The fractal design of the bronchial tree, as described by the Hess-Murray law, facilitates energy-efficient lung ventilation, yet its developmental origins remain unclear. Here, we quantify the rearrangement of the embryonic bronchial tree into its fractal architecture using SkelePlex, a new neural network-based image processing pipeline, and elucidate the biophysical principles governing its formation. We find that the branch shapes are such that pressure drop, shear, axial, and hoop stresses are equal across all branches. The seemingly random diameters of sister branches reflect the different number of tips they connect to in the asymmetric lung tree. By analyzing lungs after pneumonectomy and those affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we show that the same principles persist in adulthood and disease, potentially providing quantitative biomarkers for disease progression and therapeutic guidance.

The growing demand for follow-up imaging highlights the need for tools supporting the assessment of pulmonary nodules over time. We evaluated the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system for automated nodule matching. In this single-center study, patients with nodules and ≤ 2 chest computed tomography (CT) examinations were retrospectively selected. An AI-based algorithm was used for automated nodule detection and matching. The matching rate and the causes for incorrect matching were evaluated for the ten largest lesions (5–30 mm in diameter) registered on baseline CT. The dependence of the matching rate on nodule number and localization was also analyzed. One hundred patients (46 females), with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range 57–69), and 253 CTs were included. Focusing on the ten largest lesions, 1,141 lesions were identified, of which 36 (3.2

OBJECTIVES:To assess the accuracy of a deep learning-based algorithm for fully automated detection of thoracic aortic calcifications in chest computed tomography (CT) with a focus on the aortic clamping zone. METHODS:We retrospectively included 100 chest CT scans from 91 patients who were examined on second- or third-generation dual-source scanners. Subsamples comprised 47 scans with an electrocardiogram-gated aortic angiography and 53 unenhanced scans. A deep learning model performed aortic landmark detection and aorta segmentation to derive 8 vessel segments. Associated calcifications were detected and their volumes measured using a mean-based density thresholding. Algorithm parameters (calcium cluster size threshold, aortic mask dilatation) were varied to determine optimal performance for the upper ascending aorta that encompasses the aortic clamping zone. A binary visual rating served as a reference. Standard estimates of diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater agreement using Cohen's Kappa were calculated. RESULTS:Thoracic aortic calcifications were observed in 74% of patients with a prevalence of 27-70% by aorta segment. Using different parameter combinations, the algorithm provided binary ratings for all scans and segments. The best performing parameter combination for the presence of calcifications in the aortic clamping zone yielded a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 82%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.874. Using these parameters, the inter-rater agreement ranged from κ 0.66 to 0.92 per segment. CONCLUSIONS:Fully automated segmental detection of thoracic aortic calcifications in chest CT performs with high accuracy. This includes the critical preoperative assessment of the aortic clamping zone.

AbstractParticipant management in a lung cancer screening (LCS) depends on the assigned Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) category, which is based on reliable detection and measurement of pulmonary nodules. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement of two AI-based software tools for detection, quantification and categorization of pulmonary nodules in an LCS program in Northern Germany (HANSE-trial). 946 low-dose baseline CT-examinations were analyzed by two AI software tools regarding lung nodule detection, quantification and categorization and compared to the final radiologist read. The relationship between detected nodule volumes by both software tools was assessed by Pearson correlation (r) and tested for significance using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The consistency of Lung-RADS classifications between Software tool 1 (S1, Aview v2.5, Coreline Soft, Seoul, Korea) and Software tool 2 (S2, Prototype ‘’ChestCTExplore’’, software version ToDo, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) was evaluated by Cohen’s kappa (κ) and percentual agreement (PA).The derived volumes of true positive nodules were strongly correlated (r > 0.95), the volume derived by S2 was significantly higher than by S1 (P < 0.0001, mean difference: 6mm3). Moderate PA (62%) between S1 and S2 was found in the assignment of Lung-RADS classification (κ = 0.45). The PA of Lung-RADS classification to final read was 75% and 55% for S1 and S2, but the incorporation of S1 into the initial nodule detection and segmentation must be considered here. Significant nodule volume differences between AI software tools lead to different Lung-RADS scores in 38% of cases, which may result in altered participant management. Therefore, high performance and agreement of accredited AI software tools are necessary for a future national LCS program.

