Gas turbines rely on thermal barrier coating (TBC) to thermally insulate the nickel-based superalloys underneath during operation; however, current TBCs, yttria stabilised zirconia (YSZ), limit the operating temperature and hence efficiency. At an operating temperature above 1200 degrees C, YSZ is susceptible to failure due to phase instability and CMAS (Calcia-Magnesia-Alumina-Silica) attack. Gadolinium zirconates (GZ) could overcome the drawback of YSZ, complementing each other with the multi-layer approach. This study introduces a novel approach utilising axial suspension plasma spray (ASPS) and axial solution precursor plasma spray (ASPPS) to produce a double-layer and a triple-layer TBCs with improved CMAS resistance. The former comprised suspension plasma sprayed GZ and YSZ layers while the latter had an additional dense layer deposited through a solution precursor to minimise the columnar gaps that pre-existed in the SPS GZ layer, thus resisting CMAS infiltration. Both coatings performed similarly in furnace cycling test (FCT) and burner rig testing (BRT). In the CMAS test, the triple-layer coating exhibited better CMAS reactivity, as evidenced by the limited CMAS infiltration observed on the surface.

Gadolinium zirconate (GZ) is an attractive material for thermal barrier coatings (TBCs). However, a single layer GZ coating has poor thermal cycling life compared to Yttria Stabilized Zirconia (YSZ). In this study, Solution Precursor High Velocity Oxy-Fuel (SP-HVOF) thermal spray was used to produce a double layer GZ/YSZ TBC and compared the thermal cycling performance with the single layer YSZ TBC. The temperature behaviour of the solution precursor GZ was studied, and single splat tests were carried out to obtain an optimised spray parameter. In thermal cycling tests, the single-layer YSZ reached 20 % failure at 85 ± 5 cycles, whereas the double-layer GZ/YSZ was at 70 ± 15 cycles. The single-layer failed at the topcoat/TGO interface, whereas the double-layer failed at GZ/YSZ interface and topcoat/TGO interface. Moreover, Gd diffusion occurred near the GZ/YSZ interface, resulting in porosities in the GZ layer.