethasone therapy, dexamethasone + tocilizumab therapy. The EIT variables were (I) visualized using polynomial regression, (II) evaluated throughout admission using linear mixed-effects models, and (III) average respiratory variables were compared. Results: Visual inspection of EIT variables showed a pattern of decreasing dynamic compliance. Overall, optimal set PEEP was lower in the dexamethasone group (-1.4 cmH2O, -2.6; -0.2). Clinically applied PEEP was lower in the dexamethasone and dexamethasone + tocilizumab group (-1.5 cmH2O, -2.6; -0.2; -2.2 cmH2O, -5.1; 0.6). Dynamic compliance, alveolar overdistension, and alveolar collapse at optimal set PEEP did not significantly differ between the three groups. Conclusion: Optimal and clinically applied PEEP were lower in the dexamethasone and dexamethasone + tocilizumab groups. The results suggest that the potential beneficial effects of these therapies do not affect lung mechanics favorably. However, this study cannot fully rule out any beneficial effect of anti-inflammatory treatment on pulmonary function due to its observational nature.

Purpose CPPopt denotes a Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (CPP) value at which the Pressure-Reactivity index, reflecting the global state of Cerebral Autoregulation, is best preserved. CPPopt has been investigated as a potential dynamically individualised CPP target in traumatic brain injury patients admitted in intensive care unit. The prospective bedside use of the concept requires ensured safety and reliability of the CPP recommended targets based on the automatically-generated CPPopt. We aimed to: Increase stability and reliability of the CPPopt automated algorithm by fine-tuning; perform outcome validation of the adjusted algorithm in a multi-centre TBI cohort. Methods ICM + software was used to derive CPPopt and fine-tune the algorithm. Parameters for improvement of the algorithm were selected based on qualitative and quantitative assessment of stability and reliability metrics. Patients enrolled in the Collaborative European Neuro Trauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) high-resolution cohort were included for retrospective validation. Yield and stability of the new algorithm were compared to the previous algorithm using Mann–U test. Area under the curves for mortality prediction at 6 months were compared with the DeLong Test. Results CPPopt showed higher stability ( p < 0.0001), but lower yield compared to the previous algorithm [80.5% (70—87.5) vs 85% (75.7—91.2), p < 0.001]. Deviation of CPPopt could predict mortality with an AUC of [AUC = 0.69 (95% CI 0.59–0.78), p < 0.001] and was comparable with the previous algorithm. Conclusion The CPPopt calculation algorithm was fine-tuned and adapted for prospective use with acceptable lower yield, improved stability and maintained prognostic power.

Current neurointensive care guidelines recommend intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) centered management for moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) because of their demonstrated associations with patient outcome. Cerebrovascular reactivity metrics, such as the pressure reactivity index (PRx), pulse amplitude index (PAx), and RAC index, have also demonstrated significant prognostic capabilities with regard to outcome. However, critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity indices have only been identified in two studies conducted at the same center. In this study, we aim to determine the critical thresholds of these metrics by leveraging a unique multi-center database. The study included a total of 354 patients from the CAnadian High-Resolution TBI (CAHR-TBI) Research Collaborative. Based on 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scores, patients were dichotomized into alive versus dead and favorable versus unfavorable. Chi-square values were then computed for incrementally increasing values of each physiological parameter of interest against outcome. The values that generated the greatest chi-squares for each parameter were considered to be the thresholds with the greatest outcome discriminatory capacity. To confirm that the identified thresholds provide prognostic utility, univariate and multivariable logistical regression analyses were performed adjusting for the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) variables. Through the chi-square analysis, a lower limit CPP threshold of 60 mm Hg and ICP thresholds of 18 mm Hg and 22 mm Hg were identified for both survival and favorable outcome predictions. For the cerebrovascular reactivity metrics, different thresholds were identified for the two outcome dichotomizations. For survival prediction, thresholds of 0.35, 0.25, and 0 were identified for PRx, PAx, and RAC, respectively. For favorable outcome prediction, thresholds of 0.325, 0.20, and 0.05 were found. Univariate logistical regression analysis demonstrated that the time spent above/below thresholds were associated with outcome. Further, multivariable logistical regression analysis found that percent time above/below the identified thresholds added additional variance to the IMPACT core model for predicting both survival and favorable outcome. In this study, we were able to validate the results of the previous two works as well as to reaffirm the ICP and CPP guidelines from the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) and the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).

