Sound production rates of fishes can be used as an indicator for coral reef health, providing an opportunity to utilize long-term acoustic recordings to assess environmental change. As acoustic datasets become more common, computational techniques need to be developed to facilitate analysis of the massive data files produced by long-term monitoring. Machine learning techniques demonstrate an advantage in the identification of fish sounds over manual sampling approaches. Here we evaluated the ability of convolutional neural networks to identify and monitor call patterns for pomacentrids (damselfishes) in a tropical reef region of the western Pacific. A stationary hydrophone was deployed for 39 mo (2014-2018) in the National Park of American Samoa to continuously record the local marine acoustic environment. A neural network was trained—achieving 94% identification accuracy of pomacentrids—to demonstrate the applicability of machine learning in fish acoustics and ecology. The distribution of sound production was found to vary on diel and interannual timescales. Additionally, the distribution of sound production was correlated with wind speed, water temperature, tidal amplitude, and sound pressure level. This research has broad implications for state-of-the-art acoustic analysis and promises to be an efficient, scalable asset for ecological research, environmental monitoring, and conservation planning.
FisheriesVolume 47, Issue 3 p. 135-135 Book Review Fishery Ecosystem Dynamics Michael J. Fogarty and Jeremy S. Collie. Oxford University Press, New York, 2020. 336 pages. US$100 (hardcover) $49.95 (softcover). Alexandra M. Avila, Corresponding Author Alexandra M. Avila [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-5858-9212 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, 104 Nash Hall Corvallis, OR, 97331Search for more papers by this authorJill E. Munger, Jill E. Munger orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-4165 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorClaire Rosemond, Claire Rosemond orcid.org/0000-0001-6382-091X Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorSamara M. Haver, Samara M. Haver orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-5986 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorOlivia Boisen, Olivia Boisen orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-202X Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorJanelle Monet Layton, Janelle Monet Layton [email protected] Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorMee-ya H. Monneedy, Mee-ya H. Monneedy Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorKatherine S. Lasdin, Katherine S. Lasdin orcid.org/0000-0002-0095-4301 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorScott Heppell, Scott Heppell orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-8181 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this author Alexandra M. Avila, Corresponding Author Alexandra M. Avila [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-5858-9212 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, 104 Nash Hall Corvallis, OR, 97331Search for more papers by this authorJill E. Munger, Jill E. Munger orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-4165 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorClaire Rosemond, Claire Rosemond orcid.org/0000-0001-6382-091X Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorSamara M. Haver, Samara M. Haver orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-5986 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorOlivia Boisen, Olivia Boisen orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-202X Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorJanelle Monet Layton, Janelle Monet Layton [email protected] Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorMee-ya H. Monneedy, Mee-ya H. Monneedy Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorKatherine S. Lasdin, Katherine S. Lasdin orcid.org/0000-0002-0095-4301 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this authorScott Heppell, Scott Heppell orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-8181 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, ORSearch for more papers by this author First published: 30 November 2021 https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10706Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume47, Issue3March 2022Pages 135-135 RelatedInformation