The inhaled route is still a relatively novel route for delivering biologics and poses additional challenges to those encountered with inhaled small molecules, further complicating the design and interpretation of toxicology studies. A working group formed to summarize the current knowledge of inhaled biologics across industry and to analyze data collated from an anonymized cross-industry survey comprising 12 inhaled biologic case studies (18 individual inhalation toxicity studies on monoclonal antibodies, fragment antibodies, domain antibodies, oligonucleotides, and proteins/peptides). The output of this working group provides valuable insights into the issues faced when conducting toxicology studies with inhaled biologics, including common technical considerations on aerosol generation, use of young and sexually mature nonhuman primates, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling, exposure and immunogenicity assessment, maximum dose setting, and no observed adverse effect levels determination. Although the current data set is too small to allow firm conclusions, testing of novel biologics remains an active area and is likely to remain so for molecules where delivery via the inhaled route is beneficial. In the future, it is hoped others will continue to share their experiences and build on the conclusions of this review to further improve our understanding of these complex issues and, ultimately, facilitate the safe introduction of inhaled biologics into clinical use.

The inhalation route is a relatively novel drug delivery route for biotherapeutics and, as a result, there is a paucity of published data and experience within the toxicology/pathology community. In recent years, findings arising in toxicology studies with inhaled biologics have provoked concern and regulatory challenges due, in part, to the lack of understanding of the expected pathology, mechanisms, and adversity induced by this mode of delivery. In this manuscript, the authors describe 12 case studies, comprising 18 toxicology studies, using a range of inhaled biotherapeutics (monoclonal antibodies, fragment antigen-binding antibodies, domain antibodies, therapeutic proteins/peptides, and an oligonucleotide) in rodents, nonhuman primates (NHPs), and the rabbit in subacute (1 week) to chronic (26 weeks) toxicology studies. Analysis of the data revealed that many of these molecules were associated with a characteristic pattern of toxicity with high levels of immunogenicity. Microscopic changes in the airways consisted of a predominantly lymphoid perivascular/peribronchiolar (PV/PB) mononuclear inflammatory cell (MIC) infiltrate, whereas changes in the terminal airways/alveoli were characterized by simple (“uncomplicated”) increases in macrophages or inflammatory cell infiltrates ranging from mixed inflammatory cell infiltration to inflammation. The PV/PB MIC changes were considered most likely secondary to immunogenicity, whereas simple increases in alveolar macrophages were most likely secondary to clearance mechanisms. Alveolar inflammatory cell infiltrates and inflammation were likely induced by immune modulation or stimulation through pharmacologic effects on target biology or type III hypersensitivity (immune complex disease). Finally, a group of experts provide introductory thoughts regarding the adversity of inhaled biotherapeutics and the basis for reasonable differences of opinion that might arise between toxicologists, pathologists, and regulators.

Currently, off-label continuous administration of inhaled epoprostenol is used to manage hemodynamics during mitral valve surgery. A toxicology program was developed to support the use of inhaled epoprostenol during mechanical ventilation as well as pre- and postsurgery via nasal prongs. To support use in patients using nasal prongs, a Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), 14-day rat, nose-only inhalation study was performed. No adverse findings were observed at ∼50× the dose rate received by patient during off-label use. To simulate up to 48 hours continuous aerosol exposure during mechanical ventilation, a GLP toxicology study was performed using anesthetized, intubated, mechanically ventilated dogs. Dogs inhaled epoprostenol at approximately 6× and 13× the dose rate reported in off-label human studies. This novel animal model required establishment of a dog intensive care unit providing sedation, multisystem support, partial parenteral nutrition, and management of the intubated mechanically ventilated dogs for the 48-hour duration of study. Aerosol was generated by a vibrating mesh nebulizer with novel methods required to determine dose and particle size in-vitro. Continuous pH 10.5 epoprostenol was anticipated to be associated with lung injury; however, no adverse findings were observed. As no toxicity at pH 10.5 was observed with a formulation that required refrigeration, a room temperature stable formulation at pH 12 was evaluated in the same ventilated dog model. Again, there were no adverse findings. In conclusion, current toxicology findings support the evaluation of inhaled epoprostenol at pH 12 in surgical patients with pulmonary hypertension for up to 48 hours continuous exposure.

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a simple procedure that is used to investigate drug efficacy or lung toxicity. It is sensitive to lung changes and less invasive than histological evaluation. It can be performed repeatedly at interim time points or as a terminal procedure. Airborne contaminants and purposely inhaled compounds, resident and inflammatory cells, as well as different cellular soluble products can be harvested in bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) and measured. Bronchoalveolar lavage can also be an important tool to understand drug exposure and its metabolism in the lung, although it should be rigorously performed and interpreted with caution, especially in the context of regulated toxicology studies. This review focuses on the methods and uses of BAL in animal research, primarily in the pharmaceutical industry, as well as for the assessment of drugs, pollutants, and chemical lung toxicity. Methods of collecting and analyzing BALF and parameters affecting variability are discussed in detail. Improved automated methods for cell counting and analysis of the inflammatory cellular differential using hematology analyzers, common markers of lung injury, and new methodologies are described. Correlation between BALF and histological evaluation should not be considered as repetitive but as complementary assessments in the context of efficacy and toxicity studies.