Pulmonary Embolisms (PE) represent a leading cause of cardiovascular death. While medical imaging, through computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA), represents the gold standard for PE diagnosis, it is still susceptible to misdiagnosis or significant diagnosis delays, which may be fatal for critical cases. Despite the recently demonstrated power of deep learning to bring a significant boost in performance in a wide range of medical imaging tasks, there are still very few published researches on automatic pulmonary embolism detection. Herein we introduce a deep learning based approach, which efficiently combines computer vision and deep neural networks for pulmonary embolism detection in CTPA. Our method brings novel contributions along three orthogonal axes: (1) automatic detection of anatomical structures; (2) anatomical aware pretraining, and (3) a dual-hop deep neural net for PE detection. We obtain state-of-the-art results on the publicly available multicenter large-scale RSNA dataset.

Background: To validate the automated quantification of cardiac chamber volumes and myocardial mass on non-contrast chest CT using cardiac MR (CMR) as a reference. Methods: We retrospectively included 53 consecutive patients who received non-contrast chest CT and CMR within three weeks. A deep learning model created cardiac segmentations on axial soft-tissue reconstructions from CT, covering all four cardiac chambers and the left ventricular myocardium. Segmentations on CMR cine short-axis and long-axis images served as a reference. Standard estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for ventricular volumes at end-diastole and end-systole (LVEDV, LVESV, RVEDV, RVESV), left ventricular mass (LVM), and atrial volumes (LA, RA) at ventricular end-diastole. A qualitative assessment noted segmentation issues. Results: The deep learning model generated CT measurements for 52 of the 53 patients (98%). Based on CMR measurements, the average LVEDV was 166 ± 64 mL, RVEDV was 144 ± 51 mL, and LVM was 115 ± 39 g. The CT measurements correlated well with CMR measurements for LVEDV, LVESV, and LVM (ICC = 0.85, ICC = 0.84, and ICC = 0.91; all p < 0.001) and RVEDV and RVESV (ICC = 0.79 and ICC= 0.78; both p < 0.001), and moderately well with LA and RA (ICC = 0.74 and ICC = 0.61; both p < 0.001). Absolute agreements likewise favored LVEDV, LVM, and RVEDV. ECG-gating did not relevantly influence the results. The CT results correctly identified 7/15 LV and 1/1 RV as dilated (one and six false positives, respectively). Major qualitative issues were found in three cases (6%). Conclusions: Automated cardiac chamber volume and myocardial mass quantification on non-contrast chest CT produced viable measurements in this retrospective sample. Relevance Statement: An automated cardiac assessment on non-contrast chest CT provides quantitative morphological data on the heart, enabling a preliminary organ evaluation that aids in incidentally identifying at-risk patients who may benefit from a more targeted diagnostic workup.

Purpose/objective: Reliable detection of thoracic aortic dilatation (TAD) is mandatory in clinical routine. For ECG -gated CT angiography, automated deep learning (DL) algorithms are established for diameter measurements according to current guidelines. For non-ECG gated CT (contrast enhanced (CE) and non-CE), however, only a few reports are available. In these reports, classification as TAD is frequently unreliable with variable result quality depending on anatomic location with the aortic root presenting with the worst results. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the impact of re-training on a previously evaluated DL tool for aortic measurements in a cohort of non-ECG gated exams. Methods & materials: A cohort of 995 patients (68 +/- 12 years) with CE (n = 392) and non-CE (n = 603) chest CT exams was selected which were classified as TAD by the initial DL tool. The re-trained version featured improved robustness of centerline fitting and cross-sectional plane placement. All cases were processed by the re-trained DL tool version. DL results were evaluated by a radiologist regarding plane placement and diameter measurements. Measure-ments were classified as correctly measured diameters at each location whereas false measurements consisted of over-/under-estimation of diameters. Results: We evaluated 8948 measurements in 995 exams. The re-trained version performed 8539/8948 (95.5%) of diameter measurements correctly. 3765/8948 (42.1%) of measurements were correct in both versions, initial and re-trained DL tool (best: distal arch 655/995 (66%), worst: Aortic sinus (AS) 221/995 (22%)). In contrast, 4456/8948 (49.8%) measurements were correctly measured only by the re-trained version, in particular at the aortic root (AS: 564/995 (57%), sinotubular junction: 697/995 (70%)). In addition, the re-trained version performed 318 (3.6%) measurements which were not available previously. A total of 228 (2.5%) cases showed false measurements because of tilted planes and 181 (2.0%) over-/under-segmentations with a focus at AS (n = 137 (14%) and n = 73 (7%), respectively). Conclusion: Re-training of the DL tool improved diameter assessment, resulting in a total of 95.5% correct measurements. Our data suggests that the re-trained DL tool can be applied even in non-ECG-gated chest CT including both, CE and non-CE exams.

