Background Pediatric nephrologists are rare in the United States; many children with poisoning needing extracorporeal treatments may not have timely access to care. This study compared outcomes in children receiving extracorporeal treatments for poisoning at centers with and without a pediatric nephrologist. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients aged <= 17 years reported to an American poison center covering three upper midwestern states during 2000-2024. Results We identified 72 patients: 54 received extracorporeal treatments at a hospital with pediatric nephrologists, and 18 patients aged 14-17 years (minimum weight, 35 kg) received extracorporeal treatments at hospitals staffed solely by adult nephrologists. The most common responsible poisons were toxic alcohols (10/18, 55%) and salicylates (4/18, 22%). Children receiving extracorporeal treatments from adult nephrologists more commonly (P <0.001) received intermittent hemodialysis (18/18, 100%) compared to pediatric nephrologists (31/54, 57%). Conversely, children treated by pediatric nephrologists more commonly (P <0.05) received continuous kidney replacement therapy (28/54, 52%) compared to adult nephrologists (0/18). We found no difference (P = 0.1) in mortality between the children treated by pediatric nephrologists (9/54, 17%) compared to those treated by adult nephrologists (0/18). Discussion Teenage children commonly received hemodialysis from adult nephrologists for poisoning and had similar outcomes to those treated by pediatric nephrologists. Conclusions These data suggest adult nephrologists can successfully perform extracorporeal treatments for poisoning in teenage children.

Poisoning with a large variety of drugs and naturally occurring toxins may result in acute liver injury and failure. Drug-induced liver injury is a major cause of liver failure nationwide, and it is likely that nephrologists will be involved in treating patients with these conditions. A number of xenobiotics resulting in liver toxicity may cause acute kidney injury or other organ injury as well. Most agents causing drug- or toxin-induced liver failure lack specific therapies, although a few xenobiotics such as acetaminophen have effective antidotal therapies if administered prior to development of hepatotoxicity. The nephrologist should be aware that extracorporeal treatment of liver failure associated with drugs and toxins may be indicated, including therapies conventionally performed by nephrologists (hemodialysis, continuous kidney replacement therapy), therapies occasionally performed by nephrologists and other specialists (plasma exchange, albumin dialysis, hemadsorption), and therapies performed by other specialists (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). An overview of the role of these therapies in liver failure is provided, as well as a review of their limitations and potential complications.

Background The diagnosis of toxic alcohol poisoning is often based on clinical presentation and nonspecific surrogate laboratory studies due to limited testing availability. Fomepizole is the recommended antidote and often administered empirically. The objective of this study is to identify substances that mimic toxic alcohols and compare key clinical factors between toxic alcohol and non-toxic alcohol exposures when fomepizole was administered. Methods This study was a retrospective evaluation using the National Poison Data System from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2021. Exposures were included if fomepizole was administered. Toxic alcohol exposures had ethylene glycol or methanol as a coded substance. For exposures not coded as a toxic alcohol, the first substance was described. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) exposures from 2020 and 2021 were excluded. Results Fomepizole was reportedly used 25,110 times over 12 years. Use increased from 1,955 in 2010 to 2,710 in 2021. Most administrations were for reported toxic alcohol poisoning (60 percent) but use in reported non-toxic alcohol poisoning was greater starting in 2020. Toxic alcohol exposures were older (43.3 versus 39.8 years; P < 0.001) and more likely male (65.7 percent versus 58.2 percent). Level of care was mostly a critical care unit (67.7 percent), which was less common in toxic alcohol (63.3 percent) than non-toxic alcohol exposures (74.2 percent). The most common non-toxic alcohol substances were ethanol (24.9 percent) or an unknown drug (17.5 percent). Acidosis, increased creatinine concentration, anion gap, and osmolal gap, and kidney failure were coded in a lower proportion of toxic alcohol exposures than non-toxic alcohol exposures (P < 0.001). Discussion The inability to provide rapid clinical confirmation of toxic alcohol poisoning results in the empiric administration of fomepizole to many patients who will ultimately have other diagnoses. Although fomepizole is relative well tolerated we estimated that this practice costs between $1.5 to $2.5 million. The major limitations of this work include the biases associated with retrospective record review, and the inability to confirm the exposures which may have resulted in allocation error. Conclusion Most fomepizole use was for a presumed toxic alcohol. This recently shifted to greater use in likely non-toxic alcohol poisoning. Key difference between the groups suggest fomepizole administration was likely due to the difficulty in diagnosis of toxic alcohol poisoning along with the efficacy and safety of fomepizole. Increased toxic alcohol laboratory testing availability could improve timely diagnosis, reserving fomepizole use for toxic alcohol poisoning.

