IntroductionIn Europe, half of people living with HIV (PLWH) present late to care, with associated higher morbidity and mortality. This study aims to assess short- and long-term costs of HIV-care based on time of presentation and identify other factors contributing to higher costs in the first and fifth year after antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation.Material and methodsWe included ATHENA cohort data which prospectively includes 98% of PLWH in the Netherlands. PLWH who initiated ART in 2013 were included and followed over five years. PLWH were divided in three categories based on CD4 cell-count at time of ART initiation: timely presentation (CD4>350cells/μL), late presentation (CD4 200-350cells/μL or >350cells/μL with AIDS-defining illness) and very late presentation (CD4<200cells/μL). The total HIV-care cost was calculated distinguishing ART medication and non-ART medication costs (hospitalization, outpatient clinic visits, co-medications, and HIV-laboratory tests).ResultsFrom 1,296 PLWH, 273 (21%) presented late and 179 (14%) very late. Nearly half of those who entered HIV-care in a very late stage were of non-Dutch origin, with 21% originating from sub-Saharan Africa. The mean cost per patient in the first year was €12,902 (SD€11,098), of which about two-thirds due to ART (€8,250 (SD€3,142)). ART costs in the first and fifth year were comparable regardless of time of presentation. During the first year on treatment, non-ART medication costs were substantially higher among those with late presentation (€4,749 (SD€8,009)) and very late presentation (€15,886 (SD€ 21,834)), compared with timely presentation (€2,407(SD€4,511)). Higher non-ART costs were attributable to hospitalization and co-medication. The total non-ART costs incurred across five years on treatment were 56% and 246% higher for late and very late presentation respectively as compared to timely presentation.ConclusionVery late presentation is associated with substantial costs, with non-ART costs nearly seven times higher than for those presenting timely. Hospitalization and co-medication costs are likely to continue to drive higher costs for individuals with late presentation into the future. Programs that identify individuals earlier will therefore likely provide significant short- and long-term health cost savings.

Background Although key populations (KPs), such as men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV, many prevention and treatment services are not easily accessible for KP members. To address the needs of KPs, Thailand established pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) service delivery together with and led by KP members. This study determines the epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of key population-led (KP-led) PrEP.Methods We calibrated a compartmental deterministic HIV transmission model to the HIV epidemic among Thai MSM. Besides KP-led PrEP, we included other Thai service delivery models of PrEP (fee-based PrEP, the government PrEP program).Data on consistent PrEP use (5 years daily use, 95% effectiveness for preventing HIV) came from Thai PrEP delivery models. For the period 2015-2032, we ranged the number of PrEP starters (40,000-120,000), effectiveness of PrEP (45%-95%), and proportion of consistent users (10%-50%). The analysis started in 2015 when PrEP was introduced. A cost-effectiveness ratio of <160,000 Baht per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) over 40 years was cost-effective.Findings Without PrEP, 53,800 (interquartile range 48,700-59,700) new HIV infections are expected in 2015-2032. KP-led PrEP was found to have the strongest epidemiological impact of all delivery models averting 58% of infections compared to without PrEP. The epidemiological impact depends on the number of PrEP starters and proportion of consistent use. Although all PrEP service delivery models are cost-effective, KP-led PrEP is most cost-effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 28,000-37,300 Thai Baht per QALY.Interpretation Our model projects KP-led PrEP having the greatest epidemiological impact and being the most cost-effective service delivery model of PrEP in Thailand.