BACKGROUND. Deep learning-based convolutional neural networks have enabled major advances in development of artificial intelligence (AI) software applications. Modern AI applications offer comprehensive multiorgan evaluation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the impact of an automated AI platform integrated into clinical workflow for chest CT interpretation on radiologists' interpretation times when evaluated in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS. In this prospective single-center study, a commercial AI software solution was integrated into clinical workflow for chest CT interpretation. The software provided automated analysis of cardiac, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal findings, including labeling, segmenting, and measuring normal structures as well as detecting, labeling, and measuring abnormalities. AI-annotated images and autogenerated summary results were stored in the PACS and available to interpreting radiologists. A total of 390 patients (204 women, 186 men; mean age, 62.8 ± 13.3 [SD] years) who underwent out-patient chest CT between January 19, 2021, and January 28, 2021, were included. Scans were randomized using 1:1 allocation between AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted arms and were clinically interpreted by one of three cardiothoracic radiologists (65 scans per arm per radiologist; total of 195 scans per arm) who recorded interpretation times using a stopwatch. Findings were categorized according to review of report impressions. Interpretation times were compared between arms. RESULTS. Mean interpretation times were significantly shorter in the AI-assisted than in the non-AI-assisted arm for all three readers (289 ± 89 vs 344 ± 129 seconds, p < .001; 449 ± 110 vs 649 ± 82 seconds, p < .001; 281 ± 114 vs 348 ± 93 seconds, p = .01) and for readers combined (328 ± 122 vs 421 ± 175 seconds, p < .001). For readers combined, the mean difference was 93 seconds (95% CI, 63-123 seconds), corresponding with a 22.1% reduction in the AI-assisted arm. Mean interpretation time was also shorter in the AI-assisted arm compared with the non-AI-assisted arm for contrast-enhanced scans (83 seconds), noncontrast scans (104 seconds), negative scans (84 seconds), positive scans without significant new findings (117 seconds), and positive scans with significant new findings (92 seconds). CONCLUSION. Cardiothoracic radiologists exhibited a 22.1% reduction in chest CT interpretations times when they had access to results from an automated AI support platform during real-world clinical practice. CLINICAL IMPACT. Integration of the AI support platform into clinical workflow improved radiologist efficiency.

Purpose Thoracic aortic (TA) dilatation (TAD) is a risk factor for acute aortic syndrome and must therefore be reported in every CT report. However, the complex anatomy of the thoracic aorta impedes TAD detection. We investigated the performance of a deep learning (DL) prototype as a secondary reading tool built to measure TA diameters in a large-scale cohort. Material and methods Consecutive contrast-enhanced (CE) and non-CE chest CT exams with “normal” TA diameters according to their radiology reports were included. The DL-prototype (AIRad, Siemens Healthineers, Germany) measured the TA at nine locations according to AHA guidelines. Dilatation was defined as >45 mm at aortic sinus, sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AA) and proximal arch and >40 mm from mid arch to abdominal aorta. A cardiovascular radiologist reviewed all cases with TAD according to AIRad. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was used to identify factors (demographics and scan parameters) associated with TAD classification by AIRad. Results 18,243 CT scans (45.7% female) were successfully analyzed by AIRad. Mean age was 62.3 ± 15.9 years and 12,092 (66.3%) were CE scans. AIRad confirmed normal diameters in 17,239 exams (94.5%) and reported TAD in 1,004/18,243 exams (5.5%). Review confirmed TAD classification in 452/1,004 exams (45.0%, 2.5% total), 552 cases were false-positive but identification was easily possible using visual outputs by AIRad. MLR revealed that the following factors were significantly associated with correct TAD classification by AIRad: TAD reported at AA [odds ratio (OR): 1.12, p < 0.001] and STJ (OR: 1.09, p = 0.002), TAD found at >1 location (OR: 1.42, p = 0.008), in CE exams (OR: 2.1–3.1, p < 0.05), men (OR: 2.4, p = 0.003) and patients presenting with higher BMI (OR: 1.05, p = 0.01). Overall, 17,691/18,243 (97.0%) exams were correctly classified. Conclusions AIRad correctly assessed the presence or absence of TAD in 17,691 exams (97%), including 452 cases with previously missed TAD independent from contrast protocol. These findings suggest its usefulness as a secondary reading tool by improving report quality and efficiency.

