Background: Previous studies have often reported a link between advanced age and inadequate cancer pain management. Given Italy’s demographic profile as the country with the oldest population in Europe, it offers an ideal setting to explore whether this association remains valid today. Aim: This study aimed primarily to assess the influence of advanced age on the adequacy of pain management among patients receiving treatment in Italian radiotherapy (RT) departments, and secondarily, to identify age-specific determinants of analgesic undertreatment. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study, we enrolled 2104 consecutive patients attending 13 RT centers between October and November 2019. Pain intensity was evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS), and patients reporting scores ≥ 1 (n = 1353) were included in the analysis. Pain management adequacy was assessed using the Pain Management Index (PMI), with negative values indicating undertreatment. A two-step statistical approach was employed: variable selection via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression, followed by Classification and Regression Tree analysis to identify key predictors. Separate analyses were performed for the overall population, older adults (≥65 years), and younger adults (18–64 years). Results: Overall, 42% of patients were undertreated (PMI < 0), without significant differences between older (41.0%) and younger patients (43.1%). However, factors contributing to undertreatment varied according to age. For the entire cohort, non-cancer pain was associated with substantially higher rates of undertreatment (74.3%) compared to cancer-related pain (34.2%). Among cancer patients, those receiving curative RT had poorer pain control (49.4%) than those receiving palliative RT (28.8%). In older patients, geographic location strongly influenced pain management, with higher rates of undertreatment in central and southern Italy compared to the north (e.g., palliative RT: 64.0% vs. 15.4%, respectively). Conversely, younger patients showed no geographical differences; instead, timing of assessment (beginning vs. end of RT) influenced outcomes, with improved PMI values towards the end of treatment. Conclusions: Unlike previous studies, advanced age itself was not associated with inadequate analgesia. However, the determinants of inadequate pain management differed significantly by age: geographic disparities were predominant among older patients, while assessment timing influenced outcomes for younger patients. Further longitudinal research and targeted interventions are needed to address these age-dependent challenges.

Local recurrence of rectal cancer (LRRC) previously treated with radiotherapy is associated with a poor prognosis. Historically, the integration of radiotherapy (RT) with surgery has improved the likelihood of complete resections (R0) and, consequently, enhanced survival. Unfortunately, many LRRC cases are not amenable to surgical intervention. The inclusion of chemotherapy (CHT) alongside advanced RT techniques including proton and carbon ion RT (CIRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), has generated new treatment options. Therefore, there is a need for improved stratification of LRRC patients to enhance treatment outcomes. The RETRY is an integrated trial with the primary aim to explore if combining CHT with RT in all available modalities can enhance local control (LC) in LRRC patients, consequently improving survival. Experts from Italian centers specializing in rectal cancer and LRRC management collaborated to design a prospective multicenter observational study within the AIRO group for gastrointestinal malignancies. Eligible participants are adult LRRC patients who previously had pelvic RT, meet specific criteria, and are affiliated with the participating Italian centers. Specific criteria must be met for CIRT referral. A total of 88 patients will be enrolled over three years. The primary objective is to determine the 3-year LC rate. Secondary outcomes include assessing survival, quality of life, and R0 resection rates in surgery cases. A minimum dose of 40 Gy, conventional fractionation with concomitant fluoropyrimidine—with/without oxaliplatin-based CHT (CRT) is prescribed in neoadjuvant setting. Alternatively, the dose will vary from 35 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions based on clinical judgment, by SBRT. Both proton and photon therapies will be evaluated in these approaches. Surgery will be considered if deemed operable. In inoperable cases, CIRT with a dose of 40–60 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) will be administered with a daily dose fraction ranging between 3 and 4.8 Gy RBE. The RETRY trial aims to investigate the combined effects of RT and CHT and when feasible the addition of surgery, to determine whether this comprehensive approach can result in improved survival and quality of life for LRRC patients. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT05984576).

