BACKGROUND:Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, it presents significant surgical challenges, leading to controversy over the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive surgery. This study aims to assess the adequacy of minimally invasive surgery and preoperatively predict its difficulty for non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. METHODS:Initial stage IIA-IIIB (excluding stage T4N2) non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy undergoing minimally invasive surgery or open thoracotomy at 12 institutions between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Difficult minimally invasive surgery was defined by conversion to thoracotomy. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics. RESULTS:Of the 571 cases included, propensity score matching led to 240 patients per group. Minimally invasive surgery decreased intraoperative bleeding, shortened postoperative chest tube duration and hospitalization, ameliorated postoperative pain, and reduced postoperative complications compared to open thoracotomy. Moreover, minimally invasive surgery had an acceptable conversion rate of 15.8%, and notably, converted minimally invasive surgery achieved similar perioperative outcomes to open thoracotomy. Accumulated surgeons' experiences reduced minimally invasive surgery conversion rates and shortened surgical durations. Additionally, logistic regression identified squamous cell carcinoma, advanced preinduction N stage, preoperative tumor size >5 cm, advanced preoperative stage, and extended resection as independent risk factors for conversion. A nomogram was further established with good performance (area under curve value = 0.804) and clinical utility to predict conversion probability preoperatively. Finally, minimally invasive surgery and open thoracotomy achieved comparable event-free survival and overall survival profiles. CONCLUSIONS:Minimally invasive surgery achieved improved perioperative outcomes and similar oncologic efficacies to open thoracotomy. Moreover, minimally invasive surgery had an acceptable conversion rate, which would not compromise perioperative outcomes compared with open thoracotomy and could be effectively forecasted by a prediction model.

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) but may notably escalate the surgery’s intricacy. Consequently, the sufficiency of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) remains controversial. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of MIS for NSCLC patients after induction immunochemotherapy. Methods NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy who underwent MIS or open lobectomy at six institutions from 2019 to 2023 were retrospectively identified. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline clinical characteristics. Results A total of 186 cases were included, and PSM led to 84 patients in MIS and OPEN groups. The baseline clinical characteristics and induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.050). 11.9% of MIS converted to thoracotomy. By comparison, the MIS group was associated with reduced blood loss (100 [100–125] vs. 100 [100–200] mL, P = 0.011), shortened chest tube duration (5 [4–7] vs. 6 [5–8] days, P = 0.007), and decreased assessed lymph nodes (LNs; 12 [9–15] vs. 14 [11–20], P = 0.007) compared with the OPEN group. The two groups had no difference in the other surgical and pathological outcomes (all P > 0.050). Finally, MIS reduced postoperative complications compared with thoracotomy (23.8% vs. 39.3%, P = 0.031) Conclusion MIS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, with the advantages of lower blood loss, faster recoveries, and fewer postoperative complications and the disadvantage of LN assessment compared with thoracotomy.

Background The efficacy of lymph node dissection (LND) and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted (RL) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VL) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with nodal involvement remains controversial. This study aims to compare LND quality and early recurrence (ER) rate between RL and VL for stage N1-2 NSCLC patients based on eleven-year real-world data from a high-volume center. Methods Pathologic stage IIB-IIIB (T1-3N1-2) NSCLC patients undergoing RL or VL in Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2010 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity-score matching (PSM, 1:4 RL versus VL) was performed to mitigate baseline differences. LND quality was evaluated by adequate (≥16) LND and nodal upstaging rates. ER was defined as recurrence occurring within 24 months post-surgery. Results Out of 1578 cases reviewed, PSM yielded 200 RL and 800 VL cases. Without compromising perioperative outcomes, RL assessed more N1 and N2 LNs and N1 stations, and led to higher incidences of adequate LND (58.5 % vs. 42.0 %, p < 0.001) and nodal upstaging (p = 0.026), compared to VL. Notably, RL improved perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing adequate LND than VL. Finally, RL notably reduced ER rate (22.0 % vs. 29.6 %, p = 0.032), especially LN ER rate (15.0 % vs. 21.5 %, p = 0.041), and prolonged disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio = 0.837, p = 0.040) compared with VL. Further subgroup analysis of ER and DFS within the cN1-2-stage cohort verified this survival benefit. Conclusions RL surpasses VL in enhancing LND quality, reducing ER rates, and improving perioperative outcomes when adequate LND is performed for stage N1-2 NSCLC patients.