Introduction: For nonclinical drug development, it is optimal if safety pharmacology and toxicology studies are performed in a model that reasonably represents the patient the drug is intended to treat. To simulate prolonged inhalation therapy in ventilated patients, GLP inhalation toxicology methods, including safety pharmacology endpoints, in anesthetized, intubated and mechanically ventilated dogs were developed. This model required establishment of a canine intensive care unit (ICU) capable of providing prolonged anesthesia (propofol infusion and morphine titration) and partial parenteral nutrition (dextrose, amino acids and lipids) while safety parameters were monitored. Method: Telemetry was used to continuously monitor heart rate, ECG and blood pressure. Blood gas parameters were periodically measured while oxygen saturation and core temperature were reported continuously. Glucose was measured hourly while other standard clinical pathology (hematology, coagulation, clinical chemistry) samples were evaluated approximately every 12 h. Aerosols were administered continuously over 48 h by inhalation using a mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo) fed by a syringe pump into a humidified circuit of a critical care ventilator (LTV (R) 1000) ending in an endotracheal tube placed in the trachea. Animals were ventilated with pressure control ventilation targeting a respiratory minute volume of 2.0-3.5 l per minute (LPM). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was maintained between 10 and 17 cm H2O and inspiratory time was set to 1 s with an inspiratory:expiratory (I:E) ratio of 1:2. Ventilator parameters and anesthesia were adjusted to maintain normal PaCO2 levels and adequate sedation, respectively. Novel methods were developed to determine dose and particle size in vitro as on-line measurements were not feasible during in vivo aerosol delivery. Results and discussion: Acceptable baseline measurements were established for all parameters over the 48-h evaluation period, qualifying the method as appropriate for assessment of GLP safety pharmacology and toxicology studies.

As the need for nasal, ocular, spinal, and articular therapeutic compounds increases, toxicology assessments of drugs administered via these routes play an important role in human safety. This symposium outlined the local and systemic evaluation to support safety during the development of these drugs in nonclinical models with some case studies. Discussions included selection of appropriate species for the intended route; conducting nonclinical studies that closely mimic the intended use with adequate duration; functional assessment, if deemed necessary; evaluation of local tissues with special histological staining procedure; and evaluations of safety margins based on local and systemic toxicity.

This article provides an overview of the discussions held by the Immunomodulatory Subcommittee of the Oligonucleotide Safety Working Group on complement activation induced by oligonucleotides, most notably the phosphorothioate-containing oligonucleotides. Alternative complement pathway activation in monkeys is a common effect of single-stranded phosphorothioate backbone oligonucleotides in toxicology studies. This article discusses the mechanism for activation, general investigational strategy, and the impact of various chemical modifications. The goal is to provide the best practice approach to characterizing this effect, understanding the implication of the species specificity, and the interpretation of clinical relevance.

Developing inhaled drugs requires knowledge of lung anatomy, cell biology, respiratory physiology, particle physics, and some plumbing. Although dose makes the poison, in the context of an inhaled drug, the dose is not easily defined. This lack of clarity around dose poses issues and challenges in the design of inhalation toxicology programs. To better understand dose, the influence of ventilation is discussed as are the perturbations in pulmonary function observed with inhalation exposure that can affect dose. Methods for determining inhaled drug deposition to arrive at an estimate of lung dose are examined. Equally important to understanding dose are the techniques used to deliver aerosols to animals. With a better understanding of dose and inhalation exposure, species-specific histopathologic lesions, both common background and toxicologically significant lesions, are reviewed. Finally, insight into how regulators synthesize and evaluate these complex findings to assess clinical safety risks is presented.

Developing inhaled drugs requires knowledge of lung anatomy, cell biology, respiratory physiology, particle physics, and some plumbing. Although dose makes the poison, in the context of an inhaled drug, the “dose” is not easily defined. This lack of clarity around dose poses issues and challenges in the design of inhalation toxicology programs. To better understand dose, the influence of ventilation is discussed as are the perturbations in pulmonary function observed with inhalation exposure that can affect dose. Methods for determining inhaled drug deposition to arrive at an estimate of lung dose are examined. Equally important to understanding dose are the techniques used to deliver aerosols to animals. With a better understanding of dose and inhalation exposure, species-specific histopathologic lesions, both common background and toxicologically significant lesions, are reviewed. Finally, insight into how regulators synthesize and evaluate these complex findings to assess clinical safety risks is presented.