Abstract Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with a high social and financial burden due to persisting (severe) disabilities. The consequences of TBI after intensive care unit (ICU) admission are generally measured with global disability screeners such as the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), which may lack precision. To improve outcome measurement after brain injury, a comprehensive clinical outcome assessment tool called the Minimal Dataset for Acquired Brain Injury (MDS-ABI) was recently developed. The MDS-ABI covers 12 life domains (demographics, injury characteristics, comorbidity, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, energy, mobility, self-care, communication, participation, social support, and quality of life), as well as informal caregiver capacity and strain. In this cross-sectional study, we used the MDS-ABI among formerly ICU admitted patients with TBI to explore the relationship between dichotomized severity of TBI and long-term outcome. Our objectives were to: 1) summarize demographics, clinical characteristics, and long-term outcomes of patients and their informal caregivers, and 2) compare differences between long-term outcomes in patients with mild-moderate TBI and severe TBI based on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores at admission. Participants were former patients of a Dutch university hospital (total n = 52; mild-moderate TBI n = 23; severe TBI n = 29) and their informal caregivers (n = 45). Hospital records were evaluated, and the MDS-ABI was administered during a home visit. On average 3.2 years after their TBI, 62% of the patients were cognitively impaired, 62% reported elevated fatigue, and 69% experienced restrictions in ≥2 participation domains (most frequently work or education and going out). Informal caregivers generally felt competent to provide necessary care (81%), but 31% experienced a disproportionate caregiver burden. All but four patients lived at home independently, often together with their informal caregiver (81%). Although the mild-moderate TBI group and the severe TBI group had significantly different clinical trajectories, there were no persisting differences between the groups for patient or caregiver outcomes at follow-up. As a large proportion of the patients experienced long-lasting consequences beyond global disability or independent living, clinicians should implement a multi-domain outcome set such as the MDS-AB to follow up on their patients.

Background A previous retrospective single-centre study suggested that the percentage of time spent with cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) below the individual lower limit of reactivity (LLR) is associated with mortality in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. We aim to validate this in a large multicentre cohort. Methods Recordings from 171 TBI patients from the high-resolution cohort of the CENTER-TBI study were processed with ICM+ software. We derived LLR as a time trend of CPP at a level for which the pressure reactivity index (PRx) indicates impaired cerebrovascular reactivity with low CPP. The relationship with mortality was assessed with Mann-U test (first 7-day period), Kruskal–Wallis (daily analysis for 7 days), univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. AUCs (CI 95%) were calculated and compared using DeLong’s test. Results Average LLR over the first 7 days was above 60 mmHg in 48% of patients. %time with CPP < LLR could predict mortality (AUC 0.73, p = < 0.001). This association becomes significant starting from the third day post injury. The relationship was maintained when correcting for IMPACT covariates or for high ICP. Conclusions Using a multicentre cohort, we confirmed that CPP below LLR was associated with mortality during the first seven days post injury.

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been suggested as a non-invasive monitoring technique to set cerebral autoregulation (CA) guided ABP targets (ABPopt) in comatose patients with hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) following cardiac arrest. We aimed to determine whether NIRS-derived CA and ABPopt values differ between left and right-sided recordings in these patients. Bifrontal regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) was measured using INVOS or Fore-Sight devices. The Cerebral Oximetry index (COx) was determined as a CA measure. ABPopt was calculated using a published algorithm with multi-window weighted approach. A paired Wilcoxon signed rank test and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to compare (1) systematic differences and (2) degree of agreement between left and right-sided measurements. Eleven patients were monitored. In one patient there was malfunctioning of the right-sided optode and in one patient not any ABPopt value was calculated. Comparison of rSO2 and COx was possible in ten patients and ABPopt in nine patients. The average recording time was 26 (IQR, 22–42) hours. The ABPopt values were not significantly different between the bifrontal recordings (80 (95

Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection present with different lung compliance and progression of disease differs. Measures of lung mechanics in SARS-CoV-2 patients may unravel different pathophysiologic mechanisms during mechanical ventilation. The objective of this prospective observational study is to describe whether Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels unravel changes in EIT-derived parameters over time and whether the changes differ between survivors and non-survivors. Serial EIT-measurements of alveolar overdistension, collapse, and compliance change in ventilated SARS-CoV-2 patients were analysed. In 80 out of 94 patients, we took 283 EIT measurements (93 from day 1–3 after intubation, 66 from day 4–6, and 124 from day 7 and beyond). Fifty-one patients (64%) survived the ICU. At admission mean PaO 2 /FiO 2 -ratio was 184.3 (SD 61.4) vs. 151.3 (SD 54.4) mmHg, ( p = 0.017) and PEEP was 11.8 (SD 2.8) cmH 2 O vs. 11.3 (SD 3.4) cmH 2 O, ( p = 0.475), for ICU survivors and non-survivors. At day 1–3, compliance was ~ 55 mL/cmH 2 O vs. ~ 45 mL/cmH 2 O in survivors vs. non-survivors. The intersection of overdistension and collapse curves appeared similar at a PEEP of ~ 12–13 cmH 2 O. At day 4–6 compliance changed to ~ 50 mL/cmH 2 O vs. ~ 38 mL/cmH 2 O. At day 7 and beyond, compliance was ~ 38 mL/cmH 2 O with the intersection at a PEEP of ~ 9 cmH 2 O vs. ~ 25 mL/cmH 2 O with overdistension intersecting at collapse curves at a PEEP of ~ 7 cmH 2 O. Surviving SARS-CoV-2 patients show more favourable EIT-derived parameters and a higher compliance compared to non-survivors over time. This knowledge is valuable for discovering the different groups.

OBJECTIVES:The recommendation of induced hypertension for delayed cerebral ischemia treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has been challenged recently and ideal pressure targets are missing. A new concept advocates an individual cerebral perfusion pressure where cerebral autoregulation functions best to ensure optimal global perfusion. We characterized optimal cerebral perfusion pressure at time of delayed cerebral ischemia and tested the conformity of induced hypertension with this target value. DESIGN:Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING:University hospital neurocritical care unit. PATIENTS:Thirty-nine aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with invasive neuromonitoring (20 with delayed cerebral ischemia, 19 without delayed cerebral ischemia). INTERVENTIONS:Induced hypertension greater than 180 mm Hg systolic blood pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Changepoint analysis was used to calculate significant changes in cerebral perfusion pressure, optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, and the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure 48 hours before delayed cerebral ischemia diagnosis. Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure increased 30 hours before the onset of delayed cerebral ischemia from 82.8 ± 12.5 to 86.3 ± 11.4 mm Hg (p < 0.05). Three hours before delayed cerebral ischemia, a changepoint was also found in the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (decrease from -0.2 ± 11.2 to -7.7 ± 7.6 mm Hg; p < 0.05) with a corresponding increase in pressure reactivity index (0.09 ± 0.33 to 0.19 ± 0.37; p < 0.05). Cerebral perfusion pressure at time of delayed cerebral ischemia was lower than in patients without delayed cerebral ischemia in a comparable time frame (cerebral perfusion pressure delayed cerebral ischemia 81.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg, no delayed cerebral ischemia 90.4 ± 10.5 mm Hg; p < 0.05). Inducing hypertension resulted in a cerebral perfusion pressure above optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (+12.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg; p < 0.0001). Treatment response (improvement of delayed cerebral ischemia: induced hypertension+ [n = 15] or progression of delayed cerebral ischemia: induced hypertension- [n = 5]) did not correlate to either absolute values of cerebral perfusion pressure or optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, nor the resulting difference (cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.69]; optimal cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.97]; and the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.51]). CONCLUSIONS:At the time of delayed cerebral ischemia occurrence, there is a significant discrepancy between cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure with worsening of autoregulation, implying inadequate but identifiable individual perfusion. Standardized induction of hypertension resulted in cerebral perfusion pressures that exceeded individual optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in delayed cerebral ischemia patients. The potential benefit of individual blood pressure management guided by autoregulation-based optimal cerebral perfusion pressure should be explored in future intervention studies.

Impairments in cerebral autoregulation (CA) are related to poor clinical outcome. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a non-invasive technique applied to estimate CA. Our general purpose was to study the clinical feasibility of a previously published ‘NIRS-only’ CA methodology in a critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) population and determine its relationship with clinical outcome. Bilateral NIRS measurements were performed for 1–2 h. Data segments of ten-minutes were used to calculate transfer function analyses (TFA) CA estimates between high frequency oxyhemoglobin (oxyHb) and deoxyhemoglobin (deoxyHb) signals. The phase shift was corrected for serial time shifts. Criteria were defined to select TFA phase plot segments (segments) with ‘high-pass filter’ characteristics. In 54 patients, 490 out of 729 segments were automatically selected (67%). In 34 primary neurology patients the median (q1–q3) low frequency (LF) phase shift was higher in 19 survivors compared to 15 non-survivors (13° (6.3–35) versus 0.83° (−2.8–13), p = 0.0167). CA estimation using the NIRS-only methodology seems feasible in an ICU population using segment selection for more robust and consistent CA estimations. The ‘NIRS-only’ methodology needs further validation, but has the advantage of being non-invasive without the need for arterial blood pressure monitoring.