Purpose: Airway wall thickening is a consequence of chronic inflammatory processes and usually only qualitatively described in CT radiology reports. The purpose of this study is to automatically quantify airway wall thickness in multiple airway generations and assess the diagnostic potential of this parameter in a large cohort of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-center study included a series of unenhanced chest CTs. Inclusion criteria were the mentioning of an explicit COPD GOLD stage in the written radiology report and time period (01/2019-12/2021). A control group included chest CTs with completely unremarkable lungs according to the report. The DICOM images of all cases (axial orientation; slice-thickness: 1 mm; soft-tissue kernel) were processed by an AI algorithm pipeline consisting of (A) a 3D-U-Net for det detection and tracing of the bronchial tree centerlines (B) extraction of image patches perpendicular to the centerlines of the bronchi, and (C) a 2D U-Net for segmentation of airway walls on those patches. The performance of centerline detection and wall segmentation was assessed. The imaging parameter average wall thickness was calculated for bronchus generations 3-8 (AWT(3-8)) across the lungs. Mean AWT(3-8) was compared between five groups (control, COPD Gold I-IV) using non-parametric statistics. Furthermore, the established emphysema score %LAV-950 was calculated and used to classify scans (normal vs. COPD) alone and in combination with AWT(3-8). Results: A total of 575 chest CTs were processed. Algorithm performance was very good (airway centerline detection sensitivity: 86.9%; airway wall segmentation Dice score: 0.86). AWT(3-8) was statistically significantly greater in COPD patients compared to controls (2.03 vs. 1.87 mm, p < 0.001) and increased with COPD stage. The classifier that combined %LAV-950 and AWT(3-8) was superior to the classifier using only %LAV-950 (AUC = 0.92 vs. 0.79). Conclusion: Airway wall thickness increases in patients suffering from COPD and is automatically quantifiable. AWT(3-8) could become a CT imaging parameter in COPD complementing the established emphysema biomarker %LAV-950.

Background Radiology reporting of emergency whole-body computed tomography (CT) scans is time-critical and therefore involves a significant risk of pathology under-detection. We hypothesize a relevant number of initially missed secondary thoracic findings that would have been detected by an artificial intelligence (AI) software platform including several pathology-specific AI algorithms. Methods This retrospective proof-of-concept-study consecutively included 105 shock-room whole-body CT scans. Image data was analyzed by platform-bundled AI-algorithms, findings were reviewed by radiology experts and compared with the original radiologist's reports. We focused on secondary thoracic findings, such as cardiomegaly, coronary artery plaques, lung lesions, aortic aneurysms and vertebral fractures. Results We identified a relevant number of initially missed findings, with their quantification based on 105 analyzed CT scans as follows: up to 25 patients (23.8%) with cardiomegaly or borderline heart size, 17 patients (16.2%) with coronary plaques, 34 patients (32.4%) with aortic ectasia, 2 patients (1.9%) with lung lesions classified as "recommended to control" and 13 initially missed vertebral fractures (two with an acute traumatic origin). A high number of false positive or non-relevant AI-based findings remain problematic especially regarding lung lesions and vertebral fractures. Conclusions We consider AI to be a promising approach to reduce the number of missed findings in clinical settings with a necessary time-critical radiological reporting. Nevertheless, algorithm improvement is necessary focusing on a reduction of "false positive" findings and on algorithm features assessing the finding relevance, e.g., fracture age or lung lesion malignancy.

