Background IL-2 inducible kinase (ITK) is highly expressed in metastatic melanomas and its inhibition suppresses melanoma cell proliferation. We hypothesize that ibrutinib has a direct antitumor effect in melanoma cell lines and that treatment of metastatic melanomas with ibrutinib induces antitumor responses. Methods We assessed the ibrutinib effect on melanoma cell proliferation, apoptosis, and motility. Patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to PD-1 and MAPK inhibitors (if BRAFV600 -mutant) were treated with ibrutinib, 840 mg PO QD, as part of a phase II clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02581930). Results Melanoma cell lines frequently express ITK, YES1, and EGFR. Ibrutinib suppressed cell motility and proliferation in most cell lines. Eighteen patients (13 male; median age 63.5 years, range 37–82; 12 with ipilimumab resistance) were enrolled. The most frequent side effects were fatigue (61%), anorexia (50%), hyponatremia (28%), nausea, and vomiting (22% each). No antitumor responses were seen. At a median follow-up of 6 months (0.3–35.8 months), the median progression-free survival was 1.3 months (range 0.2–5.5 months). Fifteen patients were discontinued from the study due to progression, and 14 patients had died from metastatic melanoma. All archived tumors expressed ITK, 41% had no expression of p16 and PTEN, and 61% had absent tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Ibrutinib significantly suppressed proliferating (Ki67+) CD19+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells and had no significant effect on other lymphocyte subsets. Conclusion Ibrutinib did not induce any meaningful clinical benefit. ITK expression may not be clinically relevant. Treatment-refractory metastatic melanomas have other fundamental defects (i.e. absent PTEN and p16 expression, absent TILs) that may contribute to an adverse prognosis.
Abstract Background. Previous epidemiologic studies, including our own, have consistently linked long-term exposure to single-source polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to increased breast cancer incidence. It is unclear whether single sources, specific groups, or all PAH sources should be targeted for breast cancer risk reduction. This study considers the impact on breast cancer incidence from multiple PAH exposure sources in a single model, which better reflects exposure to these complex mixtures. Methods. In a population-based case-control study conducted on Long Island, New York (N=1,508 breast cancer cases/1,556 controls), a Bayesian hierarchical regression approach was used to estimate adjusted posterior means and credible intervals (CrI) for the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for PAH exposure sources, considered singly and as groups: active smoking; residential environmental tobacco smoke (ETS); indoor and outdoor air pollution; and grilled/smoked meat intake. Results. Most women were exposed to PAHs from multiple sources. In a hierarchical model, breast cancer incidence was positively associated with ETS from a spouse (OR=1.20, 95%CrI=1.03, 1.42) and residential synthetic firelog burning (OR=1.30, 95%CrI=1.06, 1.60). Additionally, PAH exposure groups, including ingestion (OR=1.45, 95%CrI=1.16, 1.79), indoor stove/fireplace use (OR=1.30, 95%CrI=1.02, 1.62), and total indoor sources (active smoking, ETS from spouse, grilled/smoked meat intake, stove/fireplace use, OR=1.46, 95%CrI=1.03, 2.05), were associated with increased breast cancer incidence. Conclusions. Groups of PAH sources, especially those for ingestion and indoor sources, were associated with a 30-50% increase in breast cancer incidence. PAH exposure is ubiquitous and a potentially modifiable breast cancer risk factor. Citation Format: White AJ, Bradshaw PT, Herring AH, Teitelbaum SL, Beyea J, Stellman SD, Steck SE, Mordukhovich I, Eng SM, Engel LS, Conway K, Hatch M, Neugut AI, Santella RM, Gammon MD. Exposure to multiple sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and breast cancer incidence. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-08.
