Abstract Background Achilles tendon ruptures are the most common lower extremity tendinous rupture. While there has been extensive research into the management of mid-substance Achilles tendon ruptures, there is a paucity of literature on the management of myotendinous Achilles tendon ruptures. Methods The aim of this systematic review is to compile all available literature on the treatment of myotendinous Achilles tendon tears. A systematic search of Web of Science, Embase, and Medline databases was performed for all studies published from database inception to April 13, 2024. All publications addressing the treatment of myotendinous Achilles ruptures of all levels of evidence were included. The PRISMA Checklist guided the reporting and data abstraction. Descriptive statistics are presented. Results A total of five studies with 70 patients were included for analysis. Sixty-seven patients underwent non-operative management with an average age ranging from 40.8 to 51.0 years. Three patients underwent operative management with ages of 16, 36, and 39. The majority of patients tore their Achilles tendon during sports. For nonoperatively treated patients, one group underwent immobilization for a total of 6 weeks and one study treated patients with functional rehabilitation. All patients were able to perform a single heel-raise, had good reported strength, and returned to work or sport. Nonoperative patients reported statistically significant improvements in subjective outcomes and high rates of satisfaction. Conclusion Both nonoperative and operative management of myotendinous Achilles tendon ruptures demonstrated good outcomes after injury, although there is a limited amount of literature on this topic. Given that nonoperative treatment appears to yield good strength and return to activity, it may be preferred for the majority of patients. Operative management may be indicated in high level athletes. Imaging to determine the exact location of injury, quality of remaining tendon, and gap distance may further aid when considering treatment options. Higher level evidence studies are required to determine the optimal treatment of myotendinous Achilles tendon ruptures. Level of evidence IV; Systematic review of Level IV-V studies.

Background: Approximately 6% of people will report Achilles tendon pain during their lifetime, and one-third of these individuals will have Achilles insertional tendinopathy (AIT). For patients who have failed conservative treatment, surgical repair is performed. Achilles tendon repair can occur through various techniques, including a single-row or double-row repair. Purpose: To determine if there are significant advantages to double-row repair over single-row repair with respect to biomechanical and clinical outcomes. Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. An electronic search of the EMBASE and PubMed databases was performed for all studies related to surgical treatment of AIT, which yielded 1431 unique results. These included both biomechanical and clinical studies. Clinical studies in which patients were not diagnosed with AIT, underwent surgery for repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture, or studies that included additional procedures such as a concomitant flexor hallucis longus transfer were excluded. Eligible studies were independently screened by 2 reviewers. A risk-of-bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions and risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials tools. Results: A total of 23 studies were included, 4 of which were biomechanical studies and 19 were clinical studies. Biomechanical comparison found that there was a significant advantage to using double-row versus single-row fixation with respect to load at yield (354.7 N vs 198.7 N; P = .01) and mean peak load (433.9 N vs 212 N; P = .042). There was no significant difference between double-row and single-row repair with respect to load to failure. Significant heterogeneity of the studies did not allow for a statistical comparison of the clinical outcomes between double-row and single-row repairs. Conclusion: Although biomechanical studies favor double-row repair for AIT, the current data available on the clinical outcomes are not sufficient to determine if there is a clinical advantage of double-row repair. Larger, prospective randomized controlled trials utilizing validated outcome measures are needed to further elucidate whether the biomechanical advantages associated with double-row repair also translate into improved patient-reported outcomes.

