Background: Quantifying inter-limb differences in kinematics and kinetics during change of direction is proposed as a means of monitoring rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Velocity and centre of mass (CoM) deflection angle are fundamental task descriptors that influence kinematics and kinetics during change of direction. Inter-limb differences in approach velocity and CoM deflection angle have been identified following ACLR and may contribute to the presence of inter-limb differences in kinematics and kinetics during change of direction. Research question: The aim of this study was to quantify the proportion of variance in kinematic and kinetic interlimb differences attributable to inter-limb differences in approach velocity and centre of mass deflection angle during a change of direction task. Methods: A cohort of 192 patients (male, 23.8 +/- 3.6 years, 6.3 +/- 0.4 months post primary ACLR) completed a pre-planned 90 change of direction task on both their operated and non-operated limb. Inter-limb differences in approach velocity and CoM deflection angle were calculated alongside lower-extremity kinematic and kinetic variables. The relationship between inter-limb differences in task-level variables and inter-limb differences in kinematic and kinetic variables was examined using linear regression models. Kinematic and kinetic inter-limb differences were adjusted for inter-limb differences in approach velocity and CoM deflection angle. Adjusted and unadjusted inter-limb differences were submitted to one sample t-tests. Results: Inter-limb differences in approach velocity and centre of mass deflection angle explained 3 - 60% of the variance in kinematic and kinetic inter-limb differences. Statistical inferences remained consistent between adjusted and unadjusted conditions with the exception of hip flexion angle. Significance: Inter-limb differences in task-level features explain a large proportion of the variance in inter-limb differences in several kinematic and kinetic variables. Accounting for this variation reduced the magnitude of kinematic and kinetic inter-limb differences comparable to those previously observed in normative cohorts.

The primary aim was to identify differences in magnitude of interlimb asymmetry in isokinetic variables and upper extremity performance tests at four and six months after GHJS surgery in contact and collision athletes compared to an un-injured group. A secondary aim was to investigate if differences in magnitude of asymmetry existed between four months and six months post-operatively. The third aim was to assess if relationships existed among the performance tests and rotational torque measurements.

Later-stage rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) provides a valuable opportunity to target performance deficits before return to sport. This study aimed to: (1) evaluate bilateral counter-movement jump (CMJ) phase-specific impulse and isokinetic strength inter-limb asymmetry progression from 6 to 9 months post-ACLR; and (2) examine the extent to which individual changes in strength asymmetry could explain changes in impulse asymmetry. Male athletes (n = 44) with a hamstring tendon or bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft were tested 6 and 9 months post-ACLR. Two-way mixed-model ANOVAs were used to identify inter-session and inter-graft differences in CMJ phase-specific impulse asymmetries and knee isokinetic flexor and extensor strength asymmetries, as well as in absolute impulse and strength values of independent (ACLR/uninvolved) limbs. Linear regression models were used to assess the relationship between changes in impulse asymmetry and strength asymmetry. Reductions in strength asymmetry arose from improved ACLR-limb performance, whereas concentric impulse asymmetry reduced consequent to decreased uninvolved-limb performance and eccentric deceleration impulses decreased bilaterally. Graft type did not modulate findings. Changes in strength asymmetry had little or no ability to explain changes in impulse asymmetry. Consideration of approaches that may influence persisting deficits observed bi-laterally throughout vertical jumping performance post-ACLR may enhance rehabilitation practice.

Background Eumenorrheic women experience cyclic variations in sex hormones attributed to the menstrual cycle (MC) which can impact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) properties, knee laxity, and neuromuscular function. This systematic review aimed to examine the effects of the MC on ACL neuromuscular and biomechanical injury risk surrogates during dynamic tasks, to establish whether a particular MC phase predisposes women to greater ACL injury risk. Methods PubMed, Medline, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched (May-July 2021) for studies that investigated the effects of the MC on ACL neuromuscular and biomechanical injury risk surrogates. Inclusion criteria were: 1) injury-free women (18–40 years); 2) verified MC phases via biochemical analysis and/or ovulation kits; 3) examined neuromuscular and/or biomechanical injury risk surrogates during dynamic tasks; 4) compared ≥1 outcome measure across ≥2 defined MC phases. Results Seven of 418 articles were included. Four studies reported no significant differences in ACL injury risk surrogates between MC phases. Two studies showed evidence the mid-luteal phase may predispose women to greater risk of non-contact ACL injury. Three studies reported knee laxity fluctuated across the MC; two of which demonstrated MC attributed changes in knee laxity were associated with changes in knee joint loading (KJL). Study quality (Modified Downs and Black Checklist score: 7–9) and quality of evidence were low to very low (Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation: very low). Conclusion It is inconclusive whether a particular MC phase predisposes women to greater non-contact ACL injury risk based on neuromuscular and biomechanical surrogates. Practitioners should be cautious manipulating their physical preparation, injury mitigation, and screening practises based on current evidence. Although variable (i.e., magnitude and direction), MC attributed changes in knee laxity were associated with changes in potentially hazardous KJLs. Monitoring knee laxity could therefore be a viable strategy to infer possible ACL injury risk.

This chapter focuses on practical tests and measurements that are used in soccer and are interpreted in a biomechanical context. A suite of measurement tools and techniques exists to provide detailed, objective, and quantitative data to understand and evaluate the physical status and biomechanical effectiveness of players. The evaluation of jump performance has traditionally been part of pre-season screening. Decisions about which type of jump to test are typically interlinked with the available time and technology. Electromyography is used to measure and evaluate the electrical activity of a muscle. The most evident application in the practical setting is to provide real-time feedback on whether and how a muscle is functioning during activities, typically in a rehabilitation context. Muscular strength is a key component of physical performance and injury prevention. An isokinetic dynamometer is a sophisticated tool used to assess muscle strength under controlled circumstances, most commonly at a constant (isokinetic) velocity of joint angular rotation.

Despite decades of evidence revealing a multitude of ways in which animals are adapted to minimize the energy cost of locomotion, little is known about how energy expenditure shapes adaptive gait over complex terrain. Here, we show that the principle of energy optimality in human locomotion can be generalized to complex task-level locomotor behaviours requiring advance decision-making and anticipatory control. Participants completed a forced-choice locomotor task requiring them to choose between discrete multi-step obstacle negotiation strategies to cross a 'hole' in the ground. By modelling and analysing mechanical energy cost of transport for preferred and non-preferred manoeuvres over a wide range of obstacle dimensions, we showed that strategy selection was predicted by relative energy cost integrated across the complete multi-step task. Vision-based remote sensing was sufficient to select the strategy associated with the lowest prospective energy cost in advance of obstacle encounter, demonstrating the capacity for energetic optimization of locomotor behaviour in the absence of online proprioceptive or chemosensory feedback mechanisms. We highlight the integrative hierarchic optimizations that are required to facilitate energetically efficient locomotion over complex terrain and propose a new behavioural level linking mechanics, remote sensing and cognition that can be leveraged to explore locomotor control and decision-making.

ABSTRACT Purpose The primary aim was to identify and quantify differences in interlimb asymmetry magnitudes across a battery of upper extremity strength and performance tests at 4 and 6 months after glenohumeral joint stabilization surgery shoulder stabilization in contact and collision athletes compared with an un-injured group. A secondary aim was to investigate if identified asymmetry magnitudes changed from 4 to 6 months after glenohumeral joint stabilization surgery. The third aim was to explore associations within the different performance and strength variables. Methods Fifty-six male contact and collision sport athletes who had had undergone unilateral glenohumeral joint stabilization were tested at 4 and 6 months after surgery. An un-injured control group (n = 39 for upper extremity performance tests, n = 47 for isokinetic dynamometry) were tested on a single occasion. Three upper extremity force platform-based performance tests and angle-specific concentric internal and external isokinetic shoulder rotational strength were assessed, and interlimb asymmetries were compared between the two groups. Results At 4 months after surgery, the glenohumeral joint stabilization group demonstrated significantly higher absolute interlimb asymmetry values than the un-injured group for almost all the performance test variables. In the ballistic upper-body performance tests, the glenohumeral joint stabilization group achieved only half the body elevation reached by the un-injured (counter-movement push-up jump height (η2 = 0.50) and press-jump jump height (η2 = 0.39)). At 6 months after surgery, absolute interlimb asymmetries reduced for the performance test variables, but some asymmetry persisted. The glenohumeral joint stabilization group had significantly greater absolute interlimb asymmetries for five out the eight isokinetic variables. Conclusions Contact and collision athletes who may be cleared to return to sport at 4 to 6 months after glenohumeral joint stabilization surgery shoulder stabilization continue to demonstrate upper limb strength and performance deficits when compared with their un-injured limb and their un-injured counterparts.

