Neuropathy is one of the most common long-term complications accompanying diabetes mellitus. It affects patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, but it progresses more rapidly and its manifestations are more severe in type 1 diabetes [1, 2]. Diabetic neuropathy is defined by the presence of detectable sensory, motor, and autonomic nerve abnormalities on clinical examination, with or without the presence of symptoms [3, 4]. As many as 50% of the patients may be asymptomatic; diagnosis may only be made on examination or, in some cases, when the patient presents with a painless foot ulcer [5]. Other patients may not report symptoms, but admit on inquiry that their feet feel numb. A careful neurological examination of the lower limb usually reveals sensory loss as reflected by abnormal vibration, pressure, pain, or temperature perception, mediated by small and large fibers, as well as absence of ankle reflexes. Signs of autonomic neuropathy may include manifestations of, for example, impaired cardiovascular and gastrointestinal functions.

BACKGROUND:Replacement of proinsulin C-peptide in type 1 diabetes ameliorates nerve and kidney dysfunction, conditions which are associated with a decrease in Na,K-ATPase activity. We determined the molecular mechanism by which long term exposure to C-peptide stimulates Na,K-ATPase expression and activity in primary human renal tubular cells (HRTC) in control and hyperglycemic conditions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:HRTC were cultured from the outer cortex obtained from patients undergoing elective nephrectomy. Ouabain-sensitive rubidium ((86)Rb(+)) uptake and Na,K-ATPase activity were determined. Abundance of Na,K-ATPase was determined by Western blotting in intact cells or isolated basolateral membranes (BLM). DNA binding activity was determined by electrical mobility shift assay (EMSA). Culturing of HRTCs for 5 days with 1 nM, but not 10 nM of human C-peptide leads to increase in Na,K-ATPase α(1)-subunit protein expression, accompanied with increase in (86)Rb(+) uptake, both in normal- and hyperglycemic conditions. Na,K-ATPase α(1)-subunit expression and Na,K-ATPase activity were reduced in BLM isolated from cells cultured in presence of high glucose. Exposure to1 nM, but not 10 nM of C-peptide increased PKCε phosphorylation as well as phosphorylation and abundance of nuclear ERK1/2 regardless of glucose concentration. Exposure to 1 nM of C-peptide increased DNA binding activity of transcription factor ZEB (AREB6), concomitant with Na,K-ATPase α(1)-subunit mRNA expression. Effects of 1 nM C-peptide on Na,K-ATPase α(1)-subunit expression and/or ZEB DNA binding activity in HRTC were abolished by incubation with PKC or MEK1/2 inhibitors and ZEB siRNA silencing. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:Despite activation of ERK1/2 and PKC by hyperglycemia, a distinct pool of PKCs and ERK1/2 is involved in regulation of Na,K-ATPase expression and activity by C-peptide. Most likely C-peptide stimulates sodium pump expression via activation of ZEB, a transcription factor that has not been previously implicated in C-peptide-mediated signaling. Importantly, only physiological concentrations of C-peptide elicit this effect.

Aims/hypothesis. Data now indicate that proinsulin C-peptide exerts important physiological effects and shows the characteristics of an endogenous peptide hormone. This study aimed to investigate the influence of C-peptide and fragments thereof on erythrocyte deformability and to elucidate the relevant signal transduction pathway. Methods. Blood samples from 23 patients with type 1 diabetes and 15 matched healthy controls were incubated with 6.6 nM of either human C-peptide, C-terminal hexapeptide, C-terminal pentapeptide, a middle fragment comprising residues 11–19 of C-peptide, or randomly scrambled C-peptide. Furthermore, red blood cells from 7 patients were incubated with C-peptide, penta- and hexapeptides with/without addition of ouabain, EDTA, or pertussis toxin. Erythrocyte deformability was measured using a laser diffractoscope in the shear stress range 0.3–60 Pa. Results. Erythrocyte deformability was impaired by 18–25% in type 1 diabetic patients compared to matched controls in the physiological shear stress range 0.6–12 Pa (P < .01–.001). C-peptide, penta- and hexapeptide all significantly improved the impaired erythrocyte deformability of type 1 diabetic patients, while the middle fragment and scrambled C-peptide had no detectable effect. Treatment of erythrocytes with ouabain or EDTA completely abolished the C-peptide, penta- and hexapeptide effects. Pertussis toxin in itself significantly increased erythrocyte deformability. Conclusion/interpretation. C-peptide and its C-terminal fragments are equally effective in improving erythrocyte deformability in type 1 diabetes. The C-terminal residues of C-peptide are causally involved in this effect. The signal transduction pathway is Ca2+-dependent and involves activation of red blood cell Na+, K+-ATPase.

