본 연구는 일반국민들의 보이스피싱 심각성 인식이 보이스피싱 통합신고·대응에 대한 선호에 어떤 영향을 미치는지를 분석하고, 나아가 보이스피싱 대응방법이 이들 간의 관계를 조절하는지를 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 ‘보이스피싱 범죄 정부합동수사단 출범 관련 여론조사’ 데이터를 활용하여 상호작용항을 포함한 다중회귀모형으로 분석하였다. 그 분석결과, 보이스피싱 심각성 인식은 보이스피싱 통합신고･대응 선호에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤으며, 대처방법 중 기준범주인 ‘경찰청 등에 신고’에 ‘비대응

While the effect of organizational prestige on members’ organizational identification has been overestimated, the potential role of individual experience stimulating positive affect has not been well-explored. The present study examines the effect of perceived satisfaction with interpersonal relationships as an individual-level affective antecedent on organizational identification among government employees. We also investigate the agency power of organizations as an organizational-level determinant of members’ identification with the organization. A multilevel modelling analysis using government employee data from forty-one departments in the South Korean national government demonstrates a significant association between an affective antecedent (i.e., peer satisfaction) and organizational identification. However, using an exogenous measure of organizational power (i.e., agency power), the well-known association between organizational power and members’ organizational identification appeared to be insignificant; only moderating effect was significant with a small effect size. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings.

본 연구에서는 공공조직 구성원들의 인적 다양성과 조직문화에 대한 인식과의 관계를 산림청 직원을 대상으로 분석하였다. 특히 구성원들을 직급, 성별, 연령(세대), 소속기관 등으로 구분하여 인적 다양성에 따른 차이를 분석하고자 하였다. 다중회귀분석 결과, 먼저 혁신지향문화에 대해서는 인적 구성의 다양성 중 연령의 경우 30대가 20대에 비해 혁신지향문화를 더 강하게 인식하고 있었다. 다음 위계지향문화에 대해서는 연령의 경우 40대와 50대 연령층에서 20대보다 낮게 나타났고, 근무연수의 경우 그 기간이 길어질수록 위계지향문화를 더 강하게 인식하고 있었다. 한편 변혁적 리더십이 혁신지향문화에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 반면, 위계지향문화에는 부정적 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 형식주의가 혁신지향문화에 부정적 영향을 미쳤고, 레드테입의 경우 위계지향문화에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤다. 따라서 앞으로의 조직문화 인식의 개선에 있어 변혁적 리더십의 강화와 형식주의 및 레드테입의 타파가 중요함을 시사한다. 다양성 관리라는 관점에서 커뮤니케이션 통로를 활용하여 구성들 간의 다양성에 대한 이해와 포용을 유도하기 위한 노력 못지 않게 리더십 및 레드테입 등의 변화가 수반되어야 함을 의미한다.

본 연구는 지방의회 전문성 강화를 위한 오랜 연구와 노력의 연장에서 돌파구를 찾기 위해 진행되었다. 이 논문은 지방의회의 핵심이해관계자들을 대상으로 그들의 전문성에 대한 다양한 인식을 파악하고자 하였다. 의회전문성에 대한 선행연구와 광역시의회 활동의 핵심 이해관계자(stakeholder)을 대상으로 심층인터뷰(in-depth interview)를 바탕으로 Q방법론 활용하여 주관성을 객관적으로 파악하였다. 연구결과 의원중심역량신장형, 제도개혁형, 급진적효율성중시형, 엘리트주의형, 점진주의형으로 구별되는 총5개의 인식유형을 발견할 수 있었다. 지방의회에 대한 전문성 논의는 시간적 차원(단기, 장기)의 관점, 그리고 전문성 확보 방향에 초점이 지원조직 중심인지 아니면 의회의원 전문성 확보를 지향하는지에 따라 구분될 수 있었다. 본 연구는 이와 같은 발견에 대하여 이론적 실질적 시사점을 제시하고 향후 연구에 대한 제안을 제시하고 있다.

The demand for innovation in public organizations is increasing. In this study, I explore factors that contribute to the innovative behavior of civil servants at the individual level. The theoretical distinction between public and private organizations has long been a subject of debate, and certain characteristics of innovation in public organizations mimic innovation in the private sector, even though the purpose of innovation in public organizations is to secure public goods. In order to examine the innovative behavior of public employees who face such contradictory circumstances, I parameterized the characteristics of each sector, using whether or not the employee had worked in the private sector prior to entering the public service as the characteristic for the private sector and the effect of public service motivation on innovative behavior as the characteristic for the public sector and found that at the individual level, the two are not mutually exclusive.

