Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease with the disorder of the neuromuscular junction, characterized by muscle weakness and easy fatigue. The disease is associated with the development of a myasthenic crisis caused by invasiveness or other factors. MG treatment includes immunosuppressants and blood purification therapy, similar to the immunosuppressive management in kidney transplantation (KTx). We performed KTx in patients with MG. A female patient with chronic renal failure had already been diagnosed with MG, and she had been treated with tacrolimus (TAC) and methylprednisolone (MP). Immunoadsorption therapy was performed twice weekly along with hemodialysis therapy. At 57 years of age, the patient underwent ABO-compatible, donor-specific antibody-positive living donor KTx. TAC, mycophenolate mofetil, MP, basiliximab, and rituximab were administered as immunosuppressants. Plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins were administered prior to KTx. In addition to perioperative invasiveness, a postoperative urinary tract infection had occurred, raising concerns regarding the onset of a crisis. However, the impact of plasmapheresis and other immunosuppressive therapies may have had a positive influence on the perioperative management in this case.

BACKGROUND:The coronavirus disease 2019, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global epidemic. There are concerns regarding the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. However, there is limited data on how the epidemic has affected the treatment and prognosis of these patients. Therefore, we aimed to report the changes in the treatment and outcomes of KTx recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during each wave at our institution. METHODS:A total of 282 KTx recipients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the study period were followed up at Tokyo Women's Medical University between March 2020 and August 2022. We investigated the outcomes and treatments of infected KTx recipients. RESULTS:Nineteen (6.7%) patients showed severe outcomes, including eight SARS-CoV-2 infection-related deaths. Risk factors associated with severe outcomes included underlying conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and liver disease (odds ratios, 2.09, 2.88, and 5.52, respectively). Treatment strategies changed throughout the epidemic in response to changes in the SARS-CoV-2 variants. Antiviral drugs were gradually administered as soon as they were approved for use. CONCLUSIONS:Treatment strategies for KTx recipients were gradually established over the course of the epidemic. Although the proportion of infected KTx recipients decreased compared to that of the general population throughout the epidemic, many patients still followed a severe course.

Pregnancy in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients has been challenging because of the high risk of maternal, fetal, and renal complications. Although patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN)-chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a high risk for hypertension in pregnancy (HIP), the maternal risk in KT recipients with IgAN as the etiology remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pregnant KT recipients who delivered at our hospital. The incidence of maternal and fetal complications and the impact on kidney allografts between the group with IgAN as the primary kidney disease and the group with other primary diseases were compared. The analysis included 73 pregnancies in 64 KT recipients. The IgAN group had a higher incidence of HIP than the non-IgAN group (69% vs. 40%, p = 0.02). IgAN as primary kidney disease and interval from transplantation to conception were associated with HIP (OR 3.33 [1.11-9.92], p = 0.03, OR 0.83 [0.72-0.96], p < 0.01, respectively). The 20-year graft survival or prevention of CKD stage 5 in group with IgAN was lower than that in the group with other primary disease (p < 0.01). KT recipients should be informed of the risk of HIP and possibility of long-term worsening of postpartum renal function.

This study was conducted to evaluate de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (dnDSA) production leading to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after rituximab induction in non-sensitized ABO-compatible living kidney transplantation (ABO-CLKTx). During 2008-2015, 318 ABO-CLKTx were performed at the Department of Surgery III at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital. To reduce confounding factors, we adopted a propensity score analysis, which was applied with adjustment for age, gender, duration of pretransplant dialysis, HLA mismatch count, preformed DSA, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive treatment, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on postoperative day 7. Using a propensity score matching model (1:1, 115 pairs), we analyzed the long-term outcomes of 230 ABO-CLKTx recipients retrospectively. Recipients were classified into a rituximab-treated (RTX-KTx, N = 115) group and a control group not treated with rituximab (C-KTx, N = 115). During five years, adverse events, survival rates for grafts and patients, and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and dnDSA production for the two groups were monitored and compared. All recipients in the RTX-KTx group received rituximab induction on preoperative day 4 at a single fixed low dose of 100 mg; the CD19+ B cells were eliminated completely before surgery. Of those recipients, 13 (11.3%) developed BPAR; 1 (0.8%) experienced graft loss. By contrast, of C-KTx group recipients, 25 (21.7%) developed BPAR; 3 (2.6%) experienced graft loss. The RTX-KTx group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of BPAR (P = .041) and dnDSA production (13.9% in the RTX-KTx group vs. 26.9% in the C-RTx group, P = .005). Furthermore, lower incidence of CMV infection was detected in the RTX-KTx group than in the C-KTx group (13.9% in the RTX-KTx group vs. 27.0% in the C-KTx group, P = .014). No significant difference was found between groups for several other factors: renal function (P = .384), graft and patient survival (P = .458 and P = .119, respectively), and the respective incidences of BK virus infection (P = .722) and leukopenia (P = .207). During five-year follow-up, single fixed low-dose rituximab therapy is sufficient for ensuring safety, reducing rejection, and suppressing dnDSA production for immunological low-risk non-sensitized ABO-CLKTx.

Chronic shortages of organs for transplantation have led to the use of marginal kidneys from donors after circulatory death with acute kidney injury (AKI), but the utilization of kidneys with severe AKI is not well established. We retrospectively analyzed eight kidney transplantation (KTx) cases from donation after circulatory death (DCD) with terminal creatinine (t-Cr) concentrations higher than 10.0 mg/dL and/or oliguria for more than 5 days (AKI network criteria: stage III). Although all patients showed delayed graft function, no cases of primary nonfunction (PNF) were found. Five patients maintained stable renal function for approximately 15.5, 10, 10, 5, and 0.5 years after KTx. Only 1 patient showed biopsy-proven acute rejection. Also, 2 patients developed graft failure: one attributable to chronic antibody mediated rejection at 11.3 years after KTx, and one attributable to recurrence of IgA nephropathy at 4.6 years after KTx. Kidneys with AKI stage III yielded great outcomes without the risk of primary nonfunction and rejection. Although the AKI kidneys were associated with delayed graft function, these results suggest that even the most severe kidneys with AKI stage III from DCD donors can be considered a valid alternative for recipients on a waiting list for KTx.

A 46-year-old Japanese woman on dialysis for type 1 diabetes and chronic renal failure underwent simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation from a brain-dead donor. On postoperative day 3, ilio-femoral deep vein thrombosis on the side of pancreatic transplantation was diagnosed from swelling of the right leg, an increased D-dimer level, and imaging findings. Anticoagulant therapy was initiated to prevent proximal propagation of the thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism. However, gastrointestinal bleeding occurred, which was thought to be due to mucosal bleeding from the duodenal graft. Her anticoagulant therapy was adjusted and hemostasis was conducted, controlling the gastrointestinal bleeding without surgical intervention. Blood flow was maintained to both grafts and graft function was good. When gastrointestinal bleeding occurs during anticoagulant therapy for deep vein thrombosis after combined pancreas and kidney transplantation, bleeding can be controlled by adjusting anticoagulant therapy and other appropriate measures.

Combined liver‐kidney transplantation (CLKT) is well established as a definitive therapy with the potential to provide complete recovery for certain liver‐kidney diseases, although the results might be contingent on the cause of transplantation. The purposes of the present study were to review the longterm outcome of renal allografts in CLKT patients from single living donors and to investigate the beneficial factors, compared with solitary renal transplantation. Thirteen patients underwent sequential liver transplantation (LT) and kidney transplantation (KT) from single living donors. The indications for KT were oxaluria (n = 7), autosomal recessive polycystic disease (n = 3), and others (n = 3). The same immunosuppressive regimen used after LT was also used after KT. KT was performed between 1.7 and 47.0 months after the LT. The overall patient survival rate was 92.3% at 10 years. In 12 of the 13 surviving patients, the renal allografts were found to be functioning in 11 patients after a mean follow‐up period of 103.6 months. The death‐censored renal allograft survival rate at 10 years was 100%, which was better than that of KT alone (84.9%) in Japan. Immunological protection conferred by the preceding liver allograft may have contributed to the longterm outcomes of the renal allografts. In addition, the donation of double organs from a single living and related donor may have a favorable impact on the graft survival rate. In the future, investigations of factors affecting the longterm outcome of renal allografts, including details of the involvement of de novo donor‐specific antibody, will be needed. Liver Transplantation 23 315–323 2017 AASLD.

ABO血液型不適合生体腎移植は，術前に血液型抗A/B抗体を出来るだけ除去することが移植腎生着には重要であると考えられてきた。しかし，抗体価に関係なく稀に超急性拒絶反応により移植腎喪失症例が存在する。我々は，血液型抗A/B-IgG抗体の免疫学的なメカニズムを解明するため補体結合性のある血液型抗A/B-IgG抗体を測定した。その結果から補体結合性のある血液型抗A/B-IgG抗体の陽性率が高い症例は移植予後の腎機能不良または腎機能喪失症例であった。今後，ABO血液型不適合生体腎移植において重要な検査法になると示唆される。

Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, a rare X-linked hereditary syndrome, is characterized by immunodeficiency, thrombocytopenia, and eczema. The underlying T-cell defect renders renal transplantation and immunosuppressive treatments uncertain. The present case exhibited the mild clinical manifestation, regarded as X-linked thrombocytopenia. He successfully underwent a living-donor ABO-compatible renal transplantation and splenectomy in 2002, and thereafter experiencing no severe rejection, serious infection, or malignancy for more than 10 years. Though IgA nephropathy was detected 8 months after transplantation, the patient's renal function and proteinuria were stable without any treatment. The present case showed a successful long-term graft survival and the importance of splenectomy added to renal transplantation.

Malignant duodenal neoplasms are relatively rare, and the diagnosis is often delayed because of their vague and nonspecific symptoms. We report the case of a 79-year-old female who had a medical history of malignant melanoma of the cheek that had initially been diagnosed at 53 years of age. Work-up revealed severe stenosis of the duodenum caused by a large mass with ulceration at the tip of its mucosal surface. Tumor biopsy led to a histological diagnosis of extremely poorly differentiated carcinoma, but it was impossible to determine whether the lesion was a primary neoplasm or represented secondary involvement. Pancreatoduodenectomy was performed, and the surgical specimen showed a protuberant tumor in the nonampullary region of the second portion of the duodenum. Final diagnosis of metastatic duodenal melanoma was made by immunohistological examination. She is currently alive without recurrence 28 months after the surgical treatment.