Recent results indicate that proinsulin C-peptide, contrary to previous views, exerts important physiological effects and shows the characteristics of a bioactive peptide. Studies in type 1 diabetes, involving animal models as well as patients, demonstrate that C-peptide in replacement doses has the ability to improve peripheral nerve function and prevent or reverse the development of nerve structural abnormalities. Peripheral nerve function, as evaluated by determination of sensory nerve conduction velocity and quantitative sensory testing, is improved by C-peptide replacement in diabetes type 1 patients with early stage neuropathy. Similarly, autonomic nerve dysfunction is ameliorated following administration of C peptide for up to 3 months. As evaluated in animal models of type 1 diabetes, the improved nerve function is accompanied by reversal or prevention of nerve structural changes, and the mechanisms of action are related to the ability of C-peptide to correct diabetes-induced reductions in endoneurial blood flow and in Na+ K+-ATPase activity and modulation of neurotrophic factors. Combining the results demonstrates that C-peptide may be a possible new treatment of neuropathy in type 1 diabetes.

Autorzy zbadali dzialanie terapeutyczne peptydu Cw ustalonej neuropatii nocyceptywnej u szczurowBB/Wor z cukrzycą typu 1. Oceniono nocyceptywnąfunkcje nerwow, morfometrie niezmielinizowanychwlokien nerwu lydkowego i zwoju korzenia grzbietowego(DRG), zawartośc peptydu nocyceptywnegooraz ekspresje czynnikow neurotroficznych i ichreceptorow. Peptyd C podawano w dawce substytucyjnejdrogą pompy osmotycznej w ciąglym wlewielub raz dziennie w iniekcji podskornej. Szczuryz cukrzycą leczono od 4.-7. miesiąca trwania cukrzycyi porownywano z nieleczonymi szczurami z grupykontrolnej w tym samym okresie choroby. Peptyd Cpodawany przez pompe osmotyczną, lecz nie w iniekcjachpodskornych, zmniejszyl hiperalgezje i cukrzycozaleznąredukcje liczby wlokien niezmielinizowanych(p < 0,01) oraz średnią wielkośc aksonow(p < 0,05) w nerwie lydkowym. Ekspresja receptoraczynnika wzrostu nerwu (NGF) o duzym podobienstwie(NGFR-TrkA) w DRG zmniejszyla sie znamienniew 4. miesiącu (p < 0,01). Ekspresja receptorowinsulinowego oraz IGF-1 w DGR i NFG w nerwie kulszowym zmniejszyla sie znamiennie w 7. miesiącuu szczurow z cukrzycą (odpowiednio: p < 0,01,p < 0,05 i p < 0,005). Podawanie przez pompe osmotycznązapobieglo spadkowi ekspresji NGFR-TrkA,receptora insulinowego (p < 0,05) i IGF-IR (p < 0,005)w DRG oraz zwiekszylo zawartośc NGF (p < 0,05)w nerwie kulszowym. Natomiast peptyd C podawanydrogą podskorną wplynąl jedynie w niewielkimstopniu na morfometryczne i molekularne zmianyu szczurow z cukrzycą. Stwierdzono, ze peptyd C korzystniewplywa na cukrzycową neuropatie nocyceptywną;aby uzyskac efekt optymalny, nalezy utrzymywacfizjologiczne stezenie peptydu C w ciągu dnia.