This chapter examines the practical application of lung function tests that are or can be used in laboratory animals that provide analogues of clinical pulmonary function tests conducted on humans. Attention is given to the theory behind how changes in lung volume and flow occur and the techniques used to measure these changes in animals. With that knowledge, the various lung function tests and their usefulness in describing normal and abnormal lung function are discussed. The interpretation of functional changes detected in animals after experimental intervention remains predicated on our knowledge and experience in human pulmonary medicine yet also serves to illuminate and refine our understanding of normal and altered lung function in all mammals, including humans.

Historically, nitrogen oxides (NOx) in food, drinking water, as well as in the atmosphere have been believed to be associated with adverse health consequences. More recently, NOx have been implicated in normal homeostatic regulation, and exogenous administration has been associated with health benefits. One such potential health benefit is the prospect that inhaled nitrite will lower pulmonary blood pressure (BP) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a disease with poor prognosis due to the lack of effective treatment. To characterize potential chronic toxicity associated with inhaled AIR001 (sodium nitrite) for use in the treatment of PAH, 26-week exposures to AIR001 were carried out by inhalation administration in rats and by intravenous infusion in dogs. The studies revealed that methemoglobinemia was the primary adverse effect in both species. Methemoglobin levels less than 40% were well tolerated in both species, while levels greater than 50% methemoglobin caused death in some rats. Additionally, a decrease in systemic BP was also observed with inhaled AIR001 exposure in dogs. These acute secondary and exaggerated pharmacological effects occurred daily throughout the 26-week treatment period. Chronic exposure did not alter the magnitude of either methemoglobinemia or hypotension or result in additional toxicity or compensatory responses. Based on the exposure levels that produced these pharmacodynamic responses in animals, relative to those measured in early clinical studies, it appears that an adequate margin of safety exists to support the continued clinical development of inhaled AIR001.

This document was prepared by the Safety Pharmacology Subcommittee of the Oligonucleotide Safety Working Group (OSWG), a group of industry and regulatory scientists involved in the development and regulation of therapeutic oligonucleotides. The mission of the Subcommittee was to develop scientific recommendations for the industry regarding the appropriate scope and strategies for safety pharmacology evaluations of oligonucleotides (ONs). These recommendations are the consensus opinion of the Subcommittee and do not necessarily reflect the current expectations of regulatory authorities. 1) Safety pharmacology testing, as described in the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) S7 guidance, is as applicable to ONs as it is to small molecule drugs and biotherapeutics. 2) Study design considerations for ONs are similar to those for other classes of drugs. In general, as with other therapeutics, studies should evaluate the drug product administered via the clinical route. Species selection should ideally consider relevance of the model with regard to the endpoints of interest, pharmacological responsiveness, and continuity with the nonclinical development program. 3) Evaluation of potential effects in the core battery (cardiovascular, central nervous, and respiratory systems) is recommended. In general: a. In vitro human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) testing does not provide any specific value and is not warranted. b. Emphasis should be placed on in vivo evaluation of cardiovascular function, typically in nonhuman primates (NHPs). c. Due to the low level of concern, neurologic and respiratory function can be assessed concurrently with cardiovascular safety pharmacology evaluation in NHPs, within repeat-dose toxicity studies, or as stand-alone studies. In the latter case, rodents are most commonly used. 4) Other dedicated safety pharmacology studies, beyond the core battery, may have limited value for ONs. Although ONs can accumulate in the kidney and liver, evaluation of functional changes in these organs, as well as gastrointestinal (GI) and unintended “pro-inflammatory” effects, may be best evaluated during repeat-dose toxicity studies. Broad receptor- or ligand-binding profiling has not historically been informative for most ON subclasses, but may have value for investigative purposes.

Inhaled AIR001 is being evaluated to relieve vasoconstriction and inhibit vascular remodeling pathognomonic of PAH, both by direct effects and by supplementation of diminished endothelial nitric oxide. The safety and tolerability of AIR001 has recently been demonstrated in a multiple ascending dose Phase 1 clinical trial (AIR001-CS04) in healthy subjects, as well as in 26-week rat inhalation and dog intravenous toxicology studies. In AIR001-CS04, nebulization of 90 mg (dose loaded into Solo-Idehaler) for six days caused no SAEs and was found to be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Comparison of the estimated lung deposited doses suggested an animal to human safety margin of 4-12. Calculated safety margin ratios at the animal No Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL), compared to the same measurements at the MTD in humans, revealed similar safety margins of 4-24 fold for plasma nitrite maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) as well as %methemoglobin (%MetHb). Safety Margin Ratios AIR001-CS04 MTD* 26-Week Rat NOAEL# Safety Margin Rat/Human 26-Week Dog NOAEL# Safety Margin Dog/Human Dose (mg/kg) 1 30 14 Cmax (µg/mL) 0.46 3.77 8 2.43 5 AUC 0-inf (µg • hr/mL) 0.36 8.68 24 1.95 5 % MetHb 2.0 7.4 4 14.6 7 *emitted dose (84% of 90 mg) in average subject (75kg); # combined-sex group means Evaluation of all of the animal and human safety data indicate that the toxicity of AIR001 is primarily, if not solely, due to methemoglobinemia, a monitorable and expected secondary pharmacodynamic response to nitrite. Comparison of the human MTD to animal NOAELs suggest that an ample margin of safety exists to continue further clinical development of AIR001 in PAH.