Background: Despite studies having consistently linked exposure to single-source polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to breast cancer, it is unclear whether single sources or specific groups of PAH sources should be targeted for breast cancer risk reduction. Objectives: This study considers the impact on breast cancer incidence from multiple PAH exposure sources in a single model, which better reflects exposure to these complex mixtures.Methods: In a population-based case-control study conducted on Long Island, New York (N =1508 breast cancer cases/1556 controls), a Bayesian hierarchical regression approach was used to estimate adjusted posterior means and credible intervals (CrI) for the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for PAH exposure sources, considered singly and as groups: active smoking; residential environmental tobacco smoke (ETS); indoor and outdoor air pollution; and grilled/smoked meat intake.Results: Most women were exposed to PAHs from multiple sources, and the most commonincluded active/passive smoking and grilled/smoked food intake. In multiple-PAH source models, breast cancer incidence was associated with residential ETS from a spouse (OR =1.20, 95%CrI = 1.03,1.40) and synthetic firelog burning (OR = 1.29, 95%CrI = 1.06, 1.57); these estimates are similar, but slightly attenuated, to those from single-source models. Additionally when we considered PAH exposure groups, the most pronounced significant associations included total indoor sources (active smoking, ETS from spouse, grilled/smoked meat intake, stove/fireplace use, OR = 1.45, 95%CrI = 1.02, 2.04).Conclusions: Groups of PAH sources, particularly indoor sources, were associated with a 30-50% increase in breast cancer incidence. PAH exposure is ubiquitous and a potentially modifiable breast cancer risk factor. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Abstract Tobacco smoke, diet, and indoor and outdoor air pollution, all major sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), have been associated with breast cancer incidence. Aberrant methylation may be an early event in carcinogenesis, but whether PAHs influence the epigenome is unclear. Few studies have evaluated whether PAHs are associated with methylation, particularly in breast tumors where methylation changes are particularly relevant. In a population-based case-control study, we measured promoter methylation of 13 breast cancer-related genes in breast tumor tissue (n=765-851 cases) and global methylation in peripheral blood (1,055 cases/1,101 controls). PAH sources (current active smoking, residential environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), vehicular traffic, synthetic log burning, and grilled/smoked meat intake) were evaluated separately. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). When comparing methylated versus unmethylated genes, synthetic log use was associated with increased ORs for CDH1 (OR=2.28, 95%CI=1.07-4.83), HIN1 (OR=2.11, 95%CI=1.32-3.38) and RARβ methylation (OR=1.82, 95%CI=1.18-2.83) and decreased ORs for BRCA1 methylation (OR=0.44, 95%CI=0.30-0.65). Residential ETS was associated with decreased ORs for ESR1 (OR=0.74, 95%CI=0.56-0.99) and CCND2 methylation (OR=0.65, 95%CI=0.44-0.96). Current smoking and vehicular traffic were associated with decreased ORs for DAPK (OR=0.53, 95%CI=0.28-0.99) and increased ORs for TWIST1 methylation (OR=2.79, 95%CI=1.24-6.30), respectively. In controls, synthetic log use was inversely associated with LINE-1 methylation (OR=0.60, 95%CI=0.42-0.87). PAH sources were associated with hypo- and hypermethylation at multiple promoter regions in breast tumors and LINE-1 hypomethylation in blood of controls. Methylation may be a potential biologic mechanism for the association between PAHs and breast cancer incidence. Citation Format: White AJ, Chen J, McCullough LE, Xu X, Cho YH, Conway K, Beyea J, Stellman SD, Steck SE, Mordukhovich I, Eng SM, Terry MB, Engel LS, Hatch M, Neugut AI, Hibshoosh H, Santella RM, Gammon MD. Sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons associated with gene-specific promoter methylation in women with breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-04.