Background Minimally invasive sub-lobectomy is sufficient in treating small early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, comparison of the feasibility and oncologic efficacy between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in performing sub-lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC patients age 80 years or older is scarce. Methods Octogenarians with clinical stage IA NSCLC (tumor size, ≤ 2 cm) undergoing minimally invasive wedge resection or segmentectomy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2011 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity score-matching (PSM) with a RATS versus VATS ratio of 1:4 was performed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Results The study identified 594 patients (48 RATS and 546 VATS patients), and PSM resulted in 45 cases in the RATS group and 180 cases in the VATS group. The RATS patients experienced less intraoperative bleeding (60 mL [interquartile range (IQR), 50–100 mL] vs. 80 mL [IQR, 50–100 mL]; P = 0.027) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (4 days [IQR, 3–5 days] vs. 5 days [IQR, 4–6 days]; P = 0.041) than the VATS patients. The two surgical approaches were comparable concerning other perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications (20.00% vs. 26.11%; P = 0.396). Additionally, during a median follow-up period of 66 months, RATS and VATS achieved comparable 5-year overall survival (90.48% vs. 87.93%; P = 0.891), recurrence-free survival (83.37% vs. 83.18%; P = 0.782), and cumulative incidence of death. Further subgroup comparison also demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes between the two approaches. Finally, multivariate Cox analysis indicated that the surgical approach was not independently correlated with long-term outcomes. Conclusions The RATS approach shortened the postoperative hospital stay, reduced intraoperative bleeding by a statistically notable but clinically insignificant amount, and achieved long-term outcomes comparable with VATS in performing sub-lobectomy for octogenarians with early-stage small NSCLC.

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 can lead to chronic lung damage and respiratory issues, potentially increasing surgical difficulty and risk for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impacts of a COVID-19 history on early outcomes in NSCLC patients remain controversial. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 history on early outcomes in NSCLC patients and identify high-risk groups undergoing radical resection based on the largest Chinese multi-center real-world data to date. Design: Multi-center retrospective cohort study. Methods: NSCLC patients with (POCVD group) or without (NCVD group) a history of COVID-19 who underwent radical surgery at six institutions from January 2022 to January 2024 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was utilized to minimize patient selection bias. Results: Out of 7932 cases included, PSM resulted in 3021 cases per group. The two groups were comparable regarding the proportion of male patients (52.0% vs 51.6%) and those aged ⩾70 years (13.3% vs 13.8%). Although the two groups had comparable incidences of complications with Clavien-Dindo grades ⩾II (13.0% vs 14.4%, p = 0.117), the POCVD group had longer surgical durations (120.87 ± 40.23 min vs 110.74 ± 38.76 min, mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.13 (8.138–12.122)) and higher rates of respiratory complications than the NCVD group. Subgroup logistic regression analysis indicated that patients aged ⩾70 years (odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) = 1.322 (1.022–1.876)) and those with a smoking history (OR (95% CI) = 1.235 (1.008–1.543)) had an increased risk of developing complications with Clavien-Dindo grades ⩾II. Further analysis confirmed that these high-risk patients experienced extended surgical durations, longer chest tube drainage, and prolonged postoperative hospital stay, along with increased postoperative respiratory complications following COVID-19. Conclusion: Generally, radical resection is safe for NSCLC patients with a COVID-19 history. However, these patients experienced prolonged surgical durations and a higher incidence of postoperative respiratory complications compared to those without a COVID-19 history. In addition, individuals aged ⩾70 years or with a smoking history faced elevated surgical risks following COVID-19.

