This article presents a retrospective case series of implant site development using titanium mesh (Ti-mesh) in the maxilla. A total of 58 mesh procedures in combination with several different bone grafts (allograft, cellular allograft, and bovine xenograft) and biologics (including recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor, autogenous platelet-rich growth factor, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2) were performed in 48 patients. Ti-mesh guided bone regeneration procedures were performed 2 to 3 months after extraction of nonrestorable/hopeless teeth, and the implants were placed 6 to 8 months postaugmentation. The mean initial ridge width was 2.0 ± 1.0 mm, and the mean horizontal gain after Ti-mesh procedures was 4.7 ± 1.6 mm. The ridge width was first measured on the cross-sectional presurgical CBCT image and then confirmed clinically during surgical procedures. No statistical difference in the horizontal gain was found among different combinations of bone grafts and biomaterials. Ti-mesh exposure occurred 22% of the time. The middle-aged adults (odds ratio [OR] = 8.59; P = .046) and older adults (OR = 16.66; P = .02) had significantly higher chances of mesh exposure compared to young adults. While all implants were successfully placed, about 56% of the implants had < 2 mm of bone to the facial aspect of the osteotomy and received additional contour augmentation when placed in a prosthetically appropriate position for a screw-retained restoration. This study demonstrates that although Ti-mesh procedures result in significant bone regeneration in narrow alveolar ridges to predictably allow implant placement, the age-related mesh exposure rate and frequency of need for additional contour grafting should be discussed with patients.

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the success rates and prosthetic complications of implants with a modified sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface inserted for posterior single-implant crown restorations. Final crowns were placed 3 to 4 weeks after surgery, and patient follow-up spanned 10 years in a private practice setting. A total of 22 patients (8 women, 14 men) with 25 posterior implants placed (16 mandible, 9 maxilla) were selected, including only implants for posterior single-implant crowns with insertion torque values of ≥ 35 Ncm at placement. Twenty-one implants passed the reverse torque test at 3 to 4 weeks after implant placement, and final restorations were placed. Three patients (4 implants) had "spinners," and there was one patient dropout after completion of the final restoration. All patients were recalled for clinical exams, digital periapical radiographs, and clinical photos at short-term (≤ 5 years) and long-term (> 5 years) follow-up appointments. The Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs was also determined at the initial and follow-up visits. Crestal bone level was measured at crown placement (T1), short-term follow-up (T2; mean: 29.4 months), and long-term follow-up appointments (T3; mean: 114.4 months). Twenty patients (23 implants) returned for examination at T2, and 15 (18 implants) were available at T3. For the 17 implants available at all evaluations, statistically significant bone loss was found from T1 to T2 (0.23 ± 0.30 mm), and the mean crestal bone level appeared stable from T2 to T3. Based on clinical and radiographic findings, the success rate for the implants and restorations at T2 and T3 was graded as 100%. Therefore, it can be stated that an early loading protocol of 3 to 4 weeks using a modified SLA surface at premolar/molar single-tooth locations can result in favorable clinical and radiographic long-term results.