Volume reduction of umbilical cord blood (UCB) units before infusion is standard in most transplant centers. We examined 26 patients who underwent transplantation from May 1997 to December 2001 with unmanipulated (n=18) or volume-reduced (n=8) UCB units for engraftment. Of 18 unmanipulated UCBT patients, 16 achieved ANC>500/mm(3), a median of 26 days (range, 16-104) post-UCBT; two died before engraftment on days +2 and +14. Of 18 unmanipulated UCBT patients, 10 achieved platelet recovery, a median of 60.5 days (range, 41-144) post-UCBT; eight patients died before platelet recovery +2 to +255 days post-UCBT. These results are similar to several reported studies and our series utilizing volume-reduced UCB units for UCBT. At a median follow-up of 29.5 months, the 100-day and 3-year overall survivals of unmanipulated UCBT were 61.1% (95% CI, 38.6-83.6) and 48.6% (95% CI, 24.8-72.4) and of volume-reduced UCBT were 60% (95% CI, 24.4-95.6) and 22.5% (95% CI, 0-58.7). There was no serious toxicity from UCB infusion using unmanipulated UCB units. We conclude that unmanipulated UCB units may be infused safely into UCBT patients with adequate engraftment and survival.

Rituximab is used for in vivo tumor cell purging for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients prior to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). However, its effects on PBSC mobilization and function are poorly understood. We compared the mobilization characteristics and engraftment kinetics of 13 NHL patients receiving and 34 NHL patients not receiving rituximab 6 months before PBSC mobilization. In the rituximab group, there was a significantly longer time to neutrophil engraftment (P=0.0466), a trend toward the need for BM harvest to supplement low-yield PBSC collections (31 vs 9%, P=0.08) and a significantly increased rate of bacteremia episodes (62 vs 26%, P=0.025). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the rituximab compared to the nonrituximab patients (P=0.049 and 0.042, respectively). However, patients in the nonrituximab group were at high risk for recurrence and expected to have shorter survival. Rituximab used within 6 months prior to collection may have a detrimental effect on PBSC mobilization and engraftment. However, rituximab is a major therapeutic breakthrough for NHL treatment and this negative effect may be offset by improved survival. Further studies are warranted in larger populations to determine the impact of rituximab on engraftment, PFS and OS.

Several trials have shown the activity of thalidomide (THAL) in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients failing PBSCT or conventional chemotherapy. PBSCT is considered standard treatment for most patients requiring therapy for MM; however, patients with VAD-resistant disease may not be able to receive PBSCT due to rapidly advancing disease. We report four cases of VAD-refractory MM salvaged with THAL + VAD followed by PBSCT. All patients underwent stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide (Cy) (4.5 g/m 2 ) and GMCSF. Melphalan (140–200 mg/m 2 ) was given as conditioning. All patients engrafted within 12–16 days after PBSCT. Day +100 evaluation showed the following: very good partial response ( n = 1) and complete response ( n = 3). After a median follow-up to 153 days, two patients continue to take THAL with no signs of disease progression. One patient developed CHF and was taken off THAL while another patient has died of progressive disease while on THAL (MTD 50 mg). In conclusion, VAD-refractory patients were salvaged with the addition of THAL to VAD. They were subsequently able to undergo autologous PBSCT for MM, which will likely improve their overall survival. This suggests that THAL and other related immunomodulatory drugs may prove useful for initial MM therapy in combination with standard chemotherapy followed by PBSCT.