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnostic radiology is undergoing rapid development. Its potential utility to improve diagnostic performance for cardiopulmonary events is widely recognized, but the accuracy and precision have yet to be demonstrated in the context of current screening modalities. Here, we present findings on the performance of an AI convolutional neural network (CNN) prototype (AI-RAD Companion, Siemens Healthineers) that automatically detects pulmonary nodules and quantifies coronary artery calcium volume (CACV) on low-dose chest CT (LDCT), and compare results to expert radiologists. We also correlate AI findings with adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes in a retrospective cohort of 117 patients who underwent LDCT. Methods A total of 117 patients were enrolled in this study. Two CNNs were used to identify lung nodules and CACV on LDCT scans. All subjects were used for lung nodule analysis, and 96 subjects met the criteria for coronary artery calcium volume analysis. Interobserver concordance was measured using ICC and Cohen's kappa. Multivariate logistic regression and partial least squares regression were used for outcomes analysis. Results Agreement of the AI findings with experts was excellent (CACV ICC = 0.904, lung nodules Cohen's kappa = 0.846) with high sensitivity and specificity (CACV: sensitivity = .929, specificity = .960; lung nodules: sensitivity = 1, specificity = 0.708). The AI findings improved the prediction of major cardiopulmonary outcomes at 1-year follow-up including major adverse cardiac events and lung cancer (AUC(MACE) = 0.911, AUC(Lung Cancer) = 0.942). Conclusion We conclude the AI prototype rapidly and accurately identifies significant risk factors for cardiopulmonary disease on standard screening low-dose chest CT. This information can be used to improve diagnostic ability, facilitate intervention, improve morbidity and mortality, and decrease healthcare costs. There is also potential application in countries with limited numbers of cardiothoracic radiologists.

BACKGROUND:Manually performed diameter measurements on ECG-gated CT-angiography (CTA) represent the gold standard for diagnosis of thoracic aortic dilatation. However, they are time-consuming and show high inter-reader variability. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of measurements of a deep learning-(DL)-algorithm in comparison to those of radiologists and evaluated measurement times (MT).METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed 405 ECG-gated CTA exams of 371 consecutive patients with suspected aortic dilatation between May 2010 and June 2019. The DL-algorithm prototype detected aortic landmarks (deep reinforcement learning) and segmented the lumen of the thoracic aorta (multi-layer convolutional neural network). It performed measurements according to AHA-guidelines and created visual outputs. Manual measurements were performed by radiologists using centerline technique. Human performance variability (HPV), MT and DL-performance were analyzed in a research setting using a linear mixed model based on 21 randomly selected, repeatedly measured cases. DL-algorithm results were then evaluated in a clinical setting using matched differences. If the differences were within 5 mm for all locations, the cases was regarded as coherent; if there was a discrepancy >5 mm at least at one location (incl. missing values), the case was completely reviewed.RESULTS:HPV ranged up to ±3.4 mm in repeated measurements under research conditions. In the clinical setting, 2,778/3,192 (87.0%) of DL-algorithm's measurements were coherent. Mean differences of paired measurements between DL-algorithm and radiologists at aortic sinus and ascending aorta were -0.45±5.52 and -0.02±3.36 mm. Detailed analysis revealed that measurements at the aortic root were over-/underestimated due to a tilted measurement plane. In total, calculated time saved by DL-algorithm was 3:10 minutes/case.CONCLUSIONS:The DL-algorithm provided coherent results to radiologists at almost 90% of measurement locations, while the majority of discrepent cases were located at the aortic root. In summary, the DL-algorithm assisted radiologists in performing AHA-compliant measurements by saving 50% of time per case.

Objectives: The aim of the study is to investigate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) convolutional neural networks (CNN) in detecting lung nodules on chest computed tomography of patients with complex lung disease, and demonstrate its noninferiority when compared against an experienced radiologist through clinically relevant assessments. Methods: A CNN prototype was used to retrospectively evaluate 103 complex lung disease cases and 40 control cases without reported nodules. Computed tomography scans were blindly evaluated by an expert thoracic radiologist; a month after initial analyses, 20 positive cases were re-evaluated with the assistance of AI. For clinically relevant applications: (1) AI was asked to classify each patient into nodules present or absent and (2) AI results were compared against standard radiology reports. Standard statistics were performed to determine detection performance. Results: AI was, on average, 27 seconds faster than the expert and detected 8.4% of nodules that would have been missed. AI had a sensitivity of 67.7%, similar to an accuracy reported for experienced radiologists. AI correctly classified each patient (nodules present/absent) with a sensitivity of 96.1%. When matched against radiology reports, AI performed with a sensitivity of 89.4%. Control group assessment demonstrated an overall specificity of 82.5%. When aided by AI, the expert decreased the average assessment time per case from 2:44 minutes to 35.7 seconds, while reporting an overall increase in confidence. Conclusion: In a group of patients with complex lung disease, the sensitivity of AI is similar to an experienced radiologist and the tool helps detect previously missed nodules. AI also helps experts analyze for lung nodules faster and more confidently, a feature that is beneficial to patients and favorable to hospitals due to increased patient load and need for shorter turnaround times.