While the effect of organizational prestige on members’ organizational identification has been overestimated, the potential role of individual experience stimulating positive ?affect? has not been well-explored. The present study examines the effect of perceived satisfaction with interpersonal relationships as an individual-level ?affective? antecedent on organizational identification among government employees. We also investigate the agency power of public organizations as an organizational-level determinant of members’ identification with the organization. A multilevel modeling analysis using government employee data from forty-one departments in the South Korean national government demonstrates a significant association between an affective antecedent (i.e., relationship satisfaction) and organizational identification. However, using an exogenous measure of organizational power (i.e., public agency power), the well-known association between organizational power and members’ organizational identification appeared to be insignificant; only moderating effect was significant with small effect size. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings.

The concept of sustainable development has been criticized for its broadness and ambiguity that permits different interpretations in separate views. However, the prior studies on sustainable development generally relied on survey data, so they have some limitations that preclude congruent conclusions. In contrast to prior studies, we used Q methodology, which is designed to investigate subjective perceptions as it is. This study aims to explore the South Koreans’ perceptions of sustainable development among various stakeholders such as experts, bureaucrats, legislatures, civic group members, company employees, and journalists. Based on the hierarchical belief system of the advocacy coalition framework, we classified all statements into three categories: core value, policy core, and secondary aspects. Using Q methodology, we extracted five types: (1) democrat; (2) idealist; (3) green growth advocate; (4) skeptics; and (5) elitist. We examined the distribution of the five types according to a hierarchical belief system, and discussed implications of the findings.

Recent research suggests competing aspects of how to promote an entrepreneurial ecosystem for sustainable economic growth from a linear entrepreneurial ecosystem to non-linear ones involving diverse stakeholders beyond the dichotomy between state and market. Competing views and interests embedded in these multiple stakeholders can contribute to understanding how an entrepreneurial ecosystem can emerge, flourish and vanish. However, little systematic research has explored what aspects multiple stakeholders have for a new rising entrepreneurial ecosystem. This paper, relying on Q-methodology, explores different perspectives of stakeholders surrounding the Centres for a Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEIs) in South Korea. Application of Q-methodology with a qualitative and statistical approach allows us to clarify various competing stakeholder perspectives on entrepreneurial ecosystems embodied by the 17 government driven CCEIs. We found six different views on how to evaluate the role and function of the CCEIs deeply connected with strong state intervention and big conglomerate companies (BCCs): (1) the BCC-led CCEI ecosystem, (2) the CCEI own ecosystem, (3) a strong critic of the state-led CCEI ecosystem, (4) a negative viewpoint on the politics-led CCEI ecosystem, (5) the state-led CCEI ecosystem and (6) a strong critic of the current Korean venture capital system.

The purpose of the study is to examine how values, explicitly (1) tolerance of beneficial lies, (2) belief in fairness, and (3) belief in non-monetary values, are related to attitudes toward buying and selling counterfeits.

본 연구의 목적은 불량식품 근절정책의 효과성에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 소비자들의 인식을 중심으로 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 문화체육관광부와 식품의약품안전처가 공동으로 조사한 '불량식품 근절 추진 공감도 여론조사' 데이터를 활용하여 서열로짓분석을 하였다. 그 분석 결과, 정책인지도는 불량식품 근절정책의 효과성에 양(+)의 효과를 나타내어, 정부가 추진하는 불량식품 근절정책을 잘 알고 있을수록 그 효과성을 높게 인식하였다. 다음으로 신뢰도 불량식품 근절정책의 효과성에 양(+)의 효과를 나타냈는데, 정부기관이 제공하는 정보를 더 신뢰할수록 그 정책의 효과성을 높게 인식하였다. 그리고 민감성은 불량식품 근절정책의 효과성에 음(-)의 효과를 나타내어 불량식품의 범위를 넓게 정의할수록 그 정책의 효과성을 낮게 인식하였다. 본 연구는 불량식품 근절정책의 효과성 인식을 높이기 위해서는 보다 적극적인 홍보와 정부신뢰 향상, 불량식품의 정의에 대한 사회적 합의가 필요함을 시사한다. The purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants of the effectiveness in food safety policy, focusing on the perception of consumers. For this, we apply ordered logit analysis using "The Survey on the Attitudes towards Food Safety Policy" data investigated by Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism & Ministry of Food, and Drug Safety. According to the results of the analysis, policy literacy has a significant positive impact on the effectiveness of the policy. Trust has a positive impact on the effectiveness of the policy significantly. In addition, the results show that sensitivity has a significant negative impact on the effectiveness perceived by consumers. This study imply that the government should give more information about policies and make an effort to gain trust on food safety policy.

This study explores the complex facets of fashion counterfeits, focusing on (1) why such purchasing behaviors are widespread and (2) whether or not the behaviors are morally accepted and can be eliminated through law and regulations. In order to identify and categorize perceptual factors of the fashion counterfeits problem, we used Q-methodology with a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques to identify different patterns of subjective perceptions (Brown, 2008).