BACKGROUND:Despite the established knowledge that recurrent copy number variants (CNVs) at the 16p11.2 locus BP4-BP5 confer risk for behavioural and language difficulties, limited research has been conducted on the association between behavioural and social-communicative profiles. The current study aims to further delineate the prevalence, nature and severity of, and the association between, behavioural and social-communicative features of school-aged children with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome (16p11.2DS) and 16p11.2 duplication (16p11.2Dup). METHODS:A total of 68 individuals (n = 47 16p11.2DS and n = 21 16p11.2Dup) aged 6-17 years participated. Standardised intelligence tests were administered, and behavioural and social-communicative skills were assessed by standardised questionnaires. Scores of both groups were compared with population norms and across CNVs. The influence of confounding factors was investigated, and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS:Compared with the normative sample, children with 16p11.2DS showed high rates of social responsiveness (67%) and communicative problems (69%), while approximately half (52%) of the patients displayed behavioural problems. Children with 16p11.2Dup demonstrated even higher rates of social-communicative problems (80-90%) with statistically significantly more externalising and overall behavioural challenges (89%). In both CNV groups, there was a strong positive correlation between behavioural and social-communicative skills. CONCLUSIONS:School-aged children with 16p11.2 CNVs show high rates of behavioural, social responsiveness and communicative problems compared with the normative sample. These findings point to the high prevalence of autistic traits and diagnoses in these CNV populations. Moreover, there is a high comorbidity between behavioural and social-communicative problems. Patients with difficulties in both domains are vulnerable and need closer clinical follow-up and care.

Rare recurrent copy number variants (CNVs) at chromosomal loci 22q11.2 and 16p11.2 are genetic disorders with lifespan risk for neuropsychiatric disorders. Microdeletions and duplications are associated with neurocognitive deficits, yet few studies compared these groups using the same measures to address confounding measurement differences. We report a prospective international collaboration applying the same computerized neurocognitive assessment, the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (CNB), administered in a multi-site study on rare genomic disorders: 22q11.2 deletions (n = 492); 22q11.2 duplications (n = 106); 16p11.2 deletion (n = 117); and 16p11.2 duplications (n = 46). Domains examined include executive functions, episodic memory, complex cognition, social cognition, and psychomotor speed. Accuracy and speed for each domain were included as dependent measures in a mixed-model repeated measures analysis. Locus (22q11.2, 16p11.2) and Copy number (deletion/duplication) were grouping factors and Measure (accuracy, speed) and neurocognitive domain were repeated measures factors, with Sex and Site as covariates. We also examined correlation with IQ. We found a significant Locus × Copy number × Domain × Measure interaction (p = 0.0004). 22q11.2 deletions were associated with greater performance accuracy deficits than 22q11.2 duplications, while 16p11.2 duplications were associated with greater specific deficits than 16p11.2 deletions. Duplications at both loci were associated with reduced speed compared to deletions. Performance profiles differed among the groups with particularly poor memory performance of the 22q11.2 deletion group while the 16p11.2 duplication group had greatest deficits in complex cognition. Average accuracy on the CNB was moderately correlated with Full Scale IQ. Deletions and duplications of 22q11.2 and 16p11.2 have differential effects on accuracy and speed of neurocognition indicating locus specificity of performance profiles. These profile differences can help inform mechanistic substrates to heterogeneity in presentation and outcome, and can only be established in large-scale international consortia using the same neurocognitive assessment. Future studies could aim to link performance profiles to clinical features and brain function.

