OBJECTIVE:HSK7653 is a novel, ultralong-acting dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, promising for type 2 diabetes mellitus with a dosing regimen of once every 2 weeks. This trial investigates the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs),and safety of HSK7653 in outpatients with normal or impaired renal function.METHODS:This is a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, parallel-controlled phase I clinical study that investigates the pharmacokinetic profiles of HSK7653 after a single oral administration in 42 subjects with mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 10), severe renal impairment (n = 10), and end-stage renal disease (without dialysis, n = 5) compared with matched control subjects with normal renal function (n = 9). Safety was evaluated throughout the study, and the pharmacodynamic effects were assessed on the basis of a DPP-4 inhibition rate.RESULTS:HSK7653 exposure levels including the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to last time of quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) showed no significant differences related to the severity of renal impairment. Renal clearance (CLR) showed a certain downtrend along with the severity of renal impairment. The CLR of the group with severe renal impairment and the group with end-stage renal disease were basically similar. The DPP-4 inhibition rate-time curve graph was similar among the renal function groups. All groups had favorable safety, and no serious adverse events occurred.CONCLUSIONS:HSK7653 is a potent oral DPP-4 inhibitor with a long plasma half-life, supporting a dosing regimen of once every 2 weeks. Impaired renal function does not appear to impact the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of HSK7653 after a single administration in Chinese subjects. HSK7653 is also well tolerated without an increase in adverse events with increasing renal impairment. These results indicate that dose adjustment of HSK7653 may not be required in patients with renal impairment.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05497297.

BackgroundTesticular germ cell tumor (TGCT) is the most common type of malignancy in young men, but rarely in older adults. We aimed to construct a competing risk model to predict the prognosis for older patients with TGCT.MethodsWe collected TGCT patients aged 50 years or older diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We estimated the cumulative incidences of cause-specific death (CSD) and other causes of death and established a nomogram predicting cause-specific mortality in older patients with TGCT by Fine-Gray competing risk regression. The concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and decision analysis curves (DCA) were used to evaluate the differentiation, accuracy, and clinical significance of the nomogram.ResultsA total of 2,751 older TGCT patients were included in the study. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative incidences were 4.4, 5.0 and 6.1%, respectively, for cause-specific death, and 3.8, 6.2, 13.1%, respectively, for other causes of death. Predictors of cause-specific mortality in older TGCT included age, marital status, annual household income, histology, tumor size, stage and surgery. In the training and validation sets, the C-indexes were greater than 0.8, indicating that the nomogram had good discrimination. The AUC revealed the same result. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted and observed results of the nomogram. DCA curves indicated that the nomogram had more clinical significance than the conventional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging. Based on the total nomogram score of each case, all patients were categorized into low-risk and high-risk groups, and risk categorization allowed the identification of cases with a high risk of death.ConclusionWe established a competing risk nomogram with good performance that may help clinicians accurately predict the prognosis of older TGCT patients.

The rational combination of oral antidiabetic agents is more likely to provide better glycemic control than monotherapy. Metformin glibenclamide tablets can be used as second‐line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who cannot successfully control their blood glucose levels by diet and exercise plus metformin or sulfonylureas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of metformin hydrochloride and glibenclamide tablets (500 mg/5 mg) prepared by 2 different vendors in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. This is an open‐label, single‐center, randomized, 2‐formulation, 2‐period crossover study. After screening, 40 subjects were enrolled in the fasting trial, while 40 subjects were enrolled in the fed trial. Qualified subjects were randomly assigned to receive a monotherapy dose of 500 mg/5 mg of the test or reference formulation, and after a 1‐week washout period, they took the alternative formulation. Blood samples were collected from 24 blood collection sites per cycle for pharmacokinetic analysis until 36 hours after oral administration. In total, 78 subjects completed the study. Under fasting and fed conditions, the geometric mean ratios of maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time 0 to time of last quantifiable drug level , and AUC from time 0 to infinity between the 2 products, as well as the corresponding 90%CIs, were all within the range of 80%–125%. It was found that exposure (AUC from time 0 to infinity) to metformin is decreased by about 25% in the fed state compared to fasting, whereas glibenclamide exposure is increased by about 30% in the fed state. No severe adverse events were observed in the study.

Combined antihypertensive drugs have become the basic method of treating hypertension. Olmesartan and amlodipine, as representative drugs of angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers, were developed as a compound formulation for antihypertensive treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine besylate tablet (20 mg/5 mg) under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers. A phase 1 randomized, open-label, 2-period, single-dose crossover study (n = 56) was designed, with subjects under fasting (n = 28) or fed (n = 28) conditions. Of the 56 enrolled participants, 55 healthy volunteers completed the study. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected from 1.5 hours before dosing to 168 hours after dosing. The 90%CIs for the geometric mean ratios of maximum plasma drug concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable concentration and AUC from time 0 to infinity of the test/reference were all within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (80%-125%). The data showed that the absorption of amlodipine is not affected by food, but the exposure of olmesartan (both AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration and AUC from time 0 to infinity were P < .05) reduced significantly after consuming a high-fat meal, which indicates that the effects of food on olmesartan exposure in healthy Chinese were clinically relevant. During the study, there were no suspected serious adverse reactions or serious adverse events. All adverse events were determined to be mild after Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0 evaluation. These results indicated that both the test and reference formulations were bioequivalent with similar safety profiles.

Background: The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in human and is frequently injured, mainly in the young to middle age active population. Increasing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is still reported in several studies. Surgical repair and conservative treatment are two major management strategies widely adopted in ATR patients, but the consensus of the optimal treatment strategy is still debated. We aimed at thoroughly reviewing the ATR topic with additional assessments and performed a most comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Method: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrial.gov and retrieved all RCTs comparing surgical and conservative treatment on ATR for further analysis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and random effect model was adopted when I2 > 50%, with data presentation of risk ratio, risk difference, or mean difference and 95% confidence interval. Results: A total of 13 RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. A significant difference was observed in re-rupture, complication rate, adhesion to the underlying tendon, sural nerve injury, and superficial infection. A substantial reduction in re-rupture rate could be observed for surgical treatment while the complication rate was higher compared with conservative treatment. Conclusion: Surgical treatment revealed significance in reducing the re-rupture rate but was associated with a higher complication rate, while conservative treatment showed similar outcomes with a lower complication rate. Collectively, we recommend conservative treatment if patients' status and expectations are suitable, but surgeon and physician discretion is also crucial in decision making.