Gender biases and inequities are prevalent across many scientific fields and biomechanics is likely no exception. While progress has been made to support women in the field, especially at biomechanics society conferences, the recent COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated professional isolation. The International Women in Biomechanics (IWB) community started in July 2020 with the mission of fostering an environment for women and other under-represented genders in biomechanics to gain year-round support, visibility, and allyship. Nearly 700 biomechanists have joined the IWB community from over 300 universities/organizations and 33 countries. Our community ranges in career stages and professions and interacts through a forum-style platform, teleconference meetings, and social media. In 2021, we conducted a survey to identify the needs, concerns, and issues faced by individuals in the IWB community. We received 144 responses from members in 16 countries. Our survey revealed three primary needs for women in biomechanics: supportive working environments, career planning support, and addressing workplace gender bias. These results, in conjunction with scientific evidence on workforce gender bias, helped us identify three key areas to meet our mission: Member Support, Community Outreach, and Empowering Allyship. Several levels of support are required in these three areas to ensure a lasting, positive, and sustainable impact on gender equity in biomechanics. We conclude by providing our perspectives on an evidence-based call to action to continue addressing gender bias and inequity at the individual, institutional, and scientific society levels. These actions can collectively enhance our allyship for women in the field of biomechanics.

Background: Deficits in knee strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery are common. Deficits in the single-leg drop jump (SLDJ), a test of plyometric ability, are also found. Purpose: To examine the relationship between isokinetic knee strength, SLDJ performance, and self-reported knee function 9 months after ACLR. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Knee isokinetic peak torque, SLDJ jump height, contact time, and reactive strength index (RSI), as well as International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were assessed in 116 male, field-sport athletes at 9.2 months after ACLR. SLDJ testing took place in a 3-dimensional biomechanics laboratory. Linear regression models were used to analyze the relationship between the variables. Results: A significant relationship was found between ACLR-limb isokinetic knee extensor strength and SLDJ jump height (P < .001, r 2 = 0.29) and RSI (P < .001, r 2 = 0.33), and between ACLR-limb isokinetic knee flexor strength and SLDJ jump height (P < .001, r 2 = 0.12) and RSI (P < .001, r 2 = 0.15). A significant positive relationship was also found between knee extensor asymmetry and SLDJ jump height asymmetry (P < .001, r 2 = 0.27) and SLDJ reactive strength asymmetry (P < .001, r 2 = 0.18). Combined ACLR-limb jump height and contact time best predicted IKDC scores (P < .001, r 2 = 0.12). Conclusion: Isokinetic knee extension strength explained approximately 30% of SLDJ performance, with a much weaker relationship between knee flexion strength and SLDJ performance. Isokinetic strength and SLDJ performance were weak predictors of variation in IKDC scores.

Nine months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, athletes who undergo surgery using a bone‐patellar‐tendon‐bone (BPTB) autograft demonstrate higher loading asymmetries during vertical jumping than those with a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. These asymmetries may transfer into sporting movements with a greater ACL injury risk. The aim of this study was to compare between‐limb asymmetries in knee mechanics and task performance during an unplanned 90° change‐of‐direction (CoD) task in male field sport athletes reconstructed with BPTB or HT autografts. Seventy‐eight male multidirectional field sport athletes with either a BPTB (n = 39) or HT (n = 39) autograft completed maximal unplanned CoD trials in a three‐dimensional motion capture laboratory at approximately 9 months post‐surgery. A mixed‐model 2x2 ANOVA (autograft type x limb) was used to compare variables related to ACL injury risk (e.g., internal knee moments) and performance (e.g., completion time) between autografts and limbs. Statistical parametric mapping was used for a waveform comparison throughout stance, supplemented with a discrete point analyses of peak knee moments and performance variables. Interaction effects were found at the knee joint, with BPTB demonstrating greater asymmetries than HT in knee extension moment (p < 0.001); resultant ground reaction force (p < 0.001); peak knee external rotation moment (p = 0.04); and knee adduction (p = 0.05), medial rotation (p < 0.001), and flexion (p < 0.001) angles. No differences were found between autografts for any performance variable. BPTB demonstrated greater lower‐limb biomechanical asymmetries than HT during CoD, which may influence knee loading and longer‐term outcomes and should thus be targeted during rehabilitation prior to return to play.