PURPOSE:MITO-RT3/RAD (NCT04593381) is a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients who received diagnoses of oligometastatic ovarian cancer. In this report, we provide the results of the trial in the setting of lymph node disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS:The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate, secondary endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, treatment-free interval, and toxicity rates. The sample size was based on a previous study reporting an average 70.0% CR with SBRT. The study was powered to detect an improvement in the CR rate from 70.0% to 85.0%, with an α error of 0.05 (one-side) and a β error of 0.1. RESULTS:The study met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant improvement in CR. One hundred thirty-five patients with 249 lesions were enrolled across 15 institutions from May 2019 to November 2023. CRs were observed in 194 lesions (77.9%), partial responses in 40 (16.1%), stable disease in 14 (5.6%), and progressive disease in 1 lesion (0.4%). The objective response rate was 94%, with an overall clinical benefit rate of 99.6%. CR lesions exhibited a significantly higher LC rate than partial or not responding lesions (12-month LC: 92.7% vs 63.1%, P < .001). The 12-month actuarial rates for PFS and for overall survival were 36.6% (CR, 38.3% vs not-CR, 18.8%; P, .022) and 97.2% (CR, 97.8% vs not-CR, 93.8%; P, .067), respectively. The 12-month actuarial rate for treatment-free interval was 52.7% (CR, 58.4% vs not-CR, 24.4%; P, .004). CR was substantially associated with higher PFS (P, .036) and treatment-free interval (P, .006) rates in the univariate analysis. Twenty-three patients (17.0%) experienced mild acute toxicity. Late toxicity was reported in 9 patients (6.7%), mostly grade 1. CONCLUSIONS:This trial confirms the efficacy of ablative SBRT, with minimal toxicity observed. SBRT offered a high CR rate, promising long-term outcomes, and a significant systemic therapy-free survival period for complete responders.

Background: The primary objective of this study was to assess the adequacy of analgesic care in radiotherapy (RT) patients, with a secondary objective to identify predictive variables associated with pain management adequacy using a modern statistical approach, integrating the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithm and the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. Methods: This observational, multicenter cohort study involved 1387 patients reporting pain or taking analgesic drugs from 13 RT departments in Italy. The Pain Management Index (PMI) served as the measure for pain control adequacy, with a PMI score < 0 indicating suboptimal management. Patient demographics, clinical status, and treatment-related factors were examined to discern the predictors of pain management adequacy. Results: Among the analyzed cohort, 46.1% reported inadequately managed pain. Non-cancer pain origin, breast cancer diagnosis, higher ECOG Performance Status scores, younger patient age, early assessment phase, and curative treatment intent emerged as significant determinants of negative PMI from the LASSO analysis. Notably, pain management was observed to improve as RT progressed, with a greater discrepancy between cancer (33.2% with PMI < 0) and non-cancer pain (73.1% with PMI < 0). Breast cancer patients under 70 years of age with non-cancer pain had the highest rate of negative PMI at 86.5%, highlighting a potential deficiency in managing benign pain in younger patients. Conclusions: The study underscores the dynamic nature of pain management during RT, suggesting improvements over the treatment course yet revealing specific challenges in non-cancer pain management, particularly among younger breast cancer patients. The use of advanced statistical techniques for analysis stresses the importance of a multifaceted approach to pain management, one that incorporates both cancer and non-cancer pain considerations to ensure a holistic and improved quality of oncological care.

