Background and Purpose- The impact of a mobile stroke unit (MSU) on access to intraarterial thrombectomy (IAT) is a prespecified BEST-MSU substudy (Benefits of Stroke Treatment Delivered Using a Mobile Stroke Unit Compared to Standard Management by Emergency Medical Services). On the MSU, IAT decision-making steps, such as computed tomography, neurological exam, and tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment are completed before emergency department arrival. We hypothesized that such pre-ED assessment of potential IAT patients on an MSU improves the time from ED arrival to skin puncture time (door-to-puncture-time, DTPT). Methods- BEST-MSU is a prospective comparative effectiveness study of MSU versus standard management by emergency medical services (EMS). We compared ED DTPT among the following groups of MSU and EMS patients: all IAT patients, IAT patients post-tPA, and IAT patients post-tPA meeting thrombolytic adjudication criteria over the first 4 years of the study. Results- From August 2014 to July 2018, a total of 161 patients underwent IAT. Ninety-four patients presented to the ED via the MSU and 67 by EMS. One hundred forty patients received tPA before IAT, 85 in the MSU arm, and 55 in the EMS arm. One hundred twenty-six patients received tPA within thrombolytic adjudication criteria: 76 MSU and 50 EMS. DTPT in minutes was shorter for MSU patients (all IAT MSU versus EMS 89 versus 99, P=0.01; IAT post-tPA MSU versus EMS 93 versus 100, P=0.03; and IAT post-tPA within adjudicated criteria MSU versus EMS 93 versus 99.5, P=0.03). From 2014 to 2018, DTPT decreased at a faster rate for EMS compared with MSU-managed patients, improving by about an hour. Conclusions- Pre-ED IAT evaluation on an MSU results in faster DTPT compared with arrival by EMS. Since 2014, dramatic improvement in ED IAT metrics has attenuated this difference. However, DTPT in all groups indicates substantial room for improvement.

Introduction: The impact of a Mobile stroke unit (MSU) on access to Endovascular Thrombectomy (ET) is a pre-specified BEST-MSU sub-study. On the MSU, ET decision-making steps such as CT, neurologic exam, and tPA treatment are completed prior to Emergency Room (ER) arrival. We hypothesized that such pre-ER assessment of potential ET patients on a MSU improves metrics. Methods: BEST-MSU is a prospective comparative effectiveness study of MSU vs Standard Management by Emergency Medical Services (SM). We compared ER door-to-puncture-time (mins, DTPT) among the following groups of MSU and SM patients: all ET patients (ETP), ET patients post-tPA (ETT), and ET patients post-tPA meeting thrombolytic adjudication criteria (ETTA) over the first four years of the study. Results: There were 161 ETP (67 SM, 94 MSU), 140 ETT (55 SM, 85 MSU), and 126 ETTA (50 SM, 76 MSU) patients. DTPT was shorter for MSU patients (ETP 89 vs 99, p=0.01; ETT 93 vs 100, p=0.03; ETTA 93 vs 99.5, p=0.03). From 2015 to 2018, DTPT decreased at a faster rate for SM compared with MSU-managed patients, improving by about an hour (Figure). Conclusion: Pre-ER ET evaluation on a MSU results in faster DTPT. Since 2015, dramatic improvement in ER ET metrics has attenuated this difference. However, DTPT of 90-100 mins in all groups indicates substantial room for improvement.