Background: Healthcare clinical decision makers' (CDMs) attitudes, beliefs, and biases can negatively contribute to both clinical conversations and subsequent inequitable management decisions in persistent musculoskeletal pain (PMP). Understanding the factors that may contribute to CDMs' decisions is particularly important for vulnerable patient populations. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the current research investigating the impact of CDM's attitudes, beliefs, and biases on the process of care in PMP management in adults. Methods: A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines was run in five databases: CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Sociology Database in ProQuest, and Web of Science. Included studies: vulnerable adult populations with chronic pain. Methodological quality was assessed with the Downs and Black tool. Results: Nine studies were included. Studies examined CDMs' perceptions of case vignettes used in medical schools, allied health professional programs, and in healthcare settings. Implicit biases related to pain severity and favoring medical evidence influenced CDMs' perceptions of case legitimacy. Pharmaceutical management decisions were influenced by race/ethnicity, gender, pain severity, medical evidence, and non-verbal patient behavior. Pain severity influenced non-pharmaceutical management decisions. Conclusion: Implicit biases related to race/ethnicity, gender, supporting medical evidence, and pain severity were demonstrated in educational settings and persisted in clinical settings. Health professional curricula should include training with a focus on outcomes that demonstrate increased awareness of the factors that could lead to inequitable management decisions. Addressing biases during the training of CDMs will be necessary to improve congruency of clinical conversations and minimize marginalization of patient care in PMP.

Objective Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) outcomes are affected by numerous variables, including the clinical conversation. When good therapeutic/working alliances are formed, congruent clinical conversations can lead to improved CMP outcomes. Identifying patient/provider attitudes, beliefs, and biases in CMP that can influence the clinical conversation, and thus clinical management decisions, is foundationally important. Design The aims of this systematic review were to 1) summarize the evidence of the attitudes and beliefs of patients and health care providers (HCPs) involved in the clinical conversation about CMP, and 2) examine whether and how these perceptions impacted the process of care. Methods A systematic search of CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Sociology Database in ProQuest, and Web of Science used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included studies were those investigating vulnerable adult populations with chronic pain. Study bias was examined with the Downs and Black tool. Results Seven retrospective studies were included. When making pharmaceutical management decisions, HCPs demonstrated negative implicit biases toward minorities and women. When making referrals to multidisciplinary care, HCPs demonstrated negative implicit biases toward women with lower educational attainment. Unmet patient expectations resulted in higher dropout rates at multidisciplinary pain management programs. Patients' trust was influenced by the health care setting, and patients often had limited options secondary to health insurance type/status. Conclusion These findings suggest that patients with CMP may experience a marginalized process of care due to HCPs' negative implicit biases, unmet patient expectations, and the health care setting. Results suggest several factors may contribute to inequitable care and the recalcitrant nature of CMP, particularly in vulnerable populations with limited health care choices.