11099 Background: Independent of other factors, p53 status may influence sensitivity to anthracycline (A)- and taxane (T)-based chemotherapy. We investigated p53 as a predictive marker of differential neoadjuvant chemoresponse by examining change in MRI longest diameter (LD) during sequential A- then T-based chemotherapy in a prospective clinical trial. Methods: 171 patients (pts) with newly diagnosed locally advanced breast cancer received neoadjuvant A- then T-based chemotherapy. LD were obtained pretherapy, between regimens, and posttherapy but prior to surgery. P53 mutation analysis was performed on pretherapy tissue using gene chip technology, SSCP, and sequencing. Subtypes were by IHC: LumA (ER/PR+/HER2-), LumB (ER/PR+/HER2+), Basal (triple negative), HER2 (HER2+/ER/PR-). Results: 99 pts had p53 mutant (M) tumors and 72 were wildtype (WT). M and WT did not differ by age, menopausal status, or HER2. M were significantly more common among basal (71%) and HER2 (59%) than Lum A (24%). Anthracycline response did not differ between WT and M within subtypes. Within HER2, Basal, and LumB, WT had higher taxane- and overall responses than M; within LumB these were statistically significant (p=0.03 and 0.05 respectively). Conclusions: P53 mutation status may affect chemosensitivity even within hormone receptor/HER2 subsets. In this dataset response to anthracycline appeared independent of p53 status within subtypes, while WT tumors responded better to taxanes and overall in LumB, with a similar trend among basal and HER2. Mutational subset and correlative analyses with gene expression, molecular subtyping, and IHC data are ongoing and will be presented. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
MDM2, a protein that binds and inactivates the tumor suppressor p53, is overexpressed in a variety of human cancers (1). Bond et al. (2) recently identified a single nucleotide polymorphism in the MDM2 gene, −309 T/G within the MDM2 promoter (database for single nucleotide polymorphism reference sequence number 2279744; http://snp500cancer.nci.nih.gov). The G allele showed increased affinity for the transcriptional activator Sp1, resulting in elevated MDM2 transcription, higher MDM2 protein levels, and enhanced p53 inhibition. Among 88 members of Li-Fraumeni syndrome families who carried germ line mutations in p53, persons with one or two copies of the MDM2 −309 G allele showed earlier onset of cancer, including breast cancer, and G/G homozygous individuals showed increased frequency of multiple primary cancers. We examined the association of MDM2 genotype and breast cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study of African-Americans and Whites in North Carolina.Details regarding the Carolina Breast Cancer Study have previously been described (3, 4), including extraction of germ line DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes (5), analysis of p53 mutations in tumor blocks (6), p53 immunohistochemistry (7), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry (5), and determination of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status (8). p53 mutational status was determined in the subset of Carolina Breast Cancer Study cases enrolled between 1993 and 1996 (6).Genotyping was conducted on germ line DNA using a Minor Groove Binding Eclipse assay developed by Nanogen, Inc. (Bothell, WA). The (G) allele probe was labeled on the 3′ end with the FAM reporter dye (nucleotide sequence, 5′-CCCGCGCCGcAG-3′, variant site in lower case) and the (T) allele probe was labeled on the 3′ end with the TET reporter dye (5′-CCCGCGCCGaA*G-3′). The asterisk denotes a Superbase. Superbases are modified nucleotides that permit highly specific binding to GC-rich DNA templates. The forward PCR primer was 5′-ACCTGCGATCATCCGGACCT-3′ and the reverse primer was 5′-TGCGG*GGCCGCT-3′. Probes and primers were designed for the complementary DNA strand. PCR amplification was done on a GenAmp 9700 thermocycler (Perkin-Elmer, Wellesley, MA) under the following conditions: 1 cycle of 50.0°C for 2 minutes, 1 cycle of 95.0°C for 2 minutes, followed by 50 cycles of 95.0°C for 5 seconds (denature), 28.0°C for 20 seconds (anneal/detection), and 76.0°C for 30 seconds (extension). Post-PCR melt curve analysis was done on the ABI Prism 7700, and data was analyzed using the Minor Groove Binding Eclipse Melt Macro for Microsoft Excel (EclipseMeltMacro_v2.332_050519.xls) provided by Nanogen. Further details are available from the authors upon request.Genomic DNA samples obtained from the Coriell Cell Repositories (Camden, NJ) were sequenced to determine MDM2 −309 genotype status and used as positive controls. Positive controls were Coriell sample number NA12749 for G/G (FAM) and NA11587 for T/T (TET). DNA samples that did not amplify or could not be scored were repeated. Samples that did not amplify on the third PCR run were designated as "missing" (n = 8). A randomly selected 10% of samples were repeated, and all results matched the initial analysis.Genotype frequencies were compared using the Cochran Armitage test for trend (9), and allele frequencies were compared using χ2 tests. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and incorporated offset terms to account for sampling probabilities for cases and controls. Among cases, age at onset of breast cancer was compared across strata defined by MDM2 genotype using ANOVA for means and the Kruskal-Wallis test for medians.MDM2 −309 allele and genotype frequencies did not differ between cases and controls, and ORs for breast cancer were close to the null in African-Americans and Whites (Table 1). The frequency of the G allele in Whites was slightly higher than 0.33 [see Bond et al. (2)]. Genotype frequencies did not show significant departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium among African-American (P = 0.22) or White (P = 0.28) cases, but there were more G/G homozygotes than expected among African-American (P = 0.001) and White (P = 0.001) controls. ORs did not differ according to menopausal status or for subgroups of cases defined by in situ versus invasive breast cancer, p53 mutational status, p53 immunohistochemistry, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunochemistry, estrogen receptor, or progesterone receptor status (data not shown). ORs were unchanged when we adjusted for or stratified on family history of cancer as well as other breast cancer risk factors (data not shown). ORs were close to the null for breast cancer diagnosed before age 40, age 40 to 50, and over age 50 (Table 1).Among cases, MDM2 genotype frequencies did not differ according to p53 mutational status (P = 0.60), p53 immunohistochemistry (P = 0.70) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry (P = 0.84). MDM2 G/G genotype frequencies were slightly higher in estrogen receptor–positive compared with estrogen receptor–negative cases (P = 0.02) and for progesterone receptor–positive versus progesterone receptor–negative cases (P = 0.03). Mean and median age at onset of breast cancer did not differ according to MDM2 genotype in African-Americans or Whites (Table 2). After stratification on p53 mutational status, mean and median age at onset were lower among p53-positive cases with MDM2 G/G genotype, but the differences were not statistically significant. Age at onset was not significantly different when we compared G/G carriers to cases with T/T or T/G genotypes (data not shown).Our study had 90% power to detect an OR of ≥1.4 for MDM2 −309 G/G genotype in Whites, and 90% power to detect an OR of ≥2.6 in African-Americans. We conclude that the MDM2 −309 genotype is not associated with breast cancer risk in Whites and does not exhibit a strong association in African-Americans. MDM2 genotype may be associated with a slightly earlier age at onset of breast tumors containing somatic mutations in p53. Additional studies of breast cancer and other cancers are warranted. The search for functional polymorphisms such as MDM2 −309 that alter transcriptional regulation in biological pathways that influence tumorigenesis is an important research endeavor (10).
Thomas, N.; Alexander, A.; Edmiston, S.; Millikan, R.; Groben, P.; Hao, H.; Tolbert, D.; Berwick, M.; Busam, K.; Begg, C.; Hummer, A.; Mattingly, D.; Ollila, D.; Conway, K. Author Information
10048 Background: LCCC9819 and I-SPY1 are designed to examine multiple potential predictive markers and assays simultaneously in biopsies from neoadjuvantly treated patients. Both p53 mutation status and molecular ‘intrinsic‘ subtype have been associated with chemosensitivity. In this preliminary analysis, we present the p53 mutation spectra by molecular subtype from patients enrolled in the combined LCCC 9819 and I-SPY1 datasets. Methods: Patients received neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy with pre-therapy biopsies. p53 mutation analysis was performed by p53 GeneChip assay for point mutations/1 bp deletions followed by SSCP if GeneChip-negative. Abnormal GeneChip or SSCP were confirmed by sequencing. DNA microarrays used Agilent human microarrays and a common reference strategy approach. Results: 51 patients were treated on LCCC9819 and have available molecular analyses; 87 from I-SPY1. 111 patients have completed p53 mutation analysis, revealing a high proportion (42%) with abnormal p53. Of these, several were in known hotspots, including R175H (4 mutations), R248L (1), R273H (3), and R273C (2). Most were missense mutations (81%), however, there were 8 (17%) null and 1 (2%) silent mutations. Most (91%) mutations were in the DNA binding domain. Molecular subtypes are known on 111 tumors: 22% Luminal A, 22% Luminal B, 3% Normal-like, 23% HER2+/ER−, 27% Basal-like, and 3% unclassified. Among those with both assays complete, we found that p53 mutations differed by subtype (Table). Conclusions: P53 mutations are common in these independent neoadjuvant datasets, and differ in frequency between molecular subtypes, which may have implications for predictive factor identification. Future analyses will include aCGH, cell cycle protein analysis, proteomics, and clinical data including response to chemotherapy. (supported by UNC Breast SPORE-CA58223, NIH M01RR00046, DAMD 17–02–1-0521). [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is an important regulator of growth and differentiation and is a potent mitogen for human