Asparaginase (ASP) is used routinely in frontline clinical trials for the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The goals of this study were to assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ASP and to mathematically model the dynamics between ASP and asparagine (ASN) in relapsed ALL. Forty children were randomized to receive either native or polyethylene glycolated (PEG) Escherichia coli ASP during reinduction therapy. Serial plasma ASP and ASN, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ASN, and serum anti-ASP antibody samples were collected. The ASP clearance was higher (P = 0.001) for native vs. PEG ASP. Patients with antibodies to PEG ASP had faster PEG ASP clearance (P = 0.004) than did antibody-negative patients. patients who were positive for antibodies had higher CSF ASN concentrations than did those who were negative (P = 0.04). The modeling suggests that by modifying dosages, comparable ASN depletion is achievable with both preparations. at relapse, there were significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences attributable to ASP preparation and antibody status.

Polyethylene glycol-conjugated (PEG) asparaginase is approved for use in patients who develop allergy to other forms of asparaginase, although its ability to deplete asparagine systemically in patients with hypersensitivity has not been well elucidated. In 53 children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, we serially assessed asparagine concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma as well as serum anti-asparaginase antibodies. All patients received native Escherichia coli (Elspar) asparaginase during induction therapy; patients received PEG asparaginase during reinductions when available, and those who developed allergy received Erwinia asparaginase. All eight patients who developed clinical evidence of allergy to asparaginase had anti-asparaginase antibodies. Among patients who had no antibodies, those who received E. coli had lower mean (±s.d.) CSF asparagine (0.29±0.63, n =9) than those who received PEG (0.77±0.82, n =4) ( P =0.007). Results were similar for plasma asparagine. There was no situation where asparagine concentrations were more effectively depleted by PEG than by other preparations. None of the five patients who developed thrombosis had an allergy or antibodies to asparaginase at the time of the thrombosis. We conclude that asparagine concentrations were less effectively depleted by PEG than by E. coli asparaginase at the doses commonly used. The risk of thrombosis may be affected by the intensity of asparaginase exposure.

To evaluate how well antibodies to one asparaginase preparation predict or correlate with antibodies to another preparation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma patients who did and did not have hypersensitivity reactions during chemotherapy. In all, 24 children with newly diagnosed ALL or lymphoma, who received Escherichia coli asparaginase 10 000 IU/m 2 IM thrice weekly for nine doses as part of multiagent induction and reinduction chemotherapy, and seven monthly doses during the first 7 months of continuation treatment, were studied. Plasma samples were collected at postinduction and at postreinduction. Six of 24 patients had no overt clinical reactions (nonreacting) and received only the E. coli preparation. Of these, 18 patients who had allergic reactions were switched to Erwinia asparaginase. A total of 18 patients had an anaphylactoid reaction to Erwinia asparaginase and were switched to receive polyethylene glycol (PEG) asparaginase. Antibody levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay against all the three asparaginase preparations. At postinduction, antibodies against E. coli were higher in reacting patients (0.063±0.066) than in nonreacting patients (0.019±0.013) ( P =0.03). At postreinduction, anti- Erwinia antibodies were significantly higher in reacting patients (0.431±0.727) than in nonreacting patients (0.018±0.009) ( P =0.007). Anti- E. coli antibodies correlated with anti-PEG antibodies at postinduction ( r =0.714, P <0.001) and at postreinduction ( r =0.914, P <0.001), but did not correlate with anti- Erwinia antibodies at postinduction ( r =0.119, P =0.580) and at postreinduction (r=0.078, P =0.716). The results indicate a crossreactivity between patient antibodies raised against natural E. coli and PEG asparaginase but not Erwinia asparaginase.

PURPOSE:Development of antibodies and hypersensitivity to asparaginase are common and may attenuate asparaginase effect. Our aim was to determine the relationship between antiasparaginase antibodies or hypersensitivity reactions and event-free survival (EFS).PATIENTS AND METHODS:One hundred fifty-four children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia received Escherichia coli asparaginase 10,000 IU/m(2) intramuscularly three times weekly for nine doses during multiagent induction and reinduction phases and for seven monthly doses during continuation treatment. Erwinia asparaginase was used in case of clinical hypersensitivity to E coli but not for subclinical development of antibodies. Plasma antiasparaginase antibody concentrations were measured on day 29 of induction in 152 patients.RESULTS:Antibodies were detectable in 54 patients (35.5%), of whom 30 (55.6%) exhibited hypersensitivity to asparaginase. Of the 98 patients who had no detectable antibodies, 18 (18.4%) had allergic reactions. Patients with antibodies were more likely to have a reaction than those without antibodies (P <.001). Among the 50 patients who experienced allergic reactions (including two for whom antibodies were not measured), 36 (72.0%) were subsequently given Erwinia asparaginase; seven (19.4%) reacted to this preparation. EFS did not differ among patients who did and did not have antibodies (P =.54), with 4-year EFS (+/- 1 SE) of 83% +/- 6% and 76% +/- 5%, respectively. Similarly, EFS did not differ among patients who did and did not develop allergic reactions (P =.68), with 4-year estimates of 82% +/- 6% and 78% +/- 5%, respectively.CONCLUSION:In this setting, in which most patients with allergy were switched to another preparation, there was no adverse prognostic impact of clinical or subclinical allergy to asparaginase.