Quantifying asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant limbs is a common research objective aimed at identifying systematic differences between limbs and establishing normative ranges of asymmetry. Multiple methods for classifying limb dominance exist, and it is unclear how different methods relate to directional asymmetries during change of direction (CoD). This study aimed to determine whether different methods of classifying limb dominance, including a novel CoD task-specific method, identified significant inter-limb asymmetries during a 90° CoD task. Fifty participants completed a testing battery consisting of jumping, hopping, CoD, and isokinetic dynamometry. Limb dominance was classified for each participant according to preferred kicking limb, vertical jump height, horizontal hop distance, initial force plate contact during landing, max isokinetic knee extensor strength, and turning velocity. Asymmetries in whole-body and joint-level mechanics were defined using each method. No method for classifying limb dominance was associated with consistent inter-limb biomechanical asymmetries during CoD, and no method was related to any other method. The magnitude of asymmetry relative to the magnitude of absolute asymmetry present within the cohort suggests that using these tasks to classify the dominant limb in this CoD is akin to assigning dominance to a randomly selected limb. Previous observations of group symmetry during CoD may be statistical artifacts as opposed to a true indication of normative movement. Until an appropriate means of classifying limbs during CoD is established, quantifying normative asymmetry based on limb dominance should be done with caution.

An increased understanding of rotational strength as a potential prognostic factor for injury in contact and collision athletes may be important in planning return to sport. The aim of this study was to (1) determine the test-retest reliability of clinically relevant, angle-specific rotational and peak torque measurements in a cohort of uninjured collision and contact athletes; (2) develop a normal descriptive profile of angle-specific rotational torque measurements in the same cohort; and (3) examine the effects of direction and joint angle on shoulder rotational strength interlimb asymmetries. Twenty-three collision and contact athletes were recruited for the interday reliability substudy and 47 athletes were recruited for the remaining substudies. We used intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals to quantify interday reliability of all variables. We used a 2-way repeatedmeasures analysis of variance to analyze differences in absolute interlimb asymmetries. Interday reliability for the isokinetic strength variables was good to excellent (0.78-0.90) on the dominant side and moderate to good (0.63-0.86) on the nondominant side. Maximum angle-specific torque (as well as peak torque) can be measured reliably in internally and externally rotated positions. A normal profile of clinically relevant, angle-specific shoulder rotational torque measurements for collision and contact athletes has been established which provides a reference when assessing shoulder strength in this population.

After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), there are differences in the neuromuscular deficits observed in patients with bone‐patellar tendon‐bone (BPTB) and with hamstring tendon (HT) autografts. The differences in knee extensor and flexor strength are commonly reported, but analyses have largely focused on peak torque metrics despite the requirement to generate torque through range when returning to sport. The aim of this study was to investigate the angle‐specific strength and strength asymmetry differences between BPTB and HT around the time of return to play after ACLR. A total of 357 male field sport athletes with either a BPTB (n = 297) or an HT (n = 60) autograft underwent concentric knee flexor and extensor isokinetic strength testing 9 months post‐ACLR. Angle‐specific torques were compared between grafts and limbs using 1D Statistical Parametric Mapping and discrete‐point variables. Inter‐limb extensor torque asymmetry was greater in BTPB than HT at knee angles of >30° (p = 0.001, peak d = 5.53), with flexor torque asymmetry lower in BPTB than HT at flexion angles of >25° (p = 0.001, peak d = 2.68). Angle of maximum asymmetry and angle of operated limb peak torque differed in knee extension for BPTB (p < 0.001, d = 0.32) but not HT, whereas knee flexion angle of maximum asymmetry and operated limb peak torque differed in both BTPB (p < 0.001, d = 0.75) and HT (p < 0.001, d = 0.43). Graft type affected extensor torque at knee angles of 67°–85° and flexor torque at knee angles of 27°–85°. Angle‐specific strength analysis may inform the rehabilitation process and improve rehabilitation and return‐to‐play decision making strategies in comparison with the use of peak torque values alone.

