ABSTRACTThe Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE) project's dual product development cycle spanned a three‐year period from the September 2009 to December, 2012. During this timeframe, BKCASE authors met quarterly at various locations, primarily in various regions of the United States, but also in Stockholm, Sweden; Toulouse, France; London, England; and Rome, Italy (BKCASE, 2009–2019). The team successfully worked through challenges and differences to produce The Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) wiki and a Graduate Reference Curriculum for Systems Engineering (GRCSE) publication. This article is a collection of personal stories from the team members that focus on overcoming obstacles to successfully produce the final published products.

INSIGHTVolume 14, Issue 3 p. 34-35 Special Feature Panel: Is Systems-Security Engineering Failing? Rick Dove, Rick Dove Moderator rick.dove@incose.org Paradigm Shift InternationalSearch for more papers by this authorJennifer Bayuk, Jennifer Bayuk Panelist Stevens Institute of TechnologySearch for more papers by this authorJohn Snoderly, John Snoderly Panelist Defense Acquisition UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorBeth Wilson, Beth Wilson Panelist RaytheonSearch for more papers by this authorDonna Rhodes, Donna Rhodes Panelist Massachusetts Institute of TechnologySearch for more papers by this author Rick Dove, Rick Dove Moderator rick.dove@incose.org Paradigm Shift InternationalSearch for more papers by this authorJennifer Bayuk, Jennifer Bayuk Panelist Stevens Institute of TechnologySearch for more papers by this authorJohn Snoderly, John Snoderly Panelist Defense Acquisition UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorBeth Wilson, Beth Wilson Panelist RaytheonSearch for more papers by this authorDonna Rhodes, Donna Rhodes Panelist Massachusetts Institute of TechnologySearch for more papers by this author First published: 23 June 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.201114334AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume14, Issue3September 2011Pages 34-35 RelatedInformation

AbstractSecurity for systems of all kinds has become an urgent global concern in the face of increasing attack effectiveness and decreasing security effectiveness – measured simply by increasing losses and penetrations unchecked by increasing security expenditures. Is this a problem with security engineering, systems engineering, or the customer? Is system security strategy broken? Where does remedial action need be taken, and what would that be? Some say it is an economic tradeoff imposed by the customer. Some say it is reliance on ineffective security standards, technologies, and strategies. And some say it is a shortfall of system engineering process, knowledge, and priority. Regardless, systems engineering is responsible for life cycle effectiveness and must recognize, address, and solve this problem in some way—‐ by doing something different. Where is the gap and how does Systems Engineering begin to close it?

INCOSE International SymposiumVolume 19, Issue 1 p. 326-351 Session 2 Track 4: Panel 2.4.0 “What Defines a Systems Engineer? Comparing and Contrasting Global Perspectives on Systems Engineering Competency” Don Gelosh, Don Gelosh Moderator SAICSearch for more papers by this authorArthur Pyster, Arthur Pyster Panelist Stevens Institute of TechnologySearch for more papers by this authorJohn Snoderly, John Snoderly Panelist Defense Acquisition UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorSamantha Brown, Samantha Brown Panelist BAE SystemsSearch for more papers by this authorMark Kupeski, Mark Kupeski Panelist IBMSearch for more papers by this authorU Dinesh Kumar, U Dinesh Kumar Panelist Indian Institute of Management BangaloreSearch for more papers by this authorStephen Cook, Stephen Cook Panelist Defence and Systems Institute, University of South AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author Don Gelosh, Don Gelosh Moderator SAICSearch for more papers by this authorArthur Pyster, Arthur Pyster Panelist Stevens Institute of TechnologySearch for more papers by this authorJohn Snoderly, John Snoderly Panelist Defense Acquisition UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorSamantha Brown, Samantha Brown Panelist BAE SystemsSearch for more papers by this authorMark Kupeski, Mark Kupeski Panelist IBMSearch for more papers by this authorU Dinesh Kumar, U Dinesh Kumar Panelist Indian Institute of Management BangaloreSearch for more papers by this authorStephen Cook, Stephen Cook Panelist Defence and Systems Institute, University of South AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 04 November 2014 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2009.tb00952.xAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Volume19, Issue1Singapore, July 20–23, 2009July 2009Pages 326-351 RelatedInformation

INSIGHTVolume 5, Issue 1 p. 5-5 President's Corner Presidentr's Corner John Snoderly, John Snoderly [email protected] Search for more papers by this author John Snoderly, John Snoderly [email protected] Search for more papers by this author First published: 23 June 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.2002515AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume5, Issue1April 2002Pages 5-5 RelatedInformation

INSIGHTVolume 4, Issue 3 p. 41-42 INCOSE Infrastructure A More Responsive, More Effective INCOSE Board of Directors John Snoderly, John Snoderly President Elect Snoderly@home.com Search for more papers by this author John Snoderly, John Snoderly President Elect Snoderly@home.com Search for more papers by this author First published: 23 June 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.20014341AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume4, Issue3October 2001Pages 41-42 RelatedInformation