We examined the therapeutic effects of C-peptide on established nociceptive neuropathy in type 1 diabetic BB/Worrats. Nociceptive nerve function, unmyelinated sural nerve fiber and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cell morphometry, nociceptive peptide content, and the expression of neurotrophic factors and their receptors were investigated. C-peptide was administered either as a continuous subcutaneous replacement dose via osmopumps or a replacement dose given once daily by subcutaneous injection. Diabetic rats were treated from 4 to 7 months of diabetes and were compared with control and untreated diabetic rats of 4and 7-month duration. Osmopump delivery but not subcutaneous injection Hideki Kamiya i wsp., Peptyd C w cukrzycy typu 1 www.dp.viamedica.pl 179 improved hyperalgesia and restored the diabetesinduced reduction of unmyelinated fiber number (p < 0.01) and mean axonal size (p < 0.05) in the sural nerve. High-affinity nerve growth factor (NGF) receptor (NGFR-TrkA) expression in DRGs was significantly reduced at 4 months (p < 0.01). Insulin receptor and IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) expressions in DRGs and NGF content in sciatic nerve were significantly decreased in 7-month diabetic rats (p < 0.01, 0.05, and 0.005, respectively). Osmopump delivery prevented the decline of NGFR-TrkA, insulin receptor (p < 0.05), and IGF-IR (p < 0.005) expressions in DRGs and improved NGF content (p < 0.05) in sciatic nerve. However, subcutaneous injection had only marginal effects on morphometric and molecular changes in diabetic rats. We conclude that C-peptide exerts beneficial therapeutic effects on diabetic nociceptive neuropathy and that optimal effects require maintenance of physiological C-peptide concentrations for a major proportion of the day.

The liver plays a key role for the maintenance of blood glucose homeostasis under widely changing physiological conditions. In the overnight fasted state, breakdown of hepatic glycogen and synthesis of glucose from lactate, amino acids, glycerol, and pyruvate contribute about equally to hepatic glucose production. Postprandial glucose uptake by the liver is determined by the size of the glucose load reaching the liver, the rise in insulin concentration, and the route of glucose delivery. Hepatic glycogen stores are depleted within 36 to 48 hours of fasting, but gluconeogenesis continues to provide glucose for tissues with an obligatory glucose requirement. Glucose output from the liver increases during exercise; during short-term intensive exertion, hepatic glycogenolysis is the primary source of extra glucose for skeletal muscle, and during prolonged exercise, hepatic gluconeogenesis becomes gradually more important in keeping with falling insulin and rising glucagon levels. Type 1 diabetes is accompanied by diminished hepatic glycogen stores, augmented gluconeogenesis, and increased basal hepatic glucose production in proportion to the severity of the diabetic state. The hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetes is in part caused by an overproduction of glucose from the liver that is secondary to accelerated gluconeogenesis.

OBJECTIVE—C-peptide replacement in animals results in amelioration of diabetes-induced functional and structural abnormalities in peripheral nerves. The present study was undertaken to examine whether C-peptide administration to patients with type 1 diabetes and peripheral neuropathy improves sensory nerve function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This was an exploratory, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled study with three study groups that was carried out at five centers in Sweden. C-peptide was given as a replacement dose (1.5 mg/day, divided into four subcutaneous doses) or a dose three times higher (4.5 mg/day) during 6 months. Neurological examination and neurophysiological measurements were performed before and after 6 months of treatment with C-peptide or placebo. RESULTS—The age of the 139 patients who completed the protocol was 44.2 ± 0.6 (mean ± SE) years and their duration of diabetes was 30.6 ± 0.8 years. Clinical neurological impairment (NIA) (score >7 points) of the lower extremities was present in 86% of the patients at baseline. Sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) was 2.6 ± 0.08 SD below body height–corrected normal values at baseline and improved similarly within the two C-peptide groups (P < 0.007). The number of patients responding with a SCV peak potential improvement >1.0 m/s was greater in C-peptide–treated patients than in those receiving placebo (P < 0.03). In the least severely affected patients (SCV < 2.5 SD below normal at baseline, n = 70) SCV improved by 1.0 m/s (P < 0.014 vs. placebo). NIA score and vibration perception both improved within the C-peptide–treated groups (P < 0.011 and P < 0.002). A1C levels (7.6 ± 0.1% at baseline) decreased slightly but similarly in C-peptide–and placebo-treated patients during the study. CONCLUSIONS—C-peptide treatment for 6 months improves sensory nerve function in early-stage type 1 diabetic neuropathy.

We examined the therapeutic effects of C-peptide on established nociceptive neuropathy in type 1 diabetic BB/Wor rats. Nociceptive nerve function, unmyelinated sural nerve fiber and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cell morphometry, nociceptive peptide content, and the expression of neurotrophic factors and their receptors were investigated. C-peptide was administered either as a continuous subcutaneous replacement dose via osmopumps or a replacement dose given once daily by subcutaneous injection. Diabetic rats were treated from 4 to 7 months of diabetes and were compared with control and untreated diabetic rats of 4- and 7-month duration. Osmopump delivery but not subcutaneous injection improved hyperalgesia and restored the diabetes-induced reduction of unmyelinated fiber number (P < 0.01) and mean axonal size (P < 0.05) in the sural nerve. High-affinity nerve growth factor (NGF) receptor (NGFR-TrkA) expression in DRGs was significantly reduced at 4 months (P < 0.01). Insulin receptor and IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) expressions in DRGs and NGF content in sciatic nerve were significantly decreased in 7-month diabetic rats (P < 0.01, 0.05, and 0.005, respectively). Osmopump delivery prevented the decline of NGFR-TrkA, insulin receptor (P < 0.05), and IGF-IR (P < 0.005) expressions in DRGs and improved NGF content (P < 0.05) in sciatic nerve. However, subcutaneous injection had only marginal effects on morphometric and molecular changes in diabetic rats. We conclude that C-peptide exerts beneficial therapeutic effects on diabetic nociceptive neuropathy and that optimal effects require maintenance of physiological C-peptide concentrations for a major proportion of the day.

Background The spontaneously diabetic BB/Wor-rat is a close model of human type I diabetes and develops diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) similar to that seen in type I patients. Here we examine the therapeutic effects of C-peptide, delivered as continuous infusion or once daily subcutaneous injections on established DPN.Methods Diabetic rats were treated from four to seven months duration of diabetes with full continuous replacement dose of rat C-peptide via (a) osmopumps (OS), (b) full replacement dose (HSC) or (c) one-third of full replacement dose (LSC) by once daily injections.Results Diabetic rats treated with OS showed improvements in motor nerve conduction velocity (p < 0.001), sural nerve myelinated fibre number (p < 0.005), size (p < 0.05), axonal area (p < 0.001), regeneration (p < 0.001) and overall neuropathy score (p < 0.001). The progressive decline in sensory nerve conduction velocity was fully prevented. The frequencies of Wallerian degeneration were decreased (p < 0.005). HSC-treated rats showed prevention of further progression of DPN (p < 0.001), whereas LSC-treated rats showed a milder progression of DPN (p < 0.001) compared to untreated rats as assessed by neuropathy score.Conclusion We conclude that (1) C-peptide is effective in the treatment of established DPN, (2) its effect is dose-dependent and (3) replacement by continuous infusion is the most effective administration of C-peptide. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

BACKGROUND:There is accumulating evidence that C-peptide exerts beneficial renal effects in type-1 diabetes by reducing glomerular hyperfiltration, albuminuria and glomerular hypertrophy in the early stage of nephropathy. The aim of this study was to clarify further the effects of C-peptide on renal structural changes in type-1 diabetic rats.METHODS:The effects of C-peptide or placebo on glomerular volume, mesangial expansion, glomerular basement membrane thickness, albuminuria and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were studied in three groups of rats: a non-diabetic group (N, n=9) and two groups that, during 8 weeks of diabetes, were left untreated for 4 weeks and then given a subcutaneous infusion of either placebo (D, n=11) or C-peptide (DCp, n=11) during the next 4 weeks. Furthermore, GFR was studied after 4 weeks of diabetes in an additional diabetic group (D-early, n=9) and in an age-matched non-diabetic group (N-early, n=9).RESULTS:After 4 weeks, GFR in the D-early group was 102% higher than in the N-early group. GFR after 8 weeks did not differ between the study groups. The D group presented with a 33% larger glomerular volume than the N group (P<0.001), while glomerular volume in the DCp group was similar to that in the N-group. Total mesangial and mesangial matrix fractions were increased by 46% (P<0.001) and 133% (P<0.001), respectively, in the D group. The corresponding values in the DCp group did not differ from those for the non-diabetic animals. Neither the thickness of the glomerular basement membrane nor the level of albuminuria differed significantly between the study groups.CONCLUSIONS:C-peptide administration in replacement dose to streptozotocin-diabetic rats serves to limit or prevent the glomerular hypertrophy and the mesangial matrix expansion seen in the post-hyperfiltration phase of early diabetic nephropathy.

BACKGROUND:C-peptide has been shown to reduce glomerular hyperfiltration, glomerular hypertrophy and urinary albumin excretion in type 1 diabetes, but its effect has not been compared with that of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) in the early stage of renal involvement in diabetes.METHODS:Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured in terms of inulin clearance and renal blood flow, using ultrasound technique, in four groups of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats before and after a 60 min infusion of C-peptide (D-Cp), captopril (D-ACEI), C-peptide and captopril (D-Cp-ACEI) or placebo (D-placebo). In addition, a non-diabetic control group was studied before and after captopril infusion (C-ACEI).RESULTS:GFR was 37-51% higher in the diabetic groups than in the control animals. GFR decreased after treatment in the D-Cp, D-ACEI and D-Cp-ACEI groups, but did not change in the D-placebo group. Blood flow increased by 26-32% in the three groups receiving captopril and by 5% in the diabetic groups treated with C-peptide alone or placebo. The increase in blood flow in the three ACEI-treated groups was significantly greater than in the D-placebo group. Filtration fraction fell significantly in all groups, but only in the combined D-Cp-ACEI group did it fall significantly more than in the D-placebo group.CONCLUSIONS:C-peptide and captopril lower diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration to a similar extent, but the influence of captopril on blood flow is greater than that of C-peptide, suggesting different mechanisms of action. No statistically significant additive effects of C-peptide and captopril were shown in this acute infusion study.

Patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes show reduced skeletal muscle blood flow and coronary vasodilatory function despite intensive insulin therapy and good metabolic control. Administration of proinsulin C-peptide increases skeletal muscle blood flow in these patients, but a possible influence of C-peptide on myocardial vasodilatory function in type 1 diabetes has not been investigated. Ten otherwise healthy young male type 1 diabetic patients (Hb A1c 6.6%, range 5.7-7.9%) were studied on two consecutive days during normoinsulinemia and euglycemia in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design, receiving intravenous infusion of C-peptide (5 pmol.kg-1.min-1) for 120 min on one day and saline infusion on the other day. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured at rest and during adenosine administration (140 microg.kg-1.min-1) both before and during the C-peptide or saline infusions by use of positron emission tomography and [15O]H2O administration. Basal MBF was not significantly different in the patients compared with an age-matched control group, but adenosine-induced myocardial vasodilation was 30% lower (P < 0.05) in the patients. During C-peptide administration, adenosine-stimulated MBF increased on average 35% more than during saline infusion (P < 0.02) and reached values similar to those for the healthy controls. Moreover, as evaluated from transthoracal echocardiographic measurements, C-peptide infusion resulted in significant increases in both left ventricular ejection fraction (+5%, P < 0.05) and stroke volume (+7%, P < 0.05). It is concluded that short-term C-peptide infusion in physiological amounts increases the hyperemic MBF and left-ventricular function in type 1 diabetic patients.