Background: Performance measures such as strength, jump height/length, and change of direction (CoD) time during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation have been used to determine readiness to return to play and identify those who may be at risk of rerupture. However, athletes may reach these criteria despite ongoing biomechanical deficits when performing these tests. Combining return-to-play criteria with an assessment of movement through 3-dimensional (3D) biomechanics in male field sports athletes to identify risk factors for ACL rerupture has not been explored previously. Purpose: To prospectively examine differences in strength, jump, and CoD performance and movement using 3D biomechanics in a cohort of male athletes playing level 1 sports (ie, multidirectional field sports that involve landing, pivoting, or CoD) between those who reinjured the reconstructed ACL (RI group) and those with no reinjury (NRI group) after 2 years of follow-up and to examine the ability of these differences to predict reinjury. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: After primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR), 1045 male athletes were recruited and underwent testing 9 months after surgery including isokinetic strength, jump, and CoD performance measures as well as patient-reported outcomes and 3D biomechanical analyses. Participants were followed up after 2 years regarding ACL reinjury status. Differences were determined between the RI and NRI groups in patient-reported outcomes, performance measures, and 3D biomechanics on the ACLR side and symmetry between limbs. The ability of these measures to predict ACL reinjury was determined through logistic regression. Results: No differences were identified in strength and performance measures on the ACLR side or in symmetry. Biomechanical analysis indicated differences on the ACLR side primarily in the sagittal plane for the double-leg drop jump (effect size, 0.59-0.64) and greater asymmetry primarily in the frontal plane during unplanned CoD (effect size, 0.61-0.69) in the RI group. While these biomechanical test results were different between groups, multivariate regression modeling demonstrated limited ability (area under the curve, 0.67 and 0.75, respectively) to prospectively predict ACL reinjury. Conclusion: Commonly reported return-to-play strength, jump, and timed CoD performance measures did not differ between the RI and NRI groups. Differences in movement based on biomechanical measures during double-leg drop jump and unplanned CoD were identified, although they had limited ability to predict reinjury. Targeting these variables during rehabilitation may reduce reinjury risk in male athletes returning to level 1 sports after ACLR. Registration: NCT02771548 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Cutting maneuvers can be executed at a range of angles and speeds, and these whole-body task descriptors are closely associated with lower-limb mechanical loading. Asymmetries in angle and speed when changing direction off the operated and nonoperated limbs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may therefore influence the interpretation of interlimb differences in joint-level biomechanical parameters. The authors hypothesized that athletes would reduce center-of-mass heading angle deflection and body rotation during the change-of-direction stance phase when cutting from the operated limb, and would compensate for this by orienting their center-of-mass trajectory more toward the new intended direction of travel prior to touchdown. A total of 144 male athletes 8 to 10 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed a maximum-effort sidestep cutting maneuver while kinematic, kinetic, and ground reaction force data were recorded. Peak ground reaction force and knee joint moments were lower when cutting from the operated limb. Center-of-mass heading angle deflection during stance phase was reduced for cuts performed from the operated limb and was negatively correlated with heading angle at touchdown. Between-limb differences in body orientation and horizontal velocity at touchdown were also observed. These systematic asymmetries in cut execution may require consideration when interpreting joint-level interlimb asymmetries after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and are suggestive of the use of anticipatory control to co-optimize task achievement and mechanical loading.

Background: Athletes are twice as likely to rupture the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) on their healthy contralateral knee than the reconstructed graft after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Although physical testing is commonly used after ACLR to assess injury risk to the operated knee, strength, jump, and change-of-direction performance and biomechanical measures have not been examined in those who go on to experience a contralateral ACL injury, to identify factors that may be associated with injury risk. Purpose: To prospectively examine differences in biomechanical and clinical performance measures in male athletes 9 months after ACLR between those who ruptured their previously uninjured contralateral ACL and those who did not at 2-year follow-up and to examine the ability of these differences to predict contralateral ACL injury. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A cohort of male athletes returning to level 1 sports after ACLR (N = 1045) underwent isokinetic strength testing and 3-dimensional biomechanical analysis of jump and change-of-direction tests 9 months after surgery. Participants were followed up at 2 years regarding return to play or at second ACL injury. Between-group differences were analyzed in patient-reported outcomes, performance measures, and 3-dimensional biomechanics for the contralateral limb and asymmetry. Logistic regression was applied to determine the ability of identified differences to predict contralateral ACL injury. Results: Of the cohort, 993 had follow-up at 2 years (95%), with 67 experiencing a contralateral ACL injury and 38 an ipsilateral injury. Male athletes who had a contralateral ACL injury had lower quadriceps strength and biomechanical differences on the contralateral limb during double- and single-leg drop jump tests as compared with those who did not experience an injury. Differences were related primarily to deficits in sagittal plane mechanics and plyometric ability on the contralateral side. These variables could explain group membership with fair to good ability (area under the curve, 0.74-0.80). Patient-reported outcomes, limb symmetry of clinical performance measures, and biomechanical measures in change-of-direction tasks did not differentiate those at risk for contralateral injury. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of sagittal plane control during drop jump tasks and the limited utility of limb symmetry in performance and biomechanical measures when assessing future contralateral ACL injury risk in male athletes. Targeting the identified differences in quadriceps strength and plyometric ability during late-stage rehabilitation and testing may reduce ACL injury risk in healthy limbs in male athletes playing level 1 sports. Clinical Relevance: This study highlights the importance of assessing the contralateral limb after ACLR and identifies biomechanical differences, particularly in the sagittal plane in drop jump tasks, that may be associated with injury to this limb. These factors could be targeted during assessment and rehabilitation with additional quadriceps strengthening and plyometric exercises after ACLR to potentially reduce the high risk of injury to the previously healthy knee. Registration: NCT02771548 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

