Background. The international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS I and II) allows description of variations in kidney transplantation and wait-listing from nationally representative samples of 18- to 65-year-old hemodialysis patients. The present study examines the health status and socioeconomic characteristics of United States patients, the role of for-profit versus not-for-profit status of dialysis facilities, and the likelihood of transplant wait-listing and transplantation rates.Methods. Analyses of transplantation rates were based on 5267 randomly selected DOPPS I patients in dialysis units in the United States, Europe, and Japan who received chronic hemodialysis therapy for at least 90 days in 2000. Left-truncated Cox regression was used to assess time to kidney transplantation. Logistic regression determined the odds of being transplant wait-listed for a cross-section of 1323 hemodialysis patients in the United States in 2000. Furthermore, kidney transplant wait-listing was determined in 12 countries from cross-sectional samples of DOPPS II hemodialysis patients in 2002 to 2003 (N= 4274).Results. Transplantation rates varied widely, from very low in Japan to 25-fold higher in the United States and 75-fold higher in Spain (both P values < 0.0001). Factors associated with higher rates of transplantation included younger age, nonblack race, less comorbidity, fewer years on dialysis, higher income, and higher education levels. The likelihood of being wait-listed showed wide variation internationally and by United States region but not by for-profit dialysis unit status within the United States.Conclusion. DOPPS I and II confirmed large variations in kidney transplantation rates by country, even after adjusting for differences in case mix. Facility size and, in the United States, profit status, were not associated with varying transplantation rates. International results consistently showed higher transplantation rates for younger, healthier, better-educated, and higher income patients.

The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) is a prospective, observational study designed to elucidate aspects of hemodialysis practice that are associated with the best outcomes for hemodialysis patients. In DOPPS I, 308 hemodialysis units from 7 countries participated, including 145 facilities from the United States (1996-2001), 62 facilities from Japan (1999-2001), and 101 facilities from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (all 1998-2000). DOPPS II (2002-2004) has included 320 hemodialysis units and more than 12,400 hemodialysis patients from the 7 DOPPS I countries as well as Australia, Belgium, Canada, New Zealand, and Sweden. Dialysis units are chosen via a stratified random selection procedure to provide proportional sampling by region and type of facility within each country. In DOPPS I and II, longitudinal data have been collected from both a prevalent (cross-sectional) patient sample and an incident patient sample. Data have also been collected on numerous facility practice patterns. Most DOPPS analyses incorporate both facility- and patient-level data in regression-based analyses to investigate predictors of survival, hospitalization, quality of life, vascular access type, and other outcomes. DOPPS longitudinal data also help identify trends in subject characteristics, practice indicators, medication use, and outcomes. The DOPPS remains a unique source of data on hemodialysis patients and facilities. It continues to refine its methods of data collection and analysis with the goal of improving hemodialysis practice and end-stage renal disease patient lives worldwide.

BACKGROUND:Optimal waiting time before first use of vascular access is not known. METHODS:Two practices-first cannulation time for fistulae and grafts, and blood flow rate-were examined as potential predictors of vascular access failure in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Access failure (defined as time to first failure or first salvage intervention) was modelled using Cox regression. RESULTS:Among 309 haemodialysis facilities, 2730 grafts and 2154 fistulae were studied. For grafts, first cannulation typically occurred within 2-4 weeks at 62% of US, 61% of European and 42% of Japanese facilities. For fistulae, first cannulation occurred <2 months after placement in 36% of US, 79% of European and 98% of Japanese facilities. Overall, the relative risk (RR) of graft failure in Europe was lower compared with the USA (RR = 0.69, P = 0.04). The RR of graft failure (reference group = first cannulation at 2-3 weeks) was 0.84 with first cannulation at <2 weeks (P = 0.11), 0.94 with first cannulation at 3-4 weeks (P = 0.48) and 0.93 with first cannulation at >4 weeks (P = 0.48). The RR of fistula failure was 0.72 with first cannulation at <4 weeks (P = 0.08), 0.91 at 2-3 months (P = 0.43) and 0.87 at >3 months (P = 0.31) (reference group = first cannulation at 1-2 months). Facility median blood flow rate was not a significant predictor of access failure. CONCLUSIONS:Earlier cannulation of a newly placed vascular access at the haemodialysis facility level was not associated with increased risk of vascular access failure. Potential for confounding due to selection bias cannot be excluded, implying the importance of clinical judgement in determining time to first use of vascular access.

The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) is a prospective, longitudinal, observational study of hemodialysis patients and facilities in seven countries with large populations of dialysis patients: France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This paper describes the study design, analytic methods, and preliminary findings of the DOPPS. The goal of the study is to determine which practice patterns are associated with the best patient outcomes, with adjustment for a wide range of patient case-mix characteristics. The primary outcomes of interest are mortality, hospitalization, quality of life, and vascular access events. The facility sample from the. seven countries consists of 327 hemodialysis centers in which 24,392 patients were treated when the study began. A random sample of 10,332 patients has been selected thus far for more detailed longitudinal data collection. Departing patients are replaced during the study using random selection. A study coordinator at each dialysis facility collects baseline and longitudinal patient data. Patients are asked to complete a questionnaire that addresses quality of life on a yearly basis. The medical director and nurse manager in each facility complete a practice pattern questionnaire. Preliminary data are presented concerning the sample facilities and the census of patients treated in each facility at the start of the study. Dialysis facilities vary widely in size and type (freestanding vs, institutionally-based) across countries. Variation is also seen in patient age, sex distribution, and diabetes mellitus as the attributed cause of endstage renal disease (ESRD). At this early phase, the DOPPS has proved to be technically feasible and has revealed basic differences in hemodialysis facilities and patients across the seven participating countries.