Abdominal tuberculosis is a rare form of tuberculosis often mistaken for conditions like inflammatory bowel disease or malignancy due to overlapping symptoms such as abdominal pain, fever, weight loss, and gastrointestinal bleeding. We present a patient with a presumed diagnosis of Crohn’s disease who continued to have abdominal pain, fever, and diarrhea despite infliximab therapy. Imaging revealed new-onset ascites with peritoneal nodularity, and repeated QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus tests were negative. Paracentesis showed elevated adenosine deaminase, and omental biopsy confirmed tuberculosis, despite non-necrotizing granulomas and negative acid-fast bacilli smears. He had complete resolution of symptoms after nine months of rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. Repeat imaging and colonoscopy showed no residual disease, refuting the initial diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Our case highlights the importance of considering abdominal tuberculosis in patients from high-risk backgrounds with presumed Crohn’s disease worsening on biologic therapy, regardless of having multiple negative QuantiFERON tests.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience increased rates of sexual dysfunction (SD). This study investigated SD longitudinally in patients initiating a biologic or small molecule therapy. Patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) starting biologic or small molecule therapy were surveyed at induction, 2 months, and 6 months. Measures included the IBD-Female and Male Sexual Dysfunction Scales (FSDS, MSDS), PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Brief Profile, Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI), Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), partial Mayo score, Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ), PHQ-9, and IBD Disability Index (IBDDI). Endoscopic and biomarker data were collected. Correlations, longitudinal changes, and predictors of SD were analyzed. A total of 170 patients (89 males, 81 females) completed baseline surveys, 132 at 2 months, and 115 at 6 months. Median age was 31.5 years; 59

Background: Opioid use is common among patients hospitalized for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exacerbation and has been associated with an increased risk of readmissions. Prior studies, however, have mostly limited their analysis to hospital opioid use. This study examines opioid exposure and dosing before, during, and after hospitalization and its impact on 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions. Methods: We reviewed all adults admitted for an IBD exacerbation from 1 January 2016 to 3 January 2020, excluding pregnant patients and those with an IBD-related surgery. Use and dose of opioids before and during hospitalization and at discharge were identified through manual chart review. IBD type, demographics, and comorbidities were defined. The associations between opioid use characteristics and readmission were assessed using a series of multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Among 1062 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 191 (18.0%) were readmitted within 30 days of their index hospitalization, and 285 (26.8%) were readmitted within 90 days. Of these 1062 patients, 96 (9.02%) had preadmission opioid use, 340 (31.95%) had inpatient use, and 133 (12.50%) received a discharge opioid prescription. Preadmission, inpatient, and discharge opioid use were not associated with 30-day readmission. Preadmission and inpatient opioid use were also not associated with 90-day readmission; however, a prescription for an opioid at discharge was associated with 90-day readmission even after adjusting for confounders, OR 1.86 (1.27, 2.75), p = 0.002. On multivariable analysis, we also found that higher maximum daily dose of discharge opioids, OR 1.01 (1.00, 1.02), p = 0.037, was found to be associated with 30-day readmissions, and higher opioid doses preadmission, OR 1.01 (1.00, 1.03), p = 0.029, and at hospital discharge, OR 1.01 (1.00, 1.02), p = 0.034, were associated with increased 90-day readmission. Conclusions: Opioid prescribing at discharge poses a significant risk for readmissions. Discharge planning should emphasize minimal use of opioids at discharge.

Background Intravenous (IV) steroids are commonly used to treat acute flares of Crohn's disease (CD). However, it is unclear if they are beneficial in the setting of uncomplicated small bowel obstruction (SBO). We sought to examine if IV steroid administration improved short-term outcomes in patients with CD hospitalized for acute, uncomplicated SBO across three New York City hospital systems.Methods This retrospective study included patients >= 18 years old admitted between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019, with Crohn's disease and an admission diagnosis of uncomplicated acute SBO, defined as cases without adhesions, fistula, phlegmon, and sepsis. Primary endpoints (length of stay and frequency of surgery) were compared between patients who received IV steroids upon admission and those who did not.Results Our analysis included 674 unique patients. Ninety-two (14%) received IV steroids, and 582 (86%) did not. IV steroid use did not result in shorter hospital stays (median days [IQR]: 3.0 (2.0-5.5) days vs 3.0 (2.0-6.0) days in the no-steroid group, P = .65) or reduce the need for surgery (4 patients (4.4%) vs 28 patients (4.8%) in the no-steroid group, P = .85). Sex, age, disease duration, concomitant biologic therapy, and NG tube placement did not independently contribute to either outcome.Conclusions These findings suggest that IV steroid administration for uncomplicated SBO in CD patients does not decrease hospital length of stay or need for surgery. Further research may help identify specific obstruction patterns or other therapies associated with different outcomes. Intravenous steroids, commonly administered upon hospital admission of Crohn's disease patients with acute small bowel obstruction, did not decrease the length of stay or need for surgery in a retrospective study (2011-2019) of admitted patients in the New York hospital system.

Ulceration at the neo-terminal ileum in patients with Crohn's disease who have undergone previous resection remains a clinical challenge. While most patients will develop ulceration, it can be difficult to determine whether the ulceration represents a true Crohn's recurrence. Scoring systems such as the Rutgeerts Score and modified Rutgeerts score can help differentiate between disease that may have higher risk for progression. Risk factors such as tobacco use, penetrating phenotype, and prior surgical resection have been identified, in addition to surgical technique. Recent evidence has supported certain surgical techniques, such as a side-to-side stapled technique and the Kono-S, to prevent post-surgical ulceration. Post-surgical prophylactic treatment with biologic therapies have the potential to reduce disease recurrence in certain patients. Post-surgical ulceration at the ileocolonic anastomosis is a complex problem that requires careful surveillance and evidence-based management. Understanding which patients are at high risk for disease recurrence and progression is important to guide treatment.

Background Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib and upadacitinib are effective therapies for inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatologic disorders but currently possess a warning for increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. Some patients with a history of VTE may benefit from a JAK inhibitor, but the risk of recurrent VTE with JAK inhibitor use is unclear. Our goal was to observe rates of new VTE events after starting JAK inhibitor therapy in patients with a prior VTE, and observe whether concurrent anticoagulation (AC) reduces this risk.Methods We conducted a review of adults prescribed tofacitinib or upadacitinib between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2023, with a prior history of VTE. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic data, disease type, and VTE date(s), and to verify duration of JAK inhibitor use along with any concurrent AC. VTEs following JAK inhibitor initiation were identified by International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision code and verified by physician documentation and imaging.Results We identified 79 patients with a documented VTE history before initiating JAK inhibitors, 47 of whom began a JAK inhibitor with concurrent AC. Of these, 15 patients discontinued AC while receiving JAK inhibitors. In total, 5 new VTE events were observed during 55.42 patient-years of JAK inhibitor treatment without concurrent AC (9.0 events per 100 patient-years), while no new VTE events occurred during 65.2 patient-years of JAK inhibitor treatment with concurrent AC, demonstrating a lower risk of recurrent VTE (P = .020).Conclusions These results suggest that for patients with a prior VTE history there is a high risk for recurrent VTE while receiving JAK inhibitors. Concurrent use of AC with JAK inhibitors appears to be protective against recurrent VTEs in this population. Patients with a history of venous thromboembolism prior to initiation of a Janus kinase inhibitor (tofacitinib or upadacitinib) had an elevated risk (9%) of recurrent venous thromboembolism on Janus kinase inhibitor, though concurrent anticoagulation may mitigate this risk.

Background and Objective:Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition that has been increasing in prevalence and incidence worldwide. Although, most cases are described in Caucasian populations, there has been a rise in IBD diagnosis among other populations. In this article, we will discuss the disparities in the presentation, management, medical and surgical outcomes of IBD patients among different racial and ethnic groups.Methods:A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar. The search strategy included targeted keywords to identify specific studies that provided the current literature on disparities in IBD presentation and management. Articles for presentation were selected by the authors, in accordance with a narrative review format, favoring population-based studies, systematic reviews and meta-analysis over single or multicenter reports.Key Content and Findings:Epidemiological data has shown that there is an increasing incidence in IBD diagnosis among Black, Asian, and Hispanic populations over the past decade. Differences in genetic predispositions have been observed, however it is difficult to ascertain if the minor differences in presentation and medical/surgical management reported are due to innate differences or due to confounding factors such as access to health care.Conclusions:Differences in genetic predisposition, and clinical presentation have been observed to exist among IBD non-Caucasian populations. There were also differences observed in both surgical and medical management, but it is difficult to ascertain if these were innate differences or due to societal factors.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is entering a potentially new era of combined therapeutics. Triantafillidis et al provide an insightful review of the current state of combination therapy, with a focus on the use of a combined biologic and immunomodulator, as well as emerging data on the future potential of dual-biologic therapy (DBT). While current evidence for DBT is limited, encouraging safety profiles and ongoing trials suggest a brighter future for this approach. The importance of controlled trials should be stressed in establishing new treatment paradigms. Ongoing prospective randomized trials of DBT and perhaps future combinations of biologics and small molecule therapies will hopefully guide the next generation of IBD care.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving infliximab (IFX) commonly experience immunogenic loss of response (LOR) by formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). An immunomodulator (IMM) used in combination with initial IFX induction is known to reduce ADA development and improve clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess the impact of reactively adding an IMM to patients on IFX monotherapy. We conducted a retrospective cohort study and systematic review with meta-analysis of patients with IBD demonstrating immunologic LOR, with or without clinical LOR, that had an IMM (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate) reactively added (reactive combination therapy; rCT) to combat elevated ADAs and raise IFX level. Data were extracted for pooled effect size estimation using random-effects models, and ADA and IFX trough levels were compared pre- and post-IMM initiation. We identified 6 patients who received rCT due to rising ADA titers and low IFX levels. Median ADA titer decreased from 506 ng/mL (interquartile range (IQR) [416–750]) to 76.5 ng/mL (IQR [25.8–232]), an 85

Cryptogenic multifocal ulcerating stenosing enteropathy is a rare idiopathic small bowel enteropathy characterized by multiple small intestinal strictures and superficial ulcerations, often with clubbing. We present a case of a 25-year-old man who originally initially presented with small bowel obstruction believed to be secondary to suspected Crohn's disease who was ultimately diagnosed with cryptogenic multifocal ulcerating stenosing enteropathy.

Introduction:A secondary loss of response (LOR) to infliximab (IFX) therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is typically associated with low IFX trough levels, often with high levels of neutralizing antibodies to IFX (ATI). A small subset of patients on long-term therapy experience a "nonimmune" LOR, without ATI and with desired IFX trough levels ≥5 μg/mL, regarded as a LOR to the mechanism of action of IFX. However, this currently accepted IFX goal level is largely derived from observations of patients within the first year of therapy and may not apply to those on treatment beyond 1 year. Methods:Retrospective review of all IBD patients receiving IFX infusions for ≥12 months with at least 1 IFX trough and ATI measurement beyond 12 months was conducted. Chart review of all patients with absent ATI and an IFX trough ≥5 μg/mL classifies as LOR versus non-LOR based on physician assessment, with a comparison of IFX troughs between the two groups. Results:Of 167 patients using IFX ≥12 months, 13 (7.8%) experienced a nonimmune secondary LOR. The mean duration of IFX use was over 3 years for both LOR and non-LOR patients. The mean IFX trough for those with LOR was greater than for those without LOR, 18.5 μg/mL versus 13.1 μg/mL, p = 0.110. Conclusion:Our results did not demonstrate lower IFX levels among patients experiencing secondary nonimmune LOR on long-term therapy. Our results do not redefine the therapeutic IFX goal levels for those patients on long-term therapy and suggest that underdosing of IFX is not the cause of secondary LOR.

BACKGROUND & AIMS:In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and a history of cancer, retrospective studies have suggested that exposure to immunosuppressive agents does not increase the risk of incident (recurrent or new) cancer compared with unexposed patients. Safety of Immunosuppression in a Prospective Cohort of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients and a HIstoRy of CancEr (SAPPHIRE) is a prospective registry aimed at addressing this issue. METHODS:Since 2016, patients with IBD and confirmed index cancer before enrollment were followed up annually. Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation at enrollment, or recurrent cancer within 5 years, were excluded. The primary outcome was development of incident cancer related to exposure to immunosuppressive medications. RESULTS:Among 305 patients (47% male, 88% white), the median age at IBD diagnosis and cancer were 32 and 52 years, respectively. Index cancers were solid organ (46%), dermatologic (32%), gastrointestinal (13%), and hematologic (9%). During a median follow-up period of 4.8 years, 210 patients (69%) were exposed to immunosuppressive therapy and 46 patients (15%) developed incident cancers (25 new, 21 recurrent). In unadjusted analysis, the crude rate of incident cancer in unexposed patients was 2.58 per 100 person-years vs 4.78 per 100 person-years (relative risk, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.92-3.73) for immunosuppression-exposed patients. In a time-varying proportional hazards model adjusting for sex, smoking history, age and stage at index malignancy, and nonmelanoma skin cancer, no significant association was found between receipt of immunosuppression and incident cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.69-2.90), or with any major drug class. CONCLUSIONS:In this interim analysis of patients with IBD and a history of cancer, despite numerically increased adjusted hazard ratios, we did not find a statistically significant association between subsequent exposure to immunosuppressive therapies and development of incident cancers.

Background:Though viewed as a potentially safer palliative alternative to opioids, studies of cannabis use for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited. The impact of opioids on hospital readmissions for IBD has been extensively examined, but cannabis has not been similarly studied. Our goal was to examine the relationship between cannabis use and the risk of 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions.Methods:We conducted a review of all adults admitted for an IBD exacerbation from January 1, 2016 to March 1, 2020 within the Northwell Health Care system. Patients with an IBD exacerbation were identified by primary or secondary ICD10 code (K50.xx or K51.xx) and administration of intravenous (IV) solumedrol and/or biologic therapy. Admission documents were reviewed for the terms "marijuana", "cannabis", "pot" and "CBD".Results:A total of 1,021 patient admissions met inclusion criteria, of whom 484 (47.40%) had Crohn's disease (CD) and 542 (53.09%) were female. Pre-admission cannabis use was reported by 74 (7.25%) patients. Factors found to be associated with cannabis use included younger age, male gender, African American/Black race, current tobacco and former alcohol use, anxiety, and depression. Cannabis use was found to be associated with 30-day readmission among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), but not among patients with CD, after respectively adjusting each final model by other factors (odds ratio (OR): 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06 - 5.79 and OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.22 - 1.62, respectively). Cannabis use was not found to be associated with 90-day readmission on univariable analysis (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.65 - 1.87) nor in the final multivariable model after adjusting for other factors (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.68 - 2.05).Conclusion:Pre-admission cannabis use was found to be associated with 30-day readmission among patients with UC, but not with 30-day readmission for patients with CD nor with 90-day readmission, following an IBD exacerbation.