Abstract Background One procedure that has gained popularity in the surgical management of hallux valgus is the minimally invasive Chevron and Akin osteotomy (MICA). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the learning curve associated with this technically demanding procedure. Methods A search of the EMBASE and PubMed databases was performed to identify all clinical studies that assessed the learning curve associated with the MICA procedure. Studies where patients were not diagnosed with hallux valgus, did not undergo MICA, or did not report data on operation time, fluoroscopy exposure, or complications were excluded. A risk of bias assessment was conducted to assess the validity of the studies. Results The initial literature search yielded 287 studies, and seven studies were included in the final analysis. A quantitative comparative analysis could not be performed as the included studies used different statistical methods to quantify the learning curve. Lewis et al. determined that after 38 operations, there was a decrease in operation time and fluoroscopy exposure (p < .001). Merc et al. found that it took 29 and 30 operations to reach a plateau for operation time and fluoroscopy exposure, respectively (p < .001). Palmanovich et al. found that it took 20 and 26 operations to reach a plateau for operation time and fluoroscopy exposure, respectively (p < .001). Toepfer and Strässle found there was a significant decrease in operation time and fluoroscopy exposure after the first 19 procedures in their series (p < .001). With respect to complications, one study found a significant difference after the 42nd operation (p = .007). However, the remaining studies found that complication rates did not significantly change with increased technical proficiency. All seven studies were deemed to have a moderate risk of bias. Conclusions Surgeons can expect a learning curve of 20 to 40 operations before reaching technical proficiency with the MICA procedure. After the learning curve is achieved, surgeons can expect to see a significant decrease in both operation times and fluoroscopy exposure. No consistent significant difference was found in complications as one becomes more technically proficient with the procedure.

Background Oral iron supplementation is one of the mainstays of treatment for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) but can be complicated by poor absorption. Vitamin C is hypothesized to increase the acidity of the GI tract and enhance the conversion of non-absorbable ferric iron (Fe 3+) to its absorbable ferrous (Fe 2+) state for improved absorption and is often prescribed with iron. However, whether vitamin C supplementation translates to clinically relevant differences, such as sufficient improvements in hemoglobin, remains unclear and a synthesis of available evidence is lacking. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare oral iron with or without vitamin C supplementation in patients with IDA. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) that investigated the use of oral iron supplements with vitamin C compared to oral iron supplements only in patients with IDA. Title & abstract, full text review and data extraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. The primary outcome was the change in serum hemoglobin levels in g/dL. Secondary outcomes include change in serum ferritin, change in transferrin saturation, change in reticulocyte percentage, and incidence of adverse events including constipation, nausea/vomiting, GI upset and poor taste. The Mantel-Haenszel fixed effects model was utilized for the meta-analysis. The calculated effect sizes were represented by odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) for binary endpoints and continuous endpoints, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results 2231 studies were retrieved from electronic databases. 12 RCTs and one prospective cohort study comprising 2240 patients were included. There was a small but statistically significant increase in serum hemoglobin level (MD 0.14 g/dL [95%CI 0.08, 0.20]) and serum ferritin levels (MD 3.23 µg/L [95%CI 1.63, 4.84]) in the iron + vitamin C group compared to the iron only group. There was a greater reduction in serum transferrin saturation associated with vitamin C supplementation (MD -2.01% [95%CI -3.31, -0.71%]) but the pool of evidence consists of only two studies. Reticulocyte percentage (MD 0.22% [95%CI 0.08, 0.36]) was higher in the iron + vitamin C group than in the iron only group. There were no significant differences between the iron + vitamin C group and the iron only group in overall incidence of adverse effects (OR 0.71 [95%CI 0.50, 1.00]), constipation (odds ratio (OR) 0.83 [95%CI 0.35, 1.96]), or nausea/vomiting (OR 0.80 [95%CI 0.52, 1.24]). The risk of GI upset is lower in the iron + vitamin C group (OR 0.40 [95%CI 0.18, 0.92]). Nevertheless, only three primary studies reported on incidence of adverse events. Conclusion The addition of vitamin C to iron supplementation in the management of IDA was associated with a statistically significant, but likely clinically unimportant, increase in serum hemoglobin of 0.14 g/dL. Similarly, a statistically significant increase in serum ferritin levels by 3.23 µg/L was observed, but its clinical relevance remains uncertain. A strength of the present analysis is the number of RCTs included; however, its conclusions are limited by the heterogeneity of interventions (e.g. different formulations/dosage) across studies. Our results do not provide strong evidence for adding vitamin C to iron supplementation.

# 01. Near-peer tutoring: an effective adjunct for virtual anatomy learning {#article-title-2} The start of the COVID-19 pandemic caused a shift in medical education from the classroom to the virtual setting. This abrupt change led to an increase in stress among students. In response, McGill