Most patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease experience symptomatic relapse after stopping acid-suppressive medication. The aim of this study was to compare willingness to continue treatment with esomeprazole on-demand versus continuous maintenance therapy for symptom control in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) after 6 months.

Objective The aim of this paper was to develop a guideline on the over-the-counter management of gastroesophageal reflux disease with proton pump inhibitors (i.e. omeprazole). Setting A meeting of internationally renowned gastroenterologists in January 2009, in Berlin, Germany. Methods An expert panel group of gastroenterologists convened to develop a consensus-based algorithm for pharmacists for over-the-counter (OTC) treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Key considerations were the short-term safety and efficacy of PPIs, and the extent of the risk to the sufferer, owing to the treatment not being controlled by a physician. Main outcome measures A consensus-based treatment algorithm for the OTC management of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evidence-based guidance on the use of OTC PPIs. Results As defined by the treatment algorithm, the pharmacist should first confirm the diagnosis based on the presence of typical symptoms and secondly, as a result, rule out general practitioner referral. The third step focuses on the nature, severity and frequency of the symptoms—the patients who might have the highest benefit from a short course (14 days) of OTC PPIs are those with less than three episodes of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation per week. Patients who have three or more episodes per week can use the OTC PPIs but should also be encouraged to visit a physician, and those who already have a diagnostic work-up can use proton pump inhibitors as rescue treatment if they are known responders. Guidance for pharmacists, in the form of questions and answers, summarises the current published clinical experience with PPIs in terms of their efficacy and safety, and optimal treatment schedule. Conclusions Gastroesophageal reflux disease imposes a considerable burden on sufferers. Owing to their accepted efficacy and safety, PPIs are becoming popular as OTC options for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms such as heartburn and acid regurgitation. Effective self-management of gastroesophageal reflux disease with OTC PPIs, e.g. omeprazole, could lead to lasting freedom from symptoms and improved quality of life for sufferers.

OBJECTIVES:To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of a new magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography sequence (MRCP), using long echo time and "single shot" acquisition (providing high-contrast thick slices: 20 mm or more), in the morphological analysis of the biliary tree and pancreatic ducts.METHODS:Fifty four patients with biliary and/or pancreatic disease were investigated with MRCP "single shot" thick slices. Biliary ducts were explored with MRCP "single shot", coronal and oblique coronal 20 mm thick slices on a 256 x 256 matrix. Natives pictures were reviewed by three independent radiologists, from three different institutions. MRCP results were compared with reference examinations in 54 cases (direct biligraphy methods: 54, CT scan: 11, endoscopic ultrasonography: 6, surgery: 6).RESULTS:For detection of bile duct dilatation, the agreement of MRCP "single shot" thick slices was more than 96% (Kappa > 0.92) and the inter-observer agreement was excellent (Kappa=0.92). For detection of biliary tree and/or pancreatic duct obstruction, MRCP "single shot" thick slice sensitivity was above 89% and specificity was 75%. The malignant nature of the lesions was determined with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92%. MRCP "single shot" thick slices could not differentiate pancreatic carcinomas from distal main bile duct cholangiocarcinomas. MRCP "single shot" thick slices did not detect small stones ( 3 mm) of the common bile duct.CONCLUSION:The excellent sensitivity, specificity and inter-observer agreement of MRCP "single shot" thick slices can be used to limit invasive imaging methods in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholestasis.

UNLABELLED:We analyzed in a retrospective series of patients treated by conservative irradiation for an epidermoid cancer of the anal canal (ECAC) the prognostic factors of locoregional control (LRC), survival, late severe complications (LSC), and sphincter conservation (SC). METHODS AND MATERIALS:From 1976 until 1994, 118 patients presenting with an ECAC were conservatively treated (mean age, 65 years). According to the 1987 International Union Against Cancer (TNM) classification, they were: 19 T1, 70 T2, 22 T3, 7 T4, 94 N0, and 24 N1-3. The treatment started with external beam irradiation (EBI) (36 Gy in 3 weeks or 45 Gy in 5 weeks). Concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C) was delivered to 31 patients. Two months later, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by interstitial 192Ir brachytherapy to 101 patients and EBI in 5. Twelve other patients had an abdominoperineal resection (APR). The mean follow-up was 6 years. RESULTS:At 5 years the overall survival was 60%, and specific survival (SS) was 75%; it was 94% for T1, 79% for T2, 53% for T3, and 19% for T4. In multivariate analysis, tumor size (> or = 4 cm), node involvement, and no response to the EBI were factors of poor prognosis for SS. Thirty-two locoregional recurrences occurred of which 21 were local recurrences in the 106 patients treated by a conservative schedule. Only tumor size and response to the EBI were prognostic factors on multivariate analysis for local and LRC. A total of 17 patients presented with LSC (Grade 3, 16 patients; and Grade 4, 1 patient), which was treated by APR in 4 patients and colostomy in 11 (of which 7 were definitive). The only significant prognostic factor for LSC in the multivariate analysis was the total extrapolated response dose of irradiation. The definitive rate of SC after conservative treatment in cured patients was 100% for T1, 82% for T2, 58% for T3, and 100% for T4. Since 1989, improvements of the technique have allowed reduction of the LSC in maintaining the same local control. CONCLUSION:The results of this series are similar to those of the literature. The confirmation of pretherapeutic prognostic factors related to response to the treatment should allow us to adapt the therapeutic intensity for each case to obtain better tumor control, with as few sequelae as possible, to yield a better rate of SC.