breast cancer cells. Recent investigations suggest an association between cytosine-adenine dinucleotide (CA)n repeat polymorphisms of the IGF1 gene and IGF-I levels and further evidence indicates that genotype may influence breast cancer risk. We assessed the relation between IGF1 (CA)n repeats and breast cancer, and evaluated modification of genotype effects according to traditional breast cancer risk factors in 1028 breast cancer cases and 1086 controls. An increased risk of breast cancer was seen for genotypes that included alleles with fewer than (CA)19 repeats when compared to (CA)19 repeat carriers, an association that was particularly strong among premenopausal women [odds ratio (OR)=3.31; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.47, 7.48]. No significant association was observed between an IGF1 genotype with no (CA)19 repeat compared to (CA)19 repeat genotypes in either pre- or postmenopausal women overall. However, when traditional breast cancer risk factors were considered, premenopausal women with genotypes that lacked a (CA)19 repeat had a nearly 60% increased risk of breast cancer among those who had ever used hormonal birth control, while never users had a significantly reduced risk (Pinteraction=0.01). Among postmenopausal women, those with genotypes lacking a (CA)19 repeat allele had significantly increased breast cancer risk among subjects with a lower than median body mass index (BMI) (OR=1.77 95% CI=1.09, 2.87), while no association for IGF1 genotype was seen among women with a higher than median BMI (Pinteraction=0.04). Our results demonstrate a role for alleles with fewer than (CA)19 repeats as a risk factor for breast cancer and also suggest that several traditional breast cancer risk factors modify the association of the IGF1 (CA)19 repeat genotype.
Knowledge about possible genotoxic effects of low-dose radiation on the human germline is limited and relies primarily on extrapolations from high-dose exposures. To test whether ionizing radiation can cause paternal genetic mutations that are transmitted to offspring, we enrolled families of 88 Chernobyl cleanup workers exposed to ionizing radiation. We analyzed DNA isolated from lymphocytes for mutations via DNA blotting with the multi-locus minisatellite probes 33.6 and 33.15 and via PCR in a panel of six tetranucleotide repeats. Children conceived before and children conceived after their father’s exposure showed no statistically significant differences in mutation frequencies. We saw an increase in germline microsatellite mutations after radiation exposure that was not statistically significant. We found no dependence of mutation rate on increasing exposure. A novel finding was that the tetranucleotide marker D7S1482 demonstrated germline hypermutability. In conclusion, our results do not support an increased level of germline minisatellite mutations but suggest a modest increase in germline mutations in tetranucleotide repeats. Small sample size, however, limited statistical power.
To explore the role of smoking in breast cancer, we undertook a population-based study to evaluate the prevalence and spectrum of p53 mutations in the breast tumors of smokers and nonsmokers. We evaluated 456 archival invasive breast tumors for mutations in exons 4-8 of the p53 gene, using single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis and manual sequencing. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the association of p53 mutations with clinical and smoking characteristics. Of 108 mutations identified, 77 (71%) were point mutations and 31 (29%) were deletions or insertions. A higher prevalence of p53 mutations was found in the breast tumors of current smokers (36.5%; P = 0.02) compared with never smokers (23.6%), whereas fewer mutations were found in former smokers (16.2%; P = 0.09). After adjustment for age, race, menopausal status, clinical stage, tumor size, and family history of breast cancer, current smokers were significantly more likely to harbor any p53 mutation [odds ratio (OR), 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-3.78], p53 transversions (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.03-11.06), and G:C-->T:A transversions (OR, 10.53; 95% CI, 1.77-62.55) compared with never smokers. Stage at diagnosis did not account for the increase in p53 mutation-positive breast cancer among current smokers. Former smokers were also more likely than never smokers to harbor G:C-->T:A transversions (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 0.37-15.73), although this association was not statistically significant. Among former smokers, the prevalence of p53 mutations varied with time since quitting: former smokers who quit smoking for longer than 1 year had a lower prevalence of p53 mutations (10.5% for 1-5 years and 12.9% for >5 years) than those who had stopped smoking within the year of their cancer diagnosis (26.3%). Our results indicate that cigarette smoking appears to modify the prevalence and spectrum of p53 mutations in breast tumors. Moreover, the difference in mutational spectra observed between smokers and nonsmokers is suggestive of the genotoxic effects of smoking in breast tissue.
