Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) has been correlated with phenotypic indicators of fertility. However, the effects of exogenous hormones used during estrus synchronization on AMH have not been evaluated. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to determine whether concentrations of AMH at estrus are similar between a synchronized compared with a natural estrous cycle. Nulliparous dairy and beef heifers (n = 68) were synchronized with the Select Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) protocol (GnRH + CIDR-7 d-CIDR removal + PG). Heifers were observed for expression of estrus every 6 h until 84 h after the injection of PG. Visual detection of the subsequent estrus, considered natural estrus, occurred every 6 h from day 16 to 24 after synchronized estrus. At the time of standing estrus, ovarian structures in heifers were evaluated by transrectal ultrasonography. Blood samples were collected at estrus for analysis of concentrations of AMH during the synchronized and natural estrous cycles. The GLM and CORR procedures of SAS were used to analyze data. Concentrations of AMH between natural and synchronized estrus were positively correlated (r = 0.67; P < 0.001). Mean concentration of AMH did not differ (P > 0.05) between the natural (0.0543 ± 0.0076 ng/mL) or synchronized (0.0428 ± 0.0076 ng/mL) estrous cycles. In conclusion, concentrations of AMH were similar between natural and synchronized estrous cycles. Concentrations of AMH in natural and synchronized estrous cycles were highly correlated within individual heifers and varied among heifers with beef heifers having increased (P < 0.05) concentrations of AMH compared with dairy heifers (0.0638 ± 0.01 and 0.0402 ± 0.01 ng/mL, respectively).

The objectives were to determine whether rates of conception, ovulation, presynchronization, or follicle and CL characteristics were altered after modifying the Double-Ovsynch (DO) protocol to include hCG compared with the DO protocol. Primiparous and multiparous lactating dairy cows (N = 183), and nulliparous dairy heifers (N = 51) were used. Cows were blocked by parity and heifers were stratified by age and breed before being randomly assigned to one of two treatments. All females received either 100 μg GnRH or 2000 IU hCG im, at initiation of the Pre-Ovsynch (PO) portion of the DO protocol (PO: GnRH/hCG, 7 days PGF2α and 3 days GnRH). After 7 days, females started the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of the DO protocol (Breeding-Ovsynch: GnRH, 7 days, PGF2α, 48 or 56 h and GnRH 16 hours timed artificial insemination with sex-sorted semen). Transrectal ultrasonography and blood samples were used to assess ovarian structures, ovulation, pregnancy diagnosis, and concentration of progesterone in plasma. Conception rates were similar in females treated with GnRH or hCG in cows (32.2 and 25.0%) and in heifers (30.8 and 36.0%). Ovulation rates in cows at the onset of PO were increased with hCG compared to GnRH (77.2 vs. 62.2%, P < 0.05). Concentrations of progesterone 7 days post-hCG or GnRH were greater in cows treated with hCG compared with GnRH (least significant mean ± SEM; 4.3 ± 0.3 and 3.0 ± 0.3 ng/mL, P < 0.01), but did not differ in heifers (4.5 ± 0.9 and 2.9 ± 0.9 ng/mL). More cows ovulated within 7 days post-hCG and a greater proportion of these cows tended to have failed luteal regression by Day 3 post-PGF2α compared with cows that had ovulated to GnRH (29.6 vs. 16.1%, P ≤ 0.10). The overall percentage of females which were synchronized to PO did not differ between GnRH- or hCG-treated cows (61.5% and 52.2%) and heifers (42.3% and 40.0%). In conclusion, no overall improvement in fertility was achieved by replacing the first injection of GnRH in the DO protocol with hCG.

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the biostimulatory effect of bull exposure, with or without the deposition of seminal plasma, on expression of estrus and pregnancy rate to AI in cattle. Beef heifers (n=86) and cows (n=193) were allocated to one of three treatments: (1) no bull exposure (CON; n=95), (2) exposure to a bull with a surgically-deviated penis for 21 d prior to AI (DB; n=88), or (3) exposure to a vasectomized bull for 21 d prior to AI (VB; n=96). The DB treatment provided the physical presence of a bull but prevented intromission, whereas the VB treatment allowed for intromission and deposition of seminal plasma but not spermatozoa. The estrous cycles of all females were synchronized using the Select Synch+CIDR protocol (GnRH+CIDR-7d-CIDR removal+PGF(2α), detection of estrus+AI 12h later for 84 h-clean-up TAI+GnRH). Pregnancy was detected via transrectal ultrasonography on d 35 post-AI. At the onset of the experiment, 75.7% of heifers and 86.1% of cows were estrous cycling. The percentages of females that displayed estrus were similar (P>0.05) among treatments (71.4%, 76.8%, and 74.4% for CON, DB, and VB, respectively). Pregnancy rates tended to be greater (P=0.06) in females in the DB treatment (60.5%) compared to females in the VB treatment (42.2%), with the control group intermediate (49.5%). In conclusion, biostimulation did not affect the expression of estrus but females exposed to the DB treatment tended to have an increased pregnancy rate.