BACKGROUND:Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical threat to public health and disproportionately affects the health and well-being of persons in low-income and middle-income countries. Our aim was to identify synthetic antimicrobials termed conjugated oligoelectrolytes (COEs) that effectively treated AMR infections and whose structures could be readily modified to address current and anticipated patient needs. METHODS:Fifteen chemical variants were synthesized that contain specific alterations to the COE modular structure, and each variant was evaluated for broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and for in vitro cytotoxicity in cultured mammalian cells. Antibiotic efficacy was analyzed in murine models of sepsis; in vivo toxicity was evaluated via a blinded study of mouse clinical signs as an outcome of drug treatment. FINDINGS:We identified a compound, COE2-2hexyl, that displayed broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. This compound cured mice infected with clinical bacterial isolates derived from patients with refractory bacteremia and did not evoke bacterial resistance. COE2-2hexyl has specific effects on multiple membrane-associated functions (e.g., septation, motility, ATP synthesis, respiration, membrane permeability to small molecules) that may act together to negate bacterial cell viability and the evolution of drug-resistance. Disruption of these bacterial properties may occur through alteration of critical protein-protein or protein-lipid membrane interfaces-a mechanism of action distinct from many membrane disrupting antimicrobials or detergents that destabilize membranes to induce bacterial cell lysis. INTERPRETATION:The ease of molecular design, synthesis and modular nature of COEs offer many advantages over conventional antimicrobials, making synthesis simple, scalable and affordable. These COE features enable the construction of a spectrum of compounds with the potential for development as a new versatile therapy for an imminent global health crisis. FUNDING:U.S. Army Research Office, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the standard measurement of antibiotic activity. Here, we present a protocol for evaluating MIC values of clinically relevant antibiotics against bacterial isolates cultured in standard bacteriologic medium and in mammalian cell culture medium. We describe steps for pathogen identification, culturing bacteria, preparing MIC plates, MIC assay incubation, and determining MIC. This protocol can potentially optimize the use of existing antibiotics while enhancing efforts to discover new ones. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Heithoff et al.1

Accurate assessment of antibiotic susceptibility is critical for treatment of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) infections. Here, we examine whether antimicrobial susceptibility testing in media more physiologically representative of in vivo conditions improves prediction of clinical outcome relative to standard bacteriologic medium. This analysis reveals that ∼15% of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained in physiologic media predicted a change in susceptibility that crossed a clinical breakpoint used to categorize patient isolates as susceptible or resistant. The activities of antibiotics having discrepant results in different media were evaluated in murine sepsis models. Testing in cell culture medium improves the accuracy by which MIC assays predict in vivo efficacy. This analysis identifies several antibiotics for treatment of AMR infections that standard testing failed to identify and those that are ineffective despite indicated use by standard testing. Methods with increased diagnostic accuracy mitigate the AMR crisis via utilizing existing agents and optimizing drug discovery.

IMPORTANCE A critical need exists in low-income and middle-income countries for low-cost, low-tech, yet highly reliable and scalable testing for SARS-CoV-2 virus that is robust against circulating variants. OBJECTIVE To assess whether a smartphone-based assay is suitable for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus testing without requiring specialized equipment, accessory devices, or custom reagents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study enrolled 2 subgroups of participants (symptomatic and asymptomatic) at Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital. The symptomatic group consisted of 20 recruited patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with symptoms; 30 asymptomatic patients were recruited from the same community, through negative admission screening tests for SARS-CoV-2. The smartphone-based real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification (smaRT-LAMP) was first optimized for analysis of human saliva samples spiked with either SARS-CoV-2 or influenza A or B virus; these results then were compared with those obtained by side-by-side analysis of spiked samples using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criterion-standard reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay. Next, both assays were used to test for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses present in blinded clinical saliva samples obtained from 50 hospitalized patients. Statistical analysis was performed from May to June 2021. EXPOSURES Testing for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A and B viruses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES SARS-CoV-2 and influenza infection status and quantitative viral load were determined. RESULTS Among the 50 eligible participants with no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection included in the study, 29 were men. The mean age was 57 years (range, 21 to 93 years). SmaRT-LAMP exhibited 100% concordance (50 of 50 patient samples) with the CDC criterion-standard diagnostic for SARS-CoV-2 sensitivity (20 of 20 positive and 30 of 30 negative) and for quantitative detection of viral load. This platform also met the CDC criterion standard for detection of clinically similar influenza A and B viruses in spiked saliva samples (n = 20), and in saliva samples from hospitalized patients (50 of 50 negative). The smartphone-based LAMP assay was rapid (25 minutes), sensitive (1000 copies/mL), low-cost (<$7/test), and scalable (96 samples/phone). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of saliva samples from patients, the smartphone-based LAMP assay detected SARS-CoV-2 infection and exhibited concordance with RT-qPCR tests. These findings suggest that this tool could be adapted in response to novel CoV-2 variants and other pathogens with pandemic potential including influenza and may be useful in settings with limited resources.