MicroAbstractThis study spanned six Chinese medical centers and included 143 resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with induction immunochemotherapy with a median follow-up of 29.5 months, demonstrating that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) led to decreased surgical-related pain, earlier chest tube removal, fewer postoperative complications, and comparable two-year survival outcomes to thoracotomy. Even when converted, VATS achieved perioperative outcomes equivalent to thoracotomy. Therefore, VATS could be considered feasible and oncologically effective for resectable stage III NSCLC after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment but may pose greater technical challenges for surgery. This study aims to assess the feasibility and oncological effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for resectable stage III NSCLC after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.MethodsInitial stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy undergoing either VATS or open lobectomy at six medical centers during 2019-2023 were retrospectively identified. Perioperative outcomes and two-year survival were analyzed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was employed to balance patient baseline characteristics.ResultsAmong the total 143 patients, PSM yielded 62 cases each for VATS and OPEN groups. Induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups. VATS showed a 14.5% conversion rate. Notably, VATS decreased numeric rating scales for postoperative pain, shortened chest tube duration (5[4-7] vs. 6[5-8] days, P=0.021), reduced postoperative comorbidities (21.0% vs. 37.1%, P=0.048), and dissected less N1 lymph nodes (5[4-6] vs. 7[5-9], P=0.005) compared with thoracotomy. Even when converted, VATS achieves perioperative outcomes equivalent to thoracotomy. Additionally, over a median follow-up of 29.5 months, VATS and thoracotomy demonstrated comparable two-year recurrence-free survival (77.20% vs. 73.73%, P=0.640), overall survival (87.22% vs. 88.00%, P=0.738), cumulative incidences of cancer-related death, and recurrence patterns. Subsequent subgroup comparisons and multivariate Cox analysis likewise revealed no statistical difference between VATS and thoracotomy.ConclusionVATS is a viable and effective option for resectable stage III NSCLC patients following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, leading to decreased surgical-related pain, earlier chest tube removal, reduced postoperative complications, and similar survival outcomes compared to thoracotomy.

This study compared short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy in young adults aged ≤ 35 years with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), aiming to assess the superiority of RATS over VATS for this special group of patients. A total of 1355 consecutive NSCLC cases aged 18–35 years undergoing RATS (n = 105) or VATS (n = 1250) between 2014 and 2021 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to establish a 1:3 RATS versus VATS ratio. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative outcomes, lymph node (LN) assessment, and long-term survival were investigated. Following PSM, 105 and 315 cases were in the RATS and VATS groups, respectively. RATS led to a shorter postoperative hospital stay than VATS (4.0 ± 1.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.7 days, p = 0.02). The two groups were comparable in other perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications (all p > 0.05). Moreover, RATS assessed more LNs (9.4 ± 4.4 vs 8.3 ± 3.6, p = 0.03), especially N1 LNs (4.2 ± 3.1 vs 3.5 ± 2.2, p = 0.02), than VATS. By comparison, no difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), or recurrence or mortality patterns was found between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Further subgroup analyses also observed similar long-term outcomes between the two groups regarding age, gender, and smoking history. Finally, Cox’s analyses found that the surgical approach was not independently correlated with RFS or OS. RATS shortened postoperative hospital stay, assessed more N1 and total LNs, and achieved comparable long-term outcomes to VATS for very young NSCLC patients.

Introduction:To analyze the feasibility and efficacy of sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in multicenter patients with squamous cell lung cancer. Methods:We retrospectively identified patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy (n = 14) or chemotherapy alone (n = 33) at five thoracic surgery centers between 2018 and 2020. The primary end point was 30-day major complications. The secondary end point was major pathologic response. Multivariate analysis was performed with a log-binomial regression model adjusting potential risk factors. Results:All patients received induction therapy and underwent sleeve lobectomy without 90-day postoperative deaths. The distribution of age, sex, nutrition status, pulmonary and cardiac function, tumor stage, surgical approach, and location of the pulmonary lobe was well balanced between the two cohorts. In the immunotherapy cohort, two patients (14.3%) experienced a pulmonary major complication, whereas nine pulmonary major complications and one cardiac major complication (30.3%) occurred in the chemotherapy cohort (p = 0.302). Conclusions:Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in addition to chemotherapy did not increase 30-day risk of postoperative complications, and immunotherapy is a favorable factor affecting pathologic downstage and response. Therefore, sleeve lobectomy after induction chemoimmunotherapy appears safe and feasible.

BackgroundNeoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has been increasingly applied to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the feasibility and oncological efficacy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is scarce. This study aims to assess the superiorities of RATS over (VATS) concerning short-term outcomes in treating NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.MethodsNSCLC patients receiving RATS or VATS lobectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were retrospectively identified. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival profiles were analyzed.ResultsForty-six NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were included and divided into the RATS (n=15) and VATS (n=31) groups. The baseline clinical characteristics and induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.050). The 30-day mortality in the RATS and VATS groups were 0% and 3.23%, respectively (p=1.000). Patients undergoing RATS were associated with reduced surgical-related intensive unit care (ICU) stay than those receiving VATS (0.0 [0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-1.0] days, p=0.026). Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 LNs (6.27 ± 1.94 vs 4.90 ± 1.92, p=0.042) and LN stations (3.07 ± 1.03 vs 2.52 ± 0.57, p=0.038) compared with VATS. By comparison, no difference was found in surgical outcomes, pathological results, and postoperative complications between the RATS and VATS groups (all p>0.050). Finally, RATS and VATS achieved comparable one-year recurrence-free survival (82.96% vs. 85.23%, p=0.821) and the timing of central nervous system, LN, and bone recurrences (all p>0.050).ConclusionRATS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, reducing surgical-related ICU stay, assessing increased N1 LNs and stations, and achieving similar survival profiles to VATS.

The learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is much longer than multi-portal VATS lobectomy due to higher surgical requirement and understanding for both surgeon and assistants.To perform same lobectomy with different procedure is beneficial for the better understanding of anatomy under the unique confronting thorascopic view of uniportal VATS.Here we are going to share a case who received uniportal VATS right upper lobectomy (RUL) with the division order of bronchus-artery-vein (B-A-V) as a unique procedure.This procedure aim to show important anatomical structures of right upper lobe from both anterior and posterior ways respectively.A 64 years old female patient presented with an asymptomatic lesion of right upper lobe lesion on chest CT-scan during routine physical exam.She underwent uniportal VATS RUL after preoperative evaluation for the peripheral lung cancer.No perioperative complications were found and patient was discharged on postoperative day 3.The Pathology report revealed the dominant tumor subtype was lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma; the tumour size was 3.7 cm × 3 cm; bronchus stump margin was negative.The B-A-V procedure for uniportal VATS RUL is based on "First hard then soft" concept, it's a safe and educational procedure providing satisfactory exposure for surgeons.

(1) Background: Despite the fact that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (RATL) has been prevalently applied for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its superiorities are still to be fully revealed for patients with metastatic N1 lymph nodes (LNs). We aim to evaluate the advantages of RATL for N1 NSCLC. (2) Methods: This retrospective study identified consecutive pathological N1 NSCLC patients undergoing RATL, video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATL), or open lobectomy (OL) in Shanghai Chest Hospital between 2014 and 2020. Further, perioperative and oncological outcomes were investigated. (3) Results: A total of 855 cases (70 RATL, 435 VATL, and 350 OL) were included. Propensity score matching resulted in 70, 140, and 140 cases in the RATL, VATL, and OL groups, respectively. RATL led to (1) the shortest surgical time (p = 0.005) and lowest intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001); (2) the shortest ICU (p < 0.001) and postsurgical hospital (p < 0.001) stays as well as chest tube duration (p < 0.001); and (3) the lowest morbidities of postsurgical complications (p = 0.016). Moreover, RATL dissected more N1 (p = 0.027), more N1 + N2 (p = 0.027) LNs, and led to a higher upstaging incidence rate (p < 0.050) than VATL. Finally, RATL achieved a comparable 5-year disease-free and overall survival in relation to VATL and OL. (4) Conclusions: RATL led to the most optimal perioperative outcomes among the three surgical approaches and showed superiority in assessing N1 and total LNs over VATL, though it did achieve comparable oncological outcomes in relation to VATL and OL for N1 NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) encompasses a variety of local invasion and nodal involvement and its management is still under debate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to improve the survival in metastatic NSCLC, but are far from being accepted as an induction therapy. METHODS We retrospectively collected data of all patients who received induction ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and chemotherapy (carboplatin with paclitaxel) for stage IIIA-B NSCLC followed by surgery in our unit between January 2019 and March 2020. RESULTS Of the 12 patients (9 men, 3 women) 6 had a squamous cell carcinoma, 4 had adenocarcinoma, 1 had an undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, and 1 had adeno-squamous carcinoma. Seven patients had stage IIIA disease and 5 had stage IIIB. After induction therapy, 6 patients had stable disease and 6 had a partial response. The median tumor reduction was 3.05 cm (range, 2.30-8.70 cm). All patients, but 1 due to the COVID-19 outbreak, had no delay in surgery. Two patients experienced myelosuppression after induction therapy, 2 had minor adverse effects. Three patients had postoperative complications not related to the induction therapy. All patients had a pathologic response: 5 complete, 4 major, and 3 partial. Eleven patients are alive (mean follow-up, 18.17 +/- 4.97 months) and free of disease. CONCLUSIONS Induction ICI chemotherapy may be a valid treatment in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, providing important tumor downstaging and rendering patients operable. In our experience patients had few side effects and a good pathologic response.