The development of antibodies to asparaginase may attenuate the pharmacologic effect of asparaginase treatment, may be associated with hypersensitivity reactions, and may necessitate switching to a different commercial asparaginase preparation for current or future therapy. Thus, development of an ELISA for measurement of anti-asparaginase antibody levels is important in the clinical setting. An anti-asparaginase antibody reference was established by screening 65 plasma samples from six patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who had recently developed a hypersensitivity reaction to Escherichia coli or Erwinia chrysanthemi asparaginase therapy. Twenty-one plasma samples were selected for the anti-asparaginase antibody reference pool. Five micrograms per milliliter of commercial E. coli and Erwinia asparaginase and 10 microg/ml of E. coli asparaginase conjugated with polyethylene glycol (PEG asparaginase) were found to be optimal as coating antigen concentrations. Anti-asparaginase antibody concentrations were determined using a commercial polyclonal goat anti-human IgG horseradish peroxidase conjugate. The antibody reference curves were linear in a range of absorbance from 0.1 to 1. 5 O.D. units for dilutions from 1:1600 to 1:51,200. Inter-assay coefficients of variation were 9.04, 14.7 and 13.0%, and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 1.44, 4.43 and 3.28% for antibodies against E. coli, Erwinia, and PEG L-asparaginase, respectively. The cut-off for positivity in plasma was determined as mean+2 S.D. of the optical density values for plasma from untreated healthy volunteers. Measurement of specific IgG by this ELISA allows for the evaluation of plasma anti-asparaginase antibody concentrations in patients receiving one or more of the multiple commercial L-asparaginase preparations.

PURPOSE:The CNS is an important sanctuary site in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). CSF asparagine concentration reflects asparaginase systemic pharmacodynamics. We evaluated the time course of CSF asparagine depletion in children with ALL during and after a course of Escherichia coli asparaginase.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Thirty-one children (24 newly diagnosed and seven at relapse) received E coli asparaginase 10,000 IU/m2 intramuscularly three times weekly for six and nine doses, respectively, as part of multiagent induction chemotherapy. CSF asparagine levels were measured before, during, and after asparaginase dosing.RESULTS:The percentage of patients with undetectable (< 0.04 micromol/L) CSF asparagine was 3.2% (one of 31 patients) at baseline, 73.9% (17 of 23) during asparaginase therapy, and 56.3% (nine of 16) 1 to 5 days, 43.8% (seven of 16) 6 to 10 days, 20.0% (two of 10) 11 to 30 days and 0% (zero of 21) more than 30 days after asparaginase therapy. The proportion of patients with depleted CSF asparagine was higher during asparaginase therapy than at baseline (P < .001), 11 to 30 days (P = .003), and more than 30 days after asparaginase therapy (P < .001). Median CSF asparagine concentrations were 4.42 micromol/L before, less than 0.04 micromol/L during, and less than 0.04 micromol/L at 1 to 5 days, 1.63 micromol/L at 6 to 10 days, 1.70 micromol/L at 11 to 30 days, and 5.70 micromol/L at more than 30 days after asparaginase therapy, respectively. CSF depletion was more common in patients with low baseline CSF asparagine concentrations (P = .003).CONCLUSION:CSF asparagine concentrations are depleted by conventional doses of E coli asparaginase in the majority of patients, but they rebound once asparaginase therapy is completed.

Asparaginase is an effective antileukemic agent and is included in most front-line protocols for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) worldwide; however, allergic reactions to asparaginase may be dose-limiting. We evaluated plasma anti-asparaginase antibody concentrations in a cohort of children with newly diagnosed ALL, who did and who did not exhibit clinical hypersensitivity, after Escherichia coli (E. coli) asparaginase therapy. Thirty-five children who received asparaginase 10000 IU/m2 i.m. three times weekly for nine doses as part of both multiagent induction and reinduction chemotherapy, and seven monthly doses during the first 7 months of continuation treatment, were studied. Twenty-two patients experienced initial allergic reactions to asparaginase during continuation (n=20) or reinduction (n=2) phases and 13 children did not exhibit any reaction. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure anti-asparaginase antibodies in plasma samples, diluted 1:3200, using E. coli asparaginase as the antigen. The median anti-asparaginase antibody concentration (OD at 1:3200 dilution) increased from 0.039 at induction to 0.506 at reinduction in patients who exhibited clinical hypersensitivity (P = 0.0002). By comparison, median antibody level increased from 0.011 to 0.032 OD at identical time points in patients who did not react to asparaginase (P = 0.02). Both post-induction and post-reinduction anti-asparaginase antibody levels were higher in reacting than in nonreacting patients (P = 0.004 and P = 0.01, respectively). Antibody levels were inversely related to the time elapsed between the reaction and sampling (P = 0.011). Although anti-asparaginase antibody levels increased from the post-induction plasma sample to the post-reinduction sample in 28 of 35 patients regardless of whether they exhibited clinical hypersensitivity, patients with hypersensitivity reactions had higher antibody levels than did identically treated control patients at comparable time points in therapy. Therefore, antibody analysis may be of clinical value in predicting future hypersensitivity.