Burn injuries can cause significant morbidity and mortality; however, more effective medical interventions have resulted in a large proportion of individuals surviving. Individuals with burn injuries have an increased likelihood of psychological disorders. Burn severity and scar visibility have been tied to stigmatizing social reactions from others and, as a result, can negatively affect the mental health of individuals with burn injuries. Social support has been shown to be a buffer for mental health. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relations between stigma, mental health (anxiety and depression), and social support in individuals with burn injuries. A sample of 97 individuals with burn injuries was recruited from an outpatient burn specialty clinic. Stigma was positively related to depression and anxiety. Social support moderated the relationship between stigma and anxiety such that the statistical effect weakened for individuals with burn injuries who experience medium to high levels of social support. The same buffering effect approached significance for depression. Incorporating a focus on stigma and social support could augment behavioral health interventions that target mental health concerns after a burn injury.

BACKGROUND Psychological distress is common following a traumatic injury event. The Injured Trauma Survivor Screen (ITSS) was developed at a level 1 trauma center to assess for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive episode (MDE) following admission for a traumatic injury. The ITSS sensitivity and specificity were analyzed 1 to 3 and 6 to 9 months postinjury to test the validity across trauma centers. METHOD Four level 1 trauma centers from the East, Midwest, South, and West in the United States recruited 375 eligible adult inpatients (excluded participants included those with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, whose injury was self-inflicted, were noncommunicative, or were non-English speaking). Baseline sample (White/Caucasian, 63.2%; male, 62.4%; mean (SD) age, 45 (17.11) years; injured by motor vehicle collision, 42.4%) measurements were conducted during index hospitalization. At first follow-up, 69.6% (n = 261) were retained; at second follow-up, 61.3% (n = 230) were retained. Measurements included the ITSS, PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale—Revised, and Clinician-Administered PTSD Scaled for DSM 5. RESULTS At follow-up 1, the ITSS PTSD subscale had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 78.8%, and the MDE subscale had a sensitivity of 80.4% and specificity of 65.6%. At follow-up 2, the PTSD subscale had a sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 83.1%, and the MDE subscale had a sensitivity of 76.1% and specificity of 68.3%. A combined risk group using two symptom based measures administered at baseline produced increased specificity. CONCLUSION The nine-item ITSS continues to be an efficient and effective risk screen for PTSD and MDE following traumatic injury requiring hospitalization. This multi-institutional validation study creates a solid foundation for further exploration of the generalizability of this screen’s psychometric properties in distinct populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level III

Purpose/Objective: Despite the increasingly high number of individuals who survive burns and the documented impairments in functioning across psychological, work, sexual, and interpersonal domains, there has been a dearth of research investigating connections between pain and functioning in these domains after burn injury. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relationships among pain, mental health, and functioning of individuals with burn injury. It was hypothesized that pain after burn would yield direct effects on functioning (work, sexual, and interpersonal), as well as indirect effects on functioning through depression and anxiety. Research Method/Design: Eighty-seven individuals with burn injury completed a questionnaire assessing study constructs in an outpatient burn center setting. Results: Pain was positively related to depression and anxiety and inversely related to all three forms of functioning. In a series of mediational models, depression and anxiety simultaneously and partially mediated the relationship between pain and work functioning. Depression fully mediated the relationship between pain and sexual functioning, as well as partially mediated the relationship between pain and interpersonal functioning. The models explained 39.2% of the variance in work functioning, 28.4% in sexual functioning, and 35.6% in interpersonal functioning. Conclusions/Implications: Although the cross-sectional findings are unable to conclude causality, individuals with burn injury experiencing pain may benefit from a biopsychosocial treatment approach while also addressing symptoms of depression and anxiety. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

OBJECTIVE Less parental monitoring of adolescents' diabetes self-care and more family conflict are each associated with poorer diabetes outcomes. However, little is known about how these two family factors relate with one another in the context of self-care and glycemic control. Diabetes self-care was evaluated as a mediator of the associations among parental monitoring, family conflict, and glycemic control in early adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS Adolescent-parent dyads (n = 257) reported on the frequency of parental monitoring, family conflict, and diabetes self-care. Hemoglobin A1c was abstracted from medical charts. Structural equation modeling was used for mediation analysis. RESULTS A mediation model linking parental involvement and family conflict with A1c through diabetes self-care fit the data well. Monitoring and conflict were inversely correlated (β = -0.23, p < .05) and each demonstrated indirect associations with A1c (standardized indirect effects -0.13 and 0.07, respectively) through their direct associations with self-care (β = 0.39, p < .001 and β = -0.19, p < .05, respectively). Conflict also was positively associated with higher A1c (β = 0.31, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS Elevated family conflict and less parental monitoring are risk factors for poorer glycemic control, and diabetes self-care is one mediator linking these variables. Interventions to promote parental monitoring of diabetes management during early adolescence may benefit from emphasizing strategies to prevent or reduce family conflict.