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based prototype algorithm for the fully automated per lobe segmentation and emphysema quantification (EQ) on chest-computed tomography as it compares to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) severity classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. METHODS Patients (n=137) who underwent chest-computed tomography acquisition and spirometry within 6 months were retrospectively included in this Institutional Review Board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. Patient-specific spirometry data, which included forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, and the forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio (Tiffeneau-Index), were used to assign patients to their respective GOLD stage I to IV. Lung lobe segmentation was carried out using AI-RAD Companion software prototype (Siemens Healthineers), a deep convolution image-to-image network and emphysema was quantified in each lung lobe to detect the low attenuation volume. RESULTS A strong correlation between the whole-lung-EQ and the GOLD stages was found (ρ=0.88, P<0.0001). The most significant correlation was noted in the left upper lobe (ρ=0.85, P<0.0001), and the weakest in the left lower lobe (ρ=0.72, P<0.0001) and right middle lobe (ρ=0.72, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS AI-based per lobe segmentation and its EQ demonstrate a very strong correlation with the GOLD severity stages of COPD patients. Furthermore, the low attenuation volume of the left upper lobe not only showed the strongest correlation to GOLD severity but was also able to most clearly distinguish mild and moderate forms of COPD. This is particularly relevant due to the fact that early disease processes often elude conventional pulmonary function diagnostics. Earlier detection of COPD is a crucial element for positively altering the course of disease progression through various therapeutic options.

PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) prototype application in determining bone mineral density (BMD) from chest computed tomography (CT), as compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). MATERIALS AND METHODS:In this Institutional Review Board-approved study, we analyzed the data of 65 patients (57 female, mean age: 67.4 y) who underwent both DEXA and chest CT (mean time between scans: 1.31 y). From the DEXA studies, T-scores for L1-L4 (lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4) were recorded. Patients were then divided on the basis of their T-scores into normal control, osteopenic, or osteoporotic groups. An AI algorithm based on wavelet features, AdaBoost, and local geometry constraints independently localized thoracic vertebrae from chest CT studies and automatically computed average Hounsfield Unit (HU) values with kVp-dependent spectral correction. The Pearson correlation evaluated the correlation between the T-scores and HU values. Mann-Whitney U test was implemented to compare the HU values of normal control versus osteoporotic patients. RESULTS:Overall, the DEXA-determined T-scores and AI-derived HU values showed a moderate correlation (r=0.55; P<0.001). This 65-patient population was divided into 3 subgroups on the basis of their T-scores. The mean T-scores for the 3 subgroups (normal control, osteopenic, osteoporotic) were 0.77±1.50, -1.51±0.04, and -3.26±0.59, respectively. The mean DEXA-determined L1-L4 BMD measures were 1.13±0.16, 0.88±0.06, and 0.68±0.06 g/cm, respectively. The mean AI-derived attenuation values were 145±42.5, 136±31.82, and 103±16.28 HU, respectively. Using these AI-derived HU values, a significant difference was found between the normal control patients and osteoporotic group (P=0.045). CONCLUSION:Our results show that this AI prototype can successfully determine BMD in moderate correlation with DEXA. Combined with other AI algorithms directed at evaluating cardiac and lung diseases, this prototype may contribute to future comprehensive preventative care based on a single chest CT.