Background: Despite the feasibility and promising activity data on intensity-modulated RT and simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) dose escalation in preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), few data are currently available on long-term outcomes. Patients and Methods: A cohort of 288 LARC patients with cT3-T4, cN0-2, cM0 treated with IMRT-SIB and capecitabine from March 2013 to December 2019, followed by a total mesorectal excision (TME) or an organ-preserving strategy, was collected from a prospective database of 10 Italian institutions. A dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions was prescribed to the tumor and elective nodes, while the SIB dose was prescribed according to the clinical practice of each institution on the gross tumor volume (GTV). Concurrent capecitabine was administered at a dose of 825 mg/m2 twice daily, 7 days a week. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate long-term outcomes in terms of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary objective was to confirm the previously reported feasibility, safety and efficacy (pCR, TRG1-2 and downstaging rates) of the treatment in a larger patient population. Results: All patients received a dose of 45 Gy to the tumor and elective nodes, while the SIB dose ranged from 52.5 Gy to 57.5 Gy (median 55 Gy). Acute gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity rates of grade 3–4 were 5.7% and 1.8%, respectively. At preoperative restaging, 36 patients (12.5%) with complete or major clinical responses (cCR or mCR) were offered an organ-preserving approach with local excision (29 patients) or a watch and wait strategy (7 patients). The complete pathologic response rate (pCR) in radically operated patients was 25.8%. In addition, 4 TME patients had pT0N1 and 19 LE patients had pT0Nx, corresponding to an overall pT0 rate of 31.3%. Of the 36 patients selected for organ preservation, 7 (19.5%) required the completion of TME due to unfavorable pathologic features after LE or tumor regrowth during W-W resulting in long-term rectal preservation in 29 of 288 (10.1%) of the total patient population. Major postoperative complications occurred in 14.2% of all operated patients. At a median follow-up of 50 months, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 72.3% (95% CI: 66.3–77.4) and 85.9% (95% CI: 80.2–90.1), respectively. The 5-year local recurrence (LR) rate was 9.2% (95% CI: 6.0–13.2), while the distant metastasis (DM) rate was 21.3% (95% CI: 16.5–26.5). The DM rate was 24.5% in the high-risk subset compared to 16.2% in the low-intermediate risk group (p = 0.062) with similar LR rates (10% and 8%, respectively). On multivariable analysis, cT4 and TRG3–5 were significantly associated with worse PFS, OS and metastasis-free survival. Conclusions: Preoperative IMRT-SIB with the moderate dose intensification of 52.5–57.5 Gy (median 55 Gy) and the full dose of concurrent capecitabine confirmed to be feasible and effective in our real-life clinical practice. Organ preservation was shown to be feasible in carefully selected, responsive patients. The favorable long-term survival rates highlight the efficacy of this intensified treatment program. The incorporation of IMRT-SIB with a more effective systemic therapy component in high-risk patients could represent a new area of investigational interest.

BackgroundPatients (pts) affected with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) may respond differently to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The identification of reliable biomarkers able to predict oncological outcomes could help in the development of risk-adapted treatment strategies. It has been suggested that inflammation parameters may have a role in predicting tumor response to nCRT and survival outcomes and in rectal cancer, but no definitive conclusion can be drawn at present. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the role of baseline inflammatory markers as prognostic and predictive factors in a large multicentric Italian cohort of LARC pts.MethodsPatients diagnosed with LARC from January 2002 to December 2019 in 9 Italian centers were retrospectively collected. Patients underwent long-course RT with chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidine ± oxaliplatin followed by surgery. Inflammatory markers were retrieved based on a pre-treatment blood sample including HEI (hemo-eosinophils inflammation index), SII (systemic index of inflammation), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), PLR (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) and MLR (monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio). Outcomes of interest were pathological complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).Results808 pts were analyzed. pCR rate was 22 %, 5yOS and 5yDFS were 84.0% and 63.1% respectively. Multivariate analysis identified that a NLR cut-off value >1.2 and SII cut-off value >500 could predict pCR (p = 0.05 and 0.009 respectively). In addition to age, extramesorectal nodes and RT dose, MLR >0.18 (p = 0.03) and HEI = 3 (p = 0.05) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. Finally, age, RT dose, MLR with a cut-off >0.35 (p = 0.028) and HEI = 3 (p = 0.045) were independent predictors of OS.ConclusionsHigher values of baseline composite inflammatory markers can serve as predictors of lower pCR rates and worse survival outcomes in LARC patients undergoing nCRT. More reliable data from prospective studies could lead to the integration of these inexpensive and easy-to-derive tools into clinical practice.

Purpose Radical resection (R0) represents the best curative treatment for local recurrence (LR) rectal cancer. Re-irradiation (re-RT) can increase the rate of R0 resection. Currently, there is a lack of guidelines on Re-RT for LR rectal cancer. The Italian Association of Radiation and clinical oncology for gastrointestinal tumors (AIRO-GI) study group released a national survey to investigate the current clinical practice of external beam radiation therapy in these patients. Material and methods In February 2021, the survey was designed and distributed to members of the GI working group. The questionnaire consisted of 40 questions regarding center characteristics, clinical indications, doses, and treatment techniques of re-RT for LR rectal cancer. Results A total of 37 questionnaires were collected. Re-RT was reported as an option for neoadjuvant treatment in resectable and unresectable disease by 55% and 75% of respondents, respectively. Long-course treatment with 30–40 Gy (1.8–2 Gy/die, 1.2 Gy bid) and hypofractionated regimen of 30–35 Gy in 5 fractions were used in most centers. A total dose of 90–100 Gy as EqD2 dose ( α / β = 5 Gy) was delivered by 46% of the respondents considering the previous treatment. Modern conformal techniques and daily image-guided radiation therapy protocols were used in 94% of centers. Conclusion Our survey showed that re-RT treatment is performed with advanced technology that allow a good management of LR rectal cancer. Significant variations were observed in terms of dose and fractionation, highlighting the need for a consensus on a common treatment strategy that could be validated in prospective studies.