Cerebral multimodality monitoring (MMM) is, even with a general lack of Class I evidence, increasingly recognized as a tool to support clinical decision-making in the neuroscience intensive care unit (NICU). However, literature and guidelines have focused on unimodal signals in a specific form of acute brain injury. Integrating unimodal signals in multiple signal monitoring is the next step for clinical studies and patient care. As such, we aimed to investigate the recent application of MMM in studies of adult patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), acute ischemic stroke (AIS), and hypoxic ischemic brain injury following cardiac arrest (HIBI). We identified continuous or daily updated monitoring modalities and summarized the monitoring setting, study setting, and clinical characteristics. In addition, we discussed clinical outcome in intervention studies. We identified 112 MMM studies, including 11 modalities, over the last 7 years (2015–2022). Fifty-eight studies (52%) applied only two modalities. Most frequently combined were ICP monitoring (92 studies (82%)) together with PbtO2 (63 studies (56%). Most studies included patients with TBI (59 studies) or SAH (53 studies). The enrollment period of 34 studies (30%) took more than 5 years, whereas the median sample size was only 36 patients (q1- q3, 20–74). We classified studies as either observational (68 studies) or interventional (44 studies). The interventions were subclassified as systemic (24 studies), cerebral (10 studies), and interventions guided by MMM (11 studies). We identified 20 different systemic or cerebral interventions. Nine (9/11, 82%) of the MMM-guided studies included clinical outcome as an endpoint. In 78% (7/9) of these MMM-guided intervention studies, a significant improvement in outcome was demonstrated in favor of interventions guided by MMM. Clinical outcome may be improved with interventions guided by MMM. This strengthens the belief in this application, but further interdisciplinary collaborations are needed to overcome the heterogeneity, as illustrated in the present review. Future research should focus on increasing sample sizes, improved data collection, refining definitions of secondary injuries, and standardized interventions. Only then can we proceed with complex outcome studies with MMM-guided treatment.

The cerebral pressure reactivity index (PRx), through intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements, informs clinicians about the cerebral autoregulation (CA) status in adult-sedated patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Using PRx in clinical practice is currently limited by variability over shorter monitoring periods. We applied an innovative method to reduce the PRx variability by ventilator-induced slow (1/min) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) oscillations. We hypothesized that, as seen in a previous animal model, the PRx variability would be reduced by inducing slow arterial blood pressure (ABP) and ICP oscillations without other clinically relevant physiological changes. Patients with TBI were ventilated with a static PEEP for 30 min (PRx period) followed by a 30-min period of slow [1/min (0.0167 Hz)] +5 cmH2O PEEP oscillations (induced (iPRx period). Ten patients with TBI were included. No clinical monitoring was discontinued and no additional interventions were required during the iPRx period. The PRx variability [measured as the standard deviation (SD) of PRx] decreased significantly during the iPRx period from 0.25 (0.22-0.30) to 0.14 (0.09-0.17) (P = 0.006). There was a power increase around the induced frequency (1/min) for both ABP and ICP (P = 0.002). In conclusion, 1/min PEEP-induced oscillations reduced the PRx variability in patients with TBI with ICP levels <22 mmHg. No other clinically relevant physiological changes were observed. Reduced PRx variability might improve CA-guided perfusion management by reducing the time to find "optimal" perfusion pressure targets. Larger studies with prolonged periods of PEEP-induced oscillations are required to take it to routine use.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Cerebral autoregulation assessment requires sufficient slow arterial blood pressure (ABP) waves. However, spontaneous ABP waves may be insufficient for reliable cerebral autoregulation estimations. Therefore, we applied a ventilator "sigh-function" to generate positive end-expiratory pressure oscillations that induce slow ABP waves. This method demonstrated a reduced variability of the pressure reactivity index, commonly used as continuous cerebral autoregulation measure in a traumatic brain injury population.

