TPS8617 Background: Immunomodulation with lenalidomide (L) + rituximab (R) is a promising treatment approach for patients (pts) with indolent NHL. In indolent NHL, frontline L+R provided a 90% overall response rate (ORR) and 64% complete response/complete response unconfirmed (CR/CRu) (Fowler, ASH, 2012). In phase 2 trials of L+R in relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease, pts with mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) achieved 57% ORR and 36% CR (Wang, Lancet Oncol, 2012); pts with follicular lymphoma (FL) treated with L+R had a higher response rate (73% ORR, 36% CR) compared with those receiving L alone (51% ORR, 13% CR; Leonard, ASCO, oral presentation, 2012). Methods: The phase 3b MAGNIFY study will compare the efficacy and safety of 12 cycles of combination L+R for induction with randomization to L+R (Arm A) vs R (Arm B) maintenance in pts with R/R FL, MCL, or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Target enrollment is ~500. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to 28-day (d) treatment cycles. In both arms, pts will receive induction L (20 mg/d on d 1-21; 12 cycles) + R (375 mg/m2 on d 1, 8, 15, 22 in cycle 1; d1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, 11). In Arm A, pts will receive maintenance L (10 mg/d on d 1-21; cycles 13-30) + R (375 mg/m2 on d1 of every other cycle from 13-29), followed by L (10 mg/d on d 1-21) until progression. Following 12 cycles of induction with L+R, pts in Arm B will receive maintenance R (375 mg/m2 on d1 of every other cycle from 13- 29). Eligible pts must have R/R grade 1, 2, or 3a FL, MZL, or MCL; have completed previous systemic therapy; have ≥1 measurable lesion; and have adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function (moderate renal impairment acceptable). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Key secondary endpoints include rate of CR/CRu, overall survival, ORR, duration of response, duration of CR/CRu, and safety. Health-related quality of life, as measured by the FACT-Lym questionnaire, will be assessed as an exploratory endpoint. This trial is currently enrolling pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01996865.

Background: This multicentre, single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL).Methods: Patients received oral lenalidomide 25 mg once daily on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 24 months, until disease progression or development of unacceptable adverse events (AEs). The primary end-point was efficacy; safety was evaluated as a secondary end-point. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00655668.Findings: A total of 54 patients with PTCL were treated. The overall response rate was 22% (12 of 54), including complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR (CRu) in 11% of patients; 31% of patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) responded (CR/CRu in 15% of patients). The median progression-free survival and median response duration were 2.5 and 3.6 months, respectively, in the intent-to-treat population, and 4.6 and 3.5 months, respectively, in patients with AITL. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the most common grade 3 or 4 haematological AEs, in 11 (20%) and 8 (15%) patients, respectively. Overall, 19 patients (35%) experienced at least 1 AE leading to study dose interruption or reduction (commonly neutropenia or thrombocytopenia). Serious AEs were observed in 54% of patients and 12 patients died during the study; lymphoma progression (n = 6); and acute respiratory distress syndrome, dyspnea, lung infiltration, neutropenic sepsis, pneumonia and cerebral ischaemia (n = 1 each).Interpretation: Lenalidomide exhibited single-agent activity in heavily pretreated patients with PTCL, particularly in patients with AITL. Future development is warranted in specific histologies, such as AITL, and in combination with chemotherapy or other agents considered active in PTCL.Funding: Celgene Corporation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have a poor prognosis. Additional therapy is often poorly tolerated, and new treatment modalities are needed. This efficacy and safety study was a retrospective analysis of two phase II trials (NHL-002 and NHL-003) that studied single-agent lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL with prior (n = 87) compared with no prior ASCT (n = 179). The overall response rate in the ASCT group was 39% [14% complete response (CR)], including 29% in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 63% in mantle cell lymphoma, and 60% in transformed lymphoma. The timing of transplant relative to receiving lenalidomide had no effect on outcomes. Median progression-free survival for the ASCT group was 3·7 months (16·9 months for patients in CR; 7·3 months for partial responders) at a median 12·5-month follow-up. Median response duration was 7·9 months. Regardless of prior ASCT, lenalidomide monotherapy was efficacious in heavily pretreated patients with aggressive, relapsed/refractory NHL, with a safety profile that was consistent with prior studies of single-agent lenalidomide.

Abstract Abstract 2738 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with poor prognosis that necessitates the development of new treatments. Lenalidomide is a unique immunomodulatory agent with antiproliferative and tumoricidal effects on MCL cells. NHL-003 was a phase II, open-label, multicenter trial for subjects with relapsed aggressive NHL that tested single-agent lenalidomide 25 mg PO days 1–21 every 28 days. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), survival, and safety. At the time of the initial publication (Witzig et al. Ann Oncol.2011;22:1622–1627), MCL subgroup analysis showed an ORR of 42%; the median DOR had not been reached. The purpose of this report is to provide long-term efficacy and safety results for the MCL subgroup from NHL-003. Results: Subjects with MCL (N=57) had a median age of 68 y (range, 33–82), were predominantly male (77%) with good ECOG performance status (89% PS 0–1) and advanced-stage disease (88% stage III/IV). Subjects had received a median of 3 (range, 1–13) prior systemic therapies. According to the current central review at a median follow-up of 12.4 mo, subjects achieved an ORR of 35% (CR/CRu 12%) following lenalidomide, including a median DOR of 16.3 mo (Table 1). The ORR to single-agent lenalidomide was 44% (CR/CRu 21%) by independent assessment, with a median DOR not yet reached. Median PFS was 8.8 mo by central review and 5.7 mo according to investigators. Subjects responded quickly, with a median time to first response of 1.9 mo (central and investigator). Median DOR for subjects in CR and overall survival for all subjects have not yet been reached. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (30%), fatigue (9%), and diarrhea (5%). Other AEs included one subject with grade 1 to 2 tumor flare reaction, one subject with grade 3 deep vein thrombosis, and two subjects with second primary malignancies suspected of being related to treatment (one grade 3 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that resolved and one grade 4 AML in a heavily pretreated individual with 5 prior cancer therapies). Conclusions: This subset analysis from a phase II study further confirms the efficacy of lenalidomide in subjects with relapsed MCL. Responders have a long DOR with manageable side effects. These results support continued investigation of lenalidomide alone or in combination for the treatment of MCL. Disclosures: Zinzani: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: This is a phase 2 clinical study of safety and efficacy for lenalidomide in patients with MCL. Czuczman:Celgene: Consultancy, Consultant Celgene Advisory Board Other. Reeder:Celgene: Mayo Clinic receives funding from Celgene to support clinical trials Other, Research Funding. Haioun:Celgene: Celgene Advisory Board Consultant Other, Consultancy. Tilly:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Pietronigro:Celgene: Employment. Ervin-Haynes:Celgene: Employment. Li:Celgene: Employment. Witzig:Celgene: Research Funding.

Transformed lymphoma (TL) represents a heterogeneous group of lymphomas with an aggressive course and poor prognosis. We assessed the clinical benefit of single-agent lenalidomide based on histological origin, including transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL) and transformed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (tCLL/SLL). Our analysis included 33 patients with TL. Patients received lenalidomide at a median dose of 25 mg/d. The overall response rate (ORR) was 46%, with a median response duration of 12·8 months after a median follow-up of 5·6 months. Median progression-free survival was 5·4 months. Among patients with tFL, ORR was 57%, with a median response duration of 12·8 months. None of the patients with tCLL/SLL responded to lenalidomide monotherapy. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were reversible myelosuppression. Our results suggest that the original lymphoma histology (i.e. FL) in TL patients may potentially be associated with response to salvage lenalidomide monotherapy.