The HRAS1 variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism, 1 kb downstream from the HRAS1 gene, has been reported to be associated with risk of various cancers. To examine whether individuals with rare HRAS1 VNTR alleles are at increased risk of bladder cancer we carried out a case control study with 230 bladder cancer cases and 203 hospital‐based controls frequency‐matched on ethnicity, gender and age. For genotyping we used a PCR‐based long‐gel electrophoretic assay that provides precise allele size discrimination. We did not find evidence of a strong overall effect of the HRAS1 VNTR on bladder cancer risk. Genotype data for whites and blacks were analyzed separately, but the number of black subjects was too small to estimate meaningful odds ratios. Compared to white subjects with 2 common alleles, the odds ratio (OR) for white subjects with 1 rare allele was 0.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.5–1.4) and for those with 2 rare alleles OR = 1.7 (95% CI = 0.6–5.4). HRAS1 genotype may be related to the prognosis of bladder cancer, however, because incident cases, i.e., newly diagnosed cases had a higher frequency of rare alleles than did prevalent cases, i.e., cases already existing at the time of recruitment. Repeating the analyses with incident cases only (n = 53), the OR for subjects with 1 rare allele was 1.2 (95% CI = 0.6–2.4) and for those with 2 rare alleles 3.2 (95% CI = 0.8–13.7). The number of incident cases was too small to draw firm conclusions on a possible association with a subgroup of tumors with a poor prognosis. Published 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to determine whether the presence of HER-2/neu gene amplification and/or overexpression in benign breast disease was associated with an increased risk of subsequent breast cancer.PATIENTS AND METHODS:We conducted a nested case-control study of a cohort of women who were diagnosed with benign breast disease at the Mayo Clinic and who were subsequently observed for the development of breast cancer. Patients who developed breast cancer formed the case group, and a matched sample from the remaining cohort served as controls. Benign tissue samples from 137 cases and 156 controls and malignant tissues from 99 cases provided DNA or tissue for evaluation of HER-2/neu amplification and protein overexpression.RESULTS:Among the controls, seven benign tissues (4.5%) demonstrated low-level HER-2/neu amplification, whereas 13 benign (9.5%) and 18 malignant (18%) tissue specimens from cases exhibited amplification. HER-2/neu amplification in benign breast biopsies was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio ¿OR = 2.2; 95% confidence interval ¿CI, 0.9 to 5.8); this association approached statistical significance. The risks for breast cancer associated with benign breast histopathologic diagnoses were OR = 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.9) for lesions exhibiting proliferation without atypia and OR = 1.5 (95% CI, 0.4 to 5.6) for the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. For women having both HER-2/neu amplification and a proliferative histopathologic diagnosis (either typical or atypical), the risk of breast cancer was more than seven-fold (OR = 7.2; 95% CI, 0.9 to 60.8). Overexpression of the HER-2/neu protein product, defined as membrane staining in 10% or more of epithelial cells, was found in 30% of the breast tumors but was not detected in any of the benign breast tissues. Case patients who had HER-2/neu gene amplification in their malignant tumor were more likely to have had HER-2/neu amplification in their prior benign biopsy (P =.06, Fisher's exact test).CONCLUSION:Women with benign breast biopsies demonstrating both HER-2/neu amplification and a proliferative histopathologic diagnosis may be at substantially increased risk for subsequent breast cancer.
HRAS rare alleles have been associated with the increased susceptibility to a variety of cancers. In the present study we examined the hypothesis that HRAS rare alleles are a risk factor for adult glioma in a population-based case-control study of adult glioma in six San Francisco Bay Area counties. We compared the prevalence of rare alleles in the variable number of tandem repeats region of HRAS in the germline DNA from 73 white adults who had gliomas with that of 65 controls. Overall, the prevalence of rare alleles in cases was not different from the prevalence of those in controls according to two definitions of rare alleles. We found that 25 of 73 (34%) of cases versus 25 of 65 (38%) of controls had at least one allele that was not 30, 46, 69, or 87 repeats; 4 of 73 (5%) of cases versus 6 of 65 (9%) of controls carried one or more alleles with 33, 39, 42, 53, 59, 63, 68, 105, or 114 repeats. The proportion of rare alleles was somewhat higher among subjects with anaplastic astrocytoma. Among women, cases were less likely than controls to have HRAS rare alleles, whereas among men, cases were slightly more likely to have HRAS rare alleles, but none of these results approach statistical significance. Our data do not suggest an excess of HRAS rare alleles among adult glioma cases.