INTRODUCTION:Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation (CA) in patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) can provide an individual 'optimal' cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) target (CPPopt) at which CA is best preserved. This potentially offers an individualized precision medicine approach. Retrospective data suggest that deviation of CPP from CPPopt is associated with poor outcomes. We are prospectively assessing the feasibility and safety of this approach in the COGiTATE [CPPopt Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness] study. Its primary objective is to demonstrate the feasibility of individualizing CPP at CPPopt in TBI patients. The secondary objectives are to investigate the safety and physiological effects of this strategy.METHODS:The COGiTATE study has included patients in four European hospitals in Cambridge, Leuven, Nijmegen, and Maastricht (coordinating centre). Patients with severe TBI requiring intracranial pressure (ICP)-directed therapy are allocated into one of two groups. In the intervention group, CPPopt is calculated using a published (modified) algorithm. In the control group, the CPP target recommended in the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines (CPP 60-70 mmHg) is used.RESULTS:Patient recruitment started in February 2018 and will continue until 60 patients have been studied. Fifty-one patients (85% of the intended total) have been recruited in October 2019. The first results are expected early 2021.CONCLUSION:This prospective evaluation of the feasibility, safety and physiological implications of autoregulation-guided CPP management is providing evidence that will be useful in the design of a future phase III study in severe TBI patients.

Background: The majority of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for mechanical ventilation. The role of multi-organ failure during ICU admission as driver for outcome remains to be investigated yet. Design and setting: Prospective cohort of mechanically ventilated critically ill with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants and methods: 94 participants of the MaastrICCht cohort (21% women) had a median length of stay of 16 days (maximum of 77). After division into survivors (n = 59) and non-survivors (n = 35), we analysed 1555 serial SOFA scores using linear mixed-effects models. Results: Survivors improved one SOFA score point more per 5 days (95% CI: 4-8) than non-survivors. Adjustment for age, sex, and chronic lung, renal and liver disease, body-mass index, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular risk fac-tors, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score did not change this result. This association was stronger for women than men (P-interaction = 0.043). Conclusions: The decrease in SOFA score associated with survival suggests multi-organ failure involvement dur -ing mechanical ventilation in patients with SARS-CoV-2. Surviving women appeared to improve faster than sur-viving men. Serial SOFA scores may unravel an unfavourable trajectory and guide decisions in mechanically ventilated patients with SARS-CoV-2. (c) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Managing traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) near to the cerebral autoregulation (CA)-guided "optimal" CPP (CPPopt) value is associated with improved outcome and might be useful to individualize care, but has never been prospectively evaluated. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of CA-guided CPP management in TBI patients requiring intracranial pressure monitoring and therapy (TBIicp patients). The CPPopt Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness (COGiTATE) parallel two-arm feasibility trial took place in four tertiary centers. TBIicp patients were randomized to either the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guideline CPP target range (control group) or to the individualized CA-guided CPP targets (intervention group). CPP targets were guided by six times daily software-based alerts for up to 5 days. The primary feasibility end-point was the percentage of time with CPP concordant (+/- 5 mm Hg) with the set CPP targets. The main secondary safety end-point was an increase in therapeutic intensity level (TIL) between the control and intervention group. Twenty-eight patients were randomized to the control and 32 patients to the intervention group. CPP in the intervention group was in the target range for 46.5% (interquartile range, 41.2-58) of the monitored time, significantly higher than the feasibility target specified in the published protocol (36%; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups for TIL or for other safety end-points. Conclusively, targeting an individual and dynamic CA-guided CPP is feasible and safe in TBIicp patients. This encourages a prospective trial powered for clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with high mortality due to intracranial pressure (ICP). Whether computed tomography (CT) scanning of the brain within the first 24 h is indicative of intracranial hypertension is largely unknown. We assessed the feasibility of semi-automated CT segmentation in comparison with invasive ICP measurements.RELEVANCE:CT volumetry of the brain might provide ICP data when invasive monitoring is not possible or is undesirable.METHODS:We identified 33 patients with TBI who received a CT scan at admission and ICP monitoring within 24 h. Semi-automated segmentation of CT images in Matlab yielded cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and intracranial volume (ICV) data. The ratio CSF/ICV × 100 (expressed as a percentage) was used as a proxy for ICP. The association between invasive ICP and the CSF/ICV ratio was evaluated using a simple linear regression model and a mono-exponential function derived from previous research in animals.RESULTS:ICP is moderately but significantly associated with the CSF/ICV ratio (r = -0.44, p = 0.01). The mono-exponential function provided a better fit of the relationship between ICP and the CSF/ICV ratio than the linear model.CONCLUSION:Our feasibility TBI data show that cross-sectional volumetric CT measures are associated with ICP. This non-invasive method can be used in future studies to monitor patients who are not candidates for invasive monitoring or to evaluate therapy effects objectively.