Oligonucleotides (ONs) are an emerging class of drugs being developed for the treatment of a wide variety of diseases including the treatment of respiratory diseases by the inhalation route. As a class, their toxicity on human lungs has not been fully characterized, and predictive toxicity biomarkers have not been identified. To that end, identification of sensitive methods and biomarkers that can detect toxicity in humans before any long term and/or irreversible side effects occur would be helpful. In light of the public's greater interests, the Inhalation Subcommittee of the Oligonucleotide Safety Working Group (OSWG) held expert panel discussions focusing on the potential toxicity of inhaled ONs and assessing the strengths and weaknesses of different monitoring techniques for use during the clinical evaluation of inhaled ON candidates. This white paper summarizes the key discussions and captures the panelists' perspectives and recommendations which, we propose, could be used as a framework to guide both industry and regulatory scientists in future clinical research to characterize and monitor the short and long term lung response to inhaled ONs.

BACKGROUND:Pitrakinra is a recombinant protein derived from human interleukin-4 (IL-4) that binds to IL-4Ralpha and acts as a competitive antagonist of IL-4 and IL-13. The studies reported here compare the dose-ranging effects of pitrakinra on allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airway eosinophilia when administered subcutaneously (s.c.) or by inhalation to the Ascaris suum-sensitive cynomolgus monkey for the purpose of elucidating the primary site of pitrakinra's anti-asthmatic action.METHODS:Airway responsiveness to inhaled methacholine and bronchoalveolar lavage cell composition was determined before and after three allergen exposures with a 1-week course of twice-daily (b.i.d.) s.c. or inhaled pitrakinra or placebo treatment.RESULTS:Treatment with s.c. pitrakinra significantly reduced allergen-induced AHR, with a maximum effect of a 2.8- to 3.8-fold increase in methacholine PC(100) relative to control (P < 0.05) observed at b.i.d. s.c. doses of 0.05-0.5 mg/kg. Inhaled pitrakinra also significantly reduced AHR with a similar maximum effect of a 2.8- to 3.2-fold increase in methacholine PC(100) relative to control (P < 0.05) at nominal b.i.d. doses of 3-100 mg. The maximal effect on AHR following inhalation was observed at a plasma concentration which exhibited no efficacy via the subcutaneous route. The effect of pitrakinra on lung eosinophilia was not statistically significant following either route of administration, although lung eosinophil count was reduced in all studies relative to control.CONCLUSION:Local administration of pitrakinra to the lung is sufficient to inhibit AHR, one of the cardinal features of asthma, indicating the therapeutic potential of inhaled pitrakinra in the treatment of atopic asthma.

SummaryBackground Cutaneous administration of allergen provides a means to confirm an allergic status, investigate the pathogenesis of allergic diseases, and/or provide a mechanism to evaluate the benefit of new potential therapeutics.Objective Studies were performed to characterize the allergen‐induced cutaneous early‐ and late‐phase response (EPR and LPR) in the cynomolgus monkey.Methods Following intradermal injections of Ascaris suum allergen, the cutaneous weal and flare EPR was measured 15 min post‐injection, and skin biopsies were collected at 8–24 h to determine the optimal time of LPR occurrence. Biopsies were analysed for epidermal and dermal inflammatory changes.Results The EPR was dose related with a reproducible, measurable response at 1 : 10 000 and maximal at a 1 : 100 allergen dilution. In contrast, the threshold dose required for a reproducible LPR was much greater requiring a dilution of 6 : 100, suggesting independent mechanisms for the EPR and LPR. The LPR 20 h post‐allergen injection induced an inflammatory response in the upper and deep dermis. The response was characterized by a moderate perivascular to diffuse inflammation consisting of mononuclear cells, neutrophils and eosinophils. Dexamethasone, while having no effect on the EPR, reduced dermal inflammation (upper dermis, P=0.004; deep dermis, P=0.03). Similarly, dermal eosinophilia was also reduced (upper dermis, P<0.001; deep dermis, P=0.02).Conclusion Collectively, the results indicate the dose dependency of the EPR and LPR. Furthermore, our observations indicate the value of the LPR response in the cynomolgus monkey to evaluate new therapeutics for the treatment of allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis.