BACKGROUND AND AIM:We previously identified that ever-smoking and severe gastric atrophy in pepsinogen are risk factors for synchronous gastric cancers (SGCs). This study aimed to determine the association of alcohol drinking status or alcohol-related genetic polymorphism with SGCs and also stratify their risk. METHODS:This multi-center prospective cohort study included patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for the initial early gastric cancers at 22 institutions in Japan. We evaluated the association of alcohol drinking status or alcohol dehydrogenase 1B (ADH1B) and acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) genotypes with SGCs. We then stratified the risk of SGCs by combining prespecified two factors and risk factors identified in this study. RESULTS:Among 802 patients, 130 had SGCs. Both the ADH1B Arg and ALDH2 Lys alleles demonstrated a significant association with SGCs on multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.77), although alcohol drinking status showed no association. The rates of SGCs in 0-3 risk factors in the combined evaluation of three risk factors (ever-smoking, severe gastric atrophy in pepsinogen, and both the ADH1B Arg and ALDH2 Lys alleles) were 7.6%, 15.0%, 22.0%, and 32.1%, respectively. The risk significantly increased from 0 to 3 risk factors on multivariate analysis (P for trend <0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Both the ADH1B Arg and ALDH2 Lys alleles were at high risk for SGCs. The risk stratification by these three factors may be a less invasive and promising tool for predicting their risk.

Background and study aims The long-term course of untreated asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) and minimally symptomatic eosinophilic esophagitis (mEoE) are not well understood. This study aimed to clarify this course. Patients and methods A total of 36 patients with EE who were endoscopically followed up for more than 5 years, and who underwent more than one endoscopy evaluation after the first diagnosis, were investigated. These patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of the continuous treatment: no treatment group (NT group, n=22) and proton pump inhibitor/potassium competitive acid blocker group (Tx group, n=14). Symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings were retrospectively reviewed according to endoscopic phenotypes. Endoscopic assessment was performed using the EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS). Results The median follow-up period was 84.5 months in the Tx group and 92 months in the NT group. During the follow-up period, about half of the patients in the Tx-diffuse group persisted EREFS >3, while the remaining half had EREFS ≤2. The total EREFS in the NT-diffuse group remained almost unchanged (median: 2-4) without apparent exacerbation. In contrast, EREFS in the NT-localized group exhibited an unchanged or gradually decreasing trend, with statistical significance from the first diagnosis to 72 to 83 months after. Conclusions Untreated aEE and mEoE are not likely to worsen even without treatment at least for a median follow-up of 7 years. Instead, the localized type may spontaneously improve, implying a different pathogenesis in the presence of the diffuse type. Further studies should clarify the long-term prognosis.

Objective The impact of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric endoscopic findings in non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (non-EoE EGIDs) remains unclear. This study investigated the influence of H. pylori infection on the prevalence and distribution of gastric lesions. Methods The details of 75 patients diagnosed with non-EoE EGIDs were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 56 patients with a definitive diagnosis according to the Japanese criteria (any GI tract; >= 20 eosinophils/high-power field), 25 patients with pathologic gastric eosinophil infiltration (gastric EI; >= 30 eosinophils/high-power field) were investigated in detail. The prevalence and distribution of gastric endoscopy findings were assessed according to the gastric mucosal atrophy status, an indicator of H. pylori infection. Results Erythema (76%) was the most common finding in the gastric EI-positive group, followed by erosions (36%), ulcers (28%), ulcer scars (28%), and edema (24%). None of these lesions differed significantly in frequency between the patients with and without gastric atrophy. When erosions, ulcers, and ulcer scars were unified, they were slightly more common in the gastric bodies of patients with gastric atrophy than those without gastric atrophy; however, no preferential site was found in those without gastric atrophy. We identified six patients with active gastric ulcers, and half had large, deep ulcers with marginal swelling/irregularity. Conclusion Gastric endoscopy findings in non-EoE EGIDs with gastric EI were evenly observed in the stomach, with no specific trend in frequency or distribution depending on atrophic gastritis, an indicator of H. pylori infection. Gastric ulcers in patients with non-EoE EGIDs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of idiopathic peptic ulcers.

Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan; Division of Endoscopy, Yamagata University Hospital, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Hospital, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, South Miyagi Medical Center, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Yamagata City Hospital SAISEIKAN, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Japan; Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, JR Sendai Hospital, Japan.

BackgroundNo studies have evaluated the relationship between lifestyle and synchronous gastric cancers (SGCs) in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancers (EGCs). Using data from the Tohoku gastrointestinal (GI) study, we aimed to identify factors associated with SGCs.MethodsTohoku GI study is a multicenter prospective cohort study investigating the relationship between lifestyle and metachronous gastric cancers. Patients who had a schedule to undergo ESD for primary EGCs were enrolled. We used logistic regression analysis to examine the relationship of 15 candidate factors, including lifestyle, with the prevalence of SGCs in this study.ResultsOf 850 patients between 2016 and 2019, 16.0% (136 patients) had SGCs. In multivariate analysis, smoking history (odds ratio [OR], 1.93; p = 0.048) and severe atrophic gastritis assessed by pepsinogen (OR, 1.92; p = 0.004) were risk factors for the prevalence of SGCs. Regarding smoking, current smoking (OR, 2.33; p = 0.021), but not former smoking (OR, 1.76; p = 0.098), was a significant risk factor for its prevalence. In the stratified analysis, severe atrophic gastritis assessed by pepsinogen was a risk factor in patients without Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication (OR, 2.10; p = 0.002), but not a risk factor in those with H. pylori eradication (OR, 0.75; p = 0.737).ConclusionSmoking history was a risk factor for the prevalence of SGCs in patients with ESD for EGCs, and severe atrophic gastritis assessed by pepsinogen was also a risk factor when H. pylori was not eradicated.

Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan; Division of Endoscopy, Yamagata University Hospital, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Hospital, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, JR Sendai Hospital, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, South Miyagi Medical Center, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Yamagata City Hospital SAISEIKAN, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Japan; Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Japan.

Waku Hatta: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Tomoyuki Koike: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Sho Asonuma: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Hideki Okata: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Kaname Uno: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Tomoyuki Oikawa: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Wataru Iwai: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Makoto Yonechi: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Daisuke Fukushi: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Itaru Sato: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Shoichi Kayaba: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Fumitake Ishiyama: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Hirohiko Shinkai: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Ryosuke Kikuchi: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Hiroki Kikuchi: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Motoki Ohyauchi: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Hirotaka Ito: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Jun Fushiya: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Takeharu Shiroki: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Ryuhei Maejima: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Yasuhiko Abe: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Makoto Yagi: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Masashi Kawamura: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Satoshi Yokosawa: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Junya Honda: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Yutaka Kondo: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Naohiro Dairaku: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Tomohiro Masaka: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Kazuaki Norita: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Kenta Watanabe: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Kiichi Takahashi: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Masahiro Saito: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Yasushi Takahashi: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Hiroharu Echigo: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Yasuaki Abe: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Hiroyuki Endo: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Tomoki Okata: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Tatsuya Hoshi: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Taku Fujiya: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Katsunori Iijima: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest | Atsushi Masamune: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest

Objective Esophageal eosinophilia (EE), a histological hallmark of eosinophilic esophagitis, is classified into two endoscopic phenotypes: localized and diffuse EE. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of EE localized in the lower esophagus and to describe its clinical features in comparison with diffuse EE. Methods Data from 81 consecutive patients with EE were retrospectively investigated. EE was histologically defined as ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field. Based on the endoscopic appearance with a histological assessment, EE was classified as either diffuse or localized type. We compared the clinical features, including the medical treatment and natural course, between the two types. Results Of the 81 patients, 52 (64.2%) had diffuse EE, and 29 (35.8%) had localized EE. Among men patients, localized EE was significantly more common than diffuse EE. In localized EE, dysphagia and food impaction were less prevalent, and the presence of rings was significantly less common than in diffuse EE. Acid-suppressive therapy was administered to only 3 of the 29 patients with localized EE. In asymptomatic patients, especially those with localized EE, endoscopic abnormalities did not worsen but rather improved in some findings, such as with regard to furrows or exudate, during the natural course of three years without medical treatment. Conclusion Localized EE has a strong predilection for men patients and accounted for more than one third of all cases of EE. This condition appears to be less symptomatic and necessitates milder medical treatment than diffuse EE and might not worsen progressively.

ABSTRACT A 37-year-old man underwent screening examinations, and a pale-colored submucosal tumor was detected on gastric cardia. Endosonography showed a 15-mm cyst with hypoechoic nodules in the muscularis propria, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration obtained mucinous fluid with atypical spindle cells positive for c-kit, indicating a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Surgical resection was recommended, but he initially agreed to surveillance. After becoming larger for 8 years, partial gastrectomy was performed for the 22 × 22 × 15-mm capsulized lesion. Surprisingly, its histology was gastric duplication cyst without gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Gastric duplication cyst is a rare entity with the possibility of malignant complications, but careful assessment of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration might also be required.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Barrett's esophageal cancer is usually included in gastroesophageal (GE) junction adenocarcinoma in Japanese people. No study on the pathogenesis of Barrett's esophageal cancer in comparison with GE junction adenocarcinoma other than Barrett's esophageal cancer has been reported in Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics and gastric acid secretion of Barrett's esophageal cancer and GE junction adenocarcinoma other than Barrett's esophageal cancer in Japanese subjects.MATERIAL AND METHODS:Twenty-three patients with Barrett's esophageal cancer and 23 patients with GE junction adenocarcinoma other than Barrett's esophageal cancer were enrolled in this study. We evaluated and compared them by assessing the Helicobactor pylori (HP) infection status and gastric acid secretion using the endoscopic gastrin test (EGT).RESULTS:In the patients with Barrett's esophageal cancer, no significant difference was found in the mean EGT value between HP-positive and -negative patients, but in the patients with GE junction adenocarcinoma other than Barrett's esophageal cancer, the mean EGT value in HP-positive patients was significantly lower than that in HP-negative patients.CONCLUSION:Two distinct types of cancer of different origin may be mixed in GE junction adenocarcinomas. One is Barrett's esophageal cancer associated with high gastric acid secretion and reflux of gastric acid into the esophagus, the other is cancer resembling distal gastric cancer associated with gastric atrophy and low gastric acid secretion.

AIM To study the value of serum biomarker tests to differentiate between patients with healthy or diseased stomach mucosa: i.e. those with Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) gastritis or atrophic gastritis, who have a high risk of gastric cancer or peptic ulcer diseases. METHODS Among 162 Japanese outpatients, pepsinogen I (Pg I) and II (Pg II) were measured using a conventional Japanese technique, and the European GastroPanel examination (Pg I and Pg II, gastrin-17 and H pylori antibodies). Gastroscopy with gastric biopsies was performed to classify the patients into those with healthy stomach mucosa, H pylori non-atrophic gastritis or atrophic gastritis. RESULTS Pg I and Pg II assays with the GastroPanel and the Japanese method showed a highly significant correlation. For methodological reasons, however, serum Pg I, but not Pg II, was twice as high with the GastroPanel test as with the Japanese test. The biomarker assays revealed that 5% of subjects had advanced atrophic corpus gastritis which was also verified by endoscopic biopsies. GastroPanel examination revealed an additional seven patients who had either advanced atrophic gastritis limited to the antrum or antrum-predominant H pylori gastritis. When compared to the endoscopic biopsy findings, the GastroPanel examination classified the patients into groups with "healthy" or "diseased" stomach mucosa with 94% accuracy, 95% sensitivity and 93% specificity. CONCLUSION Serum biomarker tests can be used to differentiate between subjects with healthy and diseased gastric mucosa with high accuracy.

Although oncogenic functions and the clinical significance of Wilms tumor 1 ( WT1 ) have been extensively studied in acute leukemia, the regulatory mechanism of its transcription still remains to be determined. We found a significant correlation among the amounts of WT1, GATA-1 and GATA-2 mRNAs from leukemia and solid tumor cell lines. Overexpression and small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection experiments of GATA-1 and GATA-2 showed that these GATA transcription factors could induce WT1 expression. Promoter analysis showed that the 5′ promoter did not explain the different WT1 mRNA levels between cell lines. The 3′ enhancer, especially the distal sites out of six putative GATA binding sites located within the region, but not the intron 3 enhancer, were essential for the WT1 mRNA level. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) showed both GATA-1 and GATA-2 bound to these GATA sites. Besides acute leukemia cell lines, solid tumor cell lines including, TYK-nu-cPr also showed a high level of WT1 mRNA. We showed that GATA-2 expression is a determinant of WT1 mRNA expression in both TYK-nu-cPr cells and HL60 cells without GATA-1 expression. Taken together, these results suggest that GATA-1 and/or GATA-2 binding to a GATA site of the 3′ enhancer of WT1 played an important role in WT1 gene expression.

It was reported that short interfering RNA (siRNA) of EWS/Fli-1 downregulated phospholipase D (PLD)2 in Ewing's sarcoma (EWS) cell line, suggesting that PLD2 is the target of aberrant transcription factor, EWS/Fli-1. Here, we further investigated the regulation of PLD2 gene expression by EWS/Fli-1 and Fli-1 in another EWS cell line, and also in EWS/Fli-1- or Fli-1-transfected cell line. EWS/Fli-1- or Fli-1-overexpressed cells showed higher PLD2 but not PLD1 protein expression and enhanced cell proliferation as compared to mock transfectant. The treatment of these cells with 1-butanol or siRNA of PLD2 inhibited cell growth, suggesting the pivotal role of PLD in cell growth promotion. PLD2 but not PLD1 mRNA level was also increased in EWS/Fli-1 or Fli-1-transfectants. After determining the transcription initiation points, we cloned the 5′ promoter of both PLD1 and PLD2 and analysed promoter activities. Results showed that EWS/Fli-1 and Fli-1 increase PLD2 gene expression by binding to an erythroblast transformation-specific domain (−126 to −120 bp from the transcription initiation site) of PLD2 promoter, which is the minimal and most powerful region. Electrophoresis mobility shift assay using truncated proteins showed that both DNA-binding domain and trans-activating domain were necessary for the enhanced gene expression of PLD2.