Background: There is an urgent need for rapid, sensitive, and affordable diagnostics for microbial infections at the point-of-care. Although a number of innovative systems have been reported that transform mobile phones into potential diagnostic tools, the translational challenge to clinical diagnostics remains a significant hurdle to overcome. Methods: A smartphone-based real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification (smaRT-LAMP) system was developed for pathogen ID in urinary sepsis patients. The free, custom-built mobile phone app allows the phone to serve as a stand-alone device for quantitative diagnostics, allowing the determination of genome copy-number of bacterial pathogens in real time. Findings: A head-to-head comparative bacterial analysis of urine from sepsis patients revealed that the performance of smaRT-LAMP matched that of clinical diagnostics at the admitting hospital in a fraction of the time (similar to 1 h vs. 18-28 h). Among patients with bacteremic complications of their urinary sepsis, pathogen ID from the urine matched that from the blood - potentially allowing pathogen diagnosis shortly after hospital admission. Additionally, smaRT-LAMP did not exhibit false positives in sepsis patients with clinically negative urine cultures. Interpretation: The smaRT-LAMP system is effective against diverse Gram-negative and -positive pathogens and biological specimens, costs less than $100 US to fabricate (in addition to the smartphone), and is configurable for the simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens. SmaRT-LAMP thus offers the potential to deliver rapid diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections and urinary sepsis with a simple test that can be performed at low cost at the point-of-care. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Epigenetic programming of the pathogen and the host can have a marked influence on the development and progression of acute and chronic disease. Bacterial pathogenesis may be viewed as a developmental program similar to that of cell differentiation and development in eukaryotes. Bacterial epigenetic programming is imparted by DNA methylation, whereby the virulence traits expressed by a pathogen may depend on the cumulative interactions between the microbe and its environment. Such bacterial "memory" provides a means for adaptation to the varied subsequent microenvironments encountered during the infective process. DNA methylation can affect DNA-protein interactions and resultant gene expression by altering DNA thermodynamic stability and curvature and by methyl-group-mediated steric hindrance. Some of these epigenetic interactions can form heritable DNA methylation patterns in the microbial genome that control gene expression in their progeny cells. Microbes can also stimulate heritable changes in the host epigenome via infection-associated alterations to host epigenetic determinants including DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin-associated complexes, and noncoding RNA-mediated silencing. The resultant changes in host chromatin remodeling and gene expression may be localized and/or systemic due to direct microbe-to-host cell communication or via dissemination of microbialhost signaling. Thus, the role of epigenetics in host-microbe interactions may be the nexus of many pathological syndromes even though there may be no apparent direct link between infection and disease, providing the basis for the development of novel therapeutics and diagnostic tests for diseases with epigenomic determinants.

The emergence and prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria are an increasing cause of death worldwide, resulting in a global 'call to action' to avoid receding into an era lacking effective antibiotics. Despite the urgency, the healthcare industry still relies on a single in vitro bioassay to determine antibiotic efficacy. This assay fails to incorporate environmental factors normally present during host-pathogen interactions in vivo that significantly impact antibiotic efficacy. Here we report that standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) failed to detect antibiotics that are in fact effective in vivo; and frequently identified antibiotics that were instead ineffective as further confirmed in mouse models of infection and sepsis. Notably, AST performed in media mimicking host environments succeeded in identifying specific antibiotics that were effective in bacterial clearance and host survival, even though these same antibiotics failed in results using standard test media. Similarly, our revised media further identified antibiotics that were ineffective in vivo despite passing the AST standard for clinical use. Supplementation of AST medium with sodium bicarbonate, an abundant in vivo molecule that stimulates global changes in bacterial structure and gene expression, was found to be an important factor improving the predictive value of AST in the assignment of appropriate therapy. These findings have the potential to improve the means by which antibiotics are developed, tested, and prescribed.