Background: The role of surgery in combined modality therapy for selected stage IV oligometastatic (OM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) significantly improved the survival in adjuvant therapy in metastatic NSCLC but has rare evidence in inductive setting. This is the first case report about uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery after induction therapy of TKI for OM-NSCLC. Case Description: A 50-year-old Chinese woman presented to hospital with headache and blurred vision and was diagnosed with an intracranial tumor. The craniotomy confirmed the metastasis from primary lung cancer. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) showed the mass located in the left upper lobe and left hilar lymph node involvement. Next-generation sequencing found an EGFR mutation (exon 21 p.L858R missense), and osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, was used 80 mg per day as the induction therapy due to the EGFR mutation detected from the metastatic tumor. A favorable treatment response was observed of the lung tumor with lymph node regression, followed by uniportal thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy. The postoperative pathology evaluated both the lung lesion and lymph nodes and confirmed the OM status of this patient. No complications were observed and postoperative osimertinib 80 mg per day continued. Conclusions: Our case suggests that the role of surgery should be appropriately reevaluated for EGFRmutated OM-NSCLC with the emerging development of EGFR-TKI.

IntroductionAlthough robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has been widely applied in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its advantages remain unclear for very old patients. The present study compared the perioperative outcomes and survival profiles among RATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and open lobectomy (OL), aiming to access the superiority of RATS for NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years.MethodsPathological IA-IIIB NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years who underwent RATS, VATS, or OL between June 2015 and June 2021 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were included. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1:1 RATS versus VATS versus OL) was based on 10 key prognostic factors. The primary endpoints were perioperative outcomes, and the secondary endpoints were disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CS).ResultsA total of 504 cases (126 RATS, 200 VATS, and 178 OL) were enrolled, and PSM led to 97 cases in each group. The results showed that RATS led to: 1) the best surgical-related outcomes including the shortest operation duration (p <0.001) and the least blood loss (p <0.001); 2) the fastest postoperative recoveries including the shortest ICU stay (p = 0.004), chest tube drainage duration (p <0.001), and postoperative stay (p <0.001), and the most overall costs (p <0.001); 3) the lowest incidence of postoperative complications (p = 0.002), especially pneumonia (p <0.001). There was no difference in the resection margins, reoperation rates, intraoperative blood transfusion, and volume of chest tube drainage among the three groups. Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 (p = 0.009) and total (p = 0.007) lymph nodes (LNs) than VATS, while the three surgical approaches dissected similar numbers of N1, N2, and total LN stations and led to a comparable incidence of postoperative nodal upstaging. Finally, the three groups possessed comparable DFS, OS, and CS rates. Further subgroup analysis found no difference in DFS or OS among the three groups, and multivariable analysis showed that the surgical approach was not independently correlated with survival profiles.ConclusionRATS possessed the superiority in achieving better perioperative outcomes over VATS and OL in very old NSCLC patients, though the three surgical approaches achieved comparable survival outcomes.

Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors may be promising for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with potential pathological and survival benefits. But severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may cause fatal consequences which require early identification and timely intervention. The basis for most of these adverse events is a reactive hyperactivated T-cell response to normal tissues that results in the production of high levels of CD4 T-helper cell cytokines or increased migration of cytolytic CD8 T cells in normal tissues. It is recommended that all patients receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors routinely have thyroid function studies, complete blood counts, and liver function and metabolic panels at each treatment and at intervals of 6 to 12 weeks for the first 6 months after finishing treatment. Herein, we report a rare case who had two grade 3-4 irAEs consecutively occurring after PD-1 induction therapy and surgery. A 59-year-old man with stage IIIA squamous cell lung cancer receiving 3 cycles of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin, and nivolumab was reevaluated for resectability. The patient experienced acute serum transaminase elevation right after induction therapy. Seven days after surgery he had severe pneumonia. These two serious complications were both eventually relieved by a month long treatment of corticosteroids but not regular medicine which verified the diagnosis of irAEs. Although results of clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy are worth expecting, our case calls attention to careful surveillance and timely management of irAEs during the perioperative use of PD-(L)1 inhibitors. We also further discuss the standard use of corticosteroids for irAEs based on a review of literature.