1. Hewett TE, Di Stasi SL, Myer GD. Current concepts for injury prevention in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):216-224. 2. King E, Richter C, Daniels KAJ, et al. Biomechanical but not strength or performance measures differentiate male athletes who experience ACL reinjury on return to level 1 sports. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(4):918-927. 3. King E, Richter C, Daniels KAJ, et al. Can biomechanical testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction identify athletes at risk for subsequent ACL injury to the contralateral uninjured limb? Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(3):609-619. 4. King E, Richter C, Jackson M, et al. Factors influencing return to play and second anterior cruciate ligament injury rates in level 1 athletes after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2-year followup on 1432 reconstructions at a single center. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(4):812-824.

The aim of this study was threefold (1) to assess the reliability of three upper-extremity performance tests: a countermovement push up, press jump and drop box land, performed on a set of dual-force plates (2) to examine whether there was an association between isokinetic dynamometry and the performance tests in a non-injured cohort of collision/contact athletes and (3) to establish a normal descriptive profile of the vertical ground reaction forces from the performance tests, in a cohort of contact/collision athletes. The study was split into two sub-sections; the inter-day reliability of three upper-extremity performance tests (n = 21) and a descriptive, correlation study investigating the relationship between isokinetic dynamometry and performance tests metrics (n = 39). We used intraclass correlation coefficients (absolute agreement, 2-way mixed-effects model) with 95% confidence intervals to quantify inter-day reliability of all variables. We used Pearson correlation coefficients to investigate associations between isokinetic strength and vertical ground reaction force asymmetry variables. Inter-day reliability was moderate-to-excellent for the upper-extremity performance tests (ICC 0.67-0.97). There was no statistically significant correlation between external and internal rotational peak torque and the variables of CPMU, PJ and BDL (r range = .02-.24).These upper-extremity tests are reliable for use with male contact/collision athletes.

The limb kinematics used for stepping or leaping over an obstacle are determined primarily by visual sensing of obstacle position and geometry. In this study, we demonstrate that changes are induced in limb kinematics even when obstacle geometry is manipulated in a way that does not introduce a mechanical requirement for a change of limb trajectory nor increase risk of collision. Human participants performed a running leap over a single raised obstacle bar. Kinematic changes were measured when an identical second bar was introduced at a ground level underneath the obstacle and displaced by a functionally insignificant distance along the axis of travel. The presence or absence of a baseline directly beneath the highest extremity had no significant effect on limb kinematics. However, displacing the baseline horizontally induced a horizontal translation of limb trajectory in the direction of the displacement. These results show that systematic changes to limb trajectories can occur in the absence of a change in sensed mechanical constraints or optimization. The nature of visuomotor control of human leaping may involve a continuous mapping of sensory input to kinematic output rather than one responsive only to information perceived to be mechanically relevant.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to examine the differences in patient-reported outcome measures, isokinetic strength, plyometric ability and ability to meet return to play criteria ten months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery between those who underwent meniscectomy, those who underwent meniscal repair and those with no meniscal intervention alongside ACL reconstruction surgery.MethodsThree hundred and thirteen athletes with clinically and radiologically confirmed ACL ruptures were included in this study. Participants were grouped according to their intra-operative procedures (isolated ACL reconstruction surgery n = 155, ACL reconstruction surgery with meniscectomy n = 128, ACL reconstruction surgery with meniscal repair n = 30). Participants completed patient-reported outcome measures questionnaires (Marx Activity Rating Scale, the ACL Return to Sport after Injury and the International Knee Documentation Committee Score) and completed a battery of objective functional testing including isokinetic dynamometry and jump performance testing (countermovement jump and drop jump) between 9 and 11 months after surgery.ResultsNo significant between-group differences were identified in any metric relating to patient-reported outcome measures (p = .611), strength and jump measures (p = .411) or the ability to achieve symmetry-based return to play criteria (p = .575).ConclusionsClinically, these results suggest that concomitant meniscal surgery has no significant effects on patient-reported outcome measures, strength and jump metrics at the return to play stage post-operatively and can inform the pre-operative counselling of those awaiting ACL reconstruction surgery with likely meniscal intervention.