Objective: Follow-up of aortic aneurysms by computed tomography (CT) is crucial to balance the risks of treatment and rupture. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted radiology reporting promises time savings and reduced inter-reader variabilities. Methods: The influence of AI assistance on the efficiency and accuracy of aortic aneurysm reporting according to the AHA / ESC guidelines was quantified based on 324 AI measurements and 1944 radiological measurements: 18 aortic aneurysm patients, each with two CT scans (arterial contrast phase, electrocardiogram-gated) with an interval of at least six months have been included. One board-certified radiologist and two residents (8/4/2 years of experience in vascular imaging) independently assessed aortic diameters at nine landmark positions. Aneurysm extensions were compared with original CT reports. After three weeks washout period, CTs were reassessed, based on graphically illustrated AI measurements. Results: Time-consuming guideline-compliant aortic measurements revealed additional affections of the mot/arch for 80 % of aneurysms that had initially been reported to be limited to the ascending aorta. AI assistance reduced mean reporting time by 63 % from 13:01 to 04:46 min including manual corrections of AI measurements (performed for 33.6 % of all measurements with predominance at the sinuses of Vasalva). AI assistance reduced total diameter inter-reader variability by 42.5 % (0.42/1.16 mm with/without AI assistance, mean of all patients and landmark positions, significant reduction for 6 out of 9 measuring positions). Conventional and AI-assisted quantification aneurysm progress varied to small extent (mean of 0.75 mm over all patients/landmark positions) not significantly exceeding radiologist's inter-reader variabilities. Conclusions: Guideline-compliant aorta measurement is crucial to report detailed aneurysm extension which might affect the strategy of interventional repair. AI assistance promises improved reporting efficiency and has high potential to reduce radiologist's inter-reader variabilities that can hamper diagnostic follow-up accuracy. Key point: The time-consuming guideline-compliant aorta aneurysm assessment is crucial to report aneurysm extension in detail; AI-assisted measurement reduces reporting time, improves extension evaluation and reduces inter-reader variability.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based prototype algorithm for fully automated quantification of emphysema on chest CT compared with pulmonary function testing (spirometry). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 141 patients (72 women, mean age ± SD of 66.46 ± 9.7 years [range, 23-86 years]; 69 men, mean age of 66.72 ± 11.4 years [range, 27-91 years]) who underwent both chest CT acquisition and spirometry within 6 months were retrospectively included. The spirometry-based Tiffeneau index (TI; calculated as the ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity) was used to measure emphysema severity; a value less than 0.7 was considered to indicate airway obstruction. Segmentation of the lung based on two different reconstruction methods was carried out by using a deep convolution image-to-image network. This multilayer convolutional neural network was combined with multilevel feature chaining and depth monitoring. To discriminate the output of the network from ground truth, an adversarial network was used during training. Emphysema was quantified using spatial filtering and attenuation-based thresholds. Emphysema quantification and TI were compared using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS. The mean TI for all patients was 0.57 ± 0.13. The mean percentages of emphysema using reconstruction methods 1 and 2 were 9.96% ± 11.87% and 8.04% ± 10.32%, respectively. AI-based emphysema quantification showed very strong correlation with TI (reconstruction method 1, ρ = -0.86; reconstruction method 2, ρ = -0.85; both p < 0.0001), indicating that AI-based emphysema quantification meaningfully reflects clinical pulmonary physiology. CONCLUSION. AI-based, fully automated emphysema quantification shows good correlation with TI, potentially contributing to an image-based diagnosis and quantification of emphysema severity.

PURPOSE:The compartmental nature of brain tissue microstructure is typically studied by diffusion MRI, MR relaxometry or their correlation. Diffusion MRI relies on signal representations or biophysical models, while MR relaxometry and correlation studies are based on regularized inverse Laplace transforms (ILTs). Here we introduce a general framework for characterizing microstructure that does not depend on diffusion modeling and replaces ill-posed ILTs with blind source separation (BSS). This framework yields proton density, relaxation times, volume fractions, and signal disentanglement, allowing for separation of the free-water component. THEORY AND METHODS:Diffusion experiments repeated for several different echo times, contain entangled diffusion and relaxation compartmental information. These can be disentangled by BSS using a physically constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. RESULTS:Computer simulations, phantom studies, together with repeatability and reproducibility experiments demonstrated that BSS is capable of estimating proton density, compartmental volume fractions and transversal relaxations. In vivo results proved its potential to correct for free-water contamination and to estimate tissue parameters. CONCLUSION:Formulation of the diffusion-relaxation dependence as a BSS problem introduces a new framework for studying microstructure compartmentalization, and a novel tool for free-water elimination.

We propose a robust reconstruction model for dynamic perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from undersampled k-space data. Our method is based on a joint penalization of the pixel-wise incoherence on temporal differences and patch-wise dissimilarities between spatio-temporal neighborhoods of perfusion image series. We evaluate our method on dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI brain perfusion datasets and demonstrate that the proposed reconstruction model can achieve up to 8-fold acceleration by yielding improved spatial reconstructions and providing highly accurate matching of perfusion timeintensity curves, thus leading to more precise quantification of clinically relevant perfusion parameters over two existing reconstruction methods.