Purpose: Individuals with proximal 16p11.2 copy number variants (CNVs), either deletions (16p11.2DS) or duplications (16p11.2Dup), are predisposed to neurodevelopmental difficulties and disorders, such as language disorders, intellectual disability, and autism spectrum disorder. The purpose of the current study was to characterize language profiles of school-age children with proximal 16p11.2 CNVs, in relation to the normative sample and unaffected siblings of children with 16p11.2DS. Method: Standardized language tests were conducted in 33 school-age children with BP4–BP5 16p11.2 CNVs and eight unaffected siblings of children with 16p11.2DS to evaluate language production and comprehension skills across various language domains. A standardized intelligence test was also administered, and parents completed a standardized questionnaire to assess autistic traits. Language profiles were compared across 16p11.2 CNVs and intrafamilial pairs. The influence of nonverbal intelligence and autistic traits on language outcomes was investigated. Results: No significant differences were found between children with 16p11.2DS and those with 16p11.2Dup, although both groups exhibited significantly poorer language skills compared to the normative sample and unaffected siblings of children with 16p11.2DS. Severe language deficits were identified in 70% of individuals with 16p11.2 CNVs across all language subdomains, with significantly better receptive vocabulary skills than overall receptive language abilities. In children with 16p11.2DS, expressive language deficits were more pronounced than receptive deficits. In contrast, only in children with 16p11.2Dup did nonverbal intelligence influence their language outcomes. Conclusions: The current study contributes to the deeper understanding of language profiles in 16p11.2 CNVs in a clinically ascertained cohort, indicating generalized deficits across multiple language domains, rather than a syndrome-specific pattern targeting specific subdomains. The findings underscore the importance of early diagnosis, targeted therapy, and monitoring of language skills in children with 16p11.2 CNVs. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27228702

Although it is known that copy number variants (CNVs) on chromosome 22, such as 22q11.2 deletion (22q11.2DS) and 22q11.2 duplication (22q11.2Dup) syndromes, are associated with higher risk for neurodevelopmental issues, few studies have examined the language skills across 22q11.2Dup nor compared them with the 22q11.2DS. The current study aims to characterize language abilities in school-aged children with 22q11.2Dup (n = 29), compared to age-matched children with 22q11.2DS (n = 29). Standardized language tests were administered, assessing receptive and expressive language skills across different language domains. Results indicate that children with 22q11.2Dup demonstrate significantly more language problems compared to the general population. Mean language skills were not significantly different among children with 22q11.2 CNVs in this cohort. While children with 22q11.2DS demonstrated language difficulties starting at the word level, the most common language problems in children with 22q11.2Dup started at the sentence level. Importantly, both expressive and receptive language as well as lexico-semantic and morphosyntactic domains were impaired in children with 22q11.2 CNVs. Early identification, therapeutic intervention, and follow-up of language impairments in children with 22q11.2Dup are recommended to support language development and to reduce longitudinal impact of language and communicative deficits.

22q11.2 deletion (22q11.2DS) and 22q11.2 duplication (22q11.2Dup) confer risk for neurodevelopmental difficulties, but the characterization of speech-language and social skills in 22q11.2Dup is still limited. Therefore, this study aims to delineate social-communicative skills in school-aged children with 22q11.2Dup (n = 19) compared to their non-carrier siblings (n = 11) and age-matched children with 22q11.2DS (n = 19). Parents completed two standardized questionnaires: the Children’s Communication Checklist (CCC-2), screening speech, language, and social skills, and the Social Responsiveness Scales (SRS-2), assessing deficits in social behavior. Parents report that both children with 22q11.2Dup and 22q11.2DS show more social-communicative deficits than the general population; children with 22q11.2Dup seem to take an intermediate position between their siblings and children with 22q11.2DS. Compared to 22q11.2DS, they demonstrate less frequent and less severe problems, and more heterogeneous social-communicative profiles, with fewer restricted interests and repetitive behaviors. In siblings of 22q11Dup, milder social-communicative difficulties and equally heterogeneous profiles are reported, which might indicate that-in addition to the duplication-other factors such as the broader genetic context play a role in social-communicative outcomes.

Duplications on Chromosome 22q11.2 (22q11.2 dup) are associated with a wide spectrum of physical and neurodevelopmental features. In this chart review, physical, developmental, and behavioral features of 28 patients with 22q11.2 dup (median age = 17.11 years) are reported, and phenotypes of de novo and inherited duplications are compared. Common medical anomalies include nutritional problems (57%), failure to thrive (33%), transient hearing impairment (52%), and congenital heart defects (33%). Developmental, speech-language, and motor delay are common in infancy, while attention (64%), learning (60%), and motor problems (52%) are typically reported at primary school age. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders are diagnosed in 44%. Median full-scale intelligence quotient is in the borderline range (IQ 76), with one-fifth of patients having mild intellectual disability. Longitudinal data in 11 patients, with the first assessment at a median age of 5.2 years and the second assessment at a median age of 8.8 years, indicate that almost two-third of patients have a relative stable cognitive trajectory, whereas one-third show a growing into deficit profile. In patients with de novo duplications, there is a trend of more failure to thrive, while more patients with inherited duplications follow special education.