Ethylene glycol (EG) toxicity is an important cause of toxic alcohol poisoning in the USA with over 5,000 exposures reported annually. While classically characterized by solitary accidental or intentional ingestions, mass toxic alcohol poisoning outbreaks and more rarely collective consumptions (typically of methanol) have been described. We describe an ethylene glycol poisoning from collective ingestion that involved soldiers presenting at William Beaumont Army Medical Center in El Paso, Texas. Eleven soldiers presented to the emergency department over a 12-h period after ingestion of an unknown substance. The first two patients exhibited severe neurologic symptoms, while the remainder were asymptomatic. As serum EG levels were not immediately available, treatment decisions were based on surrogate laboratory values. Two patients received immediate hemodialysis, and fomepizole (FOM) because of severe acidosis with elevated anion and osmolal gaps. These patients developed acute kidney injury with renal recovery within a 3-week period. Two patients with elevated lactate received bicarbonate-based intravenous (IV) fluids and FOM. Two patients received IV fluids only and required prolonged observation for worsening acidosis and/or acute kidney injury. Five patients with normal laboratory values were treated with IV fluids and observation. All patients received cofactors including thiamine and pyridoxine. All patients survived. The outbreak occurred in the setting of limited dialysis resources, limited FOM availability, and in a resource-limited community. Additional guidelines are needed to determine allocation of limited resources, optimal dialysis and FOM treatment course, and comorbid conditions, which may prolong recovery.

SUMMARY Risks of food fraud have been exacerbated by ongoing supply-chain shortages and reduced regulatory oversight caused by the COVID19 pandemic. Since food fraud cases involve adulterants that are deliberately disguised, resulting poisonings are especially difficult to investigate and treat. We encountered a near-fatal poisoning with “weight-loss candlenuts” that are readily available online. We leveraged state-of-the-art high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and discovered that commonly used spectral libraries and toxin/poison standards panels do not contain the materials needed to identify the causative agents of this nearly lethal poisoning. By building new methods, we ultimately found ‘Nuez de la India’ contain high levels of uncommon cardiac glycosides, while deploying HRMS as a novel ‘chemical fingerprinting’ tool revealed them to be mislabeled yellow oleander seeds. Our work presents a rapid investigative strategy to empower future investigations, and provides guiding principles to food safety programs for treating, and indeed preventing, these potentially fatal poisonings that are increasing worldwide.

Background: We previously described a nephrology-specific “Breaking Bad News” Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) assessing nephrology fellow communication and counseling skills in 3 scenarios: kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in kidney failure, urgent KRT in acute kidney injury (AKI), and kidney biopsy (KBx). Objective: The main objectives of this study is to adapt the OSCE to a virtual platform, simulating nephrology patient telemedicine encounters involving difficult conversations, and to assess fellow and faculty satisfaction with the virtual format. Design: Description of a formative telemedicine simulation for nephrology fellows. Setting: Fully virtual simulation conducted by 2 academic medical simulation centers. Participants: Nephrology faculty and fellows at 3 urban/suburban training programs in the eastern United States. Measurements: Description of the virtual OSCE process. Fellow and faculty satisfaction overall and for each scenario. Faculty and fellow estimates of frequency of virtual patient encounters in the past year. Methods: The OSCE consisted of 3 scenarios: KRT in kidney failure, urgent KRT in AKI, and KBx. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations were administered in May 2021. Each scenario lasted 20 minutes. The AKI scenario was audio only. Fellows telephoned a simulated patient surrogate for urgent KRT consent. Kidney failure and KBx scenarios were video encounters. Faculty observed while muted/video off. Immediately after the OSCE, fellows and faculty were anonymously surveyed regarding their satisfaction with each scenario, the OSCE overall, and their estimate of outpatient encounters and inpatient KRT counseling done virtually in the preceding year. Results: Seventeen fellows completed the OSCE at 2 centers (3 programs). Sixteen (94%) completed the survey. Almost 94% rated the OSCE as a good/very good approximation of telemedicine encounters. Those satisfied/very satisfied with each scenario are as follow: 100% for AKI, 75% for kidney failure, and 75% for KBx. Two commented that they often did urgent KRT counseling by telephone. Fellows estimated a median 20% (interquartile range: 175, 50%) of counseling for acute inpatient KRT and a median 50% (IQR: 33.75, 70%) of outpatient encounters were virtual in the prior year. Two (regarding the kidney failure and KBx scenarios) indicated they would not have counseled similar outpatients virtually. Limitations: The 15-minute interactions may be too short to allow the encounter to be completed comfortably. A small number of programs and fellows participated, and programs were located in urban/suburban areas on the east coast of the United States. Conclusions: Overall, fellows felt that the OSCE was a good approximation of virtual encounters. The OSCE is an opportunity for fellows to practice telemedicine communication skills.