Background: Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) was defined as a unique tumor invasion pattern in adenocarcinoma (ADC) by The World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors in 2015. Since then, STAS had been shown to be associated with local recurrence and poor survival results, as the typical signature and potential mechanisms of STAS remained unclear. Our objectives were to comprehensively demonstrate the clinicopathological and genetic signatures in STAS-positive lung cancer patients.Methods: The clinicopathological and gene alteration characteristics of 878 STAS-positive lung cancer patients were presented. Associations between parameters were evaluated using the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression. The capture-based targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) with a platform of 68 lung cancer-related genes was conducted in 139 cases, and the mutational spectrum was summarized.Results: STAS was identified in 391 female and 481 male patients, of which ADC accounted for the majority of cases (92.6%). The concomitant solid or micropapillary subtype was observed in 92.12% patients with ADC. Poorly differentiated histological subtypes were more frequent and negatively correlated with tumor size in smaller tumor cases (P=0.036, Pearson's R=−0.075). Furthermore, in the subgroup of nodules within 3 cm, the distribution of the solid and micropapillary subtypes were significantly frequent in lymph node-positive patients (P<0.001). Tumor protein p53 (TP53) alterations were more frequent in smoking patients (27.6%, P=0.007), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) alterations were more common in female (10.8%, P=0.025), while Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) (20.3%, P=0.024) and TP53 (45.9%, P=0.003) were more prevalent in males.Conclusions: Poorly differentiated histological subtypes likely played a crucial role in promoting the invasiveness of STAS, especially in small tumor-size cases. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), TP53, KARS, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) were the five most frequent alterations in STAS-positive ADC.

Background The recent novel conception of neoadjuvant immunotherapy has generated interest among surgeons worldwide, especially the lack of experience involving surgical treatment for the neoadjuvant immunotherapy population. Methods Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy, were retrospectively collected between September 2018 and April 2020. Demographic data, pathological and clinical features, therapeutic regimens and outcome data of all individuals were collected by retrospective chart review. Operative details, information of neoadjuvant therapy, were also abstracted. Results In total, 31 patients were included in the final analysis. The patients' median age was 61 years. In total, 29 of the patients were males, while 2 were females. Patients received a median of 3 doses before resection. The median duration from final treatment to surgery was 34 days. After neoadjuvant treatment, post-treatment computed tomography scan showed that 24 patients had partial response. In total, 12 of 31 patients had a major pathological response, 15 pathological downstaging. Three patients had no residual viable tumor. A positive surgical margin was identified in 7 cases. One or more postoperative complications occurred in 18 of all 31 patients. In total, 26 patients underwent next-generation sequencing before surgery in total. Among them, 2 patients were detected STK11 mutations, none of whom had a major pathological response by final pathological examination. Conclusions Pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC appears to be safe with low operative mortality and morbidity rate in the current population.

BACKGROUND:Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has been widely used in the treatment of lung cancer. The perioperative outcomes of right upper lobectomy (RUL) using RATS and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) were retrospectively investigated and compared. We aimed to summarize a single-center experience of RATS and 4-port unidirectional VATS in RUL, and to discuss the safety and the essentials of the surgery.METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the 685 with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent minimally invasive RUL in our center by the same surgical group from January 2015 to December 2019. Both RATS and VATS were performed with three ports with utility incision. The 685 participants were divided into RATS (335 cases) and VATS (350 cases) groups according to surgical method. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes including dissected lymph nodes, postoperative duration of drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the groups.RESULTS:In the 685 patients enrolled, the baseline characteristics were comparable, and no postoperative 30-day mortality or intraoperative blood transfusion were observed. Compared with VATS, RATS had less surgical duration (90.22±12.16 vs. 92.68±12.26 min, P<0.001), less length of stay (4.71±1.37 vs. 5.26±1.56 days, P<0.001), and decreased postoperative duration of drainage (3.49±1.15 vs. 4.09±1.57 days, P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in the lymph nodes dissection, blood loss, conversion rate and morbidities. The cost of RATS was much higher than VATS (85,329.41±12,893.44 vs. 68,733.43±14,781.32 CNY, P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS:Robot assisted RUL had similar perioperative outcomes compared to VATS RUL lobectomy using similar three port with utility incision technique. The advantages of RATS included finer dissection of lymph node, relatively less operation time, earlier chest tube removal and discharge.