BackgroundHIV is now considered a chronic condition, and people living with HIV, when treated, have a similar life expectancy as compared to the general population. Consequently, improving and ensuring a good health-related quality of life (HrQoL) among people living with HIV (people living with HIV) is increasingly important and has risen on the global agenda in recent years. A ‘fourth 90’ as 90% of people with viral load suppression have a good HrQoL should therefore be adopted alongside the other 90-90-90 targets. This study aims to report the progress on HrQoL as the ‘fourth 90’ and compare against the general population in the Netherlands and England.MethodsIn the Netherlands, individuals attending the HIV outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L from June 2016 until December 2018. In England, individuals attending one of 73 HIV outpatient clinics were randomly sampled to complete the Positive Voices survey, which included the EQ-5D-5L, from January to September 2017. HrQoL scores were combined with demographic data and compared to general population data.FindingsThe EQ-5D-5L was filled-out by 895 people living with HIV in the NL and 4,137 in England. HrQoLutility was 0·85 among Dutch and 0·83 among English people living with HIV. This equated to 98% and 94% of the general population HrQoLutility in the Netherlands and England, respectively. Of the EQ-5D domains, anxiety/depression was mostly affected, with one-third in Dutch (35%) and almost half (47%) of English people living with HIV reporting symptoms. This was higher compared to their respective general populations (21% NL and 31% England).InterpretationOverall, HrQoLutility for people living with HIV was high in both countries and highly comparable to the general populations Nevertheless, there should be an increased focus on anxiety and depression in the people living with HIV population The EQ-5D-5L proved an easy HrQoL measurement tool and identified areas for improvement by social and behavioural interventions.FundingThe study received funding (unrestricted grants) from: Gilead sciences, ViiV Healthcare, MSD, and Jansen pharmaceuticals.

Introduction: Nowadays, HIV is a chronic condition with a similar life expectancy as the general population. Consequently, improving and ensuring a good health-related quality of life (HrQoL) among people living with HIV (PLWH) is increasingly important and has risen on the global agenda in recent years. A ‘fourth 90’ as 90% of people with viral load suppression have a good HrQoL should therefore be adopted alongside the other 90-90-90 targets. This study aims to report the progress on HrQoL as the ‘fourth 90’ and compare against the general population in the Netherlands and England. Methods: In the Netherlands, individuals attending the HIV outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L from June 2016 until December 2018. In England, individuals attending one of 73 HIV outpatient clinics were randomly sampled to complete the Positive Voices survey, which included the EQ-5D-5L, from January to September 2017. HrQoL scores were combined with demographic data and compared to general population data. Findings: The EQ-5D-5L was filled-out by 895 PLWH in the NL and 4,137 in England. HrQoLutility was 0.85 among Dutch and 0.83 among English PLWH. This equated to 98% and 94% of the general population HrQoLutility in the Netherlands and England, respectively. Of the EQ-5D domains, anxiety/depression was mostly affected, with one-third in Dutch (35%) and almost half (47%) of English PLWH reporting symptoms. This was significantly higher compared to their respective general populations (21% NL and 31% England). Interpretation: Overall, HrQoLutility for PLWH was high in both countries and highly comparable to the general populations Nevertheless, focus on anxiety and depression should be increased. The EQ-5D-5L proved an easy HrQoL measurement tool and identified areas for improvement by social and behavioural interventions. Funding Statement: The study received funding (unrestricted grants) from: Gilead sciences, ViiV Healthcare, MSD and MSD, Janssen pharmaceuticals. Declaration of Interests: SP reports an unrestricted educational grant from Gilead Sciences; DvdV reports unrestricted research grant from Gilead Sciences, MSD, ViiV and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; CAB reports personal fees from speaker honoraria from ViiV outside the submitted work; AvS reports grants from Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, during the conduct of the study; grants from European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, outside the submitted work. MV: Dr. Versteegh reports grants from ZonMW, grants from EuroQoL Research Foundation, during the conduct of the study; grants from EuroQoL Research Foundation, outside the submitted work; MK, ES, BN, LV, VD, AV have nothing to disclose. Ethics Approval Statement: The Netherlands study was reviewed and approved by the local Medical Ethics Committee (MEC-2016-264). Additionally, all participants were asked to sign an informed consent form and all data were anonymized. The England study was reviewed and approved by the London – Harrow Research Ethics Committee (13/LO/0279).