Aims: Anal canal adenocarcinoma is a rare neoplasm and there is currently no consensus on optimal management. Indeed, some clinical studies support trimodal therapy

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in the treatment of patients with previously irradiated locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Over the years, numerous technologies and different types of RT have emerged. The aim of our systematic literature review was to determine whether the new techniques have led to improvements in both outcomes and toxicities. Methods: A computerized search was performed by MEDLINE and the Cochrane database. The studies reported data from patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT), and stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT). Results: Seven publications of the 126 titles/abstracts that emerged from our search met the inclusion criteria and presented outcomes of 230 patients. OS was reported with rates of 90.0% and 73.0% at 1 and 2 years, respectively; LC was 89.0% and 71.6% at 1 and 2 years after re-RT, respectively. Toxicity data vary widely, with emphasis on acute and chronic gastrointestinal and urogenital toxicity, even with modern techniques. Conclusion: data on toxicity and outcomes of re-RT for LRRC with new technologies are promising compared with 3D techniques. Comparative studies are needed to define the best technique, also in relation to the site of recurrence.

Purpose: To provide straightforward instructions for daily practice in delineating emerging organs-at-risk (OARs) of the female pelvis and to discuss the interobserver variability in a two-step multicenter study. Methods and materials: A contouring atlas with anatomical boundaries for each emerging OAR was realized by radiation oncologists and radiologists who are experts in pelvic imaging, as per their knowledge and clinical practice. These contours were identified as quality benchmarks for the analysis subsequently carried out. Radiation oncologists not involved in setting the custom-built contouring atlas and interested in the treatment of gynecological cancer were invited to participate in this 2-step trial. In the first step all participants were supplied with a selected clinical case of locally advanced cervical cancer and had to identify emerging OARs (Levator ani muscle; Puborectalis muscle; Internal anal sphincter; External anal sphincter; Bladder base and trigone; Bladder neck; Iliac Bone Marrow; Lower Pelvis Bone Marrow; Lumbosacral Bone Marrow) based on their own personal knowledge of pelvic anatomy and experience. The suggested OARs and the contouring process were then presented at a subsequent webinar meeting with a contouring laboratory. Finally, in the second step, after the webinar meeting, each participant who had joined the study but was not involved in setting the benchmark received the custom-built contouring atlas with anatomical boundaries and was requested to delineate again the OARs using the tool provided. The Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC) were used to evaluate the spatial overlap accuracy of the different volume delineations and compared with the benchmark; the Hausdorff distance (HD) and the mean distance to agreement (MDA) to explore the distance between contours. All the results were reported as sample mean and standard deviation (SD). Results: Fifteen radiation oncologists from different Institutions joined the study. The participants had a high agreement degree for pelvic bones sub-structures delineation according to DICE (IBM: 0.9 ± 0.02; LPBM: 0.91 ± 0.01). A moderate degree according to DICE was showed for ovaries (Right: 0.61 ± 0.16, Left: 0.72 ± 0.05), vagina (0.575 ± 0.13), bladder sub-structures (0.515 ± 0.08) and EAS (0.605 ± 0.05), whereas a low degree for the other sub-structures of the anal-rectal sphincter complex (LAM: 0.345 ± 0.07, PRM: 0.41 ± 0.10, and IAS: 0.4 ± 0.07). Conclusion: This study found a moderate to low level of agreement in the delineation of the female pelvis emerging OARs, with a high degree of variability among observers. The development of delineation tools should be encouraged to improve the routine contouring of these OARs and increase the quality and consistency of radiotherapy planning.