This article reviews the background, metabolism, clinical effects, and treatment of toxic alcohols, specifically ethylene glycol , methanol, diethylene glycol , propylene glycol , and isopropyl alcohol . This article also reviews the importance of an anion gap metabolic acidosis in relation to toxic alcohols and explores both the utility and the limitations of the osmol gap in patient management.

Les avantages pharmacologiques d’un traitement local, par rapport à un traitement systémique, sont particulièrement intéressants pour les patients vulnérables et âgés. Les études chez l’adulte montrent l’efficacité de la lidocaïne 5 % et de la capsaïcine 8 % pour les douleurs neuropathiques localisées. Plus d’informations sur l’efficacité et la sécurité de ces molécules chez les personnes très âgées sont toutefois nécessaires, en particulier sur les effets à long terme. Ces études pourraient également ouvrir la voie au développement d’autres analgésiques topiques pour les personnes âgées qui sont particulièrement à risque de développer des douleurs neuropathiques et sont vulnérables dans un contexte de comorbidités et polymédication.Pharmacological advantages of topical compared to systemic treatments are particularly interesting for vulnerable and elderly patients. Clinical studies report the effectiveness of 5% lidocaine and 8% capsaicin for localized neuropathic pain. More information on the efficacy and safety of these molecules in the elderly is however needed, particularly on the long-term. These studies could also pave the way for the development of other topical analgesics for older persons who are particularly at risk of developing neuropathic pain and are vulnerable in the context of comorbidities and polypharmacy.

Background Previous literature suggests a laboratory interference of n-acetylcysteine (NAC) with prothrombin time (PT) and the international normalized ratio (INR). Early publications focused on this interaction in the setting of an acetaminophen overdose and evaluated the INR of patients receiving intravenous NAC. However, there is limited literature describing the concentration-effect relationship of NAC to INR measurement in the absence of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity at therapeutic NAC concentrations. The purpose of the study is to quantify the degree of interference of NAC on INR values at therapeutic concentrations correlating to each infusion of the regimen (ex. bag 1: 550 mcg/mL, bag 2: 200 mcg/mL, bag 3: 35 mcg/mL, double bag 3: 70 mcg/mL) and at supratherapeutic concentrations in vitro. Methods Blood samples were obtained from study volunteers. Each blood sample was transferred into vials containing 0.3 mL buffered sodium citrate 3.2% and spiked with various concentrations of NAC for final concentrations of 0, 35, 70, 200, 550, 1000, 2000, and 4000 mcg/mL. The samples were centrifuged and tested to determine PT and INR on two separate machines: Siemens CS-2500 and Stago SN1114559. We would require a sample size of 6 to achieve a power of 80% and a level of significance of 1.7% (two-sided). Differences between INRs at varying concentrations were determined by Friedman's test. For multiple comparisons, post hoc analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni adjustment. Analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results Participants included 11 healthy subjects: 8 males, 3 females, median age 30 years (range 25 - 58). Median and interquartile ranges (IQR) INR for the baseline samples were 1.09 (IQR 1.05, 1.16) for Siemens and 1.03 (IQR 0.99, 1.11) for Stago analyzers. There was a significant difference in INR between the therapeutic concentrations (baseline, 35, 70,200, or 550 mu g/mL) (Siemens p = .0008, Stago p < .0001). The 550 mu g/mL concentration with the Siemens analyzer was the only one compared separately and found to be significantly greater than the baseline (1.07 vs 1.22, p = .02). For the Stago analyzer the 200 mu g/mL and 500 mu g/mL were compared and found to be significantly different from baseline (1.00 vs 1.07 and 1.19, adjusted p = .02 and p = .03, respectively). The largest INR increase seen was in one subject from a baseline of 1.07-1.32 with the 550 mu g/mL concentration. Increases in concentrations to supratherapeutic levels resulted in a statistically significant non-linear increase in INR for all concentrations (Siemens p < .0001, Stago p < .0001). All of these concentrations were found to be significantly different from baseline (all adjusted p < .05). Conclusion Although it was found that at therapeutic concentrations the in vitro presence of NAC affects INR measurements on two different machines, the change is of little clinical relevance. Supratherapeutic concentrations of NAC affect INR significantly, but the clinical utility of